Telegram is anything but secure; even Facebook is safer, says Signal founder

Telegram has earned a growing reputation for being the somewhat hippie, and as some may think, safer alternative of WhatsApp or Messenger—something on par with the Signal app, although perhaps better known. However, Telegram's reputation for offering any level of additional cybersecurity is overly exaggerated—a fact emphasized by Signal's own founder, Moxie Marlinspike, this week.

Marlinspike took to dishing out some heavy criticism on what is one of Signal's biggest competitors, by bashing the popular notion that Telegram offers anything in the way of end-to-end encryption. Messages sent through Telegram are stored on Telegram's servers in their original form, or plain text, without going any sort of encryption to protect private user data, shared Marlinspike.

He went on to say that in this regard, even Facebook's Messenger and WhatsApp offer greater privacy than Telegram. Both of these apps, run by the company now rebranded as Meta, offer at least end-to-end encryption for all text messages sent through their platforms. 

Telegram stores all the data ever sent through the app in its cloud, in a completely exposed format: texts, shared media, contacts, everything is essentially free game for anyone who cares to look.

This is a reality that's considered unacceptable even by Facebook's standards, which is known for its lack of care when it comes to personal privacy online. Even Messenger offers the minimum standard end-to-end encryption protocol for data stored on its servers. However, anyone with access to Telegram's serves has direct access to the entire database of users' unprotected data. 

As Winfuture (who first reported on this) words it, the Telegram app is essentially an open window into the servers storing all the history that ever was on the platform, rendering everything visible to the private user just as visible to the server operators on the other side, requiring zero extra effort for direct access.

The point being, if anyone such as a hacker, or even an authority that has you under suspicion, has any interest in spying on your personal messages in Telegram, they could easily do so. Moxie Marlinspike isn't the first to bring Telegram's false reputation and concerning methods of operation to light by any means, either. 

Thus, if there is any lingering trace of the stereotype of Telegram being any kind of "safe," it's best to dispel it once and for all; even Messenger will do you one better.

Source: phonearena.com

Gov. lies on who can access your 'tracing' & QR code details, exposed in secret court case

In the (penal) colony called Australia they govern in secret under a totalitarian manner with no transparency, yet they tell the plebs that they live in a democracy and “Nothing to hide, nothing to fear”, right?

The corrupt judiciary keeps court cases from you (the people), yet every single 'restricted' or sealed matter is in the interest of the public.

The scum in government lie to you, they lie to you every single day, just like the AFP (Australian Federal Police) have admitted that they do too.

See article:

https://corpau.blogspot.com/2015/05/sacked-afp-officer-we-lie-to-members-of.html

You are told that you 'must' conduct an action in commerce/business/trade by scanning in a QR code before you enter a premises, yet the ASD (Australian Signals Directorate) warns people not to scan QR codes.

See article:

https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/federal-government-agency-issues-warning-about-qr-codes/

Note: We do not recommend persons to scan QR codes, period.

A secret filing from within the Supreme Court of Victoria on the 22^nd of June 2021 was shown to the Herald Sun's subscribers but the readers were unable to download it.

Please find a downloadable copy here:

Another self serving politician 'acting' (they're ALL actors, aren't they?) premier Jacinta Allen defends the totalitarian government's actions.

They're lying to you that your details and those of others are safe and they're trying to cover up the fraud for the next five years.

For the past two years the Victorian people have been told by 'contact tracers' whoever they are that the data will only be used for 'health purposes', but again the people have been lied to.

Literally anyone with the cash or 'excuse' could obtain it.

Victoria Police have been abusing the database.

In this day and age, ANY new legislation is realistically to the detriment of the masses, where surveillance and limiting of movements is of utmost importance to the authorities.

'Andrews' new Bill only makes it easier for the average serf to become a criminal.

Another scumbag in office 'Covid commander' (whatever unlawfully enacted BS position that is), Jaroen Weimar launched legal action to keep the court case secret for the next 5 years.

Remembering: "Nothing to hide, nothing to fear".

Weimar even acknowledged that if the Department of Health was ordered to hand over people's PRIVATE information, then his team's assurances the would not share data "would not have been accurate"

Weimar is another person that should be removed from office!

Across this colony, we have courts dealing in secret MUCH to the detriment of the people.

On the topic of secrecy or rather transparency in another matter, a Victorian 'court of public record' was told the the sheriff's warrants do NOT exist, where then sheriff Brendan Facey was subpoenaed to show the warrants, but the lawyers for the Sheriff's Office Victoria stated that none existed.

This is the level of fraud and deception in Australia the people are under.

Another corrupt institution is the Department of Health.

They too want keep matters secret from you!

WorkSafe (VWA), demanded late last year that the Department of Health hand over the personal information of guests, staff and security guards at the Rydges Hotel Carlton and the Stamford Hotel Melbourne – the source of the called outbreaks that allegedly seeded Victoria’s second wave.

As the department pushed for the case to be suppressed, documents reveal that Marcus Hoyne, acting for VWA, ­argued the court should not ­assist the public being misled.

See paperwork in the Supreme Court of Victoria, Melbourne, Common Law Division, Judicial Review and appeals list:

Secretary to the Department of Health v Victorian WorkCover Authority and KELLY WILLIAMS:

He accused the department of seeking the suppression “to prevent the public from knowing the true story that information provided through contact tracing may have to be disclosed”.

People should not be misled into believing their information is confidential when it's not

Small Business Australia, whose members have been ­ordered to ensure patrons check in using the QR codes, said the revelation is “another example of why trust in the Victorian government is at an all-time low”.

“They say one thing, do another and then spend as much taxpayer money as they can in the courts in an effort to cover up their deceit,” executive ­director Bill Lang said.

“Victorians deserve a government that is truthful, does what it says it will do and operates with integrity, not a government that blatantly and actively deceives and then uses every mechanism at its disposal to hide the truth from the public.”

Victorian premier Daniel Michael Andrews is a serial liar, and as a result he must be removed from office.

Provisionally registered 'medicine' does not stop the spread!

EXPOSED! 

The mainstream media, governments and corporations lie to you about what's really going on.

The products being sold as the panacea have provisional registration being for Active immunisation to PREVENT the current disease which is the focus of the entire world.

The media and politicians keep issuing statements that it reduces spread, and mortality.

This is not what the provisional registration terms where for.

1.Failed to prevent infection.

The provisional registration was to provide evidence that it prevented disease!

source: supplied

The lies of 5G, what it really is - How your phone works - Tech Secrets

Corporations lie to you every day.

Let's modify the above statement so that there is some accountability where the inanimate monolith is taken out of the equation.

'Persons' (e.g the CEO, e.g. Mr. Tim Cook) within companies lie to you every day.

None is more true than when referring to technology that is sold to the average Joe.

The average Joe may not have the resources or technical ability to check if what Mr. Cook is stating is true.

With reference to mobile phone technology, '5G' is being thrown around as the newest and latest technology or rather set of higher (next level set of frequencies), but in reality the general population is being misled.

See video with a more detailed explanation on the generations frequencies of mobile phone communications:

Doctors in Australia corrupted by the medical board.

The medical profession in Australia has been compromised, with regards to the current so called global health situation.

It is not acting independently, but rather under dictation.

At law, acting under dictation is illegal in Australia.

Medical practitioners are told what to say, they are given a script (pardon the pun) on how to deal with different scenarios in order to entice their patient in order to become a customer (for life) of the pharmaceutical companies.

Adverse reactions, death statistics and all other data has been falsified by the authorities to give the general population false sense of security in relation to that particular medical procedure.

In reality this injection does not cure the disease, has unknown long tern and inter-generational effects, where it is pushed by governments and private corporations worldwide in one of the largest and quickest profit generating endeavours of our time.

We have cited a correspondence to a medical practitioner from the board that if that medical practitioner speaks negative (irrespective of any published side effects) of that particular 'medical procedure', that is in circulation in Australia at the moment, then that person will be brought forward before the board with a view to reprimand that person in order to cancel that person's practice.

Although in Australia this information is hard to come by with regards to the Average Joe, once this correspondence that we have cited will be 'released' to us we will publish this information in the not too distant future.

How many Australians have obtained their RT-PCR test, once they succumbed to that test?

It is inaccurate, not accredited nor certified, yet the authorities insist you being tested in that manner.

Why?

Because the result can be manipulated into whatever the desired result is a result of the cycle threshold.

The people responsible in the entire 'chain of events' regarding this are committing criminal negligence, where in the 'interest of the public' these matters must be brought before the courts and into public records.

World Economic Forum - Omicron less likely to hospitalize patients

Will Australian authorities ever acknowledge this and stop the fearmongering?

See source:

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/12/covid19-top-stories-coronavirus-pandemic-23-december/

Government to forcibly inject your child if you don't

According the the 'Queensland Government', child abuse is now legal.

With regards to today's (global) health situation, to say a particular medical procedure is voluntary is a lie.

MANY times the PM, Australia's CEO #ScottyFromMarketing Mr. Scott John Morrison stated that it's voluntary.

Apparently it's voluntary, yet corporations make it a mandate, where one cannot participate in society if one does not succumb to that particular medical procedure.

NOW, in Queensland we have a law put in place that states if you (the parent) do not subject your child to that particular 'medical procedure' then force will be used against you/your child.

Force will be used even given the fact that the government is fully aware that the fluid causes health problems, as documented by the Federal Department of Health within a 2 page document in the reference link below.

Force will be used, DESPITE the fact that long term and inter-generational effects are unknown.

See excerpt from the Child Protection Act 1999 - Sect 97

Carrying out medical examinations or treatment

97 Carrying out medical examinations or treatment

(1) This section applies if—

(a) an authorised officer or police officer—

(i) takes a child into the chief executive’s custody; and

(ii) seeks medical examination of, or treatment for, the child; or

Note—

Under section 18 (7) , an authorised officer or police officer may arrange for a child’s medical examination or treatment.

(b) a child is in the chief executive’s custody under this Act and the chief executive seeks medical examination of, or treatment for, the child; or

(c) an order for a child authorises the child’s medical examination or treatment.

Note—

Under section 28 (1) (b) a temporary assessment order may authorise the medical examination or treatment of the child. Also, under section 45 (1) (b) a court assessment order may authorise the medical examination or treatment of the child.

(2) A health practitioner may medically examine or treat the child.

(3) Subsection (2) applies even though the child’s parents have not consented to the examination or treatment.

(4) However, subsection (2) is subject to the rights the child has in relation to the examination or treatment.

(5) Also, the health practitioner may only carry out medical treatment that is reasonable in the circumstances.

(6) If this section applies because of subsection (1) (a) or (b) or because of an order mentioned in subsection (1) (c) that is an assessment order, the health practitioner must give the chief executive or police commissioner a report about the medical examination or treatment.

(7) For the purpose of deciding any liability in relation to the carrying out of the examination or treatment, the health practitioner is taken to have the consent of the child’s parents to the examination or treatment.

(8) In this section—

"treatment" includes vaccination.

Is this Act in circulation lawfully?

- Short answer, No.

Source: 

https://constitutionwatch.com.au/australian-government-makes-admission-covid-19-causes-myocarditis/

Legal remedies for all Australians (against a totalitarian state)

(18 Dec 2021, Flagstaff Gardens, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia)

What the government does not want you to know:

The Australian people are in the middle of a highly sophisticated psyop against them, under the banner of health.

During this time there has been much deceit, yet surprisingly an enormous amount of information has been disseminated via governments, and people via platforms like social media.

In the colony called Australia, people are accepting of medical apartheid, much like the people of Germany in the 1930's, all in the name of health.

There is no denying that:

- Australia's medical profession has been even more corrupted as a result of the happenings of the past couple of years,

- Australia's judiciary is a corrupt 'old school' boy's club,

yet there is still plenty of hope for the average serf.

There are plenty of remedies offered in good ol' fashioned law, where it's not taught to the new students that will eventually become lawyers, barristers or QC's.

So, what the people in government don't want you to know is something called 'human rights'.

They do not want you to know about this so much that they even 'advertise' this, as seen in the article from the 27^th of July 2020.

Now, on Saturday the 18^th of December 2021, at the Melbourne rally, a guest speaker provided some information to the audience which has been summarised, with references pointing to official government legislation.

See content within:

Source: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_dA8ruZjN2lFPRLW4yei62MSmIUMKGzz/view?usp=sharing

Note: For educational purposes, obtain legal consultation prior to taking any further action.

Victoria Police shooting people in the back

(Picture: source supplied)

Is this a picture the mainstream media will show you?

Or maybe it is with a lie about it being 'violent'?

Will the mainstream media mention to you that Victoria Police shoot people in the back?

A man has been shot 8 (yes eight) times in the back by the 'Public Response Team'.

We urge legal action to be taken against Victoria Police, just like it was in the matter of Corinna Horvath.

Remembering that your silence is acquiescence.

Welcome to a totalitarian state within the colony called Australia.

Google antitrust filing - unredacted

Civil Action No: 1:21-md03010-PKC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE: GOOGLE DIGITAL ADVERTISING ANTITRUST LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 

STATE OF TEXAS 

By Attorney General Ken Paxton 

STATE OF ALASKA

By Attorney General Treg R. Taylor 

STATE OF ARKANSAS

By Attorney General Leslie Rutledge

STATE OF FLORIDA

By Attorney General Ashley Moody 

STATE OF IDAHO

By Attorney General Lawrence G. Wasden

STATE OF INDIANA

By Attorney General Todd Rokita 

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY

By Attorney General Daniel Cameron

STATE OF LOUISIANA

By Attorney General Jeff Landry 

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 

By Attorney General Lynn Fitch

STATE OF MISSOURI

By Attorney General Eric Schmitt

STATE OF MONTANA

By Attorney General Austin Knudsen 

STATE OF NEVADA

By Attorney General Aaron D. Ford 

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

By Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO

By Attorney General Domingo Emanuelli-Hernández 

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

By Attorney General Alan Wilson 

STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA

By Attorney General Jason R. Ravnsborg

and

STATE OF UTAH 

By Attorney General Sean D. Reyes 

Plaintiffs,

vs. 

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant.

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

See document:

within the link:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1a62mDfvD0BRT1IsVdk18HwWXiJ3g_scS/view?usp=sharing

The farce of no medical certificate required for not wearing a face mask

If one was to say that the mainstream media was in the business of 'selling' lies/fake news/propaganda or information inciting fear then that would be an understatement.

If people from outside of Australia read the mainstream media drivel then they have a false understanding of what's really going on in Australia.

For one, the place is a colony, where colonial rule applies.

Since the advent of the current global situation, the above reigns true today more than ever.

Victoria's current premier Daniel Michael Andrews has thrown 'human rights' under a bus where he was very verbose about this.

Will these 'crimes' go unpunished in a rigged court system with the colony?

Of course.

Now headlines are made via the major outlets that all these new rules are in force that ease the so called restrictions, but once again this is false information.

One such example is that of wearing face masks.

With reference to some alleged legal framework, there was no lawful requirement for paperwork for an exemption for not wearing a face mask, as a 'lawful' excuse was spelled out within the so called framework.

This did not really change throughout its implementation.

MANY people have genuine reasons for not being able to wear face masks, where this has been reflected in these 'rules' (not law, i.e. an Act)

As of this post, the 16^th of December 2021, the government of Victoria has put out the following information:

Where this has been put into text format below:

On this page

• Where face masks are recommended

• Where face masks are required

• Exceptions for not wearing a face mask

Where face masks are recommended

Masks reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission.

We recommend wearing a mask if you can’t physically distance, are indoors in public areas, have any symptoms, or if you are with people who may be vulnerable to COVID-19. Some workplaces and other settings may recommend masks. Carry a mask when leaving home.

Face masks are mandatory in a number of key, high-risk settings. See below for more information.

Where face masks are required

A person must carry a mask at all times, except in limited circumstances.

Wearing a mask is required in certain settings across Victoria:

• Indoors only at primary schools for staff, visitors aged 12 years and above, and for students in Grades 3 to 6.

• Workers serving the public at hospitality venues.

• Workers and customers at indoor retail except at hairdressing and beauty salons.

• Workers in high-risk settings such as in prisons and other detention facilities.

• Workers in an abattoir, meat, seafood and poultry processing sites.

• All persons in indoor areas of a court which are open to the public or used by jurors.

• Workers in resident-facing roles and visitors, while indoors at care facilities.

• Visitors at a hospital.

• Workers and visitors in indoor healthcare settings including community health centres (including mental health, child and maternity, and drug and alcohol counselling services centres), general practices, COVID-19 related healthcare sites (including testing, vaccination and hotel quarantine facilities), health clinics (including medical specialist and allied health clinics), diagnostic and medical imaging centres, mobile health services or blood donation centres.

• International aircrew services workers in direct transit to their place of self-quarantine in Victoria and who leave their vehicle.

• International aircrew services workers who are in self-quarantine and leave to undertake permitted essential services.

• International passenger arrivals in direct transit to their place of self-quarantine in Victoria and who leave their vehicle.

• International passenger arrivals who are in self-quarantine and leave to undertake permitted essential services.

• On public transport, in taxis/rideshare services, in tourism vehicles and on commercial flights.

• At an airport.

• After being tested for COVID-19 and awaiting results, other than as part of surveillance testing.

• If the person is a diagnosed person or close contact and is leaving the premises in accordance with quarantine, isolation or testing requirements.

Exceptions for not wearing a face mask

A face mask is not mandatory in the following groups or situations:

• Infants and children under 12, except students in Grades 3 to 6 indoors at a primary school (who are required to wear a mask).

• Students in primary school in Grade 2 or below and students in secondary school (note: masks remain strongly recommended in secondary schools)

• Persons who have a physical or mental health condition, or disability, which makes wearing a face covering unsuitable, including persons with obstructed breathing, a serious skin condition of the face, an intellectual disability, a mental health condition or persons who have experienced trauma.

• Persons communicating with those who are deaf or hard of hearing and visibility of the mouth is essential for communication.

• Persons for whom the nature of their work or education means that wearing a face mask creates a risk to health and safety.

• Persons for whom the nature of their work or education means that clear enunciation or visibility of their mouth is essential. This includes teaching, lecturing or broadcasting.

• The person is working by themselves in an enclosed indoor space such as in an empty classroom unless another person enters that space.

• When asked to remove the face mask to ascertain identity. For instance, where asked by police, security, bank or post office staff to remove a face mask to ascertain identity.

• The person is undergoing dental or medical care or treatment to the extent that such care or treatment requires no face mask be worn.

• The person is a prisoner in a prison, subject to any policies of that prison.

• The person is detained in a remand centre, youth residential centre or youth justice centre, subject to any policies of that centre.

• The person is escaping harm or the risk of harm, including harm relating to family violence or violence of another person.

• For emergency purposes.

• Where not doing so is not safe in all the circumstances.

You do not need a medical certificate stating that you have a lawful reason for not wearing a face mask. If you have a lawful reason for not wearing a face mask, you do not need to apply for an exemption or permit.

If you are stopped by police in a setting where face masks are mandatory, they will ask you to confirm the lawful reason you are not wearing a face mask.

Reviewed 16 December 2021

____________________________________________________________

from within the link:

https://www.coronavirus.vic.gov.au/face-masks-when-wear-face-mask

It must be emphasised that whatever minute changes have occurred over the past few amendments there is no legal requirement to present a medical certificate for not wearing a face mask.

As a result doctors previously have stated that they will not be providing those exemptions.

The REALITY is that now doctors (e.g. GPs, specialists, etc) will not allow you to obtain healthcare if you are not wearing a mask or even vaccinated (well, technically succumbed to a global medical trial), unless you have an exemption, an exemption they declined to provide you one with before if you asked for it.

You will therefore be denied life saving treatment.

Therefore this 'thing' called Duty of Care has been thrown under a bus in Victoria.

So, why isn't the mainstream media informing you of this?

The medical profession has been corrupted and is not acting independently, but rather under dictation, literally from a written script from a few sources, but more on that in a future post.

National Partnership on COVID-19 Response (Document within post)

Can the 'Parliament of Australia' lawfully withhold a public document claiming it is under copyright?

Unless stated otherwise, all documents created by those in government are funded by the tax paying public.

Therefore, the taxpayers are the stakeholders of any such documents, where unless national security is in play, then the stakeholders have to right to view those documents.

This is especially true of documents pertaining to public health on a national scale, given the fact that that public's purse is used to distribute health care.

Documents /action hidden from scrutiny can be used with regards to the abuse of power.

The Australian Government claims transparency is of utmost importance in its actions.

See the document National Partnership on COVID-19 Response 

at:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1M2jRqnEMW2RjxaB5NjNV4-9f8r3aGMog/view?usp=sharing

How Australian police will use DNA sequencing to predict what suspects look like

Technology a ‘gamechanger’ for forensic science but raises privacy and racial profiling issues

Based on DNA left at a crime scene, massively parallel sequencing can predict a person’s externally visible characteristics. Photograph: nobeastsofierce Science/Alamy

Donna Lu@donnadlu Wed 8 Dec 2021 09.31 AEDT Last modified on Wed 8 Dec 2021 09.36 AEDT

Australian federal police have announced they are using next-generation DNA sequencing technology to predict the physical appearance of potential suspects.

Based on DNA left at a crime scene, the technology – also known as massively parallel sequencing – can predict externally visible characteristics of a person even in the absence of matching profiles in police databases.

MPS can “predict gender, biogeographical ancestry, eye colour and, in coming months, hair colour”, according to the AFP.

Experts say the technology is a “gamechanger” for forensic science but also raises issues around racial profiling, heightened surveillance and genetic privacy.

How does DNA profiling work?

DNA – deoxyribonucleic acid – is formed of two interlocked chains that form the basis of our genetic code. Each strand of DNA consists of four units known as nucleotide bases – A, C, G, and T – that repeat in patterns. The human genome comprises about 3bn pairs of these bases, contained within 23 chromosomes.

Human DNA is 99.9% identical, and forensic analysis is interested in the 0.1% of the genome that makes each of us genetically unique.

Traditional DNA profiling focuses on 24 sites on the genome where chains of nucleotide bases differ in length between people. The site sequences do not encode for specific genes that determine physical characteristics such as eye or hair colour. The method can determine biological sex because one of the 24 target sites is on the X chromosome and another is on the Y chromosome.

“If I told you my DNA profile for these different regions, it wouldn’t mean anything to you,” said Prof Adrian Linacre, chair in forensic DNA technology at Flinders University. “You couldn’t look at that and think: this guy’s from northern Europe, he’s got blue eyes.”

In combination, the different sequence lengths at each of these 24 sites is enough to give a person a unique genetic fingerprint. DNA collected from crime scenes can be matched to DNA profiles on criminal databases. “If your person is not on the database, it’s not very useful,” Linacre said, adding that links could be made to relatives.

What is massive parallel sequencing?

MPS has been used commercially for more than a decade and has been used overseas in forensic cases.

Linacre describes it as a “massive gamechanger”. The technology is capable of sequencing “tens of millions of bits of DNA in one go”, he said. “This new methodology is telling you things about the person … externally visible characteristics.”

Rather than looking at the length of strings of sequences, MPS can look at single nucleotides – whether, at a specific location, a base is an A, C, G or T.

There are several single base changes that are major determinants of eye colour, for example. “They’re dotted around your DNA … you put them all together, and you’ve got a real high probability of saying: this guy’s got bluey-green eyes,” Linacre said.

MPS differs from genetic genealogy tests used to identify people’s ethnic origin or relatives on genealogy databases, as was used by California police to catch Joseph James DeAngelo, the Golden State Killer.

How will next-gen DNA sequencing be used in Australia?

The new sequencing technology will allow investigators to gain information about the physical characteristics of a potential suspect even when there is no matching DNA profile on a law enforcement database.

According to the AFP, the technique could be used in “missing persons and unidentified human remains cases”.

“Most things we find at crime scenes are mixtures of two or three people’s DNA,” Linacre said. While traditional DNA profiling techniques tend to work well even on degraded DNA, using MPS for a mixture of fragmented DNA could lead to inconclusive results, he said. “We’re still yet to develop really good software programmes to deconvolute massive parallel sequencing data.”

Are there ethical concerns?

In a statement, Dr Paul Roffey, the lead MPS scientist at AFP forensics, said the agency planned “to widen prediction capabilities to include traits such as age, body mass index and height”.

“We will also be seeking opportunities to provide fine detail predictions for facial metrics such as distance between the eyes, eye, nose and ear shape, lip fullness, and cheek structure”.

Age can accurately be determined by genetic analysis; body composition and height – which have genetic components – are also influenced by environmental factors.

The ability to predict the phenotype of a suspect raises ethical issues, particularly around racial profiling, said Dr Loene Howes, senior lecturer in criminology at the University of Tasmania.

Being able to determine a suspect’s ancestry could place “a whole population group under suspicion – they become subject to greater surveillance than the rest of the community,” she said. “It’s not necessarily that informative anyway, because there might be lots of people who fit the [description].”

Genetic privacy is also a concern. “If you start to look at other parts of DNA which encode things which are very personal to you, there’s a line I think which needs to be drawn,” Linacre said.

Howes added: “The problem with the introduction of any of these things is that it often happens without … the community being fully aware of what could be involved. There’s often function creep, where a scientific technique is introduced for one reason, and gradually starts being used for other purposes that weren’t agreed to initially.

“There should be some very clear thresholds in place [for] when this can be used.”

Source: 

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/dec/08/how-australian-police-will-use-dna-sequencing-to-predict-what-suspects-look-like?fbclid=IwAR3g54cKluEZxgvl-_4B46fTyjpbCLPf9E0EgXydgsjMKQTqiZSNx06Lv6o

Consumer Warning: Family safety app Life360 sells your location data

Data sold by Life360, an app that helps people share their location with family members, is being sold by data dealers to whoever is willing to pay for it, The Markup has found. At the center of the report are two former employees of Life360 and two people who in the past have worked for two of its customers - Cuebiq and X-Mode.

The app has a user base of 33 million customers and is typically used by parents to keep an eye on their kids. Life360's privacy policy clearly states that it sells data that it collects from app users in a de-identified form. The employees questioned by The Markup have revealed that the company doesn't take the steps needed to ensure the information is not traced back to people. Some of the customers are sold raw location data and the company says it trusts its customers to obfuscate that information.

Apparently, Life360 is the go-to source for location data for most entities, a claim that founder and CEO Chris Hulls neither confirms nor denies. He says that data is an important part of the company and allows them to keep core services free, including features that have "improved driver safety and saved numerous lives." Last year, location data sales made up 20 percent of the revenue.

The data is seemingly being used by hedge funds or firms that do targeted advertising and by government organizations like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Department of Defense. 

X-Mode has been found in the past to sell location data from Muslim prayers apps to U.S. government contractors. Cuebiq sold location data to news organizations like The New York Times and NBC News during the beginning of the pandemic as they were eager to learn about the new movement patterns of the public during the early lockdown period.

Life360, which began selling data in 2016, instituted a policy barring the sale of data for law enforcement purposes in 2020 and this also applies to customers who get data from it. Whether they are complying with this is not known.

Although Life360 made a loss of $16.3 million in 2020, it is expanding its business to include products for data breach alerts, credit monitoring, and identity-theft protection.

In 2019, it bought family screen-time monitoring app ZenScreen and in April, it acquired Jiobit which makes wearable location devices for kids, pets, and seniors. Most recently, it revealed plans to buy Tile, a company that makes Bluetooth trackers to help consumers find easily lost items like wallets and keys. Hulls says data from Tile devices won't be sold.

Life360 does give an option to its app users to disable the sale of location data. 

Source: phonearena.com

Freight company's delivery fraud? AirTag exposes DHL fraud!

MANY parcel delivery corporations deceive their customers, either by accident or deliberately.

Can you monitor their progress independently of their so called 'tracking' system?

Can you 'keep the bastards honest'?

Let's see how one 'customer' documented the journey of his parcels with DHL.

Workplace 'medical procedure' mandate not lawful

Briefly,

While this article may pertain to a corporation called BHP, the reality is that no employer can lawfully force an employee to take a medical procedure or more specifically an injection of some sort where if a person did not, the consequences would be employment termination.

Governments and corporations are 'forcing' persons (or rather enticing or withdrawing privileges) to succumb to a medical procedure with zero knowledge of long-term or inter-generational effects, as mentioned in hansards.

MANY people have been deceived or conned into a medical procedure against their will.

In this case the suggestion would be for a class action against the government or corporations involved.

Andrews' 50 man 'dirt' team

To many people Daniel Michael Andrews seems unstoppable in his communist régime style of governing over the people of Victoria.

He also seems untouchable by the law, where putting him in 'person' in front of a judge seems out of reach by the mere serf.

While he is accountable to, he is also supported by the 'faceless men' in his actions.

He also has one other ace up his sleeve that the mainstream media is deliberately not reporting on.

He has a 'dirt' squad, a team of approximately 50 goons that dig up anything on any person or persons that are against (or may be against) Andrews so that he can use it against them at a later point in time.

That's right, Victorian taxpayers are paying for a hit squad that works for Andrews to keep him in office and untouchable or accountable for any actions he takes.

Is this an acceptable practice to you or more importantly at law?

It's pretty useless to ask an FOI (Freedom Of Information) from your oppressor to name them.

It's pretty useless to accuse him in order to bring the matter before a magistrate or judge, as he will not even show up.

This is just an FYI (For Your Information) post.

Authorities being sued for falsified deaths

For more than a year now, the Victorian authorities have been falsifying the cause of death with regards to a particular disease.

The fact has been (deliberately) ignored by the mainstream media.

We have obtained verifiable information that people whose loved ones have died, have not had the real cause of death written on the death certificate, but rather an alleged disease that is the focus of the authorities at the moment.

The families concerned have basically had enough of the lies, where legal action is being taken.

Now, whether or not this will be reported in the mainstream media is yet to be seen.

In any event, development with regards to these matters will be posted here.

Windows 10 spyware - keylogger

Corporations and governments (via specially selected corporations) incorporate spyware into software and electronic devices.

With regards to smartphones users have been deliberately left with a duopoly of spyware manufacturing corporations to chose from, that being Apple or Google.

With regards to Google phones certain brands can be 'de-googled', where one still has to contend with state level players where the spying is done at the communications protocols level.

With Apple phones one cannot 'de-Apple' the operating system, where if one was truly concerned about privacy one would bin the phone.

The word intel in the government community is with reference to the word intelligence meaning data gathering.

The US based corporation Intel, a semiconductor manufacturer hard coded spyware into their processors so governments could obtain the user's data without any boundaries.

This 'malicious' software was undetected for many years.

Microsoft another US based multinational, encoded a 'keylogger' into their Windows 10 operating system.

Microsoft was also 'forcing' people to upgrade from Windows 7 and Windows 8/8.1, because it was allegedly better, better for who?

Windows 10 code base is built on Win7 & 8/8.1, nothing 'new' there, well apart from the 'spyware'.

It is imperative (for governments and corporations) that users update their versions of Windows as each new version contains more telemetry, most of which cannot be disabled at the user level, irrespective of the toggle status.

Thankfully there are people that create programs that can disable the spyware baked into the operating system.

Here is just one example of software, exposing the spyware Windows 10 contains:

During the installation process of Windows 10, all the toggle switches regarding so called 'privacy' were turned off, where this program (O&O ShutUp10) detected another 37 parameters, where a keylogger was active.

If you must use Windows then it should be used in conjunction with telemetry thwarting software.

Microsoft is deliberately screwing its users over in many ways, where this has not been brought to the attention of the courts.

Medicare discriminatory?

It seems that institutions can act illegally against people or rather at law 'persons' with impunity.

To even propose a discriminatory action is ludicrous.

For a government not to step in, immediately shutting down such ideas only shows that corporations rule  over Australians.

That's life in a (penal) colony.

The lies of the mainstream media of “Melburnians out of lockdown”

If people from abroad read Australia's mainstream media websites to obtain their information, in many instances they may be obtaining a false narrative.

Headlines are designed to grab attention or evoke a reaction and may be misleading to say the least.

Around the third week of October 2021, Australia's news outlets started to tell the world that the residents of Melbourne are going to be released from 'lockdown' or rather being locked up in their homes (quite literally under house arrest) as a result of the federal government's 'failure ' to an alleged global health situation.

All over the radio waves over Melbourne the 'mainstream' disc jockeys were spruiking a false narrative that Melburnians were 'free' from being locked up.

If one was stabbed twice with regards to a particular medical procedure, then one was 'free' to participate in the 'economy'.

Today, over a month later if you did not participate in a government sponsored trial drug from one of three major manufacturers you CANNOT:

• walk into a major department store and purchase clothes (a 'necessity'),

• walk into a 'small business' clothing store to purchase clothes (security guard STOP you from entering),

• walk into a major electrical retailer to purchase an (e.g.) oven to cook food so you don't die,

and let's not forget one of the the most important instances that being that a hospital will NOT offer you life saving treatment if you are not fully (at this moment double) stabbed with a trial liquid.

So, let's emphasise this:

Hospitals in Melbourne, Australia will NOT give you life saving cancer treatment if you are not (allegedly) v@cc!nated against an alleged threat that was named after the year 2019.

The 'problem' here is that the majority of humans are supportive of this.

Would people have accepted in 2018 that one would not get cancer treatment if one did not have a 'flu' shot?

The so called oath by medical professionals to protect human life has been thrown under a bus.

So, how can you truly trust your doctor, with regards to whether or not a particular injection is factually safe for you, given the fact that we are still 'gathering data' on this trial.

How can you trust the medical profession with regards to an injection if the Australian Government has offered them immunity from prosecution?

190 Android apps with trojan malware were installed 9.3 million times

UPDATE: Huawei has issued a statement about this article and it says, "AppGallery’s built-in security system swiftly identified the potential risk within these apps. We are now actively working with affected developers to troubleshoot their apps. Once we can confirm that the apps are all clear, they will be re-listed on AppGallery so consumers can download their favourite apps again and continue enjoying them."

"Protecting network security and user privacy is Huawei's priority. We welcome all third-party oversight and feedback to ensure we deliver on this commitment. We will continue to collaborate closely with our partners, and at the same time, employ the most advanced and innovative technologies to safeguard our users’ privacy."

Protecting network security and user privacy is Huawei's priority. We welcome all third-party oversight and feedback to ensure we deliver on this commitment. We will continue to collaborate closely with our partners, and at the same time, employ the most advanced and innovative technologies to safeguard our users’ privacy.”

Trojans (besides the definition that you might be more familiar with) is an app that hides its true purpose by masquerading as a regular app. But once the app is installed it unleashes malware that infects the phone allowing a bad actor to steal personal data and even take control of the device. According to a fresh report, researchers at Dr. Web Anti-virus discovered a large malware attack on Huawei's App Gallery app storefront that led victims to unwittingly install dangerous malware on their phones.

The 190 infected Android trojan apps were installed approximately 190 million times

The 190 infected Android trojan apps were installed approximately 9.3 million times. Dr. Web says that the malware has been identified as 'Android.Cynos.7.origin' and is believed to be a modified version of the Cynos malware that is used to collect personal data from victims' handsets. The researchers ended up alerting  Huawei about the trojans and Huawei deleted them from the App Gallery.

Drive School Simulator, one of the apps carrying malware in Huawei's App Gallery

Now here's the thing. Even though Huawei removed the infected  apps from the App Gallery, if you installed  any of them on your phone, it can still be a major problem making your data vulnerable to getting stolen. The three infected apps with the largest number of installs include:

 

• Hurry up and hide – 2,000,000
• Cat adventures – 427,000
• Drive school simulator – 142,000

If you have any of these apps residing on your Huawei phone, uninstall them ASAP. You can check out the names of all 190 infected apps by tapping on this link.  The infected apps can spy on SMS messages, and according to the report from Dr. Web, "The Android.Cynos.7.origin is one of the modifications of the Cynos program module. This module can be integrated into Android apps to monetize them. This platform has been known since at least 2014."

These trojan apps can collect user's personal data and information about their device and send it to a remote server

The report adds that some of the versions of the malware have aggressive functionality. "They send premium SMS, intercept incoming SMS, download and launch extra modules, and download and install other apps." It obviously is not good to have any of these apps installed on your phone. The version of the trojan found in Huawei's App Gallery collects personal information about the user and his device and displays ads.

As the report notes, right off the bat, you can sense that something is not right since the app asks for permissions usually not associated with a gaming app such as the ability to make and manage phone calls. This gives the trojan the possibility to access certain information.

Once permission is granted, the app sends certain information to a remote server including the user's phone number, the device location, some of the specs belonging to the user's device, and according to the report, "Various mobile network parameters, such as the network code and mobile country code; also, GSM cell ID and international GSM location area code."

The infected apps have already been removed from Huawei's App Gallery app store

Dr. Web explains the problem with trojan malware apps targeting children. "At first glance, a mobile phone number leak may seem like an insignificant problem. Yet in reality, it can seriously harm users, especially given the fact that children are the games’ main target audience."

The research site adds that "Even if the mobile phone number is registered to an adult, downloading a child’s game may highly likely indicate that the child is the one who actually is using the mobile phone. It is very doubtful that parents would want the above data about the phone to be transferred not only to unknown foreign servers but to anyone else in general."

Source: phonearena.com

Michael Gunner's sociopathic rant

Michael Gunner is the Chief Minister of the Northern Territory, within the colony called Australia.

Source: https://parliament.nt.gov.au/members/by-name/michael-gunner 

According to official sources, he is 'honourable'.

In a recent press conference his words are far from being 'honourable'.

According to him, you are not allowed to question, have views or a different opinion, where you are pigeonholed into an anti 'whatever' label.

His views are that of a totalitarian leader not too dissimilar to that of communist leaders like Chairman Xi Jinping or Kim Jong-un.

See a portion of his rant (1m19s) : 

Source (An0maly): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYrWAO7P1Is

His actions are factually pro child abuse and genocide of the Indigenous Australian people.

Gunner MUST be removed from office!

Corporations 'forcing' you to use smartphones and online banking

Living in a fascist colony is 'hard yakka'.

People of the world are being deceived that Melbourne is the world's 'most livable city' almost every year in a row.

People of the world are being deceived that Australians live in a 'free' democracy.

The reality is that we live in a place where fascist corporatism rules the people.

While the spokespeople from government say that an action is completely 'voluntary' corporations put out a policy stating that an action is mandatory, where there is no lawfully enacted framework for persons to follow this 'idea'.

Now, a policy for those in power is to use people's energy (to input data, for free) via the technology they carry on them to monitor and control their movements, ingenious!

It is imperative for governments to phase out cash in order to better monitor and control people's movements.

ALL aspects of your life must have a digital footprint, where you can be tracked and monitored.

This is obviously packaged up as a benefit (to corporations) or a saving or something great for the community in such a way that it is difficult to argue against.

Just one action of using a supermarket's trolley, will 'force' you to

- have a smartphone,

- enable online banking (which is technically a security risk),

- provide data that you are not aware of to a company that can (and will) distribute this data to others irrespective of what they will write on their website.

It is because of this last point that the use of a QR code is a security risk, as described by a government cyber security department, which advises against the use of QR codes, but people are STILL willing to expose themselves to this threat.

For whatever reasons many people do not use smartphones or have enabled online banking from their accounts, where they WILL be discriminated against by corporations and not be allowed to use trolleys to take the corporation's products into their vehicle or even in store(?).

While some may resist, the majority of the herd will comply.

P.S. Oops sorry, you're not 'forced', you just can't participate in society if you don't.

See the articles:

https://www.news.com.au/technology/gadgets/mobile-phones/coins-to-unlock-shopping-trolleys-could-be-a-thing-of-past-with-new-tech-that-tracks-them-if-abandoned/news-story/a2519e0617b2b04df7240e8cd41ab27c

https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/federal-government-agency-issues-warning-about-qr-codes/

GoDaddy Hacked!

EX-99.1 2 gddyblogpostnov222021.htm EX-99.1

November 22, 2021

GoDaddy Announces Security Incident Affecting Managed WordPress Service

On November 17, 2021, we discovered unauthorized third-party access to our Managed WordPress hosting environment. Here is the background on what happened and the steps we took, and are taking, in response:

We identified suspicious activity in our Managed WordPress hosting environment and immediately began an investigation with the help of an IT forensics firm and contacted law enforcement. Using a compromised password, an unauthorized third party accessed the provisioning system in our legacy code base for Managed WordPress.

Upon identifying this incident, we immediately blocked the unauthorized third party from our system. Our investigation is ongoing, but we have determined that, beginning on September 6, 2021, the unauthorized third party used the vulnerability to gain access to the following customer information:

•Up to 1.2 million active and inactive Managed WordPress customers had their email address and customer number exposed. The exposure of email addresses presents risk of phishing attacks.

•The original WordPress Admin password that was set at the time of provisioning was exposed. If those credentials were still in use, we reset those passwords.

•For active customers, sFTP and database usernames and passwords were exposed. We reset both passwords.

•For a subset of active customers, the SSL private key was exposed. We are in the process of issuing and installing new certificates for those customers.

Our investigation is ongoing and we are contacting all impacted customers directly with specific details. Customers can also contact us via our help center (https://www.godaddy.com/help) which includes phone numbers based on country.

We are sincerely sorry for this incident and the concern it causes for our customers. We, GoDaddy leadership and employees, take our responsibility to protect our customers’ data very seriously and never want to let them down. We will learn from this incident and are already taking steps to strengthen our provisioning system with additional layers of protection.

Demetrius Comes

Chief Information Security Officer

Forward-Looking Statements

This blog post contains forward-looking statements regarding GoDaddy Inc. (“we,” “GoDaddy,” or the “Company”) which are subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including our efforts to investigate and remediate the security incident and our attempts to identify and notify affected customers and implement additional security measures. Our forward-looking statements are based on information known to us at the time of this blog post and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may cause our actual future results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from any future results expressed or implied in this blog post. Factors that contribute to the uncertain nature of our forward-looking statements include, among others, our ongoing investigation of the incident; our vulnerability to additional security incidents; adverse legal, reputational and financial effects on the Company resulting from the incident or

---

additional security incidents, including regulatory inquiries; and potential operational disruptions as a result of the incident. Because some of these risks and uncertainties cannot be predicted or quantified and some are beyond our control, you should not rely on our forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Additional risks and uncertainties that could affect GoDaddy’s business and financial results are included in the filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) from time to time, including those described in “Risk Factors” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2021 as well as those described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on From 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 and in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2021, which are available on GoDaddy's website at https://investors.godaddy.net and on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. Additional information will also be set forth in other filings that GoDaddy makes with the SEC from time to time. All forward-looking statements in this blog post are based on information available to GoDaddy as of the date hereof. GoDaddy does not assume any obligation to update the forward-looking statements provided to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made.

Source:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1609711/000160971121000122/gddyblogpostnov222021.htm