Law passed in excess of power is no law at all

The people in the colony's federal and state parliaments are corrupt.

In MANY instances they act beyond the power that is given to them.

They put in law that they are not allowed to put into circulation lawfully, but they still do.

The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, sets the boundaries how the people in govenrment must act.

The official guide to the Constitution is a book written by Sirs John Quick and Robert Randolph Garran called The Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth, which is referred to in legal circles as the 'Quick and Garran', which is approx 1050 pages.

See scanned book:

Unfortunately many self professed 'constitutional experts' mistakenly call this book Australia's 'proper constitution'.

One such person that does this very vocally is Wayne Kenneth Glew as seen in the first 43 seconds of this video:

Mr. Glew holds up the book referred to as the 'Qucik and Garran' for short referring to it as the "proper constitution", which is a plain and simple lie.

In this book, there is a section on the Judicature and its interpretation on page 791, as seen in the above excerpt. 

Paying attention to the last paragraph, the following is stated:

The Fedral Parliament and the State Parliaments are not soverign bodies; they are legislatures with limited powers, and any law which they attempt to pass in excess of those powers is no law at all it is simply a nullity, entitled to no obedience.

The so called law passed during COVID-19 is just one example.

Queensland's demolition of the Upper House is another.

Are the current 'hate speech' laws put into circulation in excess of power of the parliament?