The colony's police forces are corrupt, that just plain and simple.
They do not act honourably a lot of the time and criminally on too many occasions.
It's really up to the public to catch them out and take them to court, but the problem is that the officers rarely pay out of their own pocket but rather the tax payers are slugged with any compensation payouts.
"The system is broken" is a deliberately false narrative, where it's actually functioning quite perfectly, the way the lawmakers have set it up.
The Anglo-Masonic set-up legal system looks after its own making it deliberately difficult and expensive for the general population to claim any wrong doing by the police.
IF police were to pay out of their own pockets like the plebs do then there would a a whole lot less if not ZERO police corruption.
The mainstream only reports what they are allowed to and not nearly enough of what really goes on.
In any event this is one story the public is allowed to know about:
He’s a tradie and she sells booze online. But this ordinary couple are stuck on a secret watchlist typically reserved for gangsters until 2038.
A suburban couple have claimed in court that a NSW Police officer helped “fabricate” a domestic violence complaint that spiralled into them being placed on a secret watchlist.
Jarrod and Kathleen Davies claim a “trumped-up” apprehended domestic violence order (ADVO) was levelled against Jarrod after he had first reported an alleged assault on his gravely ill father in early 2023.
It is alleged in a statement of claim before the NSW Supreme Court that a policeman assisted Mr Davies’ relative – who was accused of the assault – to then create a false DV complaint against Jarrod.
More than 100 text messages and calls lasting up to 45 minutes were exchanged between the cop and the relative – who are also related to each other – in the days after the assault allegation in February 2023, the Davies’ lawsuit claims.
Ms Davies, who runs a boutique alcohol business, and her husband, who works in transport for the construction industry, claim they were later placed under surveillance and labelled “violent, dangerous and paranoid” by police as they tried to clear their names.
The Sydney couple were put on a watchlist until 2038, when they would be in their mid-60s, which they believe has seen their passports flagged at airports.
“This has taken a huge toll on both of us – financially and mentally – and now it’s even affecting our ability to travel internationally,” Mr Davies told news.com.au.
They have sued the State of NSW for misfeasance in public office and private nuisance in their suit filed last month.
NSW Police said it was unable to provide any comment as the matter was before the court.
‘Distress, humiliation’
It comes 18 months after news.com.au first reported the Davies’ claims, revealing their incredulity at being probed by the State Intelligence Command – which usually focuses on high-level and organised crime – despite having no criminal record.
The Davies have sought aggravated damages and claim they suffered psychological injury and economic loss as a result of the police attention on them.
“The plaintiffs have suffered distress, humiliation and nervous shock knowing that they are the subject of an intelligence report suggesting that they have been violent and/or threatening to police and are paranoid, when in fact that is not the case,” their lawsuit states.
The person they alleged assaulted Mr Davies’ father Max had an ADVO taken out against them in February 2023 before it was dropped in April of that year. No charges were laid.
Mr Davies’ ADVO was also laid in February 2023 and dropped seven months later, but not before he was also accused of possessing an illegal firearm, which was never located.
He was not charged but still lost the firearms license he had held without incident for decades, something he was fighting to have reinstated almost three years later.
The statement of claim alleges the police officer “assisted his (family member) in the fabrication of a complaint supporting an application for an ADVO against” Mr Davies.
The couple claims this was done with “reckless indifference to the identified harm likely to ensue to the plaintiffs”, their lawsuit states.
Having spent hundreds of thousands defending themselves in court already, they launched a GoFundMe page to assist in financing their lawsuit.
Treated with ‘contempt’
Court documents seen by news.com.au claim the Revesby couple’s lawyers were sent an email from another senior police officer in May 2023 stating no investigation into complaints about the first officer was warranted.
An internal State Intelligence Command report was also created detailing the “perceived threat” the Davies posed to police, describing their “fixation” and “paranoia”.
It cited their decision to install CCTV cameras at their property and a sign stating police did not have permission to enter their land as evidence of those assertions.
“They have taken numerous actions in furtherance of their paranoia,” the report states.
Ms Davies has claimed in court documents to have seen the first police officer “driving slowly” past their house on more than one occasion, and captured CCTV footage of a police vehicle marked as belonging to the gang-busting Raptor Squad parked in their driveway.
These alleged incidents have been cited in the couple’s claims for public nuisance.
Ms Davies told news.com.au she “tried every avenue” to raise concerns at their treatment but “instead of help, we’ve been treated with absolute contempt”.
“It’s disturbing that two Australian-born, middle-aged, law-abiding small business owners with no criminal history or links to terrorism, extremism or violence can be monitored for years, while genuine threats appear to evade that level of scrutiny,” she said.
The matter is due to be first heard in court in May.
Source: News Corp Australia
No comments:
Post a Comment