A Melbourne magistrate has ruled that police cannot pull over 
vehicles without a reason in a case that has reignited questions of 
racial profiling by law enforcement.
        
Police have long relied on section 59 of the Road Safety Act to stop 
motorists at random to check licences, registration and for outstanding 
warrants.
                    
        
Section 59 states that a driver is required to stop their car, produce 
their licence for inspection and state their name and address ''if 
requested or signalled to do so by a member of the police force''.

But the magistrate, Duncan Reynolds, ruled on Thursday that the law did 
not give police ''an unfettered right to stop or detain a person and 
seek identification details''.
            
 
   
Magnus Kaba, 21, 
(pictured) from the Ivory Coast, was a passenger in a car stopped 
by police in Ascot Vale in April 2012 as part of a random routine 
intercept. Mr Kaba has been charged with a number of offences including 
assault after an altercation when one of the police officers asked to 
search the car.
        
Mr Reynolds ruled that the evidence of the police officers was 
inadmissible because it had been unlawful to stop the car without cause.
 ''Their conduct, in my opinion, unjustifiably breached the right to 
freedom of movement for Kaba and the driver,'' he said.
        
Police had also arbitrarily detained the men contrary to the Victorian 
Charter of Human Rights, he said. The case has been adjourned until July
 24.
        
Mr Kaba's solicitor, Tamar Hopkins, of the Flemington & Kensington 
Community Legal Centre, said: ''Many people from African backgrounds, 
for example, have reported to us that they have been subject to routine intercepts by police where there is no underlying basis for the stop.
''As well as interfering with rights, routine intercepts are a practice that is open to abuse.''
        
Liberty Victoria president Jane Dixon, SC, said the magistrate had 
interpreted section 59 ''in a new light within the framework of the 
Charter of Human Rights. It will be interesting to see whether the 
prosecution appeal this decision.''
If police appeal the ruling in the Supreme Court, the case may set a 
precedent under Victorian law. A police spokeswoman said: ''This matter 
is still currently before the courts and Victoria Police will consider 
its options.''
        
Mr Reynolds' ruling does not affect the ability of police to conduct random breath tests, which has its own statutory power.
        
Mr Kaba is one of six young African men who claimed in a separate case 
that they were subjected to racial profiling by police in Flemington and
 North Melbourne between 2005 and 2009. Police settled the case for a 
confidential sum in February this year.
theage.com.au 21 June 2013
There are many laws that the masses are not ware of that give rights and freedoms that the governments and corporations have taken away under a false business oriented legal system.
The laws that the masses are being deprived of are the fundamental law that being common law and Australia's Constitution, which in actual fact is not 'legal' but this information is being kept away from the herd population.
In the election of 2103, the authorities are fully aware of this and are therefore trying to sneak in, certain businesses known as city councils to be recognised as being legal, which currently they are not.
 
 
 
Im enlightening everyone about this one... Settled out of court hey.... well lets just see what happens next time I get pulled up...
ReplyDelete