Police and media lies on speed camera vehicle 'ambush'.

Australia's mainstream media is the government's propaganda tool, from the Murdoch 'news' empire selling you click-bait content to our own version of the 'Xinhua News Agency' the ABC.

The primary objective of mobile speed camera vehicles is to obtain revenue for the state, under the false advertising of road safety.

People have caught on to this quite some time ago.

The opening statement by Peter Mitchell:

“A speed camera operator has been targeted in a cowardly attack on the Bellarine Peninsular” is a lie.

Please note that previously speed camera operators were police personnel, where there was no lawful delegation of duties to fall into private hands in order to obtain surveillance of a driver's velocity, therefore making any allegations technically unlawful, but that is another topic altogether.

Victoria Police Assistant Commissioner Glenn Weir, then publicly states the following (deliberately) false information:

“Absolutely terrifying to be sitting in a car doing your job in the dark, and all of a sudden out of nowhere comes some lunatic who attacks you with a pole”

If Weir's statement was presented in a so called 'court of law', to a judge or jury, then the picture he would have painted would be that a mentally impaired person physically injured the operator as a result of 'attacking' [him] with a pole.

In reality this did not happen.

The operator was not the target, the vehicle was.

How did Weir diagnose that the alleged offender was mentally impaired?

Weir's public statement lacks credibility and has zero weight behind it.

He just publicly stated that he is an 'unreliable witness' even though he did not witness anything.

Police personnel lie in court every single day, period.

MANY statements by police falsely accuse defendants/respondents where as a result they are found guilty.

The problem there is also they do not have the resources to contest the matter further, as the legal system is deliberately designed for those who can afford to defend themselves, putting aside 'favourable' outcomes for the courts.

The legal system is one of the largest rorts in this colony.

See video:

Courts corrupted by 'stakeholders' eg. financial services corporation, Challenger Group

The courts are not acting independently but rather under dictation, from their "stakeholders".

The stakeholders (internal and external) require the courts to be influenced by them in order to produce outcomes critical to the "success" of the Magistrates' Court of Victoria including staff and the judiciary, Court Services Victoria (ABN: 63 392 984 660) and other Victorian government departments.

An external 'stakeholder' of the County Court of Victoria (ABN: 32 790 228 959) is the Liberty Group (ABN: 55 167 839 394) which is owned by the Challenger Group (ABN: 91 085 657 307).

The administrative staff of the courts are paid by Court Services Victoria.

See 6 page document:

See original source:

https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/images/stories/committees/paec/2019-20_Budget_Estimates/Quons/2019-07-26_Attorney_General_written.pdf

See article:

Courts acting under dictation owned by financial services institutions

Which contains the following document:

The Concept Of The Crown - Cheryl Saunders AO

See document:

Law firm mulls class action over NDIS software provider data breach

Australia is literally a legal basket case, where the 'brotherhood' has tentacles in all tiers of government, that being the Executive, Parliament and Judicature.

The courts are subservient to internal and external entities referred to as stakeholders, as described in an employment advertisement.

See document within the article: 

Courts acting under dictation owned by financial services institutions

The external stakeholders are banks and financial services institutions, therefore ANY court matter against the banks or financial institutions will not be a 'fair hearing' as required by law.

A [real] Ch. III court has only one 'stakeholder' that being the Crown in right of ...

The headline of this article describes the widespread problem facing victims of criminal activity originating in places of 'power', where the operative word is 'mulls'.

There should be no 'mulling' but rather IMMEDIATE action.

Read the following article as covered by itnews.com.au:

                     Centennial Lawyers starts preliminary investigations.

A Sydney law firm is considering a class action against NDIS client management system provider CTARS over a security breach that exposed sensitive health data belonging to NDIS participants.

Centennial Lawyers, which is known for Australia’s first privacy class action in 2017, is conducting “preliminary investigations” into the CTARS data breach, with a view to initiating a class action.

CTARS last week revealed a “large volume” of personal, health and other sensitive data belonging to NDIS participants and other individuals was accessed by an unauthorised third-party in May.

A sample of the data, which could include details of diagnoses, treatment or recovery of a medical condition or disability, has already been posted on the dark web, according to the company.

Medicare and pensioner cards, as well as tax file numbers, are also thought to have been compromised.

Data breach repository Have I Been Pwned, which is run by security expert Troy Hunt, has estimated the number of compromised email address at approximately 12,000, a “significant portion” of which belong to staff at care providers.

Hunt has suggested that it is "highly likely sensitive personal information can be matched to individuals".

Centennial Lawyers is calling for those who have been contacted by their NDIS service provider to provide relevant details about the breach.

The law firm is particularly keen to understand when individuals were notified about the breach and the type of data that was compromised.

Centennial Lawyers has a track record of legal action over data breaches, having successfully brought a class action against the NSW Ambulance Service over a data breach in 2017.

The class actions resulted in a $275,000 settlement over the access and sale of the personal data of 130 staff data in 2013, with the lead plaintiff receiving $10,000 and the remaining 108 participants receiving $2400 each.

Centennial Lawyers is also continuing to investigate a class action against Service NSW for its 2020 data breach that saw the personal information of 104,000 customers stolen in an email compromise.  

 

No warrant in NSW raid

MANY persons have been defrauded of their liberties and or property as a result of warrant-less actions against them by the authorities.

This issue is not an isolated nor does it even pertain to one state only or even a particular short period of time.

The courts are also part of this fraud, supporting the warrant-less action by the police/sheriff.

In Tasmania it was exposed that magistrates were not sworn in correctly over the past 30 years, where the orders have no lawful effect.

In Victoria over the past few years it was exposed that the police were not sworn in correctly to issue health related fines, in effect making the fines unlawful.

The 'problem' with the current fiasco with regards to alleged 'protesters' congregating on a property in NSW in order to allegedly organise an external gathering is that there was no lawfully produced warrant to act on.

We have obtained information from a source that wishes to remain anonymous that no lawfully issued warrant was produced by the NSW police force prior to accessing the property.

As a result the police have committed criminal offences in the process.

Whether or not legal action against the NSW police force will follow is another story.

In a Melbourne 'court of public record' it was exposed that the 'Sheriff's Office Victoria' does not posses any lawfully issued warrants to act on with regards infringements issued from the so called 'Infringements Court'.

Adding further insult to injury it was stated by legal counsel for the Sheriff's Office that no warrants can be produced as the have ever existed.

The so called sheriff's have even defrauding their 'customers' by producing a summary report in an 'Excel' spreadsheet type format claiming that it was the warrant.

They also try to cash in outside of the statue of limitation on expired fines.

We have also obtained information that property seizures are not backed up by lawfully issued warrant, in effect making the seizure illegal.

We urge victims of illegal seizures to seek legal advice also demanding to see the warrant as part of a compensation claim.

If you had property taken or have been deprived of liberty without ever having seen a warrant, if you seek a remedy, then you must take action.

See articles:

Sheriff's warrants do not exist - verified on video

What a warrant form looks like

Tasmanian magistrates not sworn in correctly for 30 years