The length that the ‘authorities’ take to make your life
most difficult in court goes beyond belief.
We have been informed by someone who witnessed the actions
of senior police instructing their underlings to conceal evidence when
attending court.
This is in relation to something called ‘contemporaneous notes’.
When you have ‘dealings’ with the police for example with a ‘speeding’
or traffic ‘fine’, your comments and the
actions of the police ‘person’ must be noted down which is referred to as their
contemporaneous notes.
The notes are supposed to reflect an accurate description of
what really occurred.
Sometimes these notes can also be the officer’s undoing.
It is almost certain that the average Joe is not fully aware
of police procedures and most definitely the term contemporaneous is not part
of the lay person’s vocabulary.
It is with this deception that the ‘charged’ person is not
getting a fair hearing, based on the facts that police are concealing vital
evidence.
If you have ANY dealings with police, make sure you ask for
the contemporaneous notes in a place of business / trading / commerce called the ‘court’.
Also, if the courts and police are both Dept of Justice employees. isn't there a conflict of interest?
ReplyDeleteYes Svetlana, what you're referring to is something called 'separation of powers', which MUST be distinct ie Between the Executive, Parliament and the Judicature.
ReplyDeleteBut, since now the government has become a corporation conglomerate, the line is much finer and their IS influence between them all, but YOU have to prove this.
What a magistrate stated not too long ago in court (on public record) is that the prosecutor is an employee of the court. A HUGE 'no no'.
Thank you very much sir, you've proved how corrupt 'your' legal system is :-)