24 January 2019

Off target: Spotlight at DFO v plane owner lawsuit

Airports are constructed with a certain amount of area around the runways, which is deemed necessary in order for safe travel or in case  there is an emergency where an aeroplane  is not at risk if something has gone wrong, as seen in this picture below by the mapping authority of the day, Melway from 1966.


Town planning authorities are now flaunting previous 'best practices' policies or even changing law in order to make a buck or a few million, putting lives at risk in this case by allowing development of commercial shopping precinct on airport territory which in reality should have never been allowed.




Apparently Spotlight are seeking a lawsuit against the plane owner for compensation in ruined stock as seen in current public news media article by The Age publication.



If Victoria's  legal system allows this to occur, this will be an abuse of process of the Court, which is widely practiced in this state.

The real culprit is the town planning authority that signed off on this development.

If you're interested in a class action lawsuit against city councils, see details at:
 

No comments: