MGM Resorts cyberattack exposed the corporation's greed, incompetence and corruption

Since details have emerged on the dark web about the operations of MGM Resorts, it is concering to ANY person who hase their personal details with this corporation to belive that it is not in their best interest to conduct business with this gambling giant.

The real question is, will the U.S. authorities do a deeper dive into the corporations operations in order for criminal charges to follow.

See futher explanation:

 

Las Vagas is built on the proceeds of crime and a den of criminal activity that is 'supported' by the U.S. government.

Did Australia's mainstream media inform its citizens of this important cyberattack on this $34 blillion corporation?

First 5 pages of a Google search do not yield results pertaining to any Australian publications. 

The Manufacturing & Supply Agreement Between Pfizer & South African Government

See 46 page document:

The Voice - 'Yes' Choice is Racist and anti Human Rights.

The corporation aggregate commonly referred to as the 'Australian Govenrment' requires a YES result from the people on the referendum re: 'The Voice'.

What is delibreately kept from the public on this topic is something called the law, and in particular racial discrimination.

By promoting the yes 'vote' the government and all those involved are factually promoting racism and division within the colony known as Australia.

It's also a resources/minerals grab by the corporations.

The laws that the government is going against are the following:

• Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948

• International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination 1965

• Racial Discrimination Act 1975

See explanation with reference to the above laws, in the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KU9njIiYiDs&t=4558s

At the end of the day, the governments (state and federal) are human rights abusers, and it's all about how much they can get away with.

See references:

https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/publications/australia-and-universal-declaration-human-rights

https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-convention-elimination-all-forms-racial

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Series/C2004A00274

Exposed! Queen Elizabeth’s fundamental lie? “I do not give you law or administer justice”

Australia’s Constitution came into existence during the reign of Queen Victoria where the reign ceased upon her death on the 22nd of January 1901.

The Act was ratified on the 9th of July 1900, where it came into circulation on the 1st of January 1901.

According to the Commonwealth of Australia’s fundamental law and Imperial Act, the ‘Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK).

Section 2 of the Act states the following:

Act to extend to the Queen’s successors

The provisions of this Act referring to the Queen shall extend to Her Majesty’s heirs and successors in the sovereignty of the United Kingdom.

As we are told, Queen Elizabath II is an heir to the throne which Her great great grandmother sat on, even tough a claim/documentary exists on the 'Rightful' King of England dies in NSW (by The Sydney Morning Herald), that being Michael Abney-Hastings, 14th Earl of Loudoun (Wikipedia article).

In the Constitution paying attention to Sections 58 - 60:

the following is stated:

58. Royal assent to Bills

When a proposed law passed by both Houses of the Parliament is presented to the Governor-General for the Queen’s assent, he shall declare, according to his discretion, but subject to this Constitution, that he assents in the Queen’s name, or that he withholds assent, or that he reserves the law for the Queen’s pleasure.

Recommendations by Governor-General

The Governor-General may return to the house in which it originated any proposed law so presented to him, and may transmit therewith any amendments which he may recommend, and the Houses may deal with the recommendation.

59. Disallowance by the Queen

The Queen may disallow any law within one year from the Governor-General’s assent, and such disallowance on being made known by the Governor-General by speech or message to each of the Houses of the Parliament, or by Proclamation, shall annul the law from the day when the disallowance is so made known.

60. Signification of Queen’s pleasure on Bills reserved

A proposed law reserved for the Queen’s pleasure shall not have any force unless and until within two years from the day on which it was presented to the Governor-General for the Queen’s assent the Governor-General makes known, by speech or message to each of the Houses of the Parliament, or by Proclamation, that it has received the Queen’s assent.

So what does Queen Elizabeth have to day about the above sections of the law?

In the above video, from the Christmas Speech in 1957, Monarch states the following:

“I do not give you law or administer justice”

Please note that an excellent or rather invaluable reference to the Constitution is a book called the ‘Quick and Garran’ or ‘The Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth’, by Sirs John Quick and Robert Randolph Garran, where many people mistake this for the actual Constitution.

Without 'Royal Assent', by the current reigning Monarch, there is no law.