Monday, August 7, 2017
Gay marriage in Australia is unconstitutional
The mainstream media too has jumped on it making the herd population aware that Section 44 of the 'Constitution' can claim a few scalps, with regards to dual citizenship or allegiance to a 'foreign power' (freemasons not excluded from this section either) leaving MP's to do what they do best, that being deceiving the good people of Australia, and going into an overdrive deception mode that it may not apply to them or some other lame excuse, or even a false interpretation of the law.
What the mainstream media has not caught on is that not one MP is sitting in office lawfully, but let's not let that pesky Constitution leave our parliaments empty, or law enforcement left to charging them otherwise Allah forbid, the country just might be run by the serfs, and the 'authorities'* will never let that happen.
When you refer to this bugbear (to the unlawfully sitting MP's) called the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, you should also make reference to a book that should be side by side with the Constitution commonly referred to as the 'Quick and Garran' (for short) i.e. by the authors Sirs John Quick and Robert Garran called the Annotated Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia.
So what is actually meant by this creature called 'marriage' in the 'Constitution' according to the learned authors and according to what the legal framers had in mind.
So for those who require their spoons and bullets in silver, the definition of marriage is found on page 608 of the 'Quick and Garran' under item 200 of the heading "Marriage".
From there on you will read:
"According to the law of England a marriage is a union between a man and a woman.."
Thank you and goodbye on that topic.
* often confused as people in government as opposed to the mass population of Australia.
Illustration: Source Supplied.