Fines Victoria alleged debt, under what lawfully enacted instrument?

This is an actual [template] letter from Fines Victoria from (an alleged) Mr. Duncan Stewart to a 'person', where the 'victim's' details have been obscured.

If you received this letter in your person's name then you may become a victim of fraud by more than one entity, against your person's name.

Let's begin!

Debtor:

• How did you lawfully incur a debt to 'Fines Victoria' (ABN 68 122 448 122?)?

• Was there a lawfully issued court order in your person's name and by whom?

• Was the person issuing the order sitting in office lawfully?

• Can that person produce the oath taken?

• Did you get an opportunity to face your accuser?

• What lawfully issued instrument was used to create the (alleged) debt?

'Dealing' with a fine:

Even at this late stage of the 'game' if you write a letter to Fines Victoria, or Mr. Duncan Stewart more specifically, that you require the matter to be revocated to the court, then you are 'dealing' with the fine.

I may:

The letter states: “I may take one or more actions to recover the amount you owe.”

This means that Mr. Stewart 'may', as opposed to will take action.

I may:-

1. deduct money from your bank account or wages,

2. direct VicRoads to suspend your driver licence or vehicle registration,

3. or charge and sell the land you own.

Now, this is one of the more problematic sections of the letter.

First of all Mr. Stewart needs a lawfully issued instrument to carry out any of those actions, where if one does not exist he has carried out actions beyond his power, where the 'common law' crime of theft will occur if one or more of those actions are carried out.

In point iii). Mr. Stewart states that he 'may' charge and sell the land (eg. where your home is located on) you 'own'.

Mr. Stewart is stating that you factually 'own' this land?

Where is this paperwork that states that you 'own' the land he is coming for?

Mr. Stewart also states the following:

“ If a warrant is issued against you, the Sheriff may wheel clamp your vehicle, take and sell your assets, or arrest you."

Now, this is the most problematic part of the letter thus far.

A sheriff of a state is an officer of the state's Supreme Court.

In the case of Victoria, at this point in time, there is no lawfully appointed sheriff, nor was the previous (alleged) sheriff Mr. Brendan Facey lawfully appointed.

Again, what lawfully issued instrument will allow a person to take your possessions, arrest you or stop your vehicle from moving?

“take action”

Writing a letter to Me. Duncan Stewart regarding clarification with regards as to how one has lawfully become a 'debtor' to Fines Victoria is taking action in dealing with the matter.

There are many other aspects of law that must be considered with regards to obtaining a remedy to the letter presented to you.

For example, but not limited to:

• If there is no lawfully appointed sheriff, then there are no lawful deputies.

• If a warrant is factually issued it MUST be present to you in its prescribed format, where all the 'checks and balances' are present and not appear as an 'Excel' spreadsheet summary.

• If you did not appear in court to face your accuser, then this is a breach of the Charter of Rights & Responsibilities, a denial of natural justice.

You must take further action as they will not give you a 'remedy' on a silver plate where they will try to deceive you in the process.

So far there have been no lawfully issued warrants in the state of Victoria, since at least the tenure of Mr. Brendan Facey, as director of Fines Victoria (and not the sheriff) arising from the 'Infringements Court'.

Remembering that judges/magistrates are tort feasors, and not as described under Ch.III of the Constitution.

See other articles:

https://corpau.blogspot.com/2017/05/sheriffs-warrants-do-not-exist-verified.html

https://corpau.blogspot.com/2016/01/what-warrant-form-looks-like.html