Victoria Police lose Supreme Court defence for reprimanding officer for refusing Covid-19 jab

Australia's mainstream media was very quick to inform the general population of how Victoria Police officers have been reprimanded/stood down for not participating in the Covid-19 jab, whereas the judiciary was exempt.

Well what about the follow up? As there is a followup!

On the 13th of March, there was a court hearing, in not just any court, but the Supreme Court of Victoria.

No 'court reporters' on such a monumental matter? All is silent on the western front!

The jab has maimed many, in a life shortening venture by the government and health authorities, where Peter Simon Shearer was successful against the charges laid against him, that being an alleged breach of discipline for failing to comply with vaccination* requirements for the Victoria Police manual.

See SHEARER v CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF POLICE [2024] VSC 181

as filed in the Supreme Court of Victoria: 

* Please note that the Covid-19 'jab' cannot be legally referred to as a vaccine, as it does not confer immunity.

See related articles:

- 'Vaccine' or trail drug?

- Colony’s police forces immune from social distancing ‘rules’ (& COVID-19)?

- Australian Product Information COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca

- The Covid-19 injections do not confer immunity, & therefore do not meet the definition of a vaccine.