Friday, May 5, 2017

Parking ticket machine quietly removed from supermarket car park



Parking fines are fraud.

Parking fines originating from  a supermarket car park are even greater fraud.

(Let's put the technicality of degrees of fraud aside, where in reality fraud is fraud.)

(A company/business has)  NO LEGAL AUTHORITY TO ISSUE FINES.

So let's look at what happened in the suburb of Brunswick, Victoria.

A while ago a business installed parking ticket machines in a Woolworths car park, where as a result many customers of Woolworths were ripped off.

To make matters worse Woolworths supported this illegal activity by enticing their customers to conduct an action in commerce with the business called Secure Parking Pty Ltd (ACN: 108043689)


Many people also did not pay and as a result have had harm committed against their person's name.

From what we understand a law savvy individual took their parking ticket to court to fight it.

No hoo- ha, no court reporters, no reporter from the local newspaper reporting on such an important issue i.e. extortion, but rather a quiet 'win' and as a result the removal of the machine followed.

They just did not get enough time to remove the signage before these photos were taken.

Make no mistake about it by issuing 'fines' the owners / operators of SECURE PARKING PTY LTD are committing criminal actions i.e. fraud, extortion and the Australian government still has not shut them down.

It seems that the people in the 'Australian Government' are supporting these criminal actions.

See what the NSW government has to say about companies / businesses issuing fines from their LegalAid office under the article headline Private car park 'fines/payment notices at:


See also what an ex police officer writes on fines with reference to points of law in the post:

Ex Victorian Police officer comments on Fines



Please note: The full lawfulness of a 'fine' is not discussed in this post.

Thursday, May 4, 2017

Prince Philip and Queen Elizabeth's criminal past?


See video of the title The Royals: Royal Family Secrets Exposed! at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUfJXdMIRGw&feature=youtu.be

Microsoft stops you from controlling your own PC

The masses keep getting told by people in government that they represent them.

We cannot recall any election or result of  any votes where the people voted to be surveilled  24/7 with regards to all their computer / telephone data being stored by the people in government.

To make matters worse it seems that the people in the global I.T. giants are conspiring with the people in government against the masses.

One thing apparently that the people are supposed to have is something called a choice.

If you do not have a choice does that make you a slave?

To make matters worse for Australians, the people in governance over the general population are committing criminal offences by being in office unlawfully, but the general population are being distracted from this fact.

The new metadata laws that have come into play in Australia from April 2017 have been enacted unlawfully, but this point and the above one are beyond the scope of this post.

Microsoft may years ago were taken to the European courts for packaging a program called Internet Explorer with the Windows operating system, where the customer did not have a choice of internet browsers.

So, with regards to their new operating system Windows 10, Microsoft are at it again where they have decided for you that you will have their internet browser called Edge set permanently as your default browser.



Microsoft have also taken away your liberty to choose a search engine and have forced you to use Bing.

Windows 10 might as well be officially called spyware, where many technical publications have exposed how Microsoft covertly spies on you and sends data back without you being able to control these actions.

  • We do not recommend the purchase of Windows 10.

  • We do not recommend the purchase of any hardware that contains the Windows 10 operating system or where you cannot have another option for an operating system.

Microsoft just another government shill?

Tuesday, May 2, 2017

Computer crime law for Australians


So the people in the corporation conglomerate called the 'Australian Government' have put in a so called law that describes you committing a crime with a tool called computer.

The more relevant sections that could apply to most are items 12 and 28.

All you have to do is prove that the CYBERCRIME ACT 2001 NO. 161, 2001 is not a valid Act.

P.S
Don't go to a 'lawyer' they just might tell you that you're on your own, after all they don't really work for you....

Luke 11:52 (New International Version):

"Woe to you experts in the law, because you have taken away the key to knowledge. You yourselves have not entered, and you have hindered those who were entering."

With reference to the above mentioned Act:

12  After section 3L
Insert:
3LA  Person with knowledge of a computer or a computer system to
assist access etc.
 (1) The executing officer may apply to a magistrate for an order
requiring a specified person to provide any information or
assistance that is reasonable and necessary to allow the officer to
do one or more of the following:
 (a) access data held in, or accessible from, a computer that is on
warrant premises;
 (b) copy the data to a data storage device;
 (c) convert the data into documentary form.
 (2) The magistrate may grant the order if the magistrate is satisfied
that:
 (a) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that evidential
material is held in, or is accessible from, the computer; and
 (b) the specified person is:
 (i) reasonably suspected of having committed the offence
stated in the relevant warrant; or
 (ii) the owner or lessee of the computer; or
 (iii) an employee of the owner or lessee of the computer; and
 (c) the specified person has relevant knowledge of:
 (i) the computer or a computer network of which the
computer forms a part; or
 (ii) measures applied to protect data held in, or accessible
from, the computer.
 (3) A person commits an offence if the person fails to comply with the
order.
Penalty: 6 months imprisonment.
3LB  Accessing data held on other premises—notification to
occupier of that premises
 (1) If: Law enforcement powers relating to electronically stored data   Schedule 2
   
Cybercrime Act 2001       No. 161, 2001            19
 (a) data that is held on premises other than the warrant premises
is accessed under subsection 3L(1); and
 (b) it is practicable to notify the occupier of the other premises
that the data has been accessed under a warrant;
the executing officer must:
 (c) do so as soon as practicable; and
 (d) if the executing officer has arranged, or intends to arrange,
for continued access to the data under subsection 3L(1A) or
(2)—include that information in the notification.
 (2) A notification under subsection (1) must include sufficient
information to allow the occupier of the other premises to contact
the executing officer.



28  After section 201
Insert:
201A  Person with knowledge of a computer or a computer system
to assist access etc.
 (1) An executing officer may apply to a magistrate for an order
requiring a specified person to provide any information or
assistance that is reasonable and necessary to allow the officer to
do one or more of the following:
 (a) access data held in, or accessible from, a computer that is on
warrant premises;
 (b) copy the data to a data storage device;
 (c) convert the data into documentary form. Law enforcement powers relating to electronically stored data   Schedule 2

Cybercrime Act 2001       No. 161, 2001            23
 (2) The magistrate may grant the order if the magistrate is satisfied
that:
 (a) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that evidential
material is held in, or is accessible from, the computer; and
 (b) the specified person is:
 (i) reasonably suspected of having committed the offence
stated in the relevant warrant; or
 (ii) the owner or lessee of the computer; or
 (iii) an employee of the owner or lessee of the computer; and
 (c) the specified person has relevant knowledge of:
 (i) the computer or a computer network of which the
computer forms a part; or
 (ii) measures applied to protect data held in, or accessible
from, the computer.
 (3) A person commits an offence if the person fails to comply with the
order.
Penalty: 6 months imprisonment.
201B  Accessing data held on other premises—notification to
occupier of that premises
 (1) If:
 (a) data that is held on premises other than the warrant premises
is accessed under subsection 201(1); and
 (b) it is practicable to notify the occupier of the other premises
that the data has been accessed under a warrant;
the executing officer must:
 (c) do so as soon as practicable; and
 (d) if the executing officer has arranged, or intends to arrange,
for continued access to the data under subsection 201(1A) or
(2)—include that information in the notification.
 (2) A notification under subsection (1) must include sufficient
information to allow the occupier of the other premises to contact
the executing officer.