The Australian Government eradicating ‘free’ speech

Irrespective of which side is in power, left or right, Labor or Liberal, Australians are still under a fascist régime.

The government is limiting their online ‘free’ speech, if it was ever available in the first place.

The ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) is Australia’s largest media conglomerate.

It spans radio, television and print media.

It’s a federal government organisation, as defined by it’s Act:

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2004A02723/Download

where its employees are commonwealth ones, subject to various law but not limited to:

• Equal Employment Opportunity (Commonwealth Authorities) Act 1987
• Racial Discrimination Act 1975
• Sex Discrimination Act 1984
• Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986
• Disability Discrimination Act 1992
• Age Discrimination Act 2004
• Fair Work Act 2009
• Work Health and Safety Act 2011

Since the ABC’s funding comes out of consolidated revenue and not ‘commercials’, it’s basically the government’s mouthpiece.

It’s not a blue or white collar worker publication but rather a passive aggressive left cesspit.

If it was in Russia, it would be called Pravda, if it was in China it would be called Xinhua News Agency, you get the drift?

Social media is a powerful tool, where it may seem that it’s out of reach by the ever so powerful ‘inciters’, the mainstream media, but the social media moguls still limit free speech via their own government supported catch phrases.

So, the ABC has now taken censorship to a new level where pretty much straight after publishing a story on social media it shuts down comments, as seen in the above screen capture

Q: How much do the Australian ‘mum and dad’ taxpayers pay per year to the media conglomerate to keep their voices silenced?

A: Approximately $1 billion per year.

Even though one person may have been able to sneak in a comment, it’s even worse on the video sharing platform, where the ABC does not allow anyone to comment from the millisecond the post is live.

As Tucker Carlson said on another topic, Australians are putting up with this?

While the people in government may want to use all sorts of communist inspired tactics on the general population, what’s worse is that people are accepting of this.

Australian’s shame on you!

Australian Government a conflict of interest corporation aggregate

Australia is a white collar criminal's paradise, especially if you're in 'government', supported by the brotherhood.

Many a law has been thrown under a bus, where they tell you one thing and do another.

Human Rights violations are rampant in this colony, but as the saying goes, it's legal until you get caught, where the problem is that the general population doesn't 'catch them out'.

Acting under dictation is illegal, but they do it all the time and they flaunt it too

Above photo from the article: Police acting under dictation

In relation to the current global health situation which will be milked by the Australian Government for quite some time, Australia is a cesspit of many falsified tender processes, shady deals, unaccountable to the public secret deals, money for mates/cousins/nephews/husbands within government/corporate positions.

What is against the law for you (the serf) is not for 'them'.

See further details in this global web of deceit pertaining to Australia within the following 20 minute clip.

Since it is unknown how long the above video will last, it is encouraged to download a copy for your personal reference.

Edit: The above video was removed on the 12th of February:

Where for your information, this is the text describing the video:

If the video is removed by Google it can be viewed here:

https://odysee.com/@xipnios:7/COVID-CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST-IN-AUSTRALIA:b

Google sued for $2.4B for pushing its own shopping service

Google has been served a massive lawsuit for favoring its own native shopping service over competitors, in what has been called persistent monopolistic behavior.

This comes after a year-long series of allegations against the tech giant for displaying anti-competitive, monopolistic behaviors on multiple fronts when it comes to competing services. This includes favoring its own voice assistant over others, as well as holding an unfair hold of app distribution on Android phones.

Today, things are coming to another head for the California-based tech giant. A price comparison service based in Sweden, called PriceRunner, is taking on Google in a lawsuit for €2.1 billion (roughly USD $2.4 billion). 

It claims it is taking the side of customers who haven't had access to a fair distribution of price comparison services, resulting in financial damages for both the customers and the competing companies offering these services.

"We are [...] seeking compensation for the damage Google has caused us during many years," said PriceRunner CEO Mikael Lindahl in a statement. "But are also seeing this lawsuit as a fight for consumers who have suffered tremendously from Google’s infringement of the competition law for the past fourteen years and still today."

In November of 2021, the European Union's General Court rejected an appeal by Google and exacted from the giant a record fine of €2.42 billion (USD $2.8 billion) for unfairly pushing its own comparison shopping services ahead of its competitors. This court decision paved the way for PriceRunner's lawsuit, as Google had already been found guilty in that regard.

"Since the violation is still ongoing the amount of damages increases every day, we expect the final damages amount of the lawsuit to be significantly higher," wrote PriceRunner. It claims it regularly offers better-value deals than Google, resulting in daily unnecessary extra expenses on the customers' part.

Google's antitrust track record hasn't been looking great over the past months, and we will wait and see what happens between Google and PriceRunner in court. In any case, it hasn't been the first, and it certainly won't be the last such lawsuit.

Source: phonearena.com

Judiciary not 'public servants', on the bank's payroll?

Australia's legal system is corrupt to the core, where in reality it should be razed to the ground, but as we know that will never happen

There is no separation of powers where lowest common denominators like belonging to the brotherhood take precedence.

MANY decisions by magistrates/judicial registrars are contrary to the law, unbeknown to the victim or rather accused or defendant, where a legal representative more often than not stays silence, as that person is first and foremost an 'officer of the court'.

Australia is a legal 'basket case', where the High Court of Australia is just one example.

One would think that the High Court of Australia was established in 1901 under Section 71 of the Constitution, which is true.

But 'that' High Court died 78 years later.

The High Court of Australia we have today, was born in 1979, via it's Act.

It's not the same court as the one enacted in 1901, where people trying to obtain a remedy from the court will fail and do so.

The Australian Government of yesteryear may have been a 'Commonwealth' with departments, today it is a corporation aggregate, where a different set of 'rules' apply.

Does the general public know how many 'constitutional arguments' are rejected by this court every week?

A few years ago the figure was 70, and now with all the unlawful actions of those in government over the past couple of years, 100?

The royal commission into the banking and financial services is another example of a farce.

What the general population may or may not know is that there were over 10,000 applicants involved in the complaint.

How many of them obtained a remedy?

Not one!

Court Services Victoria (ABN:63 392 984 660) is the institution where the judiciary obtains their paychecks from.

Naysayers may say that there's nothing wrong with that, as it's still a 'state government statute authority', right?

Sure.

But only if it were true or rather no other parties had a financial interest in it.

A list of stakeholders contains the names of banks and financial institutions that partake financially in Court Services Victoria.

Therefore quite simply put the judiciary is working for the banks (and financial services institutions).

Therefore ANY judgement/order pertaining to legal action regarding a bank or financial institution in Victoria is not done without bias or independently without undue influence.

We are aware of court cases that involve banks that do not get through or the defendant loses in a judgement against the bank as the judge is on the payroll of the banks.

Sure you may win your traffic violation, or even the unlawful Covid fine, but on matters of more importance you not only will lose, but in other instances the court case will not exist in the records, as many have been hidden from the public record deemed not in the 'interest of the public'.

The judiciary is corrupt, it hides court cases from you.

How can you trust someone who hides something from you?

In any event doesn't the saying they want you to abide by hold true to them?

"Nothing to hide, nothing to fear", right?

EVERY court matter is in the 'interest of the public' as it involves the 'public'.

The tracing app a useless rort according to NSW statistics

Once again, Australian taxpayers got defrauded of their funds via a corrupt tender process, which yielded an expensive to support and realistically inaccurate way of measuring the desired subject.

Another 'money for mates' scam.

See the results for yourself within the government's own documentation:

When will the Australian people wake up?

With great relief to those in power, NEVER!

 

WA supply shortage due to bureaucratic 'bungle'.

There's trouble in the wild wild west!

The runaway state, Western Australia, within the colony is in serious trouble, where the people will suffer and not those in government.

Supplies are about to run out by tomorrow, Tuesday the 8th of February 2022.

In this economic climate it is quite easy to blame the current global health situation for causing grief to many, BUT this is not so in this case.

The government has really screwed people over this time!

Trucks/supplies are coming in from the east, but the border is shut to them.

NOT due to the current health situation, but this time rather the bureaucrats.

Western Australia's road 'authority' is not allowing (federal registered) trailers to come in into the state because it claims they are not up to scratch.

Keep in mind that when a trailer has federal registration, it can travel to ANY state/territory.

Looks like the buffoons really screwed up this time around! 

As usual people will put up with this gross negligence by those in government.

Let's see how the mainstream media reports this.

On the legality of WWII style door knocking in Queensland

In the colony of Australia, Queensland is quite literally an authoritarian state.

Democracy was thrown out to sea in 1922 and the people did NOTHING about it.

The government wanted to get rid of the 'upper house' or the Legislative Council, where this was put to a vote.

Even though 60% of people disagreed, the government went ahead anyway and took down the upper house.

There are also many other actions along the way of those in government that are unlawful, but they're going to be left out as they are outside the scope of this post.

The focus of this post is with regards to 'door knocking'.

Does one have to open the door, if another person knocks on their residence?

• NO

There is zero, legal obligation to answer a door knock, under any circumstances, emergency or otherwise.

The is no lawfully enacted law that states that one MUST answer the door knock.

In the authoritarian state of Qld, it's basically a plain old fashioned witch hunt, based on false pretences.

Also, no person can lawfully require you to partake in a medical procedure, especially partaking in a ... trial drug.