With every new action or law put into force by the
colonialists in government, the good people of Australia are having less and
less rights (term used very loosely).
This thing we call 'normal' today may not have been
so a generation ago where the new normality steered by people in authority is
not necessarily for the benefit of the general population, or "peace, order, and good government".
An important aspect of society has attention drawn away from it with deliberate distractions, one
that profoundly effects our daily lives, that being law.
In particular people's
rights where it can be easily argued that Australia's general population has
none, but that's another story altogether.
Today newly developed land, which is supported by
businesses called city councils, not in line with the Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act 1900 (UK), may come with a caveat or the 'trend' of not having
a front fence or gate.
To the legal profession this should raise alarm
bells but instead the topic has been moot.
MANY thousands of words can be written on this topic
and specific reference to case law will be deliberately omitted , where only
the relevant information will be provided, in order to make this post as short
and as easy to comprehend as possible.
A sign at your front entrance clearly indicates that you do not give permission unless by invitation therefore entry is prohibited. Information from QLD has indicated that the police will enter through an open gate regardless of the sign, but cannot open one. Therefore, keep your gates closed. Police have also indicated that they cannot deliver a summons past a proper Trespass sign unless a felony has been committed under the Crimes Act and a warrant issued.
Without a clear boundary, or a gate which can be
closed, your protections and right to no trespassing has been taken away from you.
The protection afforded within entrenched imperial
laws is being taken away from Australians with use of the Roman law of guilty
until proven otherwise, and subverted use of contract law in order to obtain
your consent, by default.
Has something changed? I didn't understand your point. Public members are taken to be available to conduct business unless indicating to the contrary. Hasn't it always been this?
ReplyDeletePrivate is a non public realm. Your home is your castle. Trespass means requiring permission by the Title holder to enter the property. There are no exemptions. Justice Michael Kirby 1998 Australian High Court Ruling.
ReplyDeleteFejo vs Northern Territory(1998)HCA 58;195CLR 96;156 ALR 172; ALJR 1442(10 September 1988)