01 September 2017

Police committing fraud and other criminal actions against Victorian motorists every single day

Victoria Police are committing criminal activities against Melbourne drivers every single day and they're getting away with literally 'highway robbery'.

So how does one deal with the situation?

Like one would with a 'common' criminal.

  • Make the allegation in the appropriate forum,
  •  Refer to the relevant sections of law,
  •  Seek a 'remedy', for harm against your 'person'.
It's that easy right?

One aspect that some people may overlook is that fines are literally unlawful, unless before a 'court' (of competent jurisdiction), where that also presents some difficulties for those in charge of this so called court.

The 'problem' is that you have to call it, i.e. comprehend the proper due process of lawfully enacted laws and document the (many) points of failure along the way.

One 'law' that is being relied upon with regards to your 'fine' is the unlawfully enacted Melbourne City Link Act 1995. All you have to do is prove it, that's all, along with the other 'failures' of government along the way.

Other laws you may want to refer to could be; 

Victoria Police Act 2013, Infringements Act 2006, Constitution Act 1975, Royal Style and Titles Act 1973, Australia Act 1986, and the Act of which ever court you're appearing in, e.g. Magistrates' Court Act 1989, Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900, 

just to name a few as there are plenty more depending how thoroughly you wish to expose the corruption and fraud of the people in 'government'.




You have already been 'fined' once, and then you are the proud recipient of another 'harsh and unreasonable penalty' on the second and third day for an alleged offence that occurred once.

For those who are familiar with the correct due process of law, there are many other aspects (deliberately) omitted in this post, as this post is not designed to provide a complete solution to the fraud that Victoria Police are committing together with Transurban and other agencies along the way including but not limited to;

- CCV (Civic Compliance Victoria), 
- DoJ&R (Department of Justice and Regulation),
- Magistrates' Court of Victoria,
- Sheriff's Office Victoria (or whatever other name / logo they go by in whichever year),
- Supreme Court of Victoria.

EVERY SINGLE (alleged) 'fine' MUST BE CONTESTED !

Will YOU let them get away with criminal activity against your 'person' ???

30 August 2017

Telstra allows fraud against your person's name


The bane of Australia's information and communications technology is Telstra.

A private company which is in charge of the Australian peoples communication infrastructure.

Why is it the "Australian peoples"?

Because the people payed for it (via their taxes), where it was unlawfully taken over by the private sector, but that is another matter for a dozen posts or so.

Telstra has stifled competition, by not allowing other companies to access the infrastructure already payed for by the Australian people.

An all too common 'problem' is that in 2017 in a 'new' suburb of a capital city, a household may not be able to get;

- the advertised internet speeds,
- internet from the competition, as Telstra has (deliberately) not allocated enough slots,
- any internet (landline) connection at all.

Telstra employs a 'low quality' migrant workforce which is based on a cheap (dollars per hour) cost rather than employing a (plentiful) skilled 'Australian' workforce.

Once the low quality workers stuff up the work, Telstra then gets another 'resource' to fix the problem, which comes at a cost to the customer. In effect work that did not need to be re-done if the correct resource was used in the first place.


Telstra has sacked many good workers only to replace them with cheap overseas outsourced labour, in questionable IT 'datacentres', with very low regards to privacy or customer data security.

At the end of the day, the shareholders, customers and 'mums and dads investors' pay for the incompetence of Telstra's management.

If you have been hacked as a result of Telstra's negligence we recommend you sue Telstra.


The results of these appalling business practices have been loosely touched on by the mainstream media in an article of the headline;

Mobile porting: Illegal hack 'happening more than we know'



One Telstra customer had her Telstra number stolen four time and the telco’s response was futile. Picture: Claudia Baxter

WHEN Katie Fletcher had her mobile number stolen and ported to a different carrier she knew it was bad news, but she didn’t necessarily expect it would lead to her friends having thousands of dollars drained from their bank accounts.

Ms Fletcher, 30, who works in Sydney and lives on the central coast has had her Telstra number illegally ported an astonishing four times in the past 18 months.

After stealing her number, hackers were able to gain access to her e-mails and from there collect personal details of her contacts and begin hacking their accounts. She believes a huge number of her friend’s personal accounts were hacked stemming from her number being ported.


“I stopped counting when I got to 33,” she told news.com.au.

Each time her own bank account was compromised, Commonwealth Bank stopped the offender from withdrawing money but some of her friends weren’t so lucky and had up to “thirty or forty thousand dollars drained from their accounts” which took months to get back, she said.

With telcos failing to adequately defend against unauthorised porting, cyber criminals are using the simple trick to steal people’s mobile numbers and use it to burrow into their digital lives. Given that most important accounts rely on two-factor authentication, which involves receiving a text message code to log into the account, the momentary access can be all they need to cause harm.

In most instances, fraudsters simply need an account number for your mobile provider and your date of birth to move the number across and begin wreaking havoc.

Dr Terry Goldsworthy is a former detective inspector for the Queensland police who now works as an assistant professor at Bond University. He began researching the prevalence of illegal porting earlier this year but says reliable data is almost non existent.

“No one seems to be collecting the data,” he told news.com.au. At least no one who is willing to share.

Last month he delivered a talk on the topic at the International Conference on Cybercrime and Computer Forensics in which he made the suggestion that there has been a regulatory failure in Australia when it comes to dealing with the issue.

At the conference “I ran into a police source and he said they’re getting hundreds of them (porting complaints), mostly referred to them by the banks,” he said.

In April the NSW police created a phone porting category for complaints however if they do get reported to police or consumer bodies, most cases typically get filed as instances of generic fraud.

“The actual offence numbers are getting diluted,” Dr Goldworthy said. “The problem is: who are we reporting to?



“I’m sure it’s happening more than we know.”

Terry Goldsworthy spent 28 years working for the Queensland police. Picture: Gosling RichardSource:News Limited

The issue made headlines earlier in the year when ABC journalist Tracey Holmes was the victim of unauthorised porting. She believed someone likely got hold of her mail after she moved house to get access to her Telstra account number and then managed to find her date of birth online to carry out the attack.

In June Telstra told news.com.au that it was “working to strengthen our identification and verification procedures even further” because it recognised the increased threat level because of the growing “availability of individual’s personal information on social media and other open platforms.” Telstra says it is continuing to do so, but couldn’t provide any concrete examples.

The first time it happened to Ms Fletcher was in March last year. Usually, it takes about a week for victims to get their number back. It happened to her again a year later and the third time her number was stolen, the hacker simply ported the number to a new SIM card on a Telstra account.

At one point, a Telstra employee called the number and someone else picked up, Ms Fletcher said.
“By the fourth time they just wouldn’t help me, they (Telstra) were useless.”

Contrary to what many disgruntled customers claim about the reality on the ground, Telstra says its porting processes are identical for pre-paid and post-paid services and comply with industry regulations.

But a number of affected customers who spoke to news.com.au have called on the telcos to ensure staff actually carry out the proper checks when porting numbers to make sure the correct procedure is followed and the number belongs to the person porting it.

“They all talk in generics, but what are they actually gonna do?” Dr Goldworthy said of industry assertions that it is addressing the problem.

In the case of Ms Fletcher, not much.

“Telstra’s advice was to just go somewhere else because we can’t stop it from happening,” she said.

Unsurprisingly, she has since switched carriers.

29 August 2017

In Australian politics any criminal can become an MP

Australia is truly a politically unique country / continent of this inhabited planet.

A penal colony of the British Empire, where its constitution allows the slave population to have ultimate authority over the people in parliament, where the slaves have chosen not to assert this 'authority', and sit on the couch with beer in hand watching ' da fooody'.

It's also a place where there is a [deliberate by design] sad state of affairs with regards to politics, where (any?) criminal can become a Member of Parliament.

The fact that Roberta Williams (a convicted criminal) has made an announcement that she has the desire to enter politics, and the fact that they will allow her to enter, is proof that literally any criminal can run this country.


Foul mouthed gutter trash Roberta Williams lived like a pig, trashed rented properties, is now in politics.

Your best 'assumption' about Australian politicians is that they are criminals first (you know guilty until proven innocent) and work your way up from there.

Trailer park trash running the country.

Australia the 'lucky' country !!! !!! !!!

28 August 2017

How the administration of the penal colony called Australia are taking away your rights


Here is a report of the title;

The state of fundamental legal rights in Australia
by Simon Breheny, Morgan Begg (Dec 2014)

on how the administration of a colony of the United Kingdom called Australia are dealing with the  unruly slave population by taking away their fundamental legal rights such as;

  • The presumption of innocence and burden of proof
  • Natural justice
  • The right to silence
  • Privilege against self-incrimination

The report is 50 pages and 1.9MB:



where it is available for download at:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B21_coIgIYu2Z2R5N1lLOGNFUmc

26 August 2017

Lamborghini rebrands phones and sell them 6x their original price without a charger

Some people may think that when they are purchasing a 'luxury' phone from a 'brand' name they are getting the best.

The reality is that the 'luxury' brand is getting a cheap phone and putting their name on it, with some of their own coverings.

Looks like it's one company hiding another company manufactured product.

Lamborghini's $2450 re-birthed $400 ZTE does not even have a charger.

Capitalistic (tight arse) pigs..

Al least BlackBerry's "Porsche Design" phones have 4 chargers.


Lamborghini Mobile has launched the Alpha-One Android smartphone for $2450. It will be available at Harrod's in the UK and multiple retailers in the UAE. It is also available on the company's website.



The Alpha-One is a reasonably straightforward high-end Android smartphone, with a 5.5-inch QHD AMOLED display and a 20 megapixel camera. Powering it is the Snapdragon 820 processor with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of expandable storage. It even has a set of stereo speakers as well as a dedicated DAC and AMP, along with Dolby Atmos audio. The phone runs on a 3,250mAh battery with Quick Charge 3.0, although a charger is not provided with the phone. Lastly, it comes with Android 7.0 Nougat.

To somewhat justify the cost, the Alpha-One has an Italian leather back and liquid metal for the side frame. An Italian leather case is also provided with the phone.

For all intents and purposes, the Alpha-One is a rebranded Axon 7 with the same specifications and same overall structure, just in a different set of materials. Except that the ZTE phone costs $400 and comes with a charger.

24 August 2017

Victoria Police states while assaulting a minor "I can do whatever I want"

Victoria Police have been trained that the law that applies to the herd population does not apply to them or the 'administration'.

This is the result of their training;


Source: Supplied.

23 August 2017

Google has been recording you without your knowledge

22 August 2017

Sussan Ley another MP sitting in office unlawfully

Looks like this is a fair dinkum "Nigerian Scammer",
scamming from the Australian Tax payers for a life / job she is not lawfully entitled to.

But don't worry they are 'protected' from criminal prosecution.



21 August 2017

Is Shiva Ayyadurai conning the world that he invented Email as a 14 year old?


Apparently there is a bit of a law suit going on, to the tune of 15 million US dollars, by a V.A Shiva Ayyadurai that he invented Email in 1978 as a 14 year old.

When we delve in a bit deeper, we are told that Ray Tomlinson (an ARPANET contractor) was credited with inventing email (with the use of the "@" symbol) in 1972.

Remember the "good ol' days" of ARPANET in Australia?

We do, and most certainly Ayyadurai was NOT credited as the inventor of eMail.

Sounds like a claim with no grounds or a vendetta against free speech, by putting individuals out of business for reporting the truth?

YOU be the 'judge' !

While you're at it;

Crank out a bit of jury,

and don't forget the executioner.



Read more in an article Jan 2017 by techdirt.com of the headline:

Techdirt's First Amendment Fight For Its Life

from the the-first-amendment-has-to-mean-something dept

As you may have heard, last week we were sued for $15 million by Shiva Ayyadurai, who claims to have invented email. We have written, at great length, about his claims and our opinion — backed up by detailed and thorough evidence — that email existed long before Ayyadurai created any software. We believe the legal claims in the lawsuit are meritless, and we intend to fight them and to win.

There is a larger point here. Defamation claims like this can force independent media companies to capitulate and shut down due to mounting legal costs. Ayyadurai's attorney, Charles Harder, has already shown that this model can lead to exactly that result. His efforts helped put a much larger and much more well-resourced company than Techdirt completely out of business.

So, in our view, this is not a fight about who invented email. This is a fight about whether or not our legal system will silence independent publications for publishing opinions that public figures do not like.

And here's the thing: this fight could very well be the end of Techdirt, even if we are completely on the right side of the law.

Whether or not you agree with us on our opinions about various things, I hope that you can recognize the importance of what's at stake here. Our First Amendment is designed to enable a free and open press — a press that can investigate and dig, a press that can challenge and expose. And if prominent individuals can make use of a crippling legal process to silence that effort, or even to create chilling effects among others, we become a weaker nation and a weaker people because of it.

We are a truly small and independent media company. We do not have many resources. We intend to fight this baseless lawsuit because of the principles at stake, but we have no illusions about the costs. It will take a toll on us, even if we win. It will be a distraction, no matter what happens. It already has been — which may well have been part of Ayyadurai's intent.

I am beyond thankful to the many of you who have reached out and offered to help in all sorts of ways. It is heartening to know so many people care about Techdirt. At some point soon, we may set up a dedicated legal defense fund. But, in the meantime, any support you can provide us will help — whether it's just alerting people to this situation and the danger of trying to stifle a free press through meritless lawsuits, or it's supporting Techdirt directly (or, if you have a company, advertising with us). As always, you can support us directly as a Friend of Techdirt, or check out some of the other perks you can get in our Insider program. You can also support us via Patreon.

If freedom of expression and the press is to actually mean something, it needs to be protected, not stomped on with baseless lawsuits that silence independent voices and opinions.

You can donate to help them at:

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20170111/11440836465/techdirts-first-amendment-fight-life.shtml

20 August 2017

Accuweather sends your location and router data to revealmobile

There are many traps in the IT world that con people into giving their private and confidential data to deliberately undisclosed sources.

Some of these traps can be spotted a mile away whereas others can be hidden in apps.

The U.S. company called Accuweather (which apparently has 450 employees) has encoded into its Apple operating system weather app actions that take the physical location of your phone/device and the Wi-Fi router it connects to, and passes it on to another company called revealmobile.com.

Now, was the user made aware of this?


The mind truly does boggle why users need (weather) apps, given that there are only a few sources where the weather data comes from.

For Australians weather data comes from a government resource called the Bureau of Meteorology.

So, the mindless app consumer may say;

"is there an app for that?"

In this case there is no need to have the added expenditure of making apps for the various mobile operating system out there, only jut one set of code that automatically adjusts to your device's screen dimensions;






Apps ARE bad... mmmmmmkaaay.