21 April 2016

Experts warn of fraud, lost cards and ‘card clash’ as contactless payments for travel is rolled out

IT’S been heralded as an Australian first making life easier for the travelling public. 

But fraud experts have warned commuters that the price to pay for being able to tap on and off with their bank cards, rather than smartcards like Opal, could be high.

While transport bosses have warned that there’s the real risk passengers could be charged twice if they tap on wrong in future. A spike in lost cards is also, well, on the cards.

On Monday, NSW Transport Minister Andrew Constance, said a contactless payment trial would begin in 2017 which could see people ditching their Opal cards forever.

Similar to smartcards, passengers will tap on at the barriers but with their debit or credit cards, with the fare deducted directly from their bank account. There will be no need to top up ever again.

“Contactless payment with credit and debit cards would offer customers another easy to use and convenient option for travelling,” Mr Constance said.

The campaign in London to warn customers not to place their bank cards and smart cards in the same place. Picture: Supplied.
The campaign in London to warn customers not to place their bank cards and smart cards in the same place. Picture: Supplied.Source:Supplied

CARD CLASH

London is a pioneer of smartcard systems, introducing the Oyster card in 2003. In 2014, Londoners began tapping on and off with bank cards with 25 per cent of journeys, or more than a million each day, now paid for via debit and credit cards.

However, the transition has not been without its problems and has even led to a whole new word entering the lexicon of Londoners — “card clash”.

Speaking in Sydney on Monday at the Future Transport Summit, Transport for London’s Director of Customer Experience, Shashi Verma, said the city’s transport authority had to educate customers to not fall victim to card clash.

“We had to warn customers to keep their debit card separate from their Oyster cards because, if you don’t do that, there is the slight possibility that you might be charged on the wrong card,” he said.

The problem arises because if a passenger keeps all their cards together, and places their whole wallet or purse above the reader, they could tap on with one card and then tap off with another.

Alternatively, people with multiple bank cards have found the fare deducted from the wrong one.

In the August 2014 run up to the official launch of contactless payments in London it was estimated some 2000 transactions every day were occurring on bank cards without the knowledge of travellers who thought they were using their Oyster cards, reported the London Evening Standard.

In some cases, Londoners have even taking to wrapping the card they don’t want to use in tin foil to prevent it from being accidentally charged.

Mr Verma said it was important to be on the front foot to avoid angry commuters and London’s card clash campaign had “worked out very successfully”.

Opal card turnstiles at Gosford that will soon accept bank cards. Picture: Peter Clark
Opal card turnstiles at Gosford that will soon accept bank cards. Picture: Peter ClarkSource:News Corp Australia

LOST CARDS

But don’t tell that to the public transport users who, in an attempt to avoid card clash, then lost their cards altogether.

In February 2015, it was revealed more than 2000 lost smart and bank cards were handed into London Underground and rail stations every month following the introduction of contactless payments.

The Mirror reported that in the entire year before contactless cards only one month had seen more than 2000 cards handed in and much of the time the figure was less than 1000.

It appeared, that in the panic to tap on with the right piece of plastic, Londoners were doing a quick card shuffle before they reached the barriers and scattering the whole lot across the station floor losing some in the process.

But a far more concerning worry is fraud.

CEO of FraudWatch International, Trent Youl, told news.com.au the extra handling of bank cards could leave people vulnerable.

“Since contactless payments have become the norm, there has been an increase in physical credit card theft.

“If public transport, which is used by so many people, is added to the uses for contactless payments, one might expect that physical credit card theft may continue to rise.”

Matt Cole, President of Cubic Transportation Systems, which runs NSW’s Opal ticketing system.

Matt Cole, President of Cubic Transportation Systems, which runs NSW’s Opal ticketing system.Source:News Corp Australia

HACKED

Even keeping hold of their cards might not be enough, he said, if personal bank data is hacked from transport databases.

“The consumer can do nothing to prevent this from occurring, and just using this type of system once will ensure their credit card details are stored within a database for an unknown period of time.

“It is highly likely that a holder of a large amount of consumer’s credit card details will be a major target for online attack, and in this day and age, one can almost assume that this type of database will be breached at some point,” said Mr Youl.

The President of US based Cubic Transportation Systems, Matt Cole, which runs the Opal system, said Australians were already using their bank cards to tap on and off. In fact, data from London shows Australian issued bank cards are second only to UK cards when it comes to entering the Underground.

He disagreed that using bank cards led to a new security concerns.

“There’s certain security measures you have to go through to provide protection to a system that accepts credit and debit cards.

“But that’s no different to a smart card system where you can add value to a card like an Opal, so much of those security requirements already exist,” said Mr Cole.

“Essentially what you’re doing is changing the location of that transaction from the web or vending machine to the turnstile itself.”

A spokeswoman for Transport for NSW told news.com.au that commuters would continue to be able to choose between Opal or bank cards and a contactless rollout would include a “comprehensive customer information campaign” on the use of credit or debit cards when travelling.

“A lot of critical work needs to be undertaken in the first stage of this project such as finalising partnerships, working with the finance and contactless payments sector, developing the software and then in 2017, undertaking a customer trial,” she said.

“Transport for NSW takes data security very seriously and will work with the finance and contactless payments sectors to implement rigorous industry standards on system security.”

benedict.brook@news.com.au

It is also important to note the video from MuthBusters who were banned from talking about RFID chip used by VISA and American Express.


See video at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cs4I-hURT7A

20 April 2016

Mass surveillance via transport system


What the majority of the general populous does not comprehend is that in 'law', Australia is still a penal colony of good ol' mother England.

Sure you can be a millionaire, enjoy the tropics of the Whitsundays, be a mining magnate and send your tax free profits to occupied land overseas to build compounds for illegal settlers, be a billionaire, or even (the best part about it) leave this colony also known as a continent.

Once you're on this continent though you're considered a criminal at law that has to prove one's innocence despite what you are told to believe, being the catch phrase "innocent until proven guilty".

Australian law follows Roman law, where strict and absolute liability is in force.

Got any doubts?

Just look at you local court list where a matter of an alleged parking fine or speeding fine has occurred it is listed as a criminal matter.

But alas that is a digression.

The 'authorities' on this prison isle are about mass surveillance and control of movements of the general populous, as you do in a penal colony.

In older styles of trans-'port' (between ports) travel registration, the likes of paper tickets, the movements of the plebs was relatively anonymous. 

Irrespective of digital surveillance technology implementation, the movements are still relatively anonymous through the newer generation of ticketing systems, like Opal in NSW or Myki in Victoria, where the traveler could purchase credits anonymously, meaning the 'name' was not linked to the card.

So in order to log the pleb's travels, the authorities made a nice and simple package marketing ease of use, or what ever other advantages to use one's credit card.

Many people still today do not use credit cards.

Is this a way of the 'authorities' forcing the plebs to use technology that logs their travels?

As we should know credit companies give out their database to whoever gives them the required monies. It's not rocket medicine.

REMEMBER : THIS IS A "CONSPIRACY THEORY 
and all this technology is for YOUR benefit and  ease of use.

See article from 18 April 2016 from news.com.au for the headline:

NSW Government to trial using bank cards to tap on and off transport system

Soon you’ll be able to catch a train or bus with your bank card. Picture: Peter Clark

IT SOUNDS innocuous enough but an announcement on Monday of a trial using bank cards to tap on and off Sydney’s transport system could lead smartcards — such as Opal, Myki and Go — to become as quaint and old fashioned as cheques, just a few years after they were introduced.

As heralded by news.com.au in December, from 2017 Transport for NSW will allow passengers to use contactless credit and debit cards to pay for public transport meaning they can ditch their opal cards all together.

Similar to smartcards, passengers will tap on at the barriers with their debit card but the fare will be deducted directly from their bank account meaning there will be no need to top up ever again.

However, commuters outside of NSW will have a long wait for the new technology with smartcards likely to hang around until near the end of the decade in Melbourne, Brisbane and other major cities.

NSW Transport Minister Andrew Constance, who made the announcement at the Future Transport Summit in Sydney on Monday morning, said the trial was an Australian first.

“Only a few major mass transit systems, similar in scale and complexity to Sydney’s, have introduced contactless payments,” Mr Constance said.

“Contactless payment with credit and debit cards would offer customers another easy to use and convenient option for travelling.”

The first trials will take place in 2017 after new software has been installed in the current system — likely to be a not inexpensive process.

The current Opal card system cost $1.2 billion to install and followed a tortured earlier attempt at a smartcard, called Tcard, which was eventually abandoned.

In London, where contactless payments were introduced in 2014, more than 25 per cent of passengers — or more than a million people a day — have given up their smartcards for their credit card.

Is the Myki system able to be converted to allow using bank cards?
Is the Myki system able to be converted to allow using bank cards?

In December, the head of global payments giant MasterCard’s ‘transit centre of excellence’, Will Judge, who was previously involved in London’s Oyster smartcard, told news.com.au, NSW was in the box seat when it came to the next leap in ticket technology.

“We believe that Transport for NSW took some wise decisions in equipment they purchased that seemed to suggest they had an eye to the future,” said Mr Judge.

Transport systems needed to be easy to use or people will choose to drive instead, he said.

“How can you stop the thought process of someone going, ‘I’m in a hurry, I’d like to get on that bus, can I get a ticket in that shop over there and will the bus still be there when I get back?’ to a much more spontaneous, ‘Great there’s a bus, I’ve got something in my pocket I can pay with, I just get on, tap and ride it’.”

Using bank cards has another benefit — the card you use to tap on in Sydney you can use to tap off in London saving people from a wallet full of different smartcards.

However, those outside of the emerald city may have a long wait to get their own trial.

Neither south east Queensland’s $140 million Go Card system or Public Transport Victoria’s [PTV] bespoke $1.3 billion Myki system, both of which went live in 2008, are unlikely to be able to make the change any time soon.

The technology they run off was introduced years earlier than Opal and, as such, is significantly older.

A spokesman for PTV told news.com.au they were in the midst of a tender process to contract a provider to operate the existing Myki system.

“Our main focus is the continuity of ticketing services but the chosen vendor must have the capability to identify and deliver future technologies that support service improvements and revenue growth,” the spokesman said.

News.com.au has contacted Queensland’s transport authority to ask when a bank card trial, similar to Sydney, was likely to happen.

Last month, news.com.au revealed that NSW transport bosses were working on a single-use Opal card that will see single and return paper ticket finally consigned to the history books.

Despite Monday’s announcement being an Australian first, in London passengers are beginning to pay for travel with their mobile phones, banishing their bank cards altogether.
Comments on this story

19 April 2016

Australia to play leading role in new world order

Lord Howell pushes for strengthening of Commonwealth, tips Australia to play leading role in new world order.

Could Australia take a lead role in the new world order? Picture: istock
CHARLES MIRANDA in LondonNews Corp Australia Network
 
AUSTRALIA is in a unique position to take a lead in the emerging new world order with its wealth, relative political stability and ‘old networks’ propelling it to strategic strength in an unsettled world.
That’s the view of senior House of Lords figure and one-time Minister of State (Foreign and Commonwealth Office) Lord Howell who has proposed a strengthening of the Commonwealth to reflect changing times.

But his belief Australia could have a leading role to play in the league of nations comes amid a debate in the British parliament on new visa laws set to see low earning Australians deported and tougher restrictions to stymie new migrants wanting to come into the UK.

Speaking on the eve of Commonwealth Day on Monday, where the Queen will lead celebrations at Westminster Abbey, Lord Howell said in an unsettled world the league of 53 nations had added importance particularly as a bloc to fight jihadism.

Australia becoming a republic has been a hot topic of discussion in recent months, but staying with the Queen and the Commonwealth. Picture: ADavidson/GoffPhotos.com.
Australia becoming a republic has been a hot topic of discussion in recent months, but staying with the Queen and the Commonwealth. Picture: ADavidson/GoffPhotos.com.Source:Picture Media

He said it should no longer be considered a “club of past affairs” but rather an ideal platform for future, on issues such as trade, security and tackling jihad, particularly in countries like Nigeria.

But he said Australia was in the box seat as a rising power in Asia to drive that influence and expansion that could only aid the UK doing business in that region.

“My sense is Australia feels the value of the growing Commonwealth network as never before,” he told a Commonwealth briefing at Buckingham Palace yesterday.

“The issue is how Australia fits into the rising new trade patterns of the world which now favours the Commonwealth.

“A place like Perth in Western Australia looking at the Indian Ocean is really becoming something of the centre of the world, rather than an outside part of the world, as is the other side of the country facing the southern Pacific as well.”

He added: “Its no longer the Anglocentric system of the history, although its true the Queen as head of it is here, this is a network and Australia is a key part of it.”

His words came as in the House of Commons, MPs were lining up to condemn plans by the Government to next month introduce the first of a tranche of new laws designed to reduce migrant intake from countries outside the EU.

Proposed laws would see Australians on low wages in the UK sent home. Picture: istock
Proposed laws would see Australians on low wages in the UK sent home. Picture: istockSource:Supplied

An e-petition of more than 100,000 signatures from the public prompted the debate during the week condemning moves for potential new skilled migrants to have to earn 30,000 pounds (about AUD $60,000) minimum in the UK to migrate.

The average salary in the UK is 26,500 pounds and the Government wants to use higher salary thresholds to prioritise higher value, skilled migrants within the Tier 2 visa route.

Some MPs who spoke to the bill said plans to deport those earning less was “crude” and “ludicrous” and had caused confusion and uncertainty and could create a skills shortage in the UK.

Under new rules companies would also have to pay a surcharge to employ a non-EU migrant. The government is yet to speak on the bill.

 news.com.au 11 Mar 2016

Maybe  model for Australia to send back low paid migrants back to where they came from.

16 April 2016

Hansard altered - Can you really trust the Australian government?

The Australian government has been busted altering an official government record called a 'hansard'.

When referring to Acts, Bills etc and the rule of law, parliamentary documents called hansards are also referred to.

Since it has come out into the public arena that in this instance the hansard was altered, in relation to Barnaby Joyce's activities, what assurance have the people of Australia got that the hansards are true and correct with respect to the many other Acts passed through parliament.

The short answer none.

Now what 'should' happen is the people responsible to be criminally charged, but anyone who knows anything about the law will know nothing will happen, as these people are above the law.

See excerpt from the Herald Sun article of 16 April 2016:





15 April 2016

Victoria Police is about beating you 'sensless' - re Corinna Horvath

This is just one example of police brutality, where the victim went all the way (in the legal sense), that being to the UN Human Rights Committee.

Are the police really all about beating you 'senseless'  ??? !!! ???

Just a reminder:

  • Victoria Police are not there for your 'protection'.
  • Victoria Police are not your 'friend'
  • Victoria Police are not 'public servants' - they are employees of a corporation.
  • You do not have to give any other information to police other than your name and address. Your date of birth is not required by 'law', even though they may claim so.
  • You do not have to say anything else to police, meaning you have the right not to self incriminate.
  • Police lie, produce false statements and witnesses in court without any repercussions.
  • Record ALL interactions with police, with the added backup of to the 'cloud'. 
  • In your matter if the 'magistrate' errs in law obtain forms for a Judicial Review.

Horvath v Australia (HRC, 2014)

Violations: ICCPR art 2(3)
Partially remedied



In 1996, 21-year-old Corinna Horvath was assaulted by police during an unlawful raid on her Melbourne home. Her nose was broken and a tooth chipped. She was hospitalised for 5 days.

In 2001, Ms Horvath won a civil case at the County Court. After 40 days of evidence, the judge found police had committed trespass, assault, unlawful arrest and false imprisonment and awarded Ms Horvath $143,525 in compensation. This amount was reduced on appeal and Ms Horvath was denied leave to appeal to the High Court.

In Victoria, individual police officers, rather than the State, are liable to pay damages for unlawful conduct. Where a police officer is unable to pay, the victim can go uncompensated. Further, none of the police involved has been disciplined or prosecuted by the State. Ms Horvath seeks adequate compensation and effective discipline of the police officers involved.

In 2014, the UN Human Rights Committee found that Ms Horvath's right to an effective remedy was violated, in relation to the cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, arbitrary arrest and detention to which she was subjected, and the interference with her home and privacy. The Committee recommended legislative reform in Victoria and adequate compensation for Ms Horvath.

Partial remedy in record time!

On 19 September 2014, Corinna Horvath obtained an individual remedy some 5 months after the UN found her rights had been violated and that she should be compensated. Ms Horvath received a written apology from the Victorian Police Commissioner and an ex gratia payment as compensation for the violent assault on her by police in 1996.

Congratulations to Ms Horvath and her legal team. Thank you to everyone who campaigned for her right to an effective remedy.

However, there is more to be done. The UN Human Rights Committee found that Australia "is also under an obligation to take steps to prevent similar violations occurring in future" by means of law reform "to ensure its conformity with the requirements of the Covenant."

Act on the Horvath case now: Sign this super-quick letter to the federal Attorney-General and the Premier of Victoria.

The events in question:

Corinna Horvath and her partner, Craig Love, had friends David and Colleen and their two boys over for a barbecue one Saturday afternoon in 1996. At about 9:40pm, two police officers knocked on the door wanting to inspect her unroadworthy car for evidence it had recently been driven, contrary to police instruction. Ms Horvath refused and asked them to leave. A scuffle ensued, in which the police claim they were assaulted by Horvath and Love, but a County Court judge found that Horvath and Love had 'used no more force than was necessary' to prevent the police trespassing on their property. The police left and called for reinforcements.

At 10:30pm, 5 police cars arrived and 8 policemen got out and surrounded the house. One of the police ‘yelled … in a loud and aggressive voice’ that the occupants should open the door, as they intended to make an arrest. The occupants refused, asking for evidence of a warrant. The officer replied that they did not need one. One of the officers then kicked open the front door ‘with great and sudden force’, striking Ms Horvath's friend David in the face with the door, causing injury and constituting an assault.

This same officer then entered the house, ‘pursued David … brought him to the floor and, in the course of so doing, struck him on the right side of the head and hit him at least once with a baton across his lower back.’ Another police officer then informed the first that David was not the man they sought to arrest.

The first officer then entered the lounge room where he tackled Ms Horvath to the floor, then 'brutally and unnecessarily' punched her in the face up to a dozen times, thereby 'rendering her senseless'. Ms Horvath has no recollection of this assault. She suffered a broken nose and chipped tooth, bruising and scratches to her face and body. Two officers then handcuffed her 'in a manner that restricted her from reducing the pain and blood flow from her nose or otherwise relieving her injuries' and dragged her to their divvy van. Meanwhile, her friend Colleen was forced to the floor and held there with a knee in her back. Ms Horvath and Mr Love were both arrested and taken away by police.
Ms Horvath, admitted to hospital a week after the assault (photo by her mum)
Ms Horvath was 'not provided with immediate medical treatment' in police custody, but instead 'left screaming in pain in [a] cell'. She was 'eventually discovered by a police doctor who contacted her parents', who called an ambulance. She was released from custody at about 12:20am and taken to hospital for emergency treatment.

A week later, Ms Horvath returned to hospital and was admitted for 5 days, requiring surgery to repair her facial injuries. She is left with scars on her nose and has been treated for anxiety and depression arising from the assault.
Ms Horvath, admitted to hospital a week after the assault (photo by her mum)


You can obtain the pdf on the UN - HRC decision at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B21_coIgIYu2M18yTHdQYTZiSUU/view?usp=sharing

remedy.org.au

14 April 2016

Australia - The Zombie Nation

There is much ado about nothing in many social media circles with relation to people standing up for their rights against the corrupt and criminal actions of people in a place of business called the "Australian Government".

Every single day the people have fraud committed against them by the very people that are allegedly governing the nation on the people's behalf.

This fraud and corruption is worth literally billions of dollars annually.

So what are the people doing about it?

Literally nothing.

The herd populace is too busy.

Too busy doing what exactly?

Well there's a plethora of reality TV to keep one addicted and put in one's place (on the couch).

Then there's the footy season to keep the 'Simpletons' with one beer in hand and remote in the other glued to the idiot box.

Not to mention all these other distractions the keep the plebs squabbling among each other, drawing away the attention from your right being eroded right before your eyes with draconian laws 'enforced' on the plebs.

There are many ways to gauge the 'health' of the people of a nation.

One way recently was used by researchers by studying the shopping habits of the general populous.

There they saw that "Much of our daily life involves habitual autopilot behaviour".


They also saw that when in that mindset people crave faster and simpler service interactions.

Since figuring out who and how "we" are being oppressed requires one to step out of the "autopilot behaviour" the oppressors can keep oppressing.

So when is this going to change?

11 April 2016

Hacking offences - an assault on the people

Let's put to the side the actual legitimacy of the laws that the current government put in place.

According to the Australian Institute of Criminology a 'hacker' can literally be anyone involved in the computer industry.

The paper put out by the company commonly referred to as the Australian Government states that a 'hacker' can be a person:

  • who explores programmable systems,
(we want to know how Windows  10 works 'cause we hate the 'Start' menu).*
  •  who is obsessive about programming,
(we really need to know how to get this app up and running for the work deadline).*
  •  who is able to program quickly, or 
(we finished this app in 3 days and told our employer it would take 7... hehehe).*
  •  is an expert in a particular program.
(we really love MS Excel 2016 (v16) and know ALL the features).*

More generally:

  • an expert enthusiast,
(we have perfected the art of being an enthusiast in tegestology).*
  •  one who enjoys creatively overcoming limitations, or 
(we have found a new way of overcoming the limitations of our large intestine).*
  •  a malicious meddler seeking confidential information.
(we need to obtain the 'colour of law' for court purposes in relation to our alleged 'speeding fine' matter).*

See how whatever little rights you have on this penal colony have been degraded with these unlawfully enacted laws.


Original source at:

http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/publications/htcb/htcb005.pdf

or alternative download at:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B21_coIgIYu2WFh6eXFsMmFZZmc/view?usp=sharing


Since Australia is still a penal colony, the laws are reflective of this. 


- Oops, that's a bit of a bugger, the administration of this penal colony classifies us as a 'hacker'?

09 April 2016

Governor General not legitimately employed

Letter to Turnbull from senior law researcher says Governor General not legitimately employed

Dear Prime Minister,

Writing to you appears to be a waste of time, but nonetheless I think you should listen to what I am about to tell you. In 1965 without a referendum as prescribed by S 128 Constitution the Parliament of the Commonwealth introduced Decimal Currency. In 1966 without a referendum courts of Judicature were abolished in Bankruptcy jurisdiction and Star Chambers introduced at the option of a Judge. ( S 30 (3) Bankruptcy Act 1966. One David John Walter of Herberton Queensland has been made Bankrupt in one of these Star Chambers probably by a Registrar. He says he cannot be made bankrupt for a Costs Order expressed in Australian Dollars. S 3 Australian Constitution, prescribes the Salary of the Governor General SHALL by paid in pounds.


Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and wife Lucy, arrive at Kinselas to enjoy the Sydney mardi gras parade. 

Picture: Kristi Miller, Source:News Corp Australia

Since the Salary of the Governor General has not been paid in Pounds, since 1966, he argues that the Governor General has not been legitimately employed, and the whole system of Government has become corrupted by this error. He argues that NO Legislation since 1966 has been legitimately approved by any Governor General because none of them have been paid in legitimate currency. Notwithstanding that, the fraud industry in Bankruptcy must be addressed. I have been pushing for this since 1993, and made a vexatious litigant for continuing to do so. Telling the truth is vexatious to some.

David John Walter tried to have the Federal Court of Australia Judicially Review the possession order against him issued by a Star Chamber in Queensland. A State Star Chamber and the Federal Court of Australia says they have no jurisdiction to do so. You should get an Officer of the Australian Federal Police to attend the Brisbane Registry of the Federal Court of Australia and point out to them that S 39B 1A (b) Judiciary Act 1903 written in the language of the Law, English, gives them original jurisdiction to entertain this Appeal under S 2 Judiciary Act 1903. The definition of appeal is also written in English.

By claiming No Jurisdiction the Federal Court of Australia has offended S 43 Crimes Act 1914, ( Cth). A measure introduced in 1914 and tested in the High Court in 1915, in Kidman V The King, to guarantee the integrity of courts of Judicature. This is what the Australian Federal Police Officer should point out and advise that this law is still in force, and has been increased to impose ten years jail on an offender. I am aware that the fertiliser will hit the ventilator over this. However I would advise a referendum to normalise the currency before embarking on the adventure of a Double Dissolution. Due to this endemic corruption I am dependent on the Age Pension. I should be a very wealthy man. Along with millions of others. I am very frightened of its ramifications, but no one should have to endure what I and David John Walter have had to put up with.

Kind regards

Peter Alexander Gargan



cairnsnews.org 7 April 2016

08 April 2016

Taking fees under pretext of being officer sheriff

Is someone who calls themselves the 'sheriff' extorting cash from you?

Is this person in office of the sheriff legally taking away your possessions?

If they're not legitimate you may have a course of action if you live in Victoria.

One of your remedies may be contained within a law (read Act) called the Supreme Court Act (1958) Vic, Section 183.

See illustration below:

The Supreme Court Act [1958] Vic, difficult to obtain(?), easy to read.

You can download a copy from:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B21_coIgIYu2MmFia2YyRXQzcFk/view?usp=sharing

or alternatively from Austlii at:

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/hist_act/sca1958183.pdf

07 April 2016

Infringements Court - What exactly is it?

Many Victorians may have received a fine from a place purported to be the 'Infringements Court'.

For those new to law, the 'main' points that one should note are:


  • That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction, are illegal and void.

as from a document called the Bill of Rights (1689) and not from the Imperial Acts Application Act (1980) Sect 8.

See link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B21_coIgIYu2RG9udU1CaURRLTQ/view?usp=sharing

  • ALL Australian courts must be constituted, have their Act, and be a premises where adversary law is applied, i.e. applicant, defendant and judge.
Can you find the "Infringements Court Act"?
  • ALL Australian Courts must be in line with (Chapter III of) the Australian 'Constitution'. 

The Australian 'Constitution' is contained within a (U.K) document called An Act to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900, from Section 9 onwards.

See link: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B21_coIgIYu2blVRSkVidDRiTU0


The 'Infringements Court' is a computer.



Well, that's not entirely accurate....

It's actually 3 computers with people operating them who are NOT sworn officers of the Supreme Court or Magistrates' Court of Victoria.

Ask for them by name.

According to the Victorian government (www.vic.gov.au) the current address for the 'Infringements Court' is:

Ground Floor
227 William St.
Melbourne
Victoria 3000.

Ref: http://www.vic.gov.au/contactsandservices/directory/?ea0_lfz149_120.&organizationalUnit&56b18a19-0025-4945-83f5-0bdec109d21f





So, go there and ask for the judge who ruled with respect to your 'fine' where had your opportunity to defend yourself against your adversary, presenting ALL the evidence before the judge.

Ask for the judge's name, again.

Just to 'notify' them (a requirement in law to be 3 times), a third time to give the name of the judge who rule 'ex-parte' with regards to your matter.

Make no mistake about it, the government is enacting fraud, deceit and extortion against your person with regards to your (alleged) fine.

How can you really 'trust' these people??? !!! ???

If you have a so called 'warrant' against your 'Natural Person' from an (alleged) sheriff (Brendan Facey), then that's also unlawful, and subject to criminal actions, but that's another post or dozen.

Do not think the government will stop, YOU must take action in your matter.