FORGET 'rules', FORGET CHO 'directions'!
Quite simply put, what lawfully enacted law by the Parliament of Victoria is in circulation that allows for discrimination of a human being or 'person', for the law experts, based on one's medical status?
We invite all readers to point to such an Act of parliament that has been lawfully enacted.
Apparently persons who have not been double jabbed with a trial drug* are not allowed to participate in society, or rather the 'economy', according to Daniel Michael Andrews.
So in essence you must (allegedly) meet a certain medial criteria, before you are allowed to participate in a business transaction.
Once again, what lawfully enacted Act of Parliament states this?
With your complicity in mind, you may say great, and get double jabbed.
But there's a problem with that.
The goal posts have been changed.
You will soon be required (by what lawfully enacted Act?) to have three jabs of a trial drug*, as mentioned by Andrews.
With all this happening:
- No 'constitutional' legal eagles are seeing alarm bells?
- No 'human rights' laws are being violated?
- No anti-discrimination laws are being thrown under a bus?
An absolute abhorrent state of affairs in this (penal) colony called Australia.
Medical apartheid at its finest.
Will the Australian New World Order puppets ever see Nuremberg?
NEVER!
* Trial drug:
No comments:
Post a Comment