14 May 2011

Always a Prince (Charles) never a King

One of the more taboo topics of the tabloid mass media is the Masonic history of the Royal Families and rightly so, as their membership is secretive to only members within a particular lodge.

Another less talked about topic is that of the bloodlines of the Royals, and as it is referred by others, the Royal Families are the Bluebloods, referring to the tinge of their blood as a result from a small gene pool.

To keep the wealth away from outsiders, the Royal and Financial Dynasties’ (for example the Rothschilds) have bred amongst themselves for many generations, and as a result they have noticed that their offspring are not fit for rule as the head of that particular Dynasty.

Enter the current fleet of Royals beginning with Prince Charles. Prince Charles is mildly retarded and as a result never been considered as an heir to the throne, after the current Monarch Queen Elizabeth II.

The Royal Family knowing this, found a suitable partner in the form of Diana Frances Spencer, and in line with Royal policies was tested for her virginity, which Kate Middleton has not. Diana’s purpose was to thin out the blood, for the replacement heir to the throne after Queen Elizabeth II.

The new policy of the Royals is to mix with the commoners and in what other stylish way to do it with than with the middle class (Middletons).

The next successor to the throne after the current Prince William of Cambridge, who will become the next King of England, will be the offspring of the marriage between William and Kate.

The mass media has become auspiciously quiet with the trials and tribulations of Prince Charles.

Prince Charles will wither away into forgottenness.

corpau.


No comments:

Post a Comment