Thursday, December 14, 2017

Australia became a British 'possession' on 28 April 1770

From the book of the title:

NEW SOUTH WALES - The Mother State, issued by the Intelligence Department, 1906.

Captain Cook, accompanied by Joseph Banks and Dr. Solander landed at Kurnell ... and took possession (i.e. no treaty or barter, therefore 'stolen' or under occupation) of the country in the name of King George III.

The book is available for download (478p, 59MB) at:

Saturday, December 9, 2017

Same Sex Marriage law a win for ex PM's

Australian politicians the biggest assholes in the world ??? !!! ???

So homosexual Australians can now rejoice that they can now be legally wedded.

People like Australia's ex prime minister Paul Keating, who is for the republic
(how VERY UN-Australian):

or our first lesbian (who's STILL in the closet) ex prime minister Ju-Liar Gillard:

oops sorry wrong picture:

that's better!

Please note:

No referendum was needed, as this was not changing the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900

- The Government Company gave $122 million to their arsehole mates for this BS 'survey'.

Changing of a 'Commonwealth' law can be made WITHOUT the approval of the herd population...

and youz participated in this crap ??? !!! ???

You dumb asses !!!

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

He missed the target

Victoria Police concealing criminal activity can be charged?

Men and women within Victoria Police have admitted to concealing, covering up or rather not reporting criminal activity within the force.

People should comprehend that criminal activity causes harm to the man or woman or more specifically their legal entity their 'person'.

Police who conceal / coverup / do not report criminal activity are not in honour where they are also causing harm to the community and in breach of the very community 'standards' they are apparently supposed to uphold.

Aiding and abetting as it is known is against the law, in particular the Crimes Act 1958.

Does this Act also apply to the police?

Show us a 'lawful' Act / clause / exemption that excludes police from the Crimes Act of 1958.

The 'problem' is much greater than described by mainstream media, and admitted to by the police, as don't forget the so called statistics are according to their honest(?) response.

See article from 5 Dec 2017 by of the headline:

One in five Victoria police say reporting corruption could cost their job

One respondent in anti-graft commission survey describes a ‘fear of retribution’, while another asks ‘is this career-ending?’

One in five Victoria police employees say they would not report corruption even if they witnessed it and another one in five said they feared losing their job if they reported corruption, according to a report released on Tuesday.

The report by the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (Ibac) is based on a survey of 1,172 Victoria police employees, of which 80% were sworn police officers. It follows a series of investigations into corruption in the police force, including allegations of drug trafficking and abuse that were substantiated by an Ibac inquiry last year.

Eighty per cent of respondents said they would report corruption if they personally observed it, up from 71% in 2015.

But the report found that 46% of survey respondents feared some form of personal repercussion if they reported corruption within the organisation, with one respondent commenting: “You ask yourself – is this career ending?” Nearly one in five (18%) agreed with the statement “if I reported corruption, I could lose my job”.

While the majority said Victoria police encouraged people to act with honesty and integrity, 13% of respondents said they felt Victoria police “actively discourages the reporting of corruption”.

“There is fear of retribution,” one respondent said. “Whilst Victoria police is a large employer, it is also very small.”

Another commented: “I have come across corruption and reported it. I was ostracised and bullied for doing so.”

Unlike other government organisations, the proportion of people who said they would report corruption did not substantially increase if they were offered the opportunity to do so anonymously, which the Ibac suggested some “tend to have doubts about Victoria police’s openness to reports of corruption”.

Most respondents said they would report corruption internally, either to professional standards or their direct supervisor.

“‘We were taught to sort it out, contain,” a respondent said. “And then if you can’t, escalate it up the line. Not externally.”

The report identified the potential for misuse of information as the highest risk of corruption in the organisation, followed by an undeclared conflict of interest, abuse of discretion, perverting the course of justice, and bribery.

One in 10 respondents said they had observed someone within Victoria police perverting the course of justice, and 29% suspected it.

One in five respondents said they had observed someone misusing information or abusing their discretion, while one in two said they suspected someone of misusing information and just under one in two said they suspected someone of abusing their discretion.

A third of respondents said they had suspected bribery but only 3% said they had observed it.

The survey also asked officers to classify certain behaviours as corruption, misconduct or acceptable, and found a high degree of confusion in certain areas, particularly around accepting a free meal from fast food restaurants.

Many fast food restaurants routinely offer free meals to uniformed police and emergency service officers.

While only 7% said accepting a free meal was definitely corrupt, 24% said it counted as misconduct and 21% were not sure.

Other bad behaviour, such as a police officer repeatedly asking a victim out on a date or using a racial slur, were classed as misconduct by about three-quarters of respondents.

Eight per cent of respondents said they did not know if a police officer removing drugs from a crime scene and keeping them for personal use would be considered corrupt.

Ibac said it was concerning that a “substantial proportion” of respondents did not agree corruption needed to be reported – 20% disagreed with suggestions they would report corruption if they directly observed it or that they would report corruption because it affected the Victorian community.

Despite those figures, the report found that generally Victoria police employees had a high level of awareness of what constituted corrupt behaviour and how to report it, and felt Victoria police had strong anti-corruption policies.

In a statement Victoria police said it was “pleasing” that most of its employees felt confident in identifying corruption and said the perception that those who reported corruption would face repercussions was incorrect.

“We acknowledge that some employees have responded with concern of the personal cost or repercussions of reporting corrupt behaviours. Victoria police will continue to respond appropriately to reported corruption or misconduct and protect our people from detrimental action,” it said.

Monday, December 4, 2017

Corrupt Supreme Court, Justice System and Attorney General of Victoria, Australia.

See pdf version of information contained within the link:

Magistrates wannabe judges more government misbehaviour

The (below) average Joe Blow or member of the serf population has very little idea of how much corruption 'misbehaviour' there is in government, as there are too many distractions to keep the simple minds busy, the likes of beer, footy reality tv and the serf population fighting among themselves on a variety of topics handed them down by the people in government.

So now the latest trick in the book spearheaded by corrupt magistrate Peter Lauriston is that he wants the herd population to call him and his magistrate buddies judges because they're;

"same in all but name",

justifying this because the lower class 'magistrates' have a ship load of work on their tables.

Let's apply the same ill conceived logic to the McDonald's 'profession', where a kitchen hand 'food' re-heater demands to be called a gourmet chef (PMSL !!! !!! !!!).

Don't worry about it, as an alleged criminal and criminal is "same in all but name".

There was a reason why mother England brought in the Colonial Laws Validity Act of 1865, that being because the people in Australia's government were 'misbehaving' a lot, a fact that the authorities would rather the serfs not be aware of.

There is no such luck today of reeling in the actions of the terrorising actions of people in government against their tax slave population by the Crown, yet you still have to answer to the Crown when you commit a criminal offence.

See article in today's Herald Sun below:

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

Monday, November 27, 2017

Warrant to Arrest police act on falsified documents?

Many people have been hunted down and unlawfully detained or arrested by police as a result of falsified documents whereby harm has been caused to their 'person'.

We have obtained a document (with blacked out identifying features) from a 'customer' of the administrative courts, where the document is a "Warrant to Arrest", as seen in the illustration below:

The government legislation that allows this document to exist is called Form 19 of the Magistrates' Court Criminal Procedure Rules 2009, as shown in the illustration below, which also includes elements which are mandatory in order for the form to be valid / executable.

In the above form it is stated that in order for a warrant to be legitimate all of the following elements must be present;

1). The correct Coat of Arms,
2). The correct Common Seal,
3). A signature and name of the judicial officer.

Does the 'customer's' form contain all the above mentioned elements and look like the one according to law?

Please also note that on the 'customer's' original form an option of Registrar is also added, where this has no lawful standing.

If your person has been harmed by an unlawfully issued "Warrant to Arrest", where the police have acted on it, you may want to seek a remedy as a result of (verifiable) financial damage caused to your person from the actions by police and the court.

Form 19 of the Magistrates' Court Criminal Procedure Rules 2009 is currently available at:

Saturday, November 25, 2017

Liberals accepting donations from Rebels Motorcycle Club

So how does it [the law] work in Australia?

Guilty by association, right?

Well it looks like the Liberal party is stuffed then.

Post taken from Social media is as follows:

That makes them an associate of the Rebels.

I am doing this to show that this party do not screen donations, therefore a criminal can donate a $100, 000 towards their campaign for a “ favour “ without being noticed by donating $20 ( or more ) many times over ( or use 100 individuals in a criminal organisation to donate $1000 each under a pseudonym).

Source Supplied

Friday, November 24, 2017

No jobs for Australians the administration's objective

People should be aware that the 'Crown' colonlised (not an 'honourable' way of doing things) Australia, as they saw it an economically viable project, where the intention was to use the inhabitants of the penal colony solely for the benefit to the administration.

Many people would have missed that a little while ago ex prime minister Tony Abbott stated that Australia was started off as a chartered corporation.

Not too long ago it was posted on the Corporate Australia blog, the documentation that established South Australia as a corporation.

Prior to his departure as PM Abbot also stated while waving his hands up in the air that Australia is "open for business".

People should also be aware that the most simplest business model to increase profits is to reduce operating costs, where staff are first on the cutting block.

From the early days the 'administration' of Australia implemented the 'White Australia' policy, where the migrant labour population was from Europe and other places where white people resided.

The problem with that is that the white slaves are an expensive labour force, where a more cost effective solution is to bring in humans (hue-man i.e. colour of 'man').

The Chinese migrants were a nice little subservient labour force of Victoria's goldfields where it was the whities that started the racket.

Let's fast forward to the present time, where one can look at whatever 'official' (read dodgy) figure the people in government publish as an unemployment rate that being 5.4% (for October 2017, an apparently an 'unexpected' drop) or 709,000 Australians.

Apparently economists have been using a figure which is double of the official government result.

A figure of 800,000 migrants per annum in total (600,000 temporary and 200,000) has been mentioned as being imported into Australia ever since the Howard days.

The migrant population being imported into Melbourne varies from 1,500 to 2,500 per week depending on which source is looked at.

It has been known for a very long time that the importation of (cheap) slave labour has many benefits to employees and corporations, therefore this is an action supported by the corporation aggregate commonly referred to as the 'Australian Government'

First and foremost is a lower dollar per hour rate of the imported slave, and another very important aspect is that the non-resident will be subservient to corporate rule for the fear of losing the job or being deported.

MANY 'Australians' have lost their jobs due to imported slaves, therefore giving rise to the inability of taking care of the bills and as a result one's family unit.

The people in government are all too aware of the consequences to the family unit as a result of the unemployment that they created, where this action can only be described as an assault on the family unit - by the people in government.

As a result of the unemployment the people in government created, they naturally created a solution called "Job Network Providers" which is a "money for mates" scam, where there is no real prospect of those so called agencies in providing employment to the Australian population as the jobs are taken up by migrant slaves.

MANY young Australians have taken their lives as a result of the climate created by the people in government.

Naturally the real figures are doctored in order to create the illusion that everything is all right.

The children of the 'administration' have no worries as to their future as they slip into positions that their parents were in once they retire.

Having said that the administration capital of Australia is not immune from the excessive pays offered to the labour force from the 'old school' train of thought, where the new Indian migration is in the process of administrating the rest of the tax slaves.

How many suicides of young Aussies will it take for things to change?

It's for the good (of the) government to reduce it's running costs no matter what the cost is to the slaves.

What is good government?

Many people are now becoming aware of a document called the Constitution, where some may have even read section 44, the section where Australia's federal MPs are getting hammered on.

Some may have even read a bit more of this document and come across some other words, for example "good government".

It's not really defined anywhere, so let's take a look at an action that is good (for the) government.

 So the people in government kill off Australia's automotive manufacturing industry.

This action saves corporate promissory notes (read cash) from subsidies handed out.

Imported cars give rise to more cash into government coffers, where an increase (of e,g, $10k for a Toyota Camry (😂) ) the tax slave population pays for it.

The 'government', a business, balances (or rather cooks) the books where the tax slave herd population pay for the mop up.

This action is good (for the) government.

The less you say / do the more they get away with.

Thursday, November 23, 2017

Savages in government put bounty on Indian actress and director

So this is the sort of garbage that is in power in certain countries.

A politician, leader or whatever puts a bounty on an actress and her director.

What's worse is that the herd population support this kind of behaviour.

One could only wonder how much of this garbage the Australian authorities allow into this country, under the "Human Rights" or refugee banner of course.

See article from 21 Nov 2017 by of the headline;

A Member of India's Ruling Party Has Put a Bounty on the Heads of a Bollywood Actress and Her Director

NEW DELHI) — A member of India’s Hindu nationalist ruling party offered 100 million rupees ($1.5 million) to anyone who beheads the lead actress and the director of an unreleased Bollywood film “Padmavati” rumored to depict a relationship between a Hindu queen and a Muslim ruler.

Suraj Pal Amu, a Bharatiya Janata Party leader from the northern state of Haryana, offered the bounty against actress Deepika Padukone and filmmaker Sanjay Leela Bhansali on Sunday. The film’s producers postponed the release of the film, which was set to be in theaters Dec. 1, and Amu was reported by local media to have said at a public rally that the film would not be allowed to be released at all.

“Padmavati” is based on a 16th century Sufi epic poem, “Padmavat,” in which a brave and beautiful Rajput queen chose to kill herself rather than be captured by the Muslim sultan of Delhi, Allaudin Khilji. Over centuries of its retelling, the epic has come to be seen as history, despite little evidence.
Padukone plays Padmini, the legendary queen who committed “jauhar,” the medieval Rajput practice in which female royals walked into funeral fires to embrace death over the dishonor of being taken captive.

“Padmavati” has been in trouble since the beginning of the year, with fringe groups in the western state of Rajasthan attacking the film’s set, threatening to burn down theaters that show it and even physically attacking Bhansali in January.

Most of the anger appears to stem from allegations that Bhansali filmed a romantic dream sequence between the protagonists, which Bhansali has denied.

Earlier this month, the head of the Rajput Karni Sena in Rajasthan said Padukone should have her nose cut — a symbol of public humiliation — for being part of a film that allegedly insulted the famed queen.

India’s 1.3 billion-strong democracy is the largest in the world and has made great economic strides, but its politics are held hostage by a complex mix of religion and caste. Books and movies have been banned or received threats of violence because they either offend one religious or caste group, or are deemed offensive to Indian culture in general.

Hollywood movies are routinely scrubbed of sex scenes, and India’s film censor board rejected “Fifty Shades of Grey.” ”The Da Vinci Code” was banned in Goa state, which has a large Christian population.

In 2014, the publishing house Penguin India pulled from shelves and destroyed all copies of American historian Wendy Doniger’s “The Hindus: An Alternative History” after a Hindu right-wing group protested, mainly because they said the book described Hindu mythological texts as fictional.

Salman Rushdie’s “The Satanic Verses” has been banned since 1998, since many Muslims consider it blasphemous. The Indian-born Rushdie was forced to cancel a 2012 appearance at the Jaipur Literary Festival amid protests and threats by prominent Muslim clerics.

Refugee and journalist Behrouz Boochani arrested in Manus as squad steps in

Papua New Guinea’s paramilitary police officers have arrested refugee and journalist Behrouz Boochani during a raid on the Manus Island detention centre.

On Thursday morning PNG police, the paramilitary Mobile Squad and immigration officers entered the centre to force out the remaining hundreds of refugees who for more than three weeks have camped in deteriorating conditions.

Refugees reported that about 40 men had been forced on to buses, presumably heading to the transit accommodation. An ABC journalist reported seeing several buses carrying refugees leave the centre.

The men have refused to leave the facility – which formally closed at the end of last month – because of their safety fears in the town of Lorengau.

It was not clear on Thursday afternoon where Boochani had been taken, or whether he had been charged. Manus Island police officials could not be reached.

Boochani has been one of the most prominent of the group, reporting for the Guardian and a number of other publications around the world on the conditions inside the centre.

On Thursday afternoon several refugees confirmed Boochani had been taken away from the camp by members of the Mobile Squad. Pictures of the event showed him being led away, flanked by officers.

Boochani had been reporting from a hiding place in the toilets while officers confiscated phones and destroyed the belongings of refugees.

However, according to witnesses, officers specifically searched for him and others reporting events to the outside world.

Iranian-Kurdish refugee and journalist Behrouz Boochani has been arrested on Manus Island. He was seen taken away from the detention centre by the paramilitary Mobile Squad.

Amnesty International said it wasn’t clear why Boochani had been arrested but it appeared to be “a deliberate attempt to isolate human rights activists from the wider group”.

“The arrest of Behrouz Boochani as a so-called ringleader of the peaceful protest on Manus Island is deeply misguided,” said Kate Schuetze, Amnesty International’s Pacific researcher.

“It violates his rights and sends a terrible signal about PNG’s intentions with regard to the remaining 400-plus men. He must be immediately and unconditionally released from police custody.”

Australia’s Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance union said if Boochani had been targeted because of his reporting then it was “an egregious attack on press freedom”.

“His reporting in the finest traditions of journalism has been critical when the Australian and PNG governments have done everything they can to prevent media from having access to the asylum seekers on Manus Island,” said the MEAA chief executive, Paul Murphy.

“We call on the Australian and PNG governments to release him from custody, assure his safety, and not to hinder him from continuing to perform his role as a journalist.”

This month Boochani was awarded an Amnesty International Australia media award for his body of journalistic work reporting from Manus.

The award’s judges said his work “delivered under very difficult circumstances, is powerful,
courageous and extraordinary. Its currency, its emotion, its credibility all combine to make it really special”.

Boochani, an ethnic Kurd from Ilam city in the west of Iran, bordering Iraq, was a freelance journalist in his homeland, and began his career writing for the student newspaper at Tarbiat Modares University in Tehran where he studied geopolitics.

He wrote for several newspapers in Iran, including the Kurdish language magazine Werya.

Boochani spent several years under surveillance because of Werya’s promotion of Kurdish language, culture and politics. His membership of the Kurdish Democratic party, outlawed in Iran, and the National Union of Kurdish Students, brought him even closer attention.

In 2011, Boochani was arrested and interrogated by Iran’s Sepah – the country’s paramilitary intelligence agency. In 2013, Werya’s offices were raided and his colleagues arrested. Escaping arrest, Boochani fled the country.
23 Nov 2017

Mercedes fooling consumers with a rebaged Nissan Navara

It seems that Mercedes-Benz is a little (or rather a lot) behind the eight ball with regards to the booming 4WD ute market in Australia.

So what does one of the world oldest car manufacturers do?

Result to the cheap and nasty practice of "badge engineering", where one car manufacturer's badge is swapped for another one's.

People should recall that the Toyota Lexen was actually a Holden Commodore.

Mazda's new BT50 ute is a Ford Ranger.

Fiat's 124 Spider is a Mazda MX-5.

Don't let the truth get in the way, hey Volker Mornhinweg, head at Mercedes-Benz commercial vehicles?

So the Merc has different door cards, and Merc spec suspension. Big Deal!

The lower spec Mercedes X-Class even has Nissan's 4 cylinder engine in it.

As one reader stated:

"Sounds like the marketing department at Mercedes is trying to convince us that white is black. Don't be fooled,..."

In any event you can read Mornhinweg's denials from an article from of the headline:

Mercedes-Benz: X-Class is not a Navara

Don't call the Mercedes-Benz X-Class a Nissan Navara.

Speaking at the global debut of the production X-Class Mercedes head of commercial vehicles, Volker Mornhinweg, said buyers shouldn't be fixated on the dual-cab's Nissan Navara origins.

"In the LCV [light commercial vehicle] business it's a common approach to work together with partners, all over the place. A lot of companies are working together quite successfully." Mornhinweg said.

"Partnering in the passenger car segment is not that common, but in the LCV segment it's quite common, therefore it's a kind of natural move also to think about pick-ups, and for us we had a target that we would like to introduce our product to market in a very short term notice."

Some of the partners he refers to include Volkswagen, whose previous generation Crafter was based on the Mercedes-Benz Sprinter large van, as well as another Renault-Nissan Alliance collaboration overseas which sees the Renault Kangoo sold as the Mercedes-Benz Citan in Europe.

Rather than a badge-engineered product (the term applied to mostly-unchanged cars that sell under a number of marques), Mornhinweg was keen to keen to point out the X-Class's unique interior and exterior styling, engineering, and development work.

"If for example, we had have done just as a double-badge, which you also see in the LCV business, okay then we have a different discussion," Mornhigweg said.

"We said, 'okay what do we have to do to achieve the description of what we would like to achieve', and this [the X-Class] is what we have done. In some parts it makes sense to work together with our partners and take their parts, yes, why shouldn't we do that because if this is not a differentiation which can a customer really feel, see, whatever, why should I change it?"
2018 Mercedes-Benz X-Class. Photo: Supplied
But he wouldn't be drawn on how much beneath-the-surface content the X-Class retained in relation to the donor Navara.

Nissan Navara ST-X. Photo: Mark Bean
During the launch of the X-Class it was revealed that the engine, transmissions and four-wheel drive systems of four-cylinder versions of the new ute are all supplied by Nissan, rather than being adapted from Mercedes' own range. The ladder chassis from the Navara is also carried over, with additional bracing to handle the available V6 engine's additional torque, with the revisions applied to all X-Class variants.

Mercedes-Benz has also created a unique, wider rear axle, wider front suspension wishbones, with spring rates and dampers tuned to Mercedes specifications. Electronic stability control tuning is also unique to the Mercedes product.

In the case of the V6-powered X350d the engine and transmission come from within Mercedes' own parts catalogue, as does the permanent four-wheel drive system. All models feature a vastly different interior, with dash, door-cards, steering wheel, and seats that differ from those used by Nissan, though internal components that can't be seen are more likely to bear the Nissan brand.

Despite the intensive re-engineering program Mornhinweg wouldn't be drawn on how much of the X-Class Mercedes would be able to call its own.

"We do not count percentage because I feel your approach is totally different to ours," he deferred. "You always ask me what is different to what, we were more focussed on 'what is the competition set in the market for pickups?"

Wednesday, November 22, 2017

International Public Notice Commercial Lien in Tort by Wayne Kenneth Glew.

People from all walks of life now have the ability to publish information on a government carriageway called the interwebs.

Apparently not too long ago a person on social media of the name Wayne Glew had a lawful seizure of the Western Australia government.

When asked of him who had the 'keys' to joint a little while later, OBVIOUSLY giving him time to settle in, no tangible response followed.

Now readers can be graced with a document of the title; 

"INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE" Common Law Commercial Lien In "Tort"

Suffice to say we love a good Australian tort.

P.S Anyone got a spare Nine Hundred and Ninety Nine Trillion Dollars to help out Western Australia??? 


WARNING: The following words must be read individually, and considered for their entertainment value only.


Common Law Commercial Lien In “Tort”


The Lien, the Lien Debtor and their address listed below;

All persons connected with the case now and in the future are severally and jointly liable and from here on referred to as lien debtors.


I, Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew CPO.OWB, For and on Behalf of the People of Western Australia Lien Claimants, have a Common Law Commercial (Security Interest) in all assets and properties, and bank accounts of the named Lien Debtor, Mark McGowan the Premier for Western Australia and the State Government of Western Australia ABN66 012 878 629 of Parliament House Perth WA.

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between I, Wayne Kenneth of the family GlewCPO.OWB and the People of Western Australia and the individual who accepts liability for the name Mark McGowan the Premier for Western Australia and the State Government of Western Australia ABN 66 012 878 629 of Parliament House Perth WA, individually herein referred to as “The Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that We have been the subject of a wrong (i.e.a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and Our Remedy IN LAW is to be able to place Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus WE ARE LAWFULLYable to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien which is $ 999.000.000.000 (Nine Hundred And Ninety Nine Trillion Dollars). current Australian Currency, severally and jointly.

This notice is to inform whomsoever that Wecan confirm that the Lien Debtor
Is in a permanent and irrevocable estoppel by THEIR failure to rebut the point-by-point MY Statement of Truth (Affidavit). The Lien Debtor is in default, and is deemed to be in bad faith. Therefore, the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor Mark McGowan the Premier for WA and the State Government of Western Australia ABN 66 012 878 629 of Parliament House Perth WA.Is henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses in 99 years or is, by some other means, removed.

Legal Authority UCC Rule 9-609 gives the Secured Party (the Lien Claimants) the right to take possession of the property on default, via the filing for Writ of Replevin in court, which in turn directs the Sheriff to take possession of the Lien Debtors’ property and give some to the Plaintiff (the Lien Claimants). Replevin, under Common Law, circa 1188, is the right to bring a lawsuit for recovery of goods improperly taken by another, and or the seizure of any personal chattels as pledge for the payment of debt, or the satisfaction of a claim.

Further, an unrebutted Affidavit stands as truth in Commerce. Universal moral/existential truth/principal, expressed in Judaic (Mosaic) Orthodox Hebrew/ Jewish Commercial Code, corollary to Exodus (chiefly Exodus 20:15,16). This is the best known Commercial process in the Commonwealth of Australia.

Yours truthfully, without ill-will, frivolity or vexation.
Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew CPO.OWB and the People of Western Australia, as commonly commonly called, Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew CPO.OWB, and the People of Western Australia and subject SOLEY to the Common Law.

Without any admission of any liability whatsoever, and with all natural Indefeasible Rights reserved.

Dated: 14thof November 2017.

Any interested parties-debt collectors, investment banks, commercial banks, trusts, brokers, solicitors. Judges, traders, futures investors and commodity clearers can contact me.

Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew CPO. OWB
For and on Behalf of the People of Western Australia
24 Hagan Road, Glenfield
Geraldton, Western Australia 6532

Tuesday, November 21, 2017

Pay your rates

Here is an article from a Melbourne suburbs newspaper telling people to pay their 'rates' at the Municipal office.

Monday, November 20, 2017

Same Sex Marriage law a con just like the Australian Constitution?

The people in this machine called government, part of an elite "boys club", have been conning the 'good people' of Australia for quite some time.

A part of Australian history that the masses may not be aware of is that due to the rampant misbehaviour of people in government, a law was brought in to bring them into line. This law was the Colonial Laws Validity Act of 1865.

Fast forwarding a bit to the years leading up to federation where a document was born which we call the Australian Constitution for short, which has apparently made a bit of a stir 116 years after its inception with regards to dual citizenship which ministers of parliament claimed that they did not know about, i.e. they were not aware of a 116 year old founding document that they all should /must be aware of.

Wouldn't it be great if the plebs did not know about a speeding or some obscure parking law claiming ignorance in the process.

Since the advent of social media and the result being a rapid rate of document sharing, some people would be aware of some early words in this document called the Constitution that being;

"Whereas the people..."

The 'problem' there is that most would have no idea what those words really mean or what was going on behind the scenes.

Leading up to this campaign of federation there were (obviously) people involved in shaping this founding document called the Constitution.

People who had a say were not the serfs, that lay person, or the pleb worker, but rather, land 'owners', pastoralists, people from various levels of governance, e.g. lawyers, judges. Also referred to as "the bearded men", "spell-binders" or ventriloquists.

Summarising, the Commonwealth [Constitution] Bill was submitted and approved by just over 11 percent of the Australian population.

Hardly what someone would call a democratic process.

In essence the Australian constitution was drafted by a small (elite) group of people with the idea of "good government" that being for the benefit of those in government or their upper / higher class of society 'brethren', where in reality this constitution was neither representative nor inclusive of the general population of Australia.

One of the most important aspects of a criminal litigation is one's actions or rather intention, leading up to the event in question.

With regards to the formation of Australia's constitution, some of the most important documents regarding to what was going on in the day, are the constitutional debates.

The people who have set up the courts also have setup rules and regulations, where if a serf has an issue with the law it can be interpreted accordingly in a place called the High Court of Australia.

The 'problem' with that (for the serf) is that documents regarding constitutional debates are not admissible as evidence.

A police generated red light camera document is not admissible as evidence in the lower courts either.

It seems that disallowing evidence which could prove vital to your matter is not allowed into the courts, yet the people presiding over you are required to be addressed as 'honourable' or 'learned'.

Is an obstruction of justice really honourable?

A more recent example of a government con is what is marketed as Same Sex Marriage laws or rather an amendment to the Marriage Act of 1961 to allow homosexuals to marry.

One should be aware there was no mass demonstrations that the majority of the Australian population wanted a small section of the community to be able to be married legally within Australia's shores.

The ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) sent out a SURVEY to Australian households, where the ABS stated that 61.6% of 'eligible' Australians responded yes to the survey.

One should also note that people stated on social media that they would 'vote' YES as many times as the number of survey envelopes appeared in their place of residence.

The Australian Prime Minister stated that if a yes 'vote' was to go through then it would become law before Christmas 2017.

So why the hurry? Was this a burgeoning issue for the heterosexual community? Was the survey result truly indicative of the Australian population's view?

What the people in government figured out that it (the proposed law to allow homosexuals to marry legally in Australia) would boost the economy by approx. one billion dollars.

It's not about the people in government giving a stuff about you (the serf) but rather how much money can be extruded from the serfs.