MEDIA organisations have begun ramping up their use of drones, but
privacy advocates warn of gross invasions in an age where virtually
anyone can now operate an eye in the sky.
Retail chains such as Harvey Norman sell remote-controlled
aerial devices equipped with cameras for as little as $350, as they move
increasingly from a covert surveillance tool to the mainstream.
More advanced models, costing more than $10,000 and capable of carrying heavy-duty cameras, can easily be bought online.
But while Australia's major TV networks are already putting the new
technology to the test for the screen, there are fears the devices could
also be used to replace the paparazzi's prying long lenses.
Moving to mainstream ... remote-controlled aerial devices equipped with a camera can cost as little as $350.
''Kate Middleton and many other people besides can rest assured that
their bare breasts are fair game, anywhere, any time,'' the Australian
Privacy Foundation's Roger Clarke warned, in a week when snaps of the
pregnant Duchess in a bikini made international headlines.
Fox Sports began using drones for aerial coverage of Twenty20
Big Bash cricket last year, while the Nine Network has conducted
similar experiments at Perth's WACA ground.
Seven's
Sunday Night program spent two weeks in the lead-up to Australia Day filming
with a drone around the country. On Sunday night the program aired a
story about rusting supertankers in Bangladesh that was partly shot
using a drone.
Sunday Night executive producer Mark Llewellyn said
most TV networks were looking at drones as replacements for expensive
and bulky helicopters.
He said increasingly networks would look to obtain drone
certification in-house as opposed to hiring third-party firms as they
could more easily control the quality of the pictures.
''There are so many things that you can do [with drones] if
you plan them properly,'' he said. ''If you want to chase a car or go at
speed towards somebody on a ski slope or climb into what was previously
a very difficult, inhospitable location you could do all of that.''
Asked whether he would sanction sending a drone to cover a
high-profile celebrity wedding, Llewellyn said that ''if it was a
celebrity who was high profile in the public eye and was behaving like a
complete prat and there was some way of drawing a legitimate reason for
doing it maybe you'd consider it''.
The paparazzi have used drones as far back as 2010 to stalk
Paris Hilton around the French Riviera and Australian snappers are
reportedly not far behind.
Last year a New South Wales resident filed a complaint after
spotting a drone hovering outside their bedroom window, Australian
Privacy Commissioner Timothy Pilgrim said.
Australian media organisations conducting journalism with
drones and individuals flying them around the street are not covered by
the Privacy Act. Pilgrim believes this and the "potentially intrusive
nature of the technology" mean a public debate about the use of drones
is needed.
Denied access to the Christmas Island immigration detention
centre in 2011, Nine's 60 Minutes controversially flew a drone over the
facility; it crashed into the sea after obtaining only mediocre footage.
ABC head of policy Alan Sunderland said drones had ''enormous
potential as a tool for modern reporting'' but there were a number of
regulatory and ethical issues to work through.
Veteran ABC journalist Mark Corcoran is on study leave at UTS
researching media applications of drones on behalf of the broadcaster.
He said the technology was evolving and proliferating too fast for CASA
to keep up.
"The day is fast approaching where the small personal drone
will be an obligatory part of the tool box for journalists,
photographers and bloggers," he said.
Media organisations can currently commission work from 30
certified Australian drone operators but Fairfax understands a number of
TV and print media organisations have recently contacted the Civil
Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) about obtaining certification to fly
drones in-house.
Hobbyist use of drones is unregulated but commercial
operators must obtain certification from CASA, which imposes strict
rules on where and when drones can fly including maintaining strict
distances away from people and not flying above 400 feet.
David Vaile of the UNSW Cyberspace Law and Policy Centre
warns of "[Rupert] Murdoch's News of the World culture" fuelling
invasive drone reporting; indeed, Murdoch's now defunct iPad
publication, The Daily, was one of the first media organisations to make
regular use of drones in 2011 when it shot videos of flood damage in
North Dakota and Mississipi.
Hai Tran, founder and chief pilot at Coptercam, a
CASA-certified aerial drone photography business, has shot cricket
footage for Fox Sports and will this week cover the NRL using a $15,000
drone capable of capturing full HD footage with a 10x optical zoom.
Tran has also been booked to cover the A-League, Rugby Union,
and Rip Curl Pro events. He says he has also done work for the Seven
and Ten networks while a year ago he shot footage of tornado damage for
News Limited's PerthNow.
A commercial TV source said his network had tested drones but
the regulations that ban flying close to people limited their
effectiveness.
"The camera and transmission gear has to be very light, so
the quality is not as strong as 'regular' television cameras," he said.
"Again, because of weight, the lenses aren't very stabilised
so the pictures are very shaky and they don't like wind or rain and you
can't fly them over water."
But Fox Sports head of innovation Todd Procter said the
relatively noiseless drones "offer unique views of play that only flying
craft can obtain".
CASA admits it has struggled to keep up as technology has
advanced to the point where highly capable autonomous drones can be
bought online for relatively low cost. This has led to a rise in
uncertified commercial drone operators who are prepared to risk fines
because of lax enforcement.
CASA has begun overhauling the rules around drones and
has proposed for instance that the craft be regulated by weight so that
those flying small drones are exempt from regulations. CASA director
John McCormick told the ABC last October that "there's no point us
writing a regulation that we can't enforce, that's just bad law".
theage.com.au 18 Feb 2013
Australia IS truly a Nanny State, a fact that the 'average Joe' may have difficulty accepting.
A person who takes a photo of a woman will be hunted by police, but a photo taken by a drone, as depicted, will be supported by law
Another way of controlling the masses.