Police illegal speeding fines withdrawn before court action, a cause for concern!

Australia's state and territory police forces are less than 'honourable' to say the least but unfortunately for the serfs that's hardly an illegal act.

The police deceive and con many people from the general population pool, generally with the support of the court system which is subservient to its 'stakeholders' that being banks and financial services institutions in order to act for the court's financial success.

See link to document: https://corpau.blogspot.com/2022/05/more-to-come-soon.html

Victoria Police have been conning motorists for decades with regards to issuing speeding fines measured by either a mobile or fixed camera vehicles, but you will not hear about it via the mainstream media.

Velocity or rather distance over time must be measured within a very narrow boundary, a boundary that is set out at law which the police do not follow, therefore issuing the fines illegally, as opposed to 'unlawfully' which would be a question of law, like the fines under dictation of a Chief Health Officer, which are public policy but that is another topic altogether.

A much prized source of income for the government is the alleged road traffic offence of speeding, where even the courts are in on it conning serfs out of their hard earned cash where the police and courts are in a conspiracy against the general population.

Police knowingly setup either camera cars or take measurements via a mobile speed reading device not in accordance to the way the device must take the measurements.

If you by chance have caught on to their scam and challenge the fine, they withdraw it.

Why?

There's little worse for the police than exposing their (huge) scam in a 'court of public record' (except maybe on social media), albeit that the court being the Magistrates' (or District) the lowest level where your matter might 'technically' be on the record, where for others to find it will be an arduous task.

In the above official letter from Victoria Police,

1. Notice that in the withdrawal, an 'Official Warning' is issued, where you are placed on a good behaviour bond for 2 years, where you are unlawfully STILL considered guilty of the alleged offence WITHOUT being heard in a so called court of law.

2. Victoria Police stated in that letter “... in consideration of all the matters raised...”.

   There were no “matters” raised by the accused or anyone where the standard template was followed, on the back of the Infringement Notice, in order for the allegation to be heard in a court.

NOTE: 

1). Victoria Police FALSELY accuse your 'person' of committing an offence without any lawful justification, i.e. court order.

2). In the letter it is stated "I am satisfied that the offence was committed", with reference to a person/human, BUT there is no 'legal person's' signature that is responsible for this letter, where in reality it is a computer generated one, just like in the illegal 'Robodebt' Centrelink scam against the good people of Australia, which caused many suicides.

No one really cares until you go to court.

Therefore a strong recommendation would be to organise a class action lawsuit against the police for this kind of  unlawful action which has been going on for nearly 40 years.

In Australia it is a myth that you are "innocent until proven otherwise", as shown in this document. 

The system is not "broken" it's functioning perfectly, the way they want it to.

Former WA police officer jailed for decades-old sexual abuse of young girl

A District Court judge has jailed a former WA police officer for sexually abusing a child more than 40 years ago, telling the man he left his victim with a lifelong sentence.

he 67-year-old pleaded guilty to two counts of indecent dealing with a child under 14, on an unknown date between 1979 and 1984.

The man, who the ABC has not named to protect his victim's identity, insisted the offences took place before he joined the police force in 1981.

Appearing in the Bunbury District Court on Monday, he was jailed for 14 months, and will be eligible for parole. 

Victim wore hidden wire

The court heard he sexually abused the child, who was aged between four and nine years old, while playing tickling games in a bedroom.

But it took decades for the abuse to come to light.

Prosecutor Alan Dungey said the victim's mother confronted the man in 2020.

"He said ... 'I wondered when it would come out'," Mr Dungey said.

 

 Police officers stand outside the Bunbury courthouse.(ABC South West: Roxanne Taylor)

The victim, who is now in her late 40s, wore a covert recording device to meet with the man in Busselton in 2021, to discuss the events which took place four decades ago.

He admitted to the abuse, and detectives arrested him on June 15, 2021.

He pleaded guilty in February.

Lasting damage

The man's lawyer, Michael Devlin, said his client had insight and remorse into his behaviour, and had sought counselling for what he had done while aged in his mid-20s.

Mr Devlin said his client had been emotionally immature, and since then had lived a "blameless life".

He said he had served more than 30 years in the WA police force in various roles, before leaving in 2017. 

But Mr Dungey said while the man had been able to go on to enjoy a long and successful career, his victim still suffered as a result of the abuse. 

Judge David MacLean said only immediate jail was appropriate.

He referred to the victim impact statement, in which the victim said she suffered from constant shame and guilt. 

"She is still attempting to come to terms with her psychological and emotional demons," he said.

"Child abuse presents a lifelong sentence for those that endure it." 

Source:abc.net.au 

Colombus? Who really settled 'America' fist?

We get told many mistruths.

Some are minor, but some are major.

Could it be that history is a deliberate lie?