Removed article from social media.
There are many agendas at play, where one of them that is enacted by the public news media and governments (state and federal) is to label persons as ‘sovereign citizens’.
That term is actually an oxymoron.
This is the new way the totalitarian state of Australia handles people that it considers a treat to their régime, and not society.
Recently, the Rupert Murdoch tabloid Herald Sun posted an article on social media, where 71 comments were made before they took down the article.
It stands to reason that all the persons shown in the above article are 'sovereign citizens', which they are not.
Therefore Murdoch's 'empire' should be sued by those individuals.
See an explanation on how the people perceive the mainstream media propaganda machine in the 10 minute video:
1 comment:
New South Wales
Imperial Acts Application Act 1969 No 30
Current version for 28 September 2020 to date (accessed 22 September 2025 at 18:13)
Part 3Division 13
Point-in-time versions
17/07/2001
08/12/2003
01/07/2009
17/07/2009
26/03/2015
28/09/2020
Enter the exact version date, if required:
22/09/2025
Division 13 Recovery of property on determination of a life or lives
18 and 19 Charles II c 11—The Cestui que Vie Act 1666; 6 Anne c 72 (or c 18)—The Cestui que Vie Act 1707.
38 Property—determination of a life or lives
(1) Every person having any estate or interest in any property determinable upon a life or lives who, after the determination of such life or lives without the express consent of the person next immediately entitled upon or after such determination, holds over or continues in possession of such property estate or interest, or of the rents, profits or income thereof, shall be liable in damages or to an account for such rents and profits, or both, to the person entitled to such property, estate, interest, rents, profits or income after the determination of such life or lives.
(2) Where a reversion remainder or other estate or interest in any property is expectant upon the determination of a life or lives, the reversioner remainderman or other person entitled to such reversion remainder or other estate or interest may in any proceeding claiming relief on the basis that such life or lives has or have determined, adduce evidence of belief that such life or lives has or have been determined and of the grounds of such belief, and thereupon the court may in its discretion order that unless the person or persons on whose life or lives such reversion remainder or other estate or interest is expectant is or are produced in court or is or are otherwise shown to be living, such person or persons shall for the purposes of such proceedings be accounted as dead, and relief may be given accordingly.
(3) If in such proceedings the lastmentioned person is shown to have remained beyond Australia, or otherwise absented himself from the place in which if in Australia he might be expected to be found, for the space of seven years or upwards, such person, if not proved to be living, shall for the purposes of such proceedings be accounted as dead, and relief may be given accordingly.
(4) If in any such proceedings judgment has been given against the plaintiff, and afterwards such plaintiff brings subsequent proceedings upon the basis that such life has determined, the court may make an order staying such proceedings permanently or until further order or for such time as may be thought fit.
(5) If in consequence of the judgment given in any such proceedings, any person having any estate or interest in any property determinable on such life or lives has been evicted from or deprived of any property or any estate or interest therein, and afterwards it appears that such person or persons on whose life or lives such estate or interest depends is or are living or was or were living at the time of such eviction or deprivation, the court may give such relief as is appropriate in the circumstances.
Post a Comment