‘Punishing’ you for not using eMail.
Governments (there are only two legitimate in
Australia, federal and state) and businesses are punishing charging you an
extra few dollars for obtaining a bill via the postal service, and pushing you
towards eMail as a means of communication.
Currently in the illustration above it is your choice
whether or not to obtain your rates notice via eMail, where at some point there
will be no choice whatsoever, which is not very ‘democracy’ like, where most
people will not care about this detail and if they wake up it will be too late.
This post has been deliberately structured to stay
away from the technical aspects covered in this post, where those who require
more information can search for it from technical sources.
People should know that the ‘internet’ is a
government resource where electronic mail is also part of this communication
medium.
Government (and business) Information Technology
administrators (should) know that email is insecure, as they themselves are
able to read their bosses emails without that person knowing or being aware
that their company email was read.
Since their inception, the fundamental
protocols created for email communications are insecure, where clear text is
passed over the internet from one recipient to another across different email
addresses, e.g. someone@gmail.com to someone.else@yahoo.com.
Over the years ‘encrypted’ email may have wrapped up
a security envelope to the context of the message, but the other ‘metadata’
necessary for communications purposes still can be easily read and used against
the sender and/or recipient.
An encrypted eMail may be safer (from other users reading it) within the same domain (or business), but it stall can be read by an ‘administrator’.
Since inter domain email is insecure, e.g. your ‘Constitutional
Argument’ regarding fines in Australia filing within the High Court of
Australia, from your email at say JohnCommonwealth@gmail.com
to whoever@hcourt.gov.au, why do
they ‘insist’ you use this medium?
If one writes a letter to another person, and
someone wanted to know the contents of this letter, then one would assume that
to do this ‘legally’ there would have to be probable cause where a warrant
would have to be issued, to be presented to the postmaster in order to open the letter without the recipient being aware that the contents of the envelope
were tampered with upon arrival at the destination.
Now, with clear text travelling over the wire, all
the authorities have to do is capture this data WITHOUT any warrant whatsoever
and literally read the contents of the message easily and quickly.
To do everything by email, from your phone, via
apps and cashless transactions is all part of the mass surveillance agenda where
MANY people are helping the authorities achieve their goals VERY quickly.
Don’t forget to stack up those ‘rewards’ from your cashless
transactions, where you’ve sold your data to government and corporations for a ‘reward’
that they’ve written off on tax.
Corporate slaves rewarded for their slave mentality.
No comments:
Post a Comment