25 June 2011

Web censorship begins quietly next month


MOST Australian internet users will have their web access censored next month after the country's two largest internet providers agreed to voluntarily block more than 500 websites from view.


Telstra and Optus confirmed they would block access to a list of child abuse websites provided by the Australian Communications and Media Authority and more compiled by unnamed international organisations from mid-year.


But internet experts have warned that the scheme is merely a "feel-good policy" that will not stop criminals from accessing obscene material online and could block websites unfairly.


The voluntary scheme was originally proposed by the Federal Government last year as part of a wider, $9.8 million scheme to encourage internet service providers to block all Refused Classification material from users as an optional service.


The Government dropped its funding for the scheme last month due to "limited interest" from the industry, but a spokesman for Communications Minister Stephen Conroy said a basic voluntary filter was still on track to be introduced by Telstra, Optus and two small ISPs.


"The ACMA will compile and manage a list of URLs of child abuse content that will include the appropriate subsection of the ACMA blacklist as well as child abuse URLs that are provided by reputable international organisations (to be blocked)," the spokesman said.


System Administrators Guild of Australia board member Donna Ashelford said blocking these website addresses should not affect internet speed, but was only a "cosmetic fix" that was easily circumvented by criminals.


"The effectiveness will be trivial because you're just blocking a single website address (and) a person can get around it by changing that address with one character," she said.

"Child abuse material is more likely to be exchanged on peer-to-peer networks and private networks anyway and is a matter for law enforcement."


Electronic Frontiers Association board member Colin Jacobs also expressed concern at the scheme, saying the Government and internet providers needed to be more upfront about websites being blocked and offer an appeals process for website owners who felt URLs had been blocked unfairly.


"There is a question about where the links are coming from and I'd like to know the answer to that," Mr Jacobs said.


"We've been waiting to hear details on this from the Government. It they turn out to be zealous with the type of material that is on the list then we'd want to have a discussion about ways to introduce more transparency."


new.com.au 22 Jun 2011


The first part of the beginning to the end of free speech.

Internet censorship has nothing to do with 'child internet porn', but rather to limit access to information.

The government claims that the project cost $9.8 million, which is an absolute lie.

Leaked documentation point to the NBN (National Broadband Network) blow out, is a result of installing Internet Censorship and NOT fast broadband speeds.

The government has again lied to the general populous regarding another matter of significance.

The government plans to allegedly censor 500 pages from an estimated 18.98 billion pages

see :WorldWideWebSize.com | The size of the World Wide Web

500 pages from 18.98 billion = 0.000002% of the internet.

A financially viable solution to so called 'child porn' eradication.

No comments: