07 January 2022

79,000 reported side effects in the trial is 'rare'?


Under/false reporting is common when it comes to statistics with regards to the current global situation.

Quite simply put Australia's authorities have been caught out falsifying the figures with regards to deaths, adverse effects and other statistics.

The real figure would be close to ten times more.

If you are participating in the injection the governments are telling you to, then you are participating in ".. the largest clinical trial, the largest global vaccination trial ever" as stated by Australia's Health Minister Mr. Greg Hunt.

These are his words.



See them within the transcript on the government website at:

https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/interview-with-david-speers-on-abc-insiders-on-the-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

See video to the above screen capture:




06 January 2022

Victorians incarcerated for not taking booster shot?

Is this even legal, or let alone 'constitutional'?

What about your 'human rights'?


According to the Victorian premier Mr. Daniel Michael Andrews if you don't take a booster shot you may be locked up.

Not long ago you were considered 'fully' vaccinated if you had two shots.

And now they changed the goal posts.

Not very kosher is it?

Australia, the [real penal] colony!

See video within the link:

https://twitter.com/therealrukshan/status/1450272238704365571


Edit: 16 Jan 2022:





05 January 2022

The figures don't lie? Viva La Victoria! The end of the disease?

Shock, horror, doom and gloom, scare tactics and fear mongering is all part of the narrative!

But has anyone actually read the statistics and compared them?

Let's look at what the Herald Sun published:




So, let's compare the pair

The figures of the 21st of December 2021

New cases; 1,245, In hospital:392, Active ICU:73, On ventilation:43.

Where the percentage of those:

  • in hospital compared to new cases is: 31.4%,

  • Active ICU compared to new cases: 5.8%,

  • On ventilation compared to new cases: 3.4%


The figures of the 3rd of Jan 2022

New cases; 8,573, In hospital:491, Active ICU:56, On ventilation:24

Where the percentage of those:

  • in hospital compared to new cases is: 5%,

  • Active ICU compared to new cases: 0.6%,

  • On ventilation compared to new cases: 0.2%


So, even though the (alleged) case numbers went up 6.8 times higher, the hospitalisation went down from 31.4% to 5%.

The alleged ICU cases went down from 5.8% to 0.6% or one tenth of that in December.

Also the people allegedly on ventilation (from the disease?) went down from 3.4% to 0.2%.

By rights then, using the same percentage figures from 21 Dec, then should be for:

Hospitalisation: 2692, Active ICU:497 and on ventilation: 291.

but they are not, they're nearly one tenth of all the figures except for those in hospital, where it's not far from one fifth.

So is the media telling you to rejoice?

Is the government telling you that 'we' are winning?

Nope.

Be prepared for more fear mongering!

Statistic source:

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/coronavirus/experts-warn-cases-could-spike-as-high-as-100000-a-day/news-story/555cd9fac5b8c038a2522ba060814dc8

Medical apartheid - Australians denied medical treatment!


What's rife in Australia at the moment is something that the mainstream media is deliberately not reporting on, that being medical apartheid.

State leaders, in particular the Victorian premier Daniel Andrews, mentioned that you can only participate in the 'va__ed economy', meaning you can only participate in the economy if you've succumbed to a particular medical procedure.

From news articles the people of the world may think that Australia has gone back to 'normal' but that is far from the truth and that will never be the case.

At the moment the people that you see in coffee shops, enjoying a beer outdoors at their favourite pub or sitting outside in front of a restaurant on any famous dining strip or enjoying music at a club is only for those who can prove (with a certificate) that they have undergone a particular medical procedure.

This is no better than Germany of the 1930s.

Yet people accept this.

But, they're the ones creating the 'cases', where that topic is for another post.

What's worse is that people or rather those who have not participated in the “largest clinical trial”* cannot receive health care, e.g. operations that are life saving e.g. cancer treatments or just plain and simple operations for a better quality of life, like a knee reconstruction or treatment after bones have been broken.

This denial of treatment falls under the banner of criminal negligence.

And what are the victims of the medical profession's criminal negligence doing?

Are they taking these matters to court?

Are they 'documenting' this on social media so that the mainstream media cannot hide under the “we were not aware of these things happening” banner?

All this is going on, yet the mainstream media is silent on this, but they focus your attention on some useless 'influencer' wearing a skimpy beach outfit.


Why, because they've been silenced with government (taxpayers) payments in the form of tax concessions.

They are told to follow the official government narrative, a narrative that lines the pockets of multinational corporations with taxpayer funding.

MANY of the alleged 90% were forced into a particular medical procedure, irrespective of what their 'consent' form states.

They've been threatened with job loss, their children not participating in school events and a plethora of other nonsensical excuses. 

Make no mistake about it, according to the official figures the 'minority' in Australia, approx 9% now, those who have not participated in the world's “largest clinical trial” are treated like outcasts, vermin, just like the 'yellow stars', the religious minority in the 30's

That's the reality of how these people are treated by the authorities in Australia.

No, it's not a 'conspiracy theory' as this is what Mr. Greg Hunt, Australia's minister for Health and Aged Care stated in an interview published on the 21st of January 2021.

Source: https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/interview-with-david-speers-on-abc-insiders-on-the-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

02 January 2022

eSIM, A new way to hack your data, Aussie family cheated of live savings


Phone manufacturers need you to purchase their newest wares in order to boost sales that pay for R&D (research and development) which brings in billion dollar fortunes for the corporations.

But, is this newest technology actually to your benefit?

Maybe or maybe not.

One thing is for sure with every new technology comes a new exploit.

Phone manufacturers may tout that their newest tech is safe, secure, etc but that is just plain and simply 'marketing' jargon, a lie, or to put it in legal terms; deceptive and misleading conduct.

The newest way of tracking people 24/7 will be via phones that do not have a physical SIM card but this new technology called eSIM.

The phone manufacturers may stated that the eSIM card might be able to be turned off, BUT in reality it can be turned on remotely.

You can turn something on if it's not physically there, like when your remove a SIM card, for privacy purposes.

Apple and Google have baked in new spying 'technology' within their respective operating systems with the use of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth scanning.

This cannot be turned off, irrespective of what you are told, where the only way to deal with it is to 'de-Google' your phone (remove the OEM's spyware attached to the baseline version of Android called AOSP), which some phone manufacturers allow this, but in the case of Apple's iPhones if you want a more private solution, then selling that phone is the first step.

We do not recommend to making the switch to eSIM (electronic Subscriber Identity Module) phones.

An Australian family was cheated out of their live saving by a hacker, using an eSIM as the 'excuse'.

While the hack may not have originated from the actual eSIM, it's another attack surface that can be exploited, and will be in the future by hackers.

From the beginning, mobile communications given to the masses were not secure/private.

Inherently or rather deliberately by design GSM protocols where made with 'backdoors' in mind, so that authorities can gain access to the target's phone.

Intel deliberately coded in a 'backdoor' into the core of its CPUs so that authorities could gain  undetected and unfettered access to your personal computer, something which was not detected for many years.

In relation to the newest hack, as usual corporations involved denounce responsibility, blame each other in a confusing legal mess that is made deliberately difficult or expensive for the average 'consumer' to obtain a remedy.

Disabling internet transactions on your card/account is another way to thwart thieves.

See more within the article  

https://www.news.com.au/finance/money/costs/south-australian-family-devastated-by-terrifying-phone-hack/news-story/d2884d85253b01aea6a0a071124d605f