Penal Colony Policies - Police Ombudsman's office to be abolished

Many people living on this continent may be blissfully unaware of the real state of 'law' in Australia.

Many Australians are ignorant of a document that protects them where it is spelled out how government must behave.

The document is called the 'Australian Constitution'.

Have you heard of it?

Get yourself a downloadable version containing the lawful seal of the 'Commonwealth of Australia'. Teach it to your children.


https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B21_coIgIYu2blVRSkVidDRiTU0

This document was taken out of the education curriculum in the early 1970's so that the children of the herd populace would not know how the government must behave.

Some people may say that it's 'outdated' or not current any more as it's from 1901.

You may even go to a barrister with regards to your criminal (parking fine) matter, and he/she may say to you that they have not seen one, or even use it as it's not valid anymore.

Well they obviously are not aware of a place called the High Court of Australia, which deals with matters in accordance with the Australian Constitution.

You should seek another legal alternative to that person who has told you of their legal incompetence.

If you want to research law, and do it properly (not just from your ergonomic chair in front of a PC) you may discover that Australia is still a penal colony of the British empire.

When you write certain questions to government departments, even though they state that they will respond within 7 day, they do not.

When you write certain questions that require the government department to show paperwork regarding the validity of a law, they may not respond for a month, three months or even a year.

To the dismay of some people, laws concerning their 'rights' are being eroded away with every new government action.

Many people may find it confronting to learn that they are 'governed' by fear and extortion (hence they shy away from addressing it), and that the common phrase "democracy" which is so widely used by politicians is a farce.

In a penal colony you do not need to oversee the 'wardens'.

Here is an example of this in action.

See article from 6 July 2016 by abc.net.au of the headline:

Police Ombudsman's office to be abolished under South Australia Government plan

The South Australian Government is moving to abolish the Police Ombudsman's office in line with a recommendation from the state's anti-corruption watchdog.

Last year Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) commissioner Bruce Lander published a report with 29 recommendations to improve the currently complex police complaints system.

At the time, Mr Lander said some of his recommendations, particularly the oversight of police conduct might be seen as "controversial" but the system must be "robust but fair".

He recommended that the Police Commissioner have "primary responsibility for the assessment and resolution of complaints and reports about police", with oversight by the Office of Public Integrity (OPI).

Attorney-General John Rau said the Government had plans to introduce three bills in line with the recommendations.

They include plans to put the police complaints system under the wing of the ICAC, but SA Police would be first in line to fix the problem.

The Government also plans to repeal the Whistleblowers Protection Act, and replace it with the Public Interest Disclosure Bill.

Mr Rau said the bills were broadly based on commission Lander's recommendations.

"In his annual report and following his own consideration of how to deal with complaints raised against police and the operation of the Whistleblowers' Protection Act, Mr Lander made several recommendations to fine-tune and clarify how ICAC operates," Mr Rau said.

Aussies eagerly sell their purchase info for only 0.25% of their total spending

It's is absolute brilliant tactics from the minds of corporate geniuses to offer their (serf) corporate slaves a reward, like akin to when you give a dog a 'treat' (very little monetary outlay) for subservience, for information that is (theoretically) private and confidential between you and your bank.

Some people on social media may say that 'we' (the people) will be forced into a cashless society, but from what we see it's already in full swing with full support of the herd populace.

One example where people 'sell' their private and confidential information to corporations for (little) gain is in the form of 'frequent flyer' points or flybuys.

The companies that acquire your private information then sell it to other companies for 'research' and statistical purposes.

Let's take a look at what Coles (at the moment owned Wesfarmers) are doing today.

According to the current brochure (see attached illustration),

this is what Coles is offering for your private and 'confidential' information:

• For every $2 spent in Australia (and $1 overseas), 1 point is accumulated in 'flybuys'.

• When you redeem 2,000 flybuys ( $4,000 worth of spending in Australia) you save $10 instantly.

So when you spend $4,000 and 'redeem' it at Coles, you get a WHOPPING $10 deducted from your grocery bill.

That's a HUGE 0.25% saving, or you're selling you private info for only 0.25% of you total expenditure.

If you shop at other places than Coles you could be better off financially.

But we hear a cry from the back of the room - 'We get to travel to L.A. for free', from one of the herd populace.

We say "Good for you"..... "you're missing the point".

Sydney siege botched by government now they need your help (we smell a rat).

So let's get this straight.

• The corporation conglomerate commonly referred to as the 'government' employs learned people.

• When communication with the government, you are 'wrong' they are right, and how dare you question our authority.

• With regards to law, the government does everything correctly and by the 'book' (whichever one that is).

We have obtained numerous letters where the response from the government is condescending with regards question of law.

So here's the deal.

The government is responsible for the murder of two innocent victims during the Martin Place, Sydney siege due to incompetence.

The Australian government has blood on it's hands with regards to the murders of Tori Johnson, 34 and Katrina Dawson 38 at the Lindt Chocolate Cafe in Martin Place, Sydney from the 15th of December 2014.

So here's what they want you to believe.

They want 'you' (the general populous, the 'serfs' - read slaves) to tell the almighty government where they went wrong.

Therefore they (indirectly) admitted they 'stuffed up', i.e. now liable for a law suit on behalf of the victim's families.

Here's what really happens to people who expose corruption and inadequacies of the government.

Have you ever heard of Sergeant Rick Flori from Brisbane?

He exposed criminal actions of the Australian government in the hands of the police, and how they bashed a handcuffed man.

Now he, Sgt. Rick Flori, is a criminal and has to defend himself.

Make now mistake with regards to the legal status of this country.

Australia still is a penal colony of the British empire, and therefore penal colony rules still apply.

It's is NOT a 'democracy' as falsely stated by various sources.

The government does not really need your help.

It wants to know what you know to shut you up in case yo make the details of their botched handling of the Martin Place siege public.

Read the article from 13 May 2016 by news.com.au of the headline:

Sydney siege inquest: Information sought on whether defence force could have handled it better

A hostage escapes the Lindt cafe during the Sydney siege. Picture: Chris McKeen

ARMY experts who have spoken to media about the police handling of the Lindt Cafe siege have been urged to “come forward” to help end the speculation and “simmering debate” that has hung over the police response.

The extraordinary request was made on Friday morning at the Sydney siege inquest by counsel assisting the coroner Jeremy Gormly SC.

He said questions over the ability of the Australian Defence Force to better handle the Lindt Cafe siege was an “ongoing and simmering debate”.

The inquest is looking at the way police responded to the siege in December 2014, when gunman Man Haron Monis took 18 people hostage at the Martin Pl cafe.

He killed cafe manager Tori Johnson which caused police to storm the cafe and end the siege. Katrina Dawson was struck by fragments of police bullets and died soon after.

Mr Gormly raised reports in The Australian, and other media, where unnamed sources told of a supposedly widely held view within the ADF of serious doubts about the police capability to cope with an event like the Lindt Cafe siege.

He said the reports were at odds with information given to the inquest by NSW Police and ADF — but offered the sources or anyone else who had proof of the claims to come forward and assist the inquest.

“If there are witnesses in support [of these views] that can provide value to investigation ... I invite them to come forward,” he said.

The Australian articles raised a series of issues the ADF allegedly had with the police handling of the siege, including the weapons and ammunition police used and a refusal from NSW Police to co-operate with their federal colleagues on the day of the siege.

The inquest has previously heard police rejected an offer from the army to use a mock up of the cafe that had built to trial tactics.

Police prepare to enter the Lindt cafe shortly before the siege comes to an end.Source:Supplied

In particular, was a claim the bullets used by police were more likely to “shatter” if they struck marble surfaces like the ones found throughout the cafe.

Mr Gormly said there was “no evidence” of that in statements already tendered — but if the claims were true then they would be “useful and relevant” to the inquest.

The source of the claims was obviously someone, or several people, who had experience at the highest levels of the ADF, he said.

However, Ian Freckelton QC, representing NSW Police, said the views of “shadowy figures” who have given unnamed quotes to media did not necessarily give them “value in a courtroom”.

He said the persons involved had already had plenty of time to contribute to the inquest.

“They have chosen not to do so.”

There was no proof at all the sources had any “expert knowledge” at all, he said.

But Mr Gormly said the subject wasn’t one that could be dismissed because the details came from “an anonymous source”.

The barrister acting for the family of Mr Johnson, Gabrielle Bashir SC, said any army evidence was highly relevant and was interested in the possible “covert entry to the cafe”.

Philip Boulton SC, acting for the family of hostage Katrina Dawson who was also killed, said it was a concern that no army witnesses were expected to be called to the inquest.

Defence force officers were present at police headquarters on the night of siege. Counsel for the Commonwealth, James Renwick, SC, told the inquest: “We could only act if we were asked. We weren’t asked, and for good reason.”

Under Australian law, the only way the defence force could have become involved was if NSW Police had declared it beyond their capability.

The siege inquest has heard at no stage did that occur.

The inquest continues.

What happens if you don't vote - AEC reveals all - (we say BS)

Here is more government propaganda from the greatest BS artists in the country.

Don't look to the corporate media for a 'solution' now will you...

The corporate media will not tell you that the $20 fine is UNLAWFUL.

The corporate media will not tell you that a 'legitimate' reason for not voting is for religious reasons.

The corporate media will not tell you:
- show me the document where I signed by my own hand in my normal signature that states that I have 'enrolled' on the electoral roll.

A spokesperson from the AEC stated that "We live in a damn good democracy, in Australia"

 - That is absolute rubbish / false / misleading information.
Australia NEVER was a 'democracy'.
It's a penal colony / corporatocracy / fascist or police state, take your pick.

In the so called democracy of the United States of America, you have a choice whether you want to vote or not.

How can a place be called a 'democracy' if your freedom of choice has been taken away?

Notice how the corporate media did not mention the name of the alleged 'spokesperson' from the AEC.

The corporate media will not tell you that the AEC (Australian Electoral Commission) is committing electoral fraud.

The corporate media tells you that Australians are 'citizens' (a totally different standing in law) rather than 'subjects of the Queen' (the Queen as in the U.K. monarch and NOT the 'Queen of Australia' - an unlawful/illegal entity).

You can read the article from 2 July 2016 from news.com.au of the headline:

What happens if you don’t vote this Federal Election?

Don’t want to vote today? Prepare to cop a $20 fine.

VOTERS uninspired by the Federal Election could elect to opt-out of the vote and instead cop a $20 fine.

It comes as the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) sent a strict warning to voters who choose not to engage in the polling booths, despite already being enrolled, telling news.com.au they could face court time if they fail to show.

A spokesperson for the AEC told news.com.au non-voters would be issued a ‘non-voter notice’ for failing to meet their legal requirement, which will provide you with two options.

1. To pay a $20 fine or ...

2. Provide a valid reason why you haven’t cast a vote.

“If somebody says they didn’t feel like it, it’s not a valid reason,” a spokesperson for AEC told news.com.au.

If you provide a valid reason instead of paying the $20 fine, it will be judged by an AEC official as to whether they believe your excuse is legitimate.

You could expect to find out if you evaded the fine in the “vicinity of a month or two”.

“If, within the time period specified on the notice, you fail to reply, cannot provide a valid and sufficient reason or decline to pay the $20 penalty, then the matter may be referred to a court,” its website reads.

“If the matter is dealt with in court and you are found guilty, you may be fined up to $180 plus court costs and a criminal conviction may be recorded against you.”

But an AEC spokesperson was baffled by the idea of not voting, telling news.com.au: “Above and beyond, the question is why wouldn't you vote? It’s kind of fun seeing the atmosphere.

“But aside from social element, you are having your say. We live in a damn good democracy,
in Australia you have very easy access to your vote, you get to have a say about who represents you, I don’t know why people would fight to not vote.”

The AEC denied rumours claiming citizens get off lightly if they don’t vote, explaining “we go and compare a list of electors, we compare that to list of other polling booths and see who has been crossed off and hasn’t.

“It’s a manual process to see who has voted or who hasn't.”

There is good news for those not enrolled to vote; the AEC said it was “out of the question” for them to vote.

“If you rock up and try to vote we won’t find you on the list of electors,” they said.

- Polling booths are open from 8am-6pm.

— Go to aec.gov.au to find your nearest poling place or call 132326 (open all day tomorrow from 7).