tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4565592844090207793.post7610201778729117004..comments2024-02-29T09:53:05.991+11:00Comments on Corporate Australia: The difference between Absolute and Strict LiabilityAuCorphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06535580971589284510noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4565592844090207793.post-22884817172852633732016-01-09T21:01:12.748+11:002016-01-09T21:01:12.748+11:00Strict-liability can play to your benefit. Exampl...Strict-liability can play to your benefit. Example I've used it with Social Security in blocking them from disclosing personal information with Service-Providers/non-government Job-Agencies.<br /><br />I have a sovereign government stance where I attempt to block out all service providers in my Government affairs.<br /><br />Social Security Public Servants are liable to two year prison sentence if they disclose personal information without an agreement. I'd have to re-examine the federal legislation to see if this still stands though.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4565592844090207793.post-46502884516997107982016-01-09T20:51:41.752+11:002016-01-09T20:51:41.752+11:00Note there's two facets, civil and criminal: s...Note there's two facets, civil and criminal: strict-liability. Both are the lack of proof needed or mens-rea to hold person responsible. The civil factor in regards to torts - negligence vs intention.<br /><br />It also plays into bodies, as in strict-liability on an employee or public-servant, means they take the rap, not the institution unless specified to the contrary in legislation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com