07 December 2021

Workplace 'medical procedure' mandate not lawful


Briefly,

While this article may pertain to a corporation called BHP, the reality is that no employer can lawfully force an employee to take a medical procedure or more specifically an injection of some sort where if a person did not, the consequences would be employment termination.

Governments and corporations are 'forcing' persons (or rather enticing or withdrawing privileges) to succumb to a medical procedure with zero knowledge of long-term or inter-generational effects, as mentioned in hansards.

MANY people have been deceived or conned into a medical procedure against their will.

In this case the suggestion would be for a class action against the government or corporations involved.

1 comment:

  1. Limited amount.
    Are you familiar with the following:

    * Cestui que vie act of 1666.

    *https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-1969-030#pt.3-div.13

    * See Blacks 4th.
    "CESTUI QUE TRUST.

    CESTUI QUE USE.

    CESTUI QUE VIE.

    DOMINIUM.

    * "CROWN COPYRIGHT IN THE INFORMATION AGE" ( i have a copy)

    * The crime of conversion of the Family Name during extraction from the registration form to the "BIRTH CERTIFICATE".
    Blacks 4th.
    "CONVERSION.
    * You are using a legal name which evidences the cestui que vie trust Estate that you are the Beneficiary thereof.

    * You will be providing a "Legal NAME" in a class action where:
    a. it is not your property, and
    b. you are not qualified.

    The Beneficiary instructs the trustee for the benefit of the Beneficiary.

    You did not volunteer. This position in their legal fiction game was either given or forced upon you via statutory legislation, the contract to register your birth, the contract between your Mother and the "CROWN", for your benefit.

    Well, play the game wisely.

    The above is my unqualified perception from my perspective for fun and entertainment.

    ReplyDelete