EXPOSED! Vic fines unlawful, in breach of 'Prescribed Details', gov MUST withdraw!

There are MANY problems in Victoria in reation to the police handing out 'Infringement Notices' for the alleged breach of so called health orders.

First and foremost, there was no lawful declaration of a 'State of Emergency' by the authorities, therfore there cannot be any 'health orders'.

This fact is supported by the court case of R v Solihin Millin on 21 June 2022.

Victoria Police were (illegally) acting under dictation, from premier Daniel Michael Andrews.

Officers where not lawfully sworn in.

'Retrospective legislation' was unlawfully used to recify the unlawfully sworn in officers.

The Infringement Notices were not issued in accordance with the law, i.e. did not meet the 'Prescribed Details', within the relevant legislation.

Here is one example:

In this instance "Non-essential travel - COVID 19" is stated.

In another example:

The (alleged) offence is: "Refusal or fail to comply with a direction, or a requirement made of, a person in the exercies of a power under an authorisation given under Section 199 (Individual) (code 0945)."

Please note that the New South Wales government has withdrawn all related fines:

The mainstream media stated that this action 'cost' the government $30 million. 

It didn't 'cost' the govenrment anything as they had no lawful right to that cash in the first place.

Similarly the government of Victoria does not have the lawful right to ANY issued Infrinement Notice  in realtion to the alleged health orders, as they also did not lawfully exist.

Infringement Notices must be consistent with legislation, period.

Source: Do Covid Infringements issued in Victoria meet the Prescribed Details?

Do the above Infringement Offence details meet the requirements within the legislation?

Quite simply put, no!

The judiciary, police and the courts are corrupt to the core in dealing with matters of this significance, where secrecy is used as 'in the public interest'.

WELL, it is 'in the public interest' for the govenrment to publicly withdraw all matters in relation 'COVID-19' Infringement Notices.

Whether the mainstream media will report on the unlawful issuing of the 'Infringement Notices' is another story.

See also document titled "Legal Remedies for all Australians":

There are also other apsects in realtion to the law, not limited to the following:

The 'Queen of Australia', which (Victorian) Constitution Act is lawful, a person obtaining a 'fair hearing' meaning an unbias one free from external influences, e.g. stakeholders (of the MCV).

As mentioned before the legal system is corrupt to its core!

The courts are nothing more than kangaroo courts.