A police officer has the duty to execute all ‘lawful’ summonses, warrants, orders and directions.

A police officer has the duty to execute all ‘lawful’ summonses, warrants, orders and directions.

Victoria and certain other states of Australia are warrant-less states, meaning that no lawfully issued warrants exist.

Take for example in the case of road traffic ‘infringements’, that when not dealt with end up at the so called Sheriff’s Office, where allegedly ’warrants’ are issued in pursuit of alleged debt to the state.

Now, as can be seen, the falsely ‘advertised’ warrants do not exist, as told by an employee of ‘Fines Victoria’ located at 277 William St, Melbourne 3000, where this hidden video took place.

Source: Sheriff's warrants do not exist - verified on video

The mainstream media has been drawn to this video, but as usual no comment and no attention drawn to this fun fact.

In this particular case there is reference to the sheriff, an officer of the Supreme Court of Victoria, a person that must be gazetted before official duties can begin, that being following the Sheriff Act 2009.

There is no lawful appointment nor gazetting of so called sheriffs Mr. Brendan Facy, Mr. Warwick Knight nor Ms. Julie Brown.

In order for Victoria Police to act, it is clearly stated in the Act that action can take place under a lawful summons, warrant etc as opposed to a legally issued one.

The original source of the instrument must come from a lawfully enacted court.

Therefore, first and foremost all courts in Australia, must be subject to Ch. III of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act.

The courts are also subject to their respective Acts.

Also, they must solely act in the Crown in right of the United Kingdom.

In the case of Victoria, for example the Magistrates’ Court Victoria is subject to the Magistrates’ Court Act 1989, which is also subject to the Victorian Constitution.

Which one? The 1975 or the 1855 one?

As exposed in an earlier post, the Magistrates’ Court Victoria  (MCV) does not act in the Crown in right of the UK.

See link to abovr document: Courts acting under dictation owned by financial services institutions

The MCV has “external stakeholders”, that influence decision making processes and outcomes critical to the (financial?) success of the MCV.

Therefore one cannot obtain a ‘fair hearing’ as required by Victorian law, because external stakeholders ‘influence’ decision making.

Court Services Victoria is also a 'stakeholder'.

The courts operate for profit, under the label of the Crown.

NOTE: Since there was no lawfully enacted 'State of Emergency' (See link: No 'State of Emergency' for Victoria, government lies) the actions of Victoria Police 'enforcing' these so called 'directions' were unlawful, therefore the state (and police) is open to litigation.

In summary, Australian courts are kangaroo courts corrupt to the core.