The extent of the fraud can be mind boggling to the 'lay person', but a well known fact within the legal and political circles.
Key aspects of Australian society, from the tax office (ATO), council rates to parking / traffic / driving infringements have all been collected fraudulently by the various 'businesses', also including the operations of the 'Sheriff's Office'.
Many individuals are involved (read committed to) in the exposure of the corrupt dealings of the Australian government, and its related entities, which also includes the police force.
The incarceration of an individual, seizure of assets, or even the selling of one's home via fraud and deception, will not preclude others from acting for or on the behalf, exposing the corruption, and eventually dealing the same financial blows that have been used against the general populous.
The corrupt system deals with matters of this calibre through the magistrates and high court judges, by shutting down any opposition, in full contempt of the law.
When the 'defendant' brings up matters that the police have been caught out in fraud, the magistrate then answers back, that this is not the issue, therefore supporting the police corruption, 'erring' therefore acting 'unlawfully'.
The following attachment (pdf) is a letter to the so called Victorian Sheriff - Brendan Facey.
The above letter has also been forwarded to other key persons, as shown in the initial pages.
The so called authorities / courts are trying to engage you as your ESTATE NAME, which are TWO different entities.
The human being e.g. john citizen (john of the citizen family) is the administrator of the estate name JOHN CITIZEN.
The court fraudulently associates the human being with the ESTATE NAME.
- Anyone who has received a letter from Victoria Police, with a return address to CCV, GPO Box 1916 Melbourne VIC 3001, can notify VicPol, that a letter has been sent fraudulently, with the intent of extortion by CCV (Civic Compliance Victoria).
- Anyone who has been sent a letter from the 'Infringements Court' P.O. Box 14487, Melbourne VIC 8001, can notify VicPol, that a letter has been sent fraudulently, with the intent of extortion by the 'Infringements Court'. The 'Infringements Court' DOES NOT exist, and is a fictitious entity.
See article:
Civic Compliance - Victoria Police fraud
http://corpau.blogspot.com.au/2013/12/civic-compliance-victoria-police-fraud.html
Edit - 28/03/2014
Information has been obtained from another source that has researched some points made within the document above.
The information pertaining to the claim only is contained below:
Recently, Mikiverse Law shared a notice/article that was entitled "OPPT NOTICE TO BRENDAN FACEY, VICTORIAN SHERIFF", and, today, my friend & i started talking about a particular claim that we found inside the notice;
"The Road Safety Act 1986 – This Act has never been proclaimed, therefore it is INVALID."
This particular claim is based on S.2 of the Road Safety Act, 1986 (Vic)
"The Road Safety Act 1986 – This Act has never been proclaimed, therefore it is INVALID."
This particular claim is based on S.2 of the Road Safety Act, 1986 (Vic)
 |
| The author of the notice, quoted this as proof that the Road Safety Act 1986 was never proclaimed, and therefore has no 'legal effect'. |
NOW.
If true, this is a powerful instrument, but, is it true?
i went & performed some research & found this;
If true, this is a powerful instrument, but, is it true?
i went & performed some research & found this;
Turns out the Act has been proclaimed.
Therefore, the claim contained in the notice was wrong.
Therefore, the claim contained in the notice was wrong.
The article in its entirety can be read at:
http://mikiverselaw.blogspot.com.au/2014/03/the-importance-of-getting-basics-correct.html
Royal assent and proclaimed by whom?. The Queen of Australia... and the governor that was appointed by the Queen of Australia, none of the acts since 1973 are valid, the states have never had power to give effect to any bills passed by the legislative council and assembly, section 109, 117 and 123 of the constitution is evidence of this. everything is subject to the 1901 constitution, exclusive means exclusive, if it hasn't been given power in the constitution, then it has no power, how can 109 and 123 exist if the state was allowed to do as it pleases
ReplyDelete123. Alteration of limits of States
The Parliament of the Commonwealth may, with the consent of the Parliament of a State, and the approval of the majority of the electors of the State voting upon the question, increase, diminish, or otherwise alter the limits of the State, upon such terms and conditions as may be agreed on, and may, with the like consent, make provision respecting the effect and operation of any increase or diminution or alteration of territory in relation to any State affected.
But then
117. Rights of residents in States
A subject of the Queen, resident in any State, shall not be subject in any other State to any disability or discrimination which would not be equally applicable to him if he were a subject of the Queen resident in such other State.
even if the electors voted to give the state increased power, what's the state going to do with power, legislate legislation that would effect residence in a way that other states residences are not effected.
Mate, do you know how many times I have read this constitution over and over, not to mention reading the annotated version, trust me when I say this, there is no part of that document that has not been contravened and molested.
It takes a while, but once you have a grasp of the purpose of such a document, it then falls into place, laws are intended to protect people, not aid the molestation of people or the theft of their energy, it's to protect them , their families and aid the prosperity, not strip them of the fruits of their labour and assets for the aid of foreigners, that is treason, anyone that ignores or bypasses the constitution in order to enriched foreigners is committing treason, our courts, police and prisons are owned by the banking cartel, just because our 4 big banks are publicly listed companies and anyone can buy shares, it doesn't make then Australian banks, lawcourts ltd is a bank, the company constitution states that it deals with promissory notes from time to time.
Our courts are banks, dealing with the estates of dead people, I have attempted to use common law and habeas corpus to have an accused released that was being held in remand, the accused has signed the undertaking of his bail and once you do that and you are accused while on that bail, you are toast, no matter if you are just accused, the contract condition are if you come into the polices custody as an accused while on that bail, you lose your freedom, I have magistrates court extracts that state the accused is remanded to magistrates court, and in the rows that contains the charges it is a multiple choice form, "charges or civil proceedings" now why would they have a totally separate form for civil and criminal, because they can disguise the fact that it is all civil, they are not constituted, they have no approval from the people, they are no commonwealth authorities and everything they are doing is by tacit consent, we have more authority than they do, if the system wasn't broken or the private prosecution via magistrates court was separate and functioning correctly, we could charge these people and they would never see the light of day again, their crimes range from treason, extortion, fraud, obtaining property by deception, racketeering, crimes against humanity, unlawful imprisonment, literally, you could throw the book at them.