20 November 2014

Exposed - Kim Kardashian's Ass Photoshopped?

Could it be true that the blog CorpAu has uncovered (pun intended) a monumental scam on Kim Kardashian's ass (in reality her hips)?

Is the corporate image of Kim Kardashian ™ a farce?

Is the company mychemist advertising a 'photoshopped' image of the trademark commonly known as Kim Kardashian?

Lets look at the (alleged) facts:

In this photo published by the heraldsun Kim Kardashian's hips appear to be 17.3 times her waist.


Meanwhile an image used by mychemist depicts her hips as almost level with her waist




Please Note: False, misleading or deceptive advertising in Australia is ILLEGAL

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?


* Let's ponder over this and debate it in the corporate media over 17 pages of the plebs paper, all whilst your rights are being eroded away by a corrupt government.

Drunk Drugged Driving Instructor

In Australia one can quite easily say that one's automobile are one's Essential Wheels.

One can also say that the police mount a very aggressive campaign against drink driving and now have equipment to test for drugged drivers to which there is zero tolerance or so the television commercials tell the masses.

Police use a variety of tools including social media to apprehend criminals, or people who break road rules to which they willingly consent to via a lawfully binding agreement called a 'licence'.




In the state of Victoria, a so called driving instructor from Melbourne's western suburbs, engages in driving whilst drunk or driving while under the influence of illegal drugs.


When confronting this person to stop their illegal activities, their response was to not to communicate with them.


Would you trust this person to tutor your child while possibly under the influence?


Let's see how long it will take Victoria Police to take action.

Government passes law allowing it to put more information out on internet without being sued

Attorney General John Rau ... bigger push for government transparency.
Attorney General John Rau ... bigger push for government transparency. Source: News Corp Australia
 
DETAILS on crimes in hospitals and “code black” events, excess public servants, submissions to policy consultations and data on outstanding fines will be put on the internet under a plan to increase Government transparency. 

The State Government passed a law in Parliament this week which will give it ­immunity from any civil suit that could result from the release of such information.

That will allow the Government to extend its “proactive disclosure” policy beyond the credit-card statements, gift registry and phone bills it began publishing last year, which it hopes will create a culture within the public service of releasing, rather than hiding, information.

Attorney-General John Rau said the passage of the law would allow the Government to put a “great deal” of information on the internet without needing teams of lawyers to go through it to redact anything the Government could have been sued for publishing.

“Without this change we would have needed an army of lawyers to work out what is in the documents that’s defamation, breach of contract, negligent mistakes and various other torts,” he said.

Information the Government will regularly update from next year, as part of the new agency disclosure logs, will likely include:

SUBMISSIONS received from the public in response to consultations on policy issues.

HOUSING SA debt statistics, waiting list data, vacancy data, property damage and repairs information.

DETAILS of hunting permits issued, and details of permits to cull native animals.

STATISTICS of crimes in hospitals or “code black” events.

NUMBER of excess public servants broken down by pay level and department.

TREASURY documents relating to credit ratings and list of unclaimed money.

COURTS Administration Authority data relating to outstanding fines.

Mr Rau said the Freedom of Information process was regarded as the “last resort” for accessing information but there was a “culture of risk aversion and a reluctance to release information” unless it was under FOI.

Opposition deputy leader Vickie Chapman said the change was “irresponsible” and would give “licence to some public servants to be recklessly negligent”.

Mr Rau said the Government had no intention of prescribing information of a personal or sensitive nature.

Originally published as Protection for govenment over internet info release

news.com.au 20 Nov 2014

Australia's corrupt government at work.

19 November 2014

Court hears of grandmother Linda Milazzo's clash with Victoria Police

Gran's clash with police caught on camera

 

EXCLUSIVE

Victoria Police members who called a "warm hearted" grandmother a "f...ing nut case" who had no rights, are to be investigated.

A screaming and shouting match erupted between Linda Milazzo – a pensioner who had recently had a heart attack – and two policemen after she "clipped" a third member on an elbow while driving through a road block.

The ensuing altercation – recorded by a policeman's body camera – escalated to threats that she could be charged and jailed for attempted murder.

Judge John Carmody, in Melbourne's County Court, likened the conduct of the police to the basketball tactic of a "full court press" and pondered Chief Commissioner Ken Lay's response to the footage.

Judge Carmody saw and heard that when Milazzo, then 63, told Senior Constable Kael Oostuizen she had had a heart attack and was then having one he replied: "You don't look like you're having a heart attack to me."

A policeman also called her a "f...ing nut case", followed by laughter, and later when she mentioned her "rights" but was told that "you haven't got any rights at the minute" she became hysterical.

Milazzo recently pleaded guilty to obstructing police, driving in a manner dangerous and unlicenseddriving from the incident in South Yarra in May, 2012.

The court heard Milazzo, who has several prior minor traffic infringements, had had a "tragic early life" with a limited education, but became a registered nurse and has for some years worked voluntarily for organisations that included the Father Bob Maguire Foundation.

On the day of the incident she was delivering items to an elderly person as part of her free ironing service.
The police footage was played in pre-trial argument before Judge Carmody and relied on by prosecutor Mark Regan as depicting her driving and conduct after the case resolved into guilty pleas.

Milazzo stopped after a short pursuit and Senior Constable Oostuizen and acting Sergeant James Robbins struggled to remove her car keys, during which she quoted a court judgment she wrongly claimed allowed her not to stop.

Prosecutor Mark Regan said there was "great uncertainty" about what could happen, the policemen were trying to "apprehend" her and their first priority was to immobilise the car for safety reasons.

Mr Regan said the police could have "bodily dragged" Milazzo from her car but had "exercised restraint".

He conceded some language was used that "perhaps with the benefit of hindsight you wouldn't want to see" and that there were "intemperate moments" and words said in the "heat of the moment".

Judge Carmody asked Mr Regan to "imagine if the [chief] commissioner heard the full set of these tapes".
"She's a nut," he recalled Milazzo being described. "[Said] As loud as you like."

Judge Carmody commented that it was "not the way" he [Ken Lay] would want his men or others to deal with members of the public.

Defence barrister Alan Marshall said Milazzo, now 65, could not understand why she didn't stop and that "everything just overcame her", and while the police obviously had concerns "she wasn't perhaps assisted" by their behaviour.

"In basketball terms," Judge Carmody commented, "it was a full court press. That's what happened."

Mr Marshall added that for "a few seconds" someone who was a "warm-hearted grandmother" behaved in a "highly unusual fashion" and that "all sides probably now regret" their part in what occurred.

In his sentencing remarks, Judge Carmody said the "manner of the approach" by police to her car and their statements and hers "escalated the emotions and behaviour" of everyone and had caused her to obstruct them.

Judge Carmody regarded Milazzo's dangerous driving at the lower end of the range and told her she had done much good work for others, but added that police were entrusted with the difficult task of ensuring that "everything works for our community".

Milazzo was put on a non-conviction undertaking to be of good behaviour for 12 months for obstructing police, was convicted and fined a total of $1000 on the other offences and was disqualified from driving for six months.

Judge Carmody noted that she had already been partly "administratively punished" as Mr Marshall had told him that acting Sergeant Robbins had advised VicRoads shortly after the incident – and after she had renewed her licence – that she may not be a proper person to be licensed.

Because of that, she was asked to supply a psychiatric report which she declined.

Inspector Ian Geddes of the police media unit told Fairfax Media on Tuesday that members were expected to demonstrate professionalism "at all times" and complaints about unprofessional behaviour were taken seriously.

"As a result of the issues raised in this case," he said, "the matter has been referred to Professional Standards Command for further investigation".

theage.com.au 19 Nov 2014

More corrupt police caught out?  Harassing motorists?
 
If they really are not corrupt, why does the matter need to be referred to the Professional Standards Command?

Samsung wants your IMEI

In today's digital world, data collection is big money and data is collected via whatever means available to the interested parties, not excluding governments.

A company that is a well known consumer electronics giant today is Samsung.

The South Korean giant is a manufacturer of mobile devices, TV audio and video equipment, home appliances and I.T. equipment like PC's peripherals and printers. A far cry from its inception as a trading company diversifying in food processing, textiles, insurance, securities and retail.

When one purchases a product from Samsung a product warranty form is attached to the product where the user must fill in the form in order to obtain the warranty for the product, which does not sound alarming at all.



What is concerning though is that one of the fields required by Samsung is your GSM IMEI number, even though the IMEI number has 15 digits and the field has 12.

Your IMEI number should NOT be disclosed to anyone other than your telecommunications service provider which they already have once you have connected your mobile phone to their network.

Your IMEI number can be cloned or used to gain access to your mobile device (independently of your mobile phone number) with or without you knowledge including recording via the microphone.

Does Samsung really need your IMEI number?

If so for what purpose?

18 November 2014

Millions of Aussies want it but the PM says NO

Does this government like creating jobs? The huge opportunities we’re missing in renewable energy 

An alien planet? Nope, it’s an artist’s impression of a proposed large-scale solar field
An alien planet? Nope, it’s an artist’s impression of a proposed large-scale solar field in the Goldfields region of WA. Picture: Scott Ludlam Source: News Limited
 
THIS is a story about thousands of jobs the Abbott government could be helping to create, but which may never come into being. 

It is not a story about climate change, or any other issue which divides people along ideological lines, despite the divide between Australia and the the rest of the world becoming much clearer over the weekend. 

Quite simply, it is about something we all believe in — Australia’s prosperity.

Let’s break this thing down into 25 quick, easily digestible points.

1. Two Aussie employers spoke exclusively this week to news.com.au about their extreme dissatisfaction with the Abbott government’s stance on renewable energy. They want to create jobs and wealth in the renewable energy industry. They say the government is making it virtually impossible for them.

2. First a little background. The renewable energy industry is by any measure is one of the world’s fastest-growing industries. Other countries understand this. For example, China this year for the first time installed more renewable energy capacity than fossil fuels.

This solar farm under construction in China’s remote Gansu province is five times the siz
This solar farm under construction in China’s remote Gansu province is five times the size of Australia’s largest operating solar farm, yet the 50 megawatt (MW) facility will soon be dwarfed by a 1100 MW one now under construction in the region. Copyright Michael Hall Source: Supplied
 
3. But the Australian government is scaling back its commitment to renewable energy. Up until recently, Australia had a bipartisan agreement to a 20 per cent renewable energy target (RET) by the year 2020.

Seems we once understood that the holy trinity of jobs, investment and a cleaner environment was well worth chasing. But the Abbott government no longer buys this. It says we should be working towards a new target of 26,000 gigawatt hours of green power instead of the agreed 41,000. This massive reduction has created an environment of great uncertainty for investors. Many of these investors come from overseas and would sink money into Australian projects. But they are now worried the industry has no future here.

“My members are looking at the United Kingdom, Ireland, the United States, France and some South American countries as having more stable investment environments for low-carbon opportunities,” said Nathan Fabian, the head of an investor group on climate change.

4. According to a revealing graph in a major report from the Climate Council this week Annual large-scale renewable energy investment in Australia in 2014 is a fraction of 2013 levels and set to be the lowest in 12 years. We are going backwards, and fast.

First Solar’s thin film PV modules at Australia’s first utility-scale solar farm, the 10M
First Solar’s thin film PV modules at Australia’s first utility-scale solar farm, the 10MW Greenough River solar project near Geraldton, WA. Pic: First Solar/Greenough River Solar Farm Source: Supplied
 
5. But facts like that are always a little cold and meaningless on their own. So here are some humans to flesh things out.

6. For the small-scale version of how the climate of uncertainty around renewable energy is affecting Australians, meet Stacy Nichols.

Stacy runs a company on the Gold Coast called Infinite Lighting And Electrical which designs and installs solar systems.

“I’ve had to let three staff go in the last three months,” Stacy tells us. “Our turnover has been halved since the The RET (renewable energy target) review.

Even at mum and dad level, the government’s negative attitude towards renewables is making people think twice about solar panels.

“Customers are just not investing in solar at the moment because of the uncertainty the government has created. They feel the government is attacking solar so they don’t want to be involved with it.”

Demand has fallen through the floor ever since the government went cold on renewables, wh
Demand has fallen through the floor ever since the government went cold on renewables, when it should be going through the roof. Source: Getty Images
 
7. Now for the large scale example. Meet Andrew Want. He’s the CEO of a company called Vast Solar. Andrew is not a greenie, a scientist or an academic.

As he tells news.com.au: “I am a business guy. My heart is in business. My business has been developed to suit a market need.”

8. Andrew’s business is cutting edge stuff. He is into solar thermal energy, which is a nifty way of capturing the sun’s energy and storing it in batteries that can generate steam which powers turbines.

9. This is where the whole energy industry is heading. Poles and wires are still invaluable — for now. But in the future, energy generation will not only be cleaner, but modes of delivery will be much more efficient. As Andrew explains:

“We are undergoing an energy revolution no less significant than the move from horse and cart to automobiles, or from copper wire telephony to mobile telephony. What’s happening is we are going to have smaller clusters of electricity generation and storage which is closer to where the electricity is actually used.

“If you think about it, we’ve never had storage in our electricity system before. We relied on a system of instantaneous generation with things burning night and day. Now we can store energy for days and even weeks and use when it is most needed.”

Old school: A power station in the Hunter Valley. Photo: Bob Barker.
Old school: A power station in the Hunter Valley. Photo: Bob Barker. Source: News Corp Australia
 
10. Just so you know, storable energy is going to be terrific for your back pocket. That’s because the huge increases in energy bills in recent years can be largely attributed to network costs. All those poles and wires don’t come cheap.

11. The new types of energy Andrew is developing will also be bloody good for regional economies. Example. Andrew Want currently employs 42 people on what he calls a “pilot, small-scale project” near Forbes in the Central West region of NSW. During its construction phase alone, the project has created work for welders, electricians, plumbers and more.

“Regional towns get a massive uplift,” Andrew says. “This has been proven in Europe and the United States. Renewable energy is a great way for rural communities to diversify.

An artist’s impression of a proposed large-scale solar field in the Goldfields region of
An artist’s impression of a proposed large-scale solar field in the Goldfields region of WA. Picture: Scott Ludlam Source: News Limited
 
12. Andrew’s project near Forbes has a few thousand solar mirrors which rotate like flowers to capture the sun’s energy. But he wants to build a much bigger project with as many as 60,000 mirrors. Obviously that would mean more jobs and an even greater all-round economic boost.

As Andrew says: “these are the benefits from renewable energy that do not come from coal mining.”

13. But Andrew’s bold plan is clouded by the government’s downsized renewable energy target.

14. The government had planned to do away with institutions like the Clean Energy Finance Corporation and the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) which help fund plants like the ones Andrew plans to build. For now, the government has shelved plans to dissolve these bodies, but the very threat was enough to make investors look elsewhere. It will take time for investor confidence to return.

What they said. Pic: Dave Cronin.
What they said. Pic: Dave Cronin. Source: News Corp Australia
 
15. The irony is that manufacturing is in decline in Australia. And Andrew Want believes the type of large-scale plants he’d like to build would be the ideal workplaces for people experienced in assembling components in the car manufacturing industry.

16. At this point you might be wondering why the government refuses to budge on its reduced renewable energy targets. We sure were, so we contacted the office of Environment Minister Greg Hunt. We are yet to receive responses to questions such as:

“Are you aware that many jobs could be created in the renewable energy industry that could employ people from industries like car manufacturing?”

And:

“What can we tell investors in hard concrete terms about Australia’s commitment to renewable energy so that thousands of potential of Aussie jobs are (hopefully) not forced offshore?

17. Lost opportunities are something we should all be worried about here. People like Andrew Want could take their business to places like China or Europe or even that bastion of dirty power (we’re talking energy, not politics) — the Middle East.

18. By turning its back on renewable energy, the government also hurts smaller-scale businesspeople like Stacy Nichols on the Gold Coast, as well as the young tradies in her area.

“We get contracted all the time by people looking for apprenticeships,” Stacy says. “The government needs to be pushing people into these industries rather than pushing them back.”

Average Aussies support a fair dinkum renewable energy target, not just greenies and acti
Average Aussies support a fair dinkum renewable energy target, not just greenies and activists. Pic: Russell Brown. Source: News Corp Australia
 
19. Why? Why does the government so steadfastly refuse to support the renewable energy industry?

Well it just so happens Stacy Nichols met with her local member this very week. His name is Bert van Manen and he holds the Queensland seat of Forde for the Liberal Party.

“We don’t see why we should invest in solar because coal is a cheaper source of electricity,” Mr van Manen told Stacy Nichols.

20. And that, right there, is the government’s position on renewable energy in a nutshell. It is committed to the short term benefits and income from coal. It has minimal interest in investing in an industry which down the track could create tens if not hundreds of thousands of jobs that do not depend on a dwindling, dirty resource.

21. This attitude really frustrates Andrew Want. He says he doesn’t want enemies in government, but he fervently believes that by putting all its energy eggs in the coal basket, the government is making an extremely poor business decision.

“If the federal cabinet is Australia’s board of directors, who is the risk management director?” he asks.
“There is a need for Australia to move on this stuff, not just for carbon mitigation but because we have an ancient system. Our coal fired power generation is like a 1968 Kingswood. It was great for its time and you can still keep it going but it’s getting harder and harder to find the leaded fuel to run it.”

22. Meanwhile, opposition leader Bill Shorten teed off last week in perhaps his feistiest media performance since his doorstop press conference in Canberra the morning after Joe Hockey’s first budget back in May.
Tony Abbott has “stabbed the renewable energy industry in the back with a broken promise” which provided “catastrophic uncertainty,” Mr Shorten said.

“He has undermined certainty, he has changed the rules, and billions of dollars of investment has come to a standstill and most importantly, cost of living pressure on Australians has gone upwards.”

Clean energy? Gimme, gimme.
Clean energy? Gimme, gimme. Source: News Corp Australia
 
23. Mr Shorten announced that Labor has given up trying to negotiate the renewable energy target with the government after the government would not budge an inch.

“This is devastating,” he said. “There are 21 thousand solar workers who don’t know if they’ve got a job at Christmas time. Tony Abbott did that when he broke his election promise and when he commissioned a bogus review.

“There has been no case made for change to the renewable energy market.”

24. Another thing Mr Shorten said today was that “Australians overwhelmingly believe in and want renewable energy. The government is completely out of touch on this issue.” It has often been reported that 80 per cent of Australians support more renewable energy. We invite your thoughts on this point in the comments below.

25. We’ll leave the last, rather troubling word to Vast Solar CEO Andrew Want.

“We have to start diversifying. Other countries are putting in programs for structural change and providing that stability for investors. Investors need that long term certainty and they are taking it where that certainty is.

“It’s certainly not Australia at the moment.”

news.com.au 18 Dec 2014

What MUST be understood first and foremost is that politicians are supposed to be public servants, i.e. enacting the WILL of the people.

THEREFORE if the people say NO, the ministers MUST enact the WILL of the people, but they do not.

Australia is the true new age Alcatraz, the model Prison Island. 

Beware of the lawyers



Luke 11: 46

King James Bible
And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.

Luke 11:52

King James Bible
Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.

15 November 2014

NAB moves to settle class action over $40m in disputed bank fees

NATIONAL Australia Bank has signalled its intention to settle a class action with thousands of customers for late charges on credit cards, breaking ranks with competitors who are still in court defending charging controversial fees. 
 
While the payout to NAB customers have been estimated as high as $40 million, any amount to be distributed by the bank is a long way from being decided and will be dependent on the number of customers who join the case as well as the outcome of an appeal in the Federal Court by ANZ.

NAB announced it had lodged an application with the Federal Court that could end the class action being brought against the bank by up to 30,000 customers.

As part of the class action, plaintiff law firm Maurice Blackburn alleges the banks have unfairly charged their customers excessive late fees for overdue credit-card payments, following a successful case in the Federal Court this year against ANZ.

In February, the Federal Court ruled that ANZ’s late credit card fees were “penalties” and not “fees” and constituted a breach of contract.

However, Justice Michelle Gordon ruled that other fees, including over-limit and non-payment fees were valid, with ANZ and Maurice Blackburn now both awaiting the outcome of an appeal of the case in the Federal Court of Appeal.

The legal action also includes another case against ANZ, Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, Citi and BankSA for alleged unfair bank fees. The number of customers affected by the suit against the group of banks could be more than 100,000 with payouts estimated at $243m at the time it was filed.

Following reports that managing director Andrew Thorburn had written a letter advising the NAB’s Council on Corporate Responsibility to resolve the dispute, Mr Thorburn said yesterday that “this is a first but significant step towards reaching a potential settlement”.

“NAB is doing this because we believe this is the right thing to do for our customers and our business.”
The application to resolve the case through settlement has been brought with the approval of plaintiff law firm Maurice Blackburn.

“We have been working for some time with NAB to resolve the bank fees issue for its customers, but these negotiations are ongoing and we won’t be elaborating on the settlement process at this stage,” Maurice Blackburn said in a statement.

“We would encourage all banks involved to follow NAB’s example to negotiate in good faith, to resolve a fair outcome for all banking customers that have unfairly been charged these fees.”

A spokesman for ANZ did not comment on whether NAB’s action would affect their approach to any settlement, with a spokesman for CBA also refusing to comment.

The case is being brought as an open class “opt in” action, meaning up to 30,000 customers could apply to join the case. It will return to the Federal Court on November 18, leaving time for more potential litigants to join the case.

Despite reports NAB is hoping to settle for up to $40m, The Australian understands that current figures are highly speculative, and any settlement may still be dependent upon the final outcome in the Federal Court of Appeal decision on the ANZ case.

theaustralian.com.au 13 Nov 2014

Another (bank) business involved in fraud where only a class action will suffice.

See High Court Australia case Andrews v ANZ Bank [2012] at:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B21_coIgIYu2ZnllcXRrWmJzM1U/edit?usp=sharing

12 November 2014

James Cook's secret instructions

See document below apparently contains the secret instructions for Captain James Cook on his way to search for Terra Australis Incognita from page 3.

The document (14pp at 872KB) is available :


Source: http://static.booktopia.com.au/pdf/9781741965421-1.pdf

11 November 2014

The British-American coup that ended Australian independence

In 1975 prime minister Gough Whitlam, who has died this week, dared to try to assert his country’s autonomy. The CIA and MI6 made sure he paid the price

Gough Whitlam and Bob Hawke in 1972
Prime minister Gough Whitlam watches ACTU president Bob Hawke drink beer from a yard glass Melbourne, Australia, 1972. Photograph: News Ltd/Newspix/REX
Across the media and political establishment in Australia, a silence has descended on the memory of the great, reforming prime minister Gough Whitlam. His achievements are recognised, if grudgingly, his mistakes noted in false sorrow. But a critical reason for his extraordinary political demise will, they hope, be buried with him.

Australia briefly became an independent state during the Whitlam years, 1972-75. An American commentator wrote that no country had “reversed its posture in international affairs so totally without going through a domestic revolution”. Whitlam ended his nation’s colonial servility. He abolished royal patronage, moved Australia towards the Non-Aligned Movement, supported “zones of peace” and opposed nuclear weapons testing.

Although not regarded as on the left of the Labor party, Whitlam was a maverick social democrat of principle, pride and propriety. He believed that a foreign power should not control his country’s resources and dictate its economic and foreign policies. He proposed to “buy back the farm”. In drafting the first Aboriginal lands rights legislation, his government raised the ghost of the greatest land grab in human history, Britain’s colonisation of Australia, and the question of who owned the island-continent’s vast natural wealth.

Latin Americans will recognise the audacity and danger of this “breaking free” in a country whose establishment was welded to great, external power. Australians had served every British imperial adventure since the Boxer rebellion was crushed in China. In the 1960s, Australia pleaded to join the US in its invasion of Vietnam, then provided “black teams” to be run by the CIA. US diplomatic cables published last year by WikiLeaks disclose the names of leading figures in both main parties, including a future prime minister and foreign minister, as Washington’s informants during the Whitlam years.

Whitlam knew the risk he was taking. The day after his election, he ordered that his staff should not be “vetted or harassed” by the Australian security organisation, Asio – then, as now, tied to Anglo-American intelligence. When his ministers publicly condemned the US bombing of Vietnam as “corrupt and barbaric”, a CIA station officer in Saigon said: “We were told the Australians might as well be regarded as North Vietnamese collaborators.”

Whitlam demanded to know if and why the CIA was running a spy base at Pine Gap near Alice Springs, a giant vacuum cleaner which, as Edward Snowden revealed recently, allows the US to spy on everyone. “Try to screw us or bounce us,” the prime minister warned the US ambassador, “[and Pine Gap] will become a matter of contention”.

Victor Marchetti, the CIA officer who had helped set up Pine Gap, later told me, “This threat to close Pine Gap caused apoplexy in the White House … a kind of Chile [coup] was set in motion.”
Pine Gap’s top-secret messages were decoded by a CIA contractor, TRW. One of the decoders was Christopher Boyce, a young man troubled by the “deception and betrayal of an ally”. Boyce revealed that the CIA had infiltrated the Australian political and trade union elite and referred to the governor-general of Australia, Sir John Kerr, as “our man Kerr”.

Kerr was not only the Queen’s man, he had longstanding ties to Anglo-American intelligence. He was an enthusiastic member of the Australian Association for Cultural Freedom, described by Jonathan Kwitny of the Wall Street Journal in his book, The Crimes of Patriots, as “an elite, invitation-only group … exposed in Congress as being founded, funded and generally run by the CIA”. The CIA “paid for Kerr’s travel, built his prestige … Kerr continued to go to the CIA for money”.

When Whitlam was re-elected for a second term, in 1974, the White House sent Marshall Green to Canberra as ambassador. Green was an imperious, sinister figure who worked in the shadows of America’s “deep state”. Known as “the coupmaster”, he had played a central role in the 1965 coup against President Sukarno in Indonesia – which cost up to a million lives. One of his first speeches in Australia, to the Australian Institute of Directors, was described by an alarmed member of the audience as “an incitement to the country’s business leaders to rise against the government”.

The Americans and British worked together. In 1975, Whitlam discovered that Britain’s MI6 was operating against his government. “The Brits were actually decoding secret messages coming into my foreign affairs office,” he said later. One of his ministers, Clyde Cameron, told me, “We knew MI6 was bugging cabinet meetings for the Americans.” In the 1980s, senior CIA officers revealed that the “Whitlam problem” had been discussed “with urgency” by the CIA’s director, William Colby, and the head of MI6, Sir Maurice Oldfield. A deputy director of the CIA said: “Kerr did what he was told to do.”

On 10 November 1975, Whitlam was shown a top-secret telex message sourced to Theodore Shackley, the notorious head of the CIA’s East Asia division, who had helped run the coup against Salvador Allende in Chile two years earlier.

Shackley’s message was read to Whitlam. It said that the prime minister of Australia was a security risk in his own country. The day before, Kerr had visited the headquarters of the Defence Signals Directorate, Australia’s NSA, where he was briefed on the “security crisis”.

On 11 November – the day Whitlam was to inform parliament about the secret CIA presence in Australia – he was summoned by Kerr. Invoking archaic vice-regal “reserve powers”, Kerr sacked the democratically elected prime minister. The “Whitlam problem” was solved, and Australian politics never recovered, nor the nation its true independence.

•John Pilger’s investigation into the coup against Whitlam is described in full in his book, A Secret Country (Vintage), and in his documentary film, Other People’s Wars, which can be viewed on http://www.johnpilger.com/

theguardian.com

Gough Whitlam - THE CRIMINAL PRIME MINISTER.

The Australian corporate media (government lap dog) fails to mentions certain truths.