Deliberate(?) failure of government re: SMS phishing (Smishing)

There are at least a couple of fundamentals the average ‘Joe’ should be aware of, that being:

1). The first job of a government is to ‘look after the safety of its people’, meaning the people in the Executive, Parliament and last but definitely not least that being the Judiciary, meaning the serfs/plebs/general population are left out of the equation.

2). The corporation aggregate commonly referred to as the 'Australian Government', being part of the Five Eyes surveillance network, obtains its residents data in real-time storing it on servers for later retrieval.

This screenshot of an SMS sent out to Australian mobile phone numbers has not been intercepted by the government as fraudulent or at risk to the vulnerable.

The ‘vulnerable’ are at the best of times targeted, neglected and often dejected by those in authority.

A vulnerable man or woman may fall into this category via mental, physical, or financial difficulties.

With regards to the SMS, a website is mentioned that has zero correlation to any mentioned topic within the message.

Keeping in mind that the government has a real-time blacklist of sites that it sees not fit for Australian internet users to access or 'consume', where any access to the site is met with a generic error that notifies the user that the sites does not exist, even though in reality it does, once one changes the DNS servers.

The fact the site mentioned in the message is not flagged and allowed to go through Australian servers is a ‘deliberate’ failure of government.

Authorities are alerted IMMEDIATELY if a message from an Australian registered mobile number like 0461380 235, contains ‘key words’ which may threaten the ‘safety’ of the government’s people, as opposed to the general population.

The government is more than capable to stamp out ALL messages that contain malicious intent / fraudulent dealings against the general population, but rather chooses not to do so.

That’s how much the government ‘cares’ about you (the ‘vulnerable’).

So why would they really care about your health, with regards to a particular global event that started 4 years ago?

Telstra to move your NBN home phone to Telstra 4G – DON’T DO IT (Update)

Consumer Advice

Telstra has advised its universal service obligation (USO) customers (those on the $25-45 per month plan) that receive a landline only (not data) via NBN that it is moving their home phone to Telstra 4G.

BLOODY INCOMPETENT TELSTRA STRIKES AGAIN (UPDATE 2 APRIL)

I received another letter on 1 April (not an April Fool’s joke) after having advised Telstra on 12 March that I categorically did not want to move from NBN to 4G. I could not have made that clearer and was given a reference number. This NEW letter was a reminder that the NBN-based landline would be moved to 4G.

So I rang Telstra again, WASTING MORE TIME, and explained that I had categorically ASKED TO REMAIN ON NBN. What manner of incompetence would allow a second letter telling me that it was going to 4G? The assistant looked up the original reference number and said that it had not been actioned because the request had not been processed correctly. I was given another reference number and assured that it would be processed correctly this time. The assistant also said that they had experienced a huge response to staying on NBN, and they were weeks behind due to that.

Why am I annoyed at Telstra?

I am annoyed at Telstra because it says if you do nothing, your home landline phone will automatically swap to Telstra 4G from 18 April 2023. I am doubly annoyed at the absolute incompetence of its so-called ‘customer service’ centre.

It should state (but does not) that you will stay with NBN if you do nothing (the old opt-in, opt-out status quo argument). Frankly, it is a dirty trick as many pensioners and non-tech savvy users don’t understand the implications of this and cannot be bothered to ring 1800 621 290 or visit a Telstra store. The Telecommunications Ombudsman and ACCC have heard about that and agreed that it should have been opt-in – yet Telstra seems content to ignore best practice.

A move from NBN landline to Telstra 4G could be a disaster.

Telstra won’t tell you that there are things such as blackspots where the signal is barely a single bar or two. It won’t admit that some areas have extremely variable signal strength, and it has been unable to fix that.

It also won’t tell you that by moving to Telstra 4G, your landline will save Telstra money as it does not have to pay NBN. The revenue goes straight to Telstra’s bottom line. It is likely not subject to the same Universal Service obligations either.

And if you have emergency medical devices, alarms, Fax, EFTPOS etc., Telstra 4G won’t work.

I rang Telstra, and it was not easy. First, the support person wanted to know why I wanted to stay with the NBN Connection when Tesltra 4G was so much better. I said it was my option to remain with NBN – full stop. But they insisted on knowing, so I let them have it regarding crap Telstra signal strength; all the while, the 4G signal was dropping out, and we were both asking, “Can you hear me?”

YOU DO NOT HAVE TO MOVE YOUR LANDLINE TO TELSTRA 4G, SO DON’T DO IT. BUT YOU HAVE TO CALL THEM TO STOP THIS

NBN provides a far more reliable service with far fewer outages and issues. Even if you just use NBN for your phone, you still have a Telstra modem and can upgrade the VOICE service to VOICE and DATA should you need it. Although at that time, it would make sense to swap to a decent NBN provider like Aussie Broadband (a company that cares), which has a landline plan for $10 per month that includes unlimited national/mobile calls across Australia. That is on top of the DATA plan starting from $69/25/10Mbps per month (Telstra is $80 per month).

CyberShack Telstra news

Victoria Police falsifying flight data?

Victoria Police commits criminal offences every single day, period.

The ‘problem’ there is to catch them out, where that is only just one hurdle.

The next problem is that if one (i.e. the serf) wants to take action, there are a few more hurdles to overcome.

The courts are corrupt and they’re corrupt to the core.

One then has to get past the ‘gate keeper’ of the court, you know, the one who stop matters getting into a ‘court of public record’, because that could alert the general population that something is not right, where that would be embarrassing for their bosses and the stakeholders (see post:   )

Just say the (lucky) serf gets the paperwork past the gate keeper, the matter is then put forward before a judicial registrar, magistrate or judge, where it may not even make it onto a ‘public record’, i.e. the juicy parts.

While the system is rigged, some people may have success BUT it comes at a price called an NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement) which is against the ‘public interest’ and should be exposed as it (the NDA) realistically has no lawful standing.

In any event it seems that Victoria Police have falsified the information of their helicopter, to look like an aeroplane, with no registration or type code.

An ‘honest’ mistake? Believe what you will.

Anyone want to bring this up with CASA?