Showing posts with label TEA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TEA. Show all posts

24 February 2025

The peaceful settling of Australia - Licence To Shoot Aboriginals


No Treaty right?

No 'honourable' conduct right?

What do you expect from UK pillagers and pirates?

This is what the imperial government and the Crown supported.

Let's not forget 40 years of Martial Law once they occupied this land.

A fruitful morning would be having tea and scones after a morning's culling of Aboriginals, seeing who would bring back the most skulls.

The actions of an honourable Crown Inc, and imperial government, surely not?

"Splendid show chaps".





26 January 2025

Can you record in court?

Happy Australia Day, but not for everyone.

The 26th of January is marked as Australia Day, you know, when the British 'pirates' arrived in an 'invasion' format (no prior treaty formed, like with New Zealand?), with ships full of criminals, where first and foremost Martial Law was installed on all 'persons' on the land, which lasted for 40 years until the enactment of the Australian Courts Act (UK) 1828.

That date, Friday the 25th of July 1828, is when the corrupt Anglo-Masonic legal system took a stranglehold on the inhabitants of this land.


When one enters a 'Kangaroo court of Australia', one may/will obtain (deliberately) false information by persons within the court either by spoken word or in writing.


In many Victorian courts, one may be greeted by a sign referring to the Court Security Act 1980 in particular Section 4A, with reference that recording is not allowed.

See reference:

https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/csa1980205/s4a.html

Well, this is a deliberate lie from the Anglo-Masonic legal system.

Putting aside a Section 78B (of the Judiciary Act (1903)), as to whether or not the Act is lawfully in circulation, which it’s not, but that is beyond the scope of this article, what the legal system is deliberately keeping from you is another Victorian law, that being the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006, specifically Section 15, paying special attention to (2)(e):

(2)     Every person has the right to freedom of expression which includes the freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, whether within or outside Victoria and whether—

(e)     in another medium chosen by him or her.

This is where a digital or analogue recording falls into this category, "another medium".

See reference:

http://www7.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/vic/consol_act/cohrara2006433/s15.html

In any event, the matter has been settled within then Supreme Court of Victoria, where at law ‘you’ ( or in legal terms: a ‘person’) can record all personal affairs in the place of business called a Victorian court.

Another exposé of corruption and deception.

05 January 2018

Police cover-up migrant crime wave created by the people in government


The people in government assure the consumers in Australia that the three arms of government function independently of each other, without bias or influence.

To remind the lay person, the three (allegedly) independent arms of government are:

1). Executive :- The Queen (U.K. Monarch) and NOT the unlawful paper entity the queen of Australia, Governor General

2). Parliament :- Ministers of Parliament, lawmakers

3). Judiciary :- Courts, police.

Let's take another important aspect that Australian case law should give the mass population the impression that no 'person' is above the law.

Very briefly;

The inception of police in Australia is that from a criminal element of society that being convicts, something no doubt our honest police force would rather the public not be aware of.

Tax slaves should also be aware that the police do not work for 'you' (the serfs) but rather the people in government, where the general population is literally the police force's enemy.

Another reminder is that the police are not answerable to the general population.

The police practice lies, deception,  false information, entrapment in order to obtain convictions against the general population, arising from policies from their 'bosses' the people in government.

The above ties the second and third arm of government together, therefore not independent as suggested.

The evidence of this is has reared its ugly head with regards to the very public crime wave by migrant Africans.

Please note that this crime wave is not new and has been around for over a dozen years with this specific migrant population, where the authorities have done very little to curb the 'problem'  where the good people of Australia are in harm's way in the hands of their government.

Bronwyn Bishop stated in 2015 that the first job of a government is to;

"look after the safety of its people"

a job that the current people in government failed at, where realistically they should be removed from their positions in government.

Since police are falsifying the reports of criminal activity;


how can you (the lay person) trust the police or even the people in government responsible for importing criminals into Australia?

Unless it's back to the policies of 1788 of this colony, where Martial  Law (officially) ruled for quite some time.

Crime, an excellent business for the people IN government, but not so good for the serf's on the receiving end of it.

The business called the 'Australia Government' importing terrorists, then creating laws to keep the good people of Australia 'safe'? WTF ??? !!! ???

STILL trust the people in Australia's government?

14 December 2017

Australia became a British 'possession' on 28 April 1770

From the book of the title:

NEW SOUTH WALES - The Mother State, issued by the Intelligence Department, 1906.

Captain Cook, accompanied by Joseph Banks and Dr. Solander landed at Kurnell ... and took possession (i.e. no treaty or barter, therefore 'stolen' or under occupation) of the country in the name of King George III.


The book is available for download (478p, 59MB) at:
https://ia801404.us.archive.org/0/items/newsouthwalesmot00news/newsouthwalesmot00news.pdf

19 November 2017

Australia the chartered corporation

Some people may know that Australia's ex prime minister Tony Abbott stated that Australia was started off as a chartered corporation.

Thanking Allah ( or 'fortunately' - for the people in government) the majority of the serf population missed it, where even if they didn't they still would not comprehend what that means.

So let's get straight into the meat of the topic from information contained within UNESCO under the headline;

Deed of Settlement of the South Australia Company 1836


The Deed of Settlement and Royal Charter of Incorporation of the South Australian Company is a key document in South Australia’s history: it highlights the difference between the manner in which South Australia was established and populated and the foundation of other Australian colonies as penal settlements. It also records British economic expansionism at its peak and illustrates the interconnections between British business interests, the Colonial Office, and social and evangelical activists. In 1834, the British Parliament passed the South Australia Act, which empowered the government to establish and settle a province in South Australia. However, the Colonization Commissioners required £35,000-worth of land in South Australia to be sold before the new province could be established. Initially, only a limited amount of land was bought. The South Australian Company was formed in London on 9 October 1835, to encourage the further purchase of land. On 27 June 1836, the Deed of Settlement was signed by about 300 shareholders of the South Australian Company. The company played a pivotal role in the founding, early survival, and development of the colony, where the company built roads, bridges, ports, warehouses, and mills, and established agriculture, whaling, banking, and mining enterprises.2

The Deed of Settlement and Royal Charter of Incorporation of the South Australian Company is significant as a document representing the history of both imperial Britain and colonial South Australia. In establishing the rights and property of the South Australian Company, it demonstrates the extent of British government, business and social-evangelical interests in Australia.

Inscription Number: #11

Year of Inscription: 2004

Physical Location: State Library of South Australia


The Deed of Settlement, signed on 27 June 1836.

Image courtesy of the State Library of South Australia.

17 August 2015

The true meaning of the title Mr Ms Mrs or Miss



On just about all government correspondence or forms you may fill in, you are asked for your 'title' that being either Mr, Ms, Mrs or Miss and you tick the appropriate box without even a second thought.

Most people would not even have a clue what that means.

Some people may come out with the line that you are a non-combatant military officer, where the response would be that you are a 'conspiracy theorist' or that you need a 'tin foil' hat.

Well the information below is provided straight from the law books in Australia, namely the Style Manual, sixth edition from 2002, page 516 to be precise.





It states:

"In formal correspondence, officers in the armed are addressed by their rank, given name or initials, family name and any postnominals; thus, Rear Admiral Felix Liou, AO. In formal correspondence, officers of the rank of army lieutenant, navy sub lieutenant and air force flying officer and below are given the conventional titles (Mr, Ms, Mrs or Miss)..."

So which one are you?

15 July 2015

The validity of the Australian Constitution according to the Parliament of Australia

We may have our views on the Australian Constitution and its legal / lawful standing.

Some may say that it did not get Royal Assent.

Some may say  that Queen Victoria, went blind and did not sign off on it.

Some may even say that because she was a 'root rat' she contracted syphilis and lost the plot.

One thing is definitely true that being that her great great grand children are married and fornicated to produce offspring by the names of Charles, Anne, Andrew and Edward.

In inbred breeding program was not confined to the Isles, but also included the mainland of Europe.

Blood 'thinners' the like of Dianna, Mary and Kate ensured the retard factor was kept at bay.

But back to the topic at hand.

Irrespective of the 'corporate' status of this 'default' government, the Australian Constitution is recognised in official documentation.

A current print (15 July 2015) from the PARLIAMENT of AUSTRALIA's web site address of:

http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Work_of_the_Parliament/Forming_and_Governing_a_Nation/parl

is available for download (3 pp and 107KB) at:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B21_coIgIYu2Rms3aU5TM3loTWM/view?usp=sharing

Containing the following information:

Parliament An Overview

The Parliamentary System

The Australian Constitution of 1901 established a federal system of government. Under this system, powers are distributed between a national government (the Commonwealth) and the six States (three Territories - the Australian Capital Territory, the Northern Territory, and Norfolk Island have self-government arrangements). The Constitution defines the boundaries of law-making powers between the Commonwealth and the States/Territories.
The Constitution: Full Description (HTML version)| PDF]

The Constitution - flowchart

The Commonwealth Parliament

The Parliament is at the very heart of the Australian national government. The Parliament consists of the Queen (represented by the Governor-General) and two Houses (the Senate and the House of Representatives). These three elements make Australia a constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy.
There are five important functions of parliament:
  • to provide for the formation of a government;
  • to legislate;
  • to provide the funds needed for government;
  • to provide a forum for popular representation; and
  • to scrutinise the actions of government.
Proposed laws (known as Bills) have to be passed by both Houses and be assented to by the Governor-General before they can become Acts of Parliament. With the exception of laws relating to revenue and taxation (which must be introduced in the House of Representatives), a proposed law can be introduced in either House.

Changes to the Constitution involve action by Parliament and the people. Both Houses of Parliament must agree on a proposed change, or if agreement cannot be reached, the Governor-General can present a proposal to the people. For a proposal to succeed, it must be favoured by a majority of voters in a majority of the states, and by a majority of voters overall.

[House of Representative Infosheet No. 7 - Making Laws | Senate Brief No. 8 - The Senate and Legislation]

The Governor-General

The Governor-General is appointed by the Queen on the advice of the Prime Minister. The Governor-General performs a large number of functions which are defined by the Constitution, but fall roughly into three categories: constitutional and statutory duties, formal ceremonial duties, and non-ceremonial social duties. On virtually all matters, however, the Governor-General acts on the advice of the Ministry.

The Senate

The Senate has 76 Senators - 12 are elected for each of the 6 states, and 2 each for the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory. State Senators are elected for 6 year terms, territory Senators for 3 year terms.

Historically, the Senate has been regarded as a State's House: the States enjoy equal representation in the Senate, regardless of their population, and State matters are still important to Senators.

The modern Senate is a very powerful Chamber. Bills cannot become law unless they are agreed to in the same terms by each House, except in the rare circumstances of a double dissolution followed by a joint sitting of both the houses

The Senate has a highly developed committee system and Senators spend much of their time on committee work.

The House of Representatives

The House of Representatives has 150 Members - each representing a separate electoral division. Members are elected for terms of up to 3 years.

The most distinctive feature of the House is that the party or group with majority support in the House forms the Government. The accountability of the Government is illustrated every sitting day, especially during Question Time.

Members have many other functions. They are involved in law making, committee work and in representing their electors.

Executive Government

The Prime Minister is appointed by the Governor-General, who by convention under the Constitution, must appoint the parliamentary leader of the party, or coalition of parties, which has a majority of seats in the House of Representatives. This majority party becomes the government and provides the ministers, all of whom must be members of Parliament.

The Federal Executive Council, referred to in the Constitution, comprises all ministers, with the Governor-General presiding. Its principal functions are to receive ministerial advice and approve the signing of formal documents such as proclamations, regulations, ordinances and statutory appointments.
Australia operates under a Cabinet system of government. The Cabinet, not mentioned in the Constitution, is the key decision-making body of the government and comprises senior Government Ministers. The decisions of Cabinet are given legal effect by their formal ratification by the Federal Executive Council.
[Australian Commonwealth Government]

Federal Judicature

The Constitution provides for the establishment of the High Court of Australia and such other courts as Parliament may create. The judges of the High Court are appointed by the Governor-General in Council (acting on advice of the Federal Executive Council).

The functions of the High Court are to interpret and apply the law of Australia; to decide cases of special federal significance including challenges to the constitutional validity of laws; and to hear appeals, by special leave, from Federal, State and Territory courts.

08 July 2015

Should our Constitution recognise indigenous Australians?

The Rupert Murdoch media has asked the some people a question and published it in their Herald Sun publication, under the section called VOX POP.

The questioned posed to the masses was:

Should our Constitution recognise indigenous Australians?

as seen in illustration below:



Some people may say:

"Do we have a constitution?".

or

"What's a 'con stee too shyn'?".

Well,


  • The Australian Constitution is our (the people's) friend.



  • The Australian Constitution is no longer taught in schools from the 1970's.



  • The Australian Constitution IS a valid and current document that mandates how the government MUST behave.



  • Once you read the Constitution you may realise how the 'government' misbehaves, in particular the judicature, which is in Chapter III of the Constitution.



  • The Constitution is a document EVERY Australian should be familiar with.


Some people may not even be aware that an entrenched 'British' law from 1688 or 1689 depending on which Act, is also valid in Australia called the Bill of Rights.

One thing is for sure is that when it comes to the Australian corporation conglomerate (nee government) and calling on the 'we the people'  for a referendum with regards to the Australian Constitution, they (the government) are definitely NOT doing it for the benefit to the people.

This is done with careful selection of words put to the people in order to make a vote on, for the benefit of the corporation conglomerate and NOT the people.

You can download a copy of the Australian Constitution in a document called:

An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia [9th July 1900], where the Constitution is contained in Clause 9 at:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B21_coIgIYu2blVRSkVidDRiTU0


It is also available from:

http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/Constitution

and

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/


You can also obtain commentaries to the Australian Constitution by John Quick and Robert Garran in a document called:

The annotated constitution of the Commonwealth by Quick and Garran at:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B21_coIgIYu2Tml3eGRjTXNRMG8

This is one of THE most important documents in Australia that the people can call upon in law.

DO NOT let the corporations take it away from you!

29 June 2015

What is the process of a guarantee of Justice in Australia

Many a solicitor, lawyer, barrister or QC that you may hire for your 'speeding' or 'parking' fine may advise you to pay it or "just pay it" as put by many a police officer.

Putting aside that: "..all Grants and Promises of Fines and Forfeitures of particular persons before Conviction are illegall and void. " from the active entrenched law of England called the Bill of Rights.

Another lesser known fact is that every single person has a guarantee of justice, as per Chapter III of the Constitution.




This has been confirmed by Bret Walker SC on ABC's Q and A show on the Magna Carta which can be sourced from youtube (341MB, 1hr 11m)  at the following address:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RYy3T8ygY4


The Australian Constitution is contained within a document called:

An Act to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia [9th July 1900]

Within this document is a set of rules the government MUST follow.

The judicature MUST follow the rules as outlined in Chapter III  (Sections 71 - 80)

Chapter III (Sections 71-80) of the 'Constitution' is available for download at:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B21_coIgIYu2VnBsREFEcGE4VDg&authuser=0

Source: http://www.aph.gov.au/~/~/~/link.aspx?_id=1A4B10F0E0C645D68D16DC6953E7CE52&_z=z

Download this document and take it with you to ALL your court matters.

NOTE: If ANY process has not been followed by the judicature with respect to your court matter, you have been denied justice in Australia.

Also note: That the actual validity of law (various Acts) in Victoria is put aside for the purpose of this post.

What is the first job of a government?



On the Australian television program Q and A, which is broadcast on the ABC's (Australian Broadcasting Commission's) channel, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Bronwyn Bishop, stated on national television (12m:17s into the program) that:

" The first job of a government is to look after the safety of its people".

Now.....

If you substitute the words "a government" for a company's name e.g. 'Hanky Panky Cleaning Services', then it should be clear that the first job of that 'company' is to look after its (own) people.

Therefore there should be no misconception, that the first job of a government is to look after the safety of... its employees, that being the Executive; Governor Generals, the Parliament; MPs, lawmakers, the Judiciary; Courts, police, as the people/general population/serfs/plebs are NOT part of the 'government'.

How many actions do you know that have been done by the 'government' (corporation conglomerate) that have NOT been for the safety of its people?

See reference:

22 June 2015

Magna Carta, the Great Charter - Clause 61 Lawfull Rebellion

On the 15th of June 2015, was the 800th anniversary of a document called the Magna Carta Libertatum (the Great Charter of Liberties), which was from a transition period from laws of the forest to some sort of structure in law.

(See illustration below from Wikipedia - Source: British Library)



Many lay people, serfs or plebs may not have ever heard of this document, and rightly so, not because it's 800 years old, but it's part of a process of opening people's eyes to the injustices and crimes that 'authorities' commit against the common folk.

Modern technology has also allowed information to travel literally at lightning speed, allowing people from all walks of life, including the lay, serfs and plebs, paedophile judges, corrupt criminals masquerading as MP's to communicate via something called the 'internet'.


While there is common saying "knowledge is power", another saying "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing" definitely holds merit.

On this thing called the 'internet' there has been a bit of 'white noise' in regards to this document of 1215.

In particular to Chapter/Clause 61 regarding something called a "Lawful Rebellion"

So the sheep (in Australia and the U.K) have obtained a bit of knowledge on this document they 'discovered' and wish to apply this against the corrupt(?) Monarchy of today.

"Yeah.... It's our RIGHT to rebel against the oppressive authorities" or
" I served a document on Her Majesty the Queen",
or whatever else the commoners are saying.

But how many have actually read the document?

How many know the true meaning of the context of the words?

The following text is (one version) on Clause 61:

Since for God, for the improvement of our kingdom, and to better allay the discord arisen between us and our barons, we have granted all these concessions, and wishing that the concessions be enjoyed in their entirety with firm endurance (for ever), we give and grant to the barons the following security:

Namely, that the barons choose any twenty-five barons of the kingdom[1] they wish, who must with all their might observe and hold, and cause to be observed, the peace and liberties we have granted and confirmed to them by this our present Charter. Then, if we, our chief justiciar, our bailiffs or any of our officials, offend in any respect against any man, or break any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offence is notified to four of the said twenty-five barons, the four shall come to us—or to our chief justicicar if we are absent from the kingdom—to declare the transgression and petition that we make amends without delay. 

And if we, or in our absence abroad the chief justice, have not corrected the transgression within forty days, reckoned from the day on which the offence was declared to us (or to the chief justice if we are out of the realm), the four barons mentioned before shall refer the matter to the rest of the twenty-five barons. Together with the community of the whole land, they shall then distrain and distress us in every way possible, namely by seizing castles, lands, possessions and in any other they can (saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children), until redress has been obtain in their opinion. And when amends have been made, they shall obey us as before.

Whoever in the country wants to, may take an oath to obey the orders of the twenty-five barons for the execution of all the previously mentioned matters and, with the barons, to distress us to the utmost of his power. We publicly and freely give permission to every one who wishes to take this oath, and we shall never forbid any one from taking it. Indeed, all those in the land who are unwilling to this oath, we shall by our command compel them to swear to it.

If any one of the twenty-five barons dies or leaves the country, or is in any other manner incapacitated so the previously mentioned provisions cannot be undertaken, the remaining barons of the twenty-five shall choose another in his place as they think fit, who shall be duly sworn in like the rest. 

If there is any disagreement amongst the twenty-five barons on any matter presented to them, or if some of them are unwilling or unable to be present, what the majority of those present ordain or command shall be held as fixed and established, exactly as if all twenty-five had consented in this.
The said twenty-five barons shall swear to faithfully observe all the aforesaid articles and will do all they can to ensure that the articles are observed by others. 

And we shall procure nothing from any one, either personally or indirectly, whereby any part of these concessions and liberties might be revoked or diminished; and if any such thing has been procured, let it be void and null, and we shall never make use of it ourselves or through someone else. 

So for all those Aussies and their British counterparts who wish to start a lawful rebellion, BEST you jump on your horse and find a Baron or 25, that's provided you're a "Freeman on The Land".

There just may be 8 freemen in Australia, and then there's the hurdle of the 'Barons' and no it's not the one who is in a red plane waging war.

Anyone who serves a notice on the Queen for a 'Lawful Rebellion', deserves a public flogging, to be recorded and broadcast on this thingi called the 'interwebs', maybe 'youtubes' will be the place to put it on, 'cause the plebs love their youtubes.

01 May 2015

Australian Independence Day, when exactly?

So would it suffice to say that most Australians know when the American's celebrate Independence Day?

Hint: It's a Public Holiday there.

What about Australia?

So, when do Australians celebrate the Independence Day of Australia?

Looking though the Public Holidays calendar, there is no holiday pertaining to Australia's independence from the United Kingdom.

Why?

Because Australia is NOT independent from the U.K. or more specifically the 'Crown'.


In the illustration above it is claimed by the Project Gutenberg Self - Publishing Press, that Australia has Independence from the United Kingdom.

Link: http://self.gutenberg.org/article/WHEBN0004689264/Australia


Another quick search in a quite popular search engine may reveal some results that show Australia Day which is the 26th of January, marking the anniversary of the arrival of the "First Fleet" in 1788.


Some law educational institutions may tell their future lawyers, solicitors or barristers that on that day (26th of January) with the arrival of the First Fleet, the laws of England came to the land as well.

This is plain and simply a lie, or [deliberate?] false information.

With the arrival of the First Fleet, came convicts, some civilians, the Royal Navy, Royal Marines, and a (naval) Governor, where MARTIAL LAW was put in place upon every man, woman and child on the land, including the Indigenous population of the continent.

Martial Law was in place from January 26th 1788 until the year 1828.

Make NO mistake about it, the legal (as opposed to political) reality, Australia is still a colony of the United Kingdom, and the general populous of this land are NOT 'free' men or women.

In legal reality, the 26th of January marks the last day of freedom people had on this land.

It has been twisted by the 'authorities' as a day of celebration (for the people?).... well maybe for them.

Ask ANY Indigenous Australian what the 26th Day of January means, and the words of slavery, murder or genocide may be uttered.

26 April 2015

Parliamentary Education Office local government Fact Sheet

Information produced by the Australian government under the banner of the Parliamentary Education Office regarding 'local government' is misleading and/or false information.

According to the printed material obtained from the site within the link:

http://www.peo.gov.au/uploads/peo/docs/fact-sheets/government.pdf


"Australia has three levels of government: federal,
state/territory and local. The federal government is
the highest level of government."


See illustration below:




In reality there are only two lawful levels (tiers) of government in Australia.

The first being federal (Commonwealth), then state/territorial (also known as 'local government' - as defined in the document called 'Australia's Constitution').

What is referred to today as 'local government' or city councils is referred to as municipal office, a department of the state, and NOT another level or tier of government.



See page 936 (illustration above) of the document called "THE ANNOTATED CONSTITUTION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH" By John Quick and Robert Randolph Garran, in the link below which is a digitised version of the book from the University of Toronto Library, Canada. (1056pages, 76.5MB)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B21_coIgIYu2Tml3eGRjTXNRMG8/view?usp=sharing


Australia's 'founding' document is the Australian Constitution which came into effect on 1st of January 1901.

Available for download in the link below is "An Act to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia" with the lawful seal, which contains the Constitution from Section 9.


https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B21_coIgIYu2b2xFTWY0NURERkU/view?usp=sharing

Another piece of misinformation brought to you by the (trusting?) government.

29 March 2015

The Constitution Act 1975

For those who are researching the validity of law in Victoria, Australia.

The document contained in the pdf is in relation to the invalid "Constitution Act 1975".

It is available for download at the following link:


We invite the mainstream media to follow, investigate or report on the validity of law (not only in Australia) but particularly in Victoria.

Would the mainstream media report on a seemingly insignificant court case challenging a 'parking fine' that exposes the validity of law in Victoria?

Source supplied.

03 March 2015

Statute Law Revision Act (1973) Another unlawful Act

The general populous are taken for a ride when it comes to something called 'law' in Australia.

Solicitors, lawyers, barristers, judicial clerks, etc are certainly not in the business of informing you the corrupt nature of Australia's legal system, as this would be a conflict of interest.

There are plenty of Acts enacted that erode the rights of the Australian people.

One such Act is the Statute Law Revision Act (1973) which allegedly was assented to on the 19th of December 1973.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B21_coIgIYu2c3BhSTVfb3gyUUk/view?usp=sharing

One important question should come to mind, is that was this Act passed lawfully?

Apart from all the checks and balances that go along the way to make an Act lawful, and putting aside the actual validity of law in Australia, an easy was to spot a fake is with the words on the first page.

The words to look out for (as in the Statute Law Revision Act) are:

BE IT ENACTED by the Queen...

whereas in a (more) lawful Act it should read:

Be it enacted by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty...

That's the easiest way to spot a 'fake' Act from a 'real one'.

27 February 2015

Australian Constitution Act - The time of Federation

The time of Federation
Some History
We accept that the people of this continent known as Australia recognize that the traditional inhibitors of the aforementioned continent are of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander decent and that the Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander people are the Indigenous people of this continent. Like it or not, it was the United Kingdom (UK),that settled this country, bringing with them their central form of Governance that had operated for centuries.
The Colonies:

In the mid to late 1800s, the Colonies were not working together instead they were constantly trying to outdo one another to the people’s disadvantage. They were also consistently making laws that were repulsive to the people and offensive to the Laws of England.This misbehaviour still continues today.
The rampant Governments of the Colonies were misbehaving so badly that the UK Parliament were forced to make a law, the Colonial Laws Validity Act 1865 (Imp) that stopped such Governments from making laws that were repugnant to the Laws of England. The wise men and women of Australia (The humanitarians) were not particularly happy with the way the Colonies were behaving to the extent, that in their eyes Australia needed a local umbrella body (the Commonwealth Government) that had the ability to restrain the Colonies.
Federation

At the time just before Federation, Australia consisted of six Colonies. To turn six Colonies into the Commonwealth of Australia required an Act from the UK Parliament. The Act that the UK Parliament used to Federate Australia was called; “An Act to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 9th July 1900”. That Act is a Law of the UK Parliament and they can repeal, amend or do nothing with it and the latter is what has happened.

There is no provision to change the Constitution Act other than the UK Parliament and it’s extremely unlikely that they would do that without a referendum of the people in this country. The Constitution Act is made up of a Preamble and 9 Covering Clauses or Sections and no more. The Constitution Act is an enabling act, in other words an Act that allowed Australia to Federate.
We must understand the difference between the Constitution Act and the Constitution. We also must understand that the Constitution is part of the Constitution Act.(Covering Clause 9)
The Constitution Act.
Below we have included part of the preamble, with some explanation of the Constitution Act.
and is referred to as the Constitution Act.
Preamble.(Relevant part only).                       
“Whereas the people of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania, humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God, have agreed to unite in one indissoluble Federal Commonwealth, under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and under the Constitution hereby established.”
“Whereas the people…..; the words “Whereas the people” establish the fact that it was the people that Federated Australia and not any form of Government. “Whereas the people” is neither discriminatory nor racist. Those three words also establish the fact that the people are sovereign over and above any Parliament in Australia.The Annotated Constitution written by Quick and Garran make the following comments; “This opinion approaches near the truth, is the supreme absolute and uncontrollable authority remains with the people.The opening words of the preamble also proclaim that the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia is founded on the will of the people whom it is designed to unite and govern”.
………New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania; those five Colonies now States, decided to unite as the Commonwealth of Australia and although Western Australia was not part of the Commonwealth at the time of the creation of the Constitution Act. They did however decide to become part of the Commonwealth about one month later. Now that all six Colonies have become six States they united to form the Commonwealth of Australia. New Zealand was invited to be part of the Commonwealth of Australia at that time but they declined the offer.


…...have agreed to unite in one indissoluble Federal Commonwealth; simply means that the six Colonies that became States, then went on to be part of the Federal Commonwealth that could not be split up. There is no provision in either the Constitution Act or the Constitution for any State to split from the Commonwealth.
……under the Crown of the United Kingdom; The words “under the Crown of the United Kingdom” have very significant meaning.The Annotated Constitution written by Quick and Garran make the following comments; “It is a concrete and unequivocal acknowledgment of a principle which pervades the whole scheme of Government; harmony with the British Constitution and loyalty to the Queen of the United Kingdom with its multitudinous peoples and its complex divisions of political power”.
……United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland; The words “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland” simply mean that three Countries formed together. Prior to the Act of Union 1707, United Kingdom consisted of three separate Countries. Those Countries were England, Scotland and Ireland (Wales is part of England). That on 1st May, 1707, the nations of England and Scotland were united into one kingdom by the name of Great Britain and that there should be one Parliament for the whole kingdom. In 1801, in another Act of Union, Great Britain and Ireland formed together to become the United Kingdom.
…..and under the Constitution hereby established; The words, “Under the Constitution,” The Annotated Constitution written by Quick and Garran make the following comments; “The Commonwealth is a political community, carved out of the British Empire and endowed through its Constitution with a defined quota of self-governing powers. Those powers are delegated by and derived from the British Parliament, and they are to be held, enjoyed, and exercised by the people of the Commonwealth in the manner prescribed by the grant, subject;
(1) to the supreme British Sovereignty (under the Crown), and
(2) to the Constitution of the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth is consequently under a double subjection. It is subject in the first place to the British Parliament, which, as the ultimate sovereign authority of the Empire, has the legal power to legislate for the Commonwealth as a part of the Empire, and even to amend or repeal the Constitution of the Commonwealth. The grant of a Constitution to any dependency of the Empire is, however, a practical guarantee that no Imperial legislation conflicting with such grant will be passed except at the express request and with the concurrence of the dependency”

Below we have included part of Covering Clause 5 again with some explanation of the Constitution Act.
Covering Clauses 5. Operation of the Constitution and laws.
(Relevant part only).
“This Act, and all laws made by the Parliament of the Commonwealth under the Constitution, shall be binding on the courts, judges, and people of every State and of every part of the Commonwealth, notwithstanding (despite) anything in the laws of any State.”
It is this Covering Clause that enables any person to bring the Constitution Act, which includes the Constitution into any court. It would help to support your argument using Covering Clause 5 with some case law.
The Annotated Constitution written by Quick and Garran make the following comments,“No difficulty is suggested by the words, “and all laws made by the Parliament of the Commonwealth under the Constitution.” The words “under the Constitution” are words of limitation and qualification. Not all enactments purporting to be laws made by the Parliament are binding; but laws made under, in pursuance of, and within the authority conferred by the Constitution, and those only, are binding on the courts, judges, and people. A law in excess of the authority conferred by the Constitution is no law; it is wholly void and inoperative; it confers no rights, it imposes no duties; it affords no protection.The Act itself is binding without limitation or qualification because it is passed by the sovereign Parliament (UK Parliament), but the laws passed by the Parliament of the Commonwealth, a subordinate Parliament, must be within the limits of the delegation of powers or they will be null and void.What is not so granted to the Parliament of the Commonwealth is denied to it. What is not so granted is either reserved to the States, as expressed in their respective Constitutions, or remains vested but dormant in the people of the Commonwealth”
The Constitution.
To understand anything about a Constitution. We must first ask ourselves two questions;
1.   What is a Constitution?
and
          2. Why do we have such a thing?
A Constitution is a document that is full of laws that control the governance of this country.


And what we mean by governance is that there are three distinct and totally separate organs of government in this country, and they are;
a.The Parliament, which consists of the upper and lower houses (someone should tell Queensland about that, and is a very good example of why we should ask question 2 above far more frequently) and it is the Parliament that make, repeal and amend laws by first creating bills, and
b. The Executive, which is headed up by the Governor General and it is one of their responsibilities to give or not to give Royal assent to bills created by Parliament so that they can become laws. The Police are also an integral part of the Executive, and
c. The Judicature, which is headed up by the Chief Justice of the High Court, it is their responsibility to interpret the law and administer justice. The High Court is also an integral part of theJudicature, their primary role is to interpret and uphold the Constitution of the Commonwealth and that of the States.They are not there to defend any form of Government, whether State or Federal, a characteristic that is becoming far too frequent.
Why do we require a Constitution?
As described early in this document the wise men and women of Australia (The humanitarians) were not particularly happy with the way the Colonies were misbehaving. To the extent, that in the eyes ofthe wise men and women a local umbrella body was needed (the Commonwealth Government) that had the ability to restrain the Colonies. It was also realised that the people required a document that would protect the people from that umbrella body. The Constitution was to be that document.
How did the people come by the Constitution?
The Constitution took about thirteen years from conception to completion. In 1888 the wise men of Australia (largely lawyers) were called the framers of the Constitution and they conducted constitutional conventional debates all around the country. The constitutional conventional debates started in1888, and went on for ten years. Then in 1898, and only after the framers were satisfied they had a document that they could put to the people in a referendum (Landowners only), a document to seek their approval, at that point the document would become a Constitution.

That 1898 referendum was unsuccessful, the framers had to go back to the drawing board, talk to the people and readjust the document to better reflect their will, and have another referendum (again landowners only),which they did in 1899. This referendum was successful and now the people had a Constitution, which came into effect on the 1st January 1901.

After federation, the people were excited about the formation of their new and independent country, all looked well. But it did last very long. Soon after Federation the rot started to set in, the extreme right wing (fascist) governments started to exert their marauding tactics upon the people. Such behaviour has grown considerably worse since Federation and it’s not going to get any better until the people wake up and do something about it.
The appalling behaviour by the three organs of government (parliament, executive and the judiciary) has been going on in this country for many decades, and is only able to take place because not enough people are reading and understanding the Constitution, nor asking the two questions mentioned above. We must also lobby our politicians and to let them know just how angry you are. It can all be summed up quite easily, the framers created the Constitution, the people approved the Constitution and such Constitution is in place to protect the people from the marauding governance.
For that reason, we all must read and understand the Constitution, if not enough of us do that, then the age old saying applies.
“If you keep doing what you have always done (nothing), why would you be surprised if you keep getting what you what you always got?”

clrg.info 22 Jan 2015
Information that EVERY Australian should be familiar with!