Bunnings privacy breach facial recognition, no legal action or repercussions?

So, Wesfarmers has breached the serfs people's privacy and there is no 'remedy' for those affected?

The OAIC has founded Bunnings to have invaded the privacy of what is estimated to be hundreds of thousands of customers through the use of “intrusive” facial recognition cameras at 63 stores across Victoria and NSW. However, the retail giant has defended its use of the technology and fired back at the OAIC’s determination, with its managing director Mike Schneider.

Michael Schneider

Bunnings and many other retailers record your face, many BEFORE you even enter the store.

Keep in mind that the ability for a retailer to record a customer’s face and store that information is a no go zone. 

In Australia it is classified as 'sensitive information', which is illegal to collect without the subject's consent.

The OAIC (Office of the Australian Information Commissioner) said Bunnings did just that for a three-year period, invading the privacy of hundreds of thousands of customers.

So will there be a class action law suite against Wesfarmers and OTHER corporations?

Will the corrupt Anglo-Masonic judiciary be honest in their actions?

Constitutional expert Anne Twomey false information on the 'King of Australia'?

Anne Twomey is considered an expert on the colony’s Constitution, where her work is seen on her YouTube channel Constitutional Clarion.

So what happens to this professor if someone calls out her ‘inaccurate’/false/(deliberately?) misleading information?

First and foremost there is no such lawfully enacted entity as the ‘Queen of Australia’, period.

It may appear in legal documentation, but this is not proof that it is there ‘lawfully’.

The below Freedom of Information response shows a legal advice to the Prime Minister and Cabinets Office to update the Royal Style and Titles Act so as to create a new title for King Charles III to adopt in relation to Australia and its Territories. In a recent video of the Constitutional Clarion Professor Ann Twomey lays claim a title Act or amendment is not required for King Charles suggesting the King can effectively use the Queens title. The below advice clearly contradicts the video of Professor Twomey.

Source:constitutionwatch.com.au