The so called ‘news’
outlets of the mainstream media are no longer realistically ‘news’
sources, but rather businesses that carefully curate government
sponsored propaganda.
It may (or not) have
taken the current global situation for people to realise this.
ANY action
questioning government decisions or disenchantment is ferociously met
by the msm as an anti whatever, ‘extremist’, far left or right,
and in order to evoke emotion or anger within the community
adjectives further supporting the falsified narrative like violent
are added.
Government reaction
in Australia has caused more harm than the purported source of our
woes.
Loss of jobs as a
result of government action caused harm to many where suicides
have gone up at an alarming rate, something that is hidden from the
public view.
MANY people have
lost their businesses forever, while multinationals have raked in
outstanding profits.
How many people have
lost their homes/business as a result of government action?
Too taboo to report
on?
Or is reporting on
this classified as inciting, because if the people really found out the
true figures they ‘may’ take it too the streets?
What’s really
important in the ‘news’ is that some ‘model’ is wearing a
Savage X Fenty bikini.
We are hounded every
single day with (fake?) stories that there are however many ‘cases’
each day.
BUT none of the
‘news’ outlet have reported on how they are classified, more
importantly what Ct (Cycle threshold) figure is used to derive these
so called cases.
The NSW department
of health stated in a tweet that it uses 40.
The problem there is
that this figure gives false positives, where the WHO recommended
25-30, as seen in the above screen capture.
Another problem is
that the current test used in Australia is inherently flawed, where
because of this a US health institution is withdrawing its use from
Dec 2021.
Now, the mainstream
media is following the government directive of giving false
information with regards to deaths, where the operative words have
been changed where it’s reported that a person died ‘with’ the
disease as opposed to previously ‘from’ the disease, therefore
amplifying the alleged severity of the situation.A truly pathetic
state of ‘journalism’ in Australia.