Microsoft conned hundreds of millions into upgrade and still no court action?

Governments around the world are subservient or 'sympathetic' towards Big Data corporations.

After all that's where they get a lot of their information from.

Microsoft deceived its users into upgrading to Windows 10, a more thorough spyware tool for governments and Microsoft.

If privacy is a concern, the use of Microsoft products is not recommended.

See video:

The Nanny State agenda in full swing.

Australia’s corrupt legal system hears C-19 matter

A legal matter of state or national importance in relation to a so called government mandated jab, has an originating motion not within a court but a tribunal, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal to be exact, how pathetic.

To make matters worse, since state tribunals are not courts they cannot exercise judicial powers.

See link: https://constitutionwatch.com.au/state-tribunals-are-not-courts-and-cannot-exercise-judicial-powers/

Also, a tribunal cannot exercise power in a hearing and determining a complaint under a state Act.

See: https://constitutionwatch.com.au/no-jurisdiction-for-tribunal-to-exercise-judicial-power-in-hearing-and-determining-a-complaint-under-the-state-act/

A hearing was held within VCAT with regards to a woman obtaining a life saving heart operation which was denied by the Alfred Hospital in Melbourne for her not succumbing to obtain an injection that allegedly vaccinates the person against the disease called COVID-19.

This hearing was held in March 2023 over a few days from the 17th to the 21st, where it was also streamed via Zoom.

What about if one does not consent to one’s matter being streamed via Zoom for not just Australia to see, but the whole world?

No court reporters or mainstream media ‘advertising’ about such an important matter?

Well, to be fair, VCAT is not a court.

As one would be aware when the opposing parties sit at the bar table, they sprawl their paperwork over the area of their respective sides in order to put through their argument, before the ‘member’, the person they both consented to in hearing their arguments.

After a while humans need nourishment, where a lunch break, mandates a halt in the proceedings where the whole room is evacuated.

It is not out of the norm to leave one’s paperwork at the table, before vacating for a well deserved break.

That’s what one party did, whereas the other party packed up the documentation prior to exiting with it in a small luggage suitcase on wheels.

What happened next is quite odd, and definitely outside of the norm.

When the room was empty, after a few minutes, the member and her 'accomplice' went back into the room and started to sift through paperwork on the benches.

Why is it necessary to find some paperwork during a 'lunch break', where it cannot wait until everyone resumes?

Is there a document that was to be removed or referred to?

If this is a 'conspiracy theory' as some may suggest, then why cannot this document be referred with everyone present and most importantly 'on the record'?

After scurrying through the benches for whatever, the 'accomplice' then noticed that the camera was still 'rolling', where that problem as soon attended to.

What was the public not allowed to see?

Isn't this supposed to be a public matter, well and truly in the 'interest of the public'?

Will the mainstream media ever mention of this?

From what can be gathered on-line, the first time the mainstream media mentioned Ms Derderian was a couple of days ago, yet a hearing was a foot in March, and all the people heard was, crickets.

Australia’s corrupt medical system has blood on its hands?

Quite simply put, the hospital, that being the Alfred Hospital in Melbourne, that has refused a life saving operation for a mother of two, Vicki Derderian, aged 47 should be sued.

Not only that, but also the persons responsible for this decision should also be charged criminally, never to ‘practice’ medicine ever again.

The reason that Ms Derderian’s life is not being saved is stated by the hospital that it is because she has not taken a drug advertised as a COVID-19 ‘vaccine’.

Irrespective from which manufacturer, in Australia the drug that many persons have taken is not a ‘vaccine’.

For it to be a ‘vaccine’ the drug must confer immunity, which it does not.

See U.S. Supreme Court Document from the 4th of November 2021, within the link:

https://constitutionwatch.com.au/the-covid-19-injections-do-not-confer-immunity-and-therefore-do-not-meet-the-definition-of-a-vaccine/

It was distributed to the general population under EUA (Emergency Use Authorisation), where the general population’s data was part of the trial, as stated by the federal Health Minister Mr. Greg Hunt, on a government website on the 21st of February 2021.

See article: https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/interview-with-david-speers-on-abc-insiders-on-the-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

Even Israel was ‘surprised and disappointed’ that the drug did not stop transmission.

On the 5th of May 2023, the WHO stated that the so called virus is no longer a global health emergency.

See article: https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/05-05-2023-statement-on-the-fifteenth-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-pandemic

Please note of the internal Pfizer document leaks the mainstream media has deliberately mislead its 'consumers' by not drawing their attention to this.

Please also note the "How Bad is My Batch" database that effected people can refer to:

https://howbadismybatch.com

See article from last year, 8th of January 2022 by Reuters of the headline:

‘Paramount importance’: Judge orders FDA to hasten release of Pfizer vaccine docs

See (205MB) file, containing 51 pdfs: pd-production-040323.zip

Australia's corrupt medical system has full support of the corrupt 'brotherhood' (Anglo-Masonic, Fabian, etc) of the judicial system working against the general population as a whole.

Microsoft takes 5 years to fix Defender 'bug' should be in the courts

Microsoft not only should be in the courts for anti competitive behaviour but also fined for it.

Microsoft has (deliberately) not addressed a piece of code that was killing Firefox performance.

MANY people may have thought that Mozilla's Firefox product was inferior in quality to the alternative Microsoft product or that the programmers were lazy or incompetent.

The truth was that Microsoft was (deliberately) sabotaging Mozilla's product.

Too many calls to the Windows kernel were stealing Firefox's thunder.

Why it matters: Microsoft has released a crucial bug-fixing update to its Windows Defender antimalware application. Its arrival means that some unlucky Firefox users should now get a much smoother and better-performing experience while browsing the web.

Update (April 11): The Mozilla developer who worked on fixing this performance issue and reported it to Microsoft added the following on a Reddit thread, clarifying the nature of the bugfix:

"The impact of this fix is that on all computers that rely on Microsoft Defender's Real-time Protection feature (which is enabled by default in Windows), MsMpEng.exe will consume much less CPU than before when monitoring the dynamic behavior of any program through ETW (Event Tracing for Windows)."

"For Firefox this is particularly impactful because Firefox (not Defender!) relies a lot on VirtualProtect - which is monitored by MsMpEng.exe through ETW. We expect that on all these computers, MsMpEng.exe will consume around 75% less CPU than it did before when it is monitoring Firefox."

The original story follows below:

For more than five years, the security protection provided by Microsoft Defender was negatively affecting Firefox users during their web browsing sessions. The Antimalware Service Executable component of Defender (MsMpEng.exe) was acting strange, showing a high CPU usage when Firefox was running at the same time.

Users were complaining that Defender was stressing the CPU while the Mozilla browser became laggy and unresponsive. The issue was first reported 5 years ago, and it was seemingly a Firefox exclusive as it was sparing Edge and other third-party browsers like Chrome.

In March 2023, Mozilla developers were able to finally discover the source of the issue: Firefox relies and executes a very high number of calls to the OS kernel's VirtualProtect function while tracing Windows events (ETW). VirtualProtect is a function to change the "protection on a region of committed pages in the virtual address space of the calling process," Microsoft explains, and Defender was doing a lot of "useless computations" upon each event while Firefox was generating a lot of ETW events.

This was an "explosive" combination that was using five times the CPU power with Firefox compared to other browsers, the Mozilla developers said. The open-source foundation worked with Microsoft to solve the issue for good, and Redmond finally delivered with a recent update for Defender's antimalware engine (1.1.20200.2).

After testing the bugfix for a while, the solution was delivered to the stable channel with updated Defender anti-malware definitions on April 4 (mpengine.dll version 1.1.20200.4) and the bug was finally closed.

Mozilla developers said that the Defender update would provide a massive ~75% improvement in CPU usage from MsMpEng.exe while browsing the web with Firefox. With the fix, Defender's Real-time Protection feature - which is enabled by default in Windows - will consume less CPU than before when monitoring the dynamic behavior of any program through ETW.

Microsoft is also bringing the update to now obsolete Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 systems, as Firefox will keep supporting the two operating systems "at least" until 2024. Furthermore, Mozilla engineers said that the "latest discoveries" made while analyzing the weird Defender bug would help Firefox "go even further down in CPU usage," with all other antivirus software and not just Defender this time.