23 April 2011
Recently, a woman was eating a burger she had purchased from McDonald's when she took a bite into it and chipped her tooth. The cause of her tooth being chipped, was found to be a rock in the burger.
In order so that the mass media outlets do not get a hold onto the story, and a subsequent inquiry into the food handling practices by the Food Standards Authority of Australia and New Zealand, McDonald's paid this woman Hush Money, which was later used in part to purchase a new vehicle.
Many Junk Food outlets breach the Food Standards codes, in terms of cleanliness, and the serving of food at the correct temperature.
Certain pubs in Melbourne also have food inspectors on their payroll in order NOT to breach them, (for example) for serving food whilst there was smoking allowed on the premises.
New laws have been put in place since, that state that no smoking is allowed inside enclosed venues.
22 April 2011
The government has coined a plan to pretend they care for workers by giving them a “free” health check. The primary purpose is to collect data on individuals, later selling it to companies such as insurance companies, health benefit organisations, etc. This information will later be used against the individual, in any circumstances that arise, that medical information needs to be accessed.
If the government said we would like to collect your health information to store it and use it at a later date, there would be a civil libertarian outburst. The government has package this data collection exercise in a more palatable format, in that the public will accept in the form that they ‘care’ for you. The government does NOT care for you but rather your ability to pay taxes.
There is NO such thing as a free ride in government.
Another covert method of obtaining data on individuals.
Data is being collected and used against individuals at an alarming rate, in which Joe Average is deliberately being misinformed or not informed by the relevant data collectors, or government agencies or corporations.
This is a map of everywhere I’ve been for nearly the last year. Everywhere.
I didn’t carry around a special tracking device. The FBI isn’t sending goons in unmarked vans to track me. All I did was use an iPhone. And if you have an iPhone, you’re being tracked right now, too, whether you like it or not.
It turns out that all our iPhones are keeping a record of everywhere you’ve been since June. This data is stored on your phone (or iPad) and computer, easily available to anyone who gets their hands on it.
And now, we’re wondering whether the same goes for our other smartphones. The opt-in wording of phone location service agreements is pretty nebulous (as agreements tend to be). When starting up a fresh Android, you’re prompted to agree to the following: “Allow Google’s location service to collect anonymous data. Collection will occur even when no applications are running.” We asked Google what exactly this meant, and they refused to answer on the record whether this “anonymous” location data is logged persistently, a la iPhone. But, importantly, unlike the iPhone, it appears to be totally opt-in for users. We’ve also reached out to Apple, BlackBerry-maker RIM, and Microsoft for similar clarifications, but haven’t gotten a response yet.
We know that AT&T and other mobile phone providers can always store this data, for any mobile phone. And law enforcement can get to it when they need to. But I don’t want this information bouncing around on my computer and in pocket, too, for no good reason, with no way to opt out. That’s just not right.
The privacy startle, apparently enabled by this winter’s iOS 4 release, was discovered by two security researchers, one of whom claims he was an Apple employee for five years. They’re equally puzzled and disturbed by the location collection: “By passively logging your location without your permission, Apple have made it possible for anyone from a jealous spouse to a private investigator to get a detailed picture of your movements,” they explain. All it would take to crack the information out of your iOS device is an easy jailbreak. On your computer, the information can be opened as easily as JPEG using the mapping software that the security experts have made for download – try it yourself.
The data itself is jarringly accurate. Even though it appears to rely on tower triangulation rather than GPS pinpointing (meaning you’re not safe with location services switched off), the map I was able to generate with mapping software the security duo released visualises my life since the day I bought my iPhone 4 in July. Everywhere I’ve been. Bus trips home. Train trips to visit family. Holidays. Places I’d forgotten I’d even gone. Zoom in on that giant blotch over New York, and you can see my travels, block by block. My entire personal and professional life – documented by a phone I didn’t know was also a full-time location logging device. It’s all accessible – where I’ve been, and when. (The animated software doesn’t show location linked to any duration of less than a week, so it can’t be used to snoop that closely. But the actual underlying database is timed to the second.) I don’t really have anything to hide, which is why I don’t mind sharing my map above. But at least let me turn this tracker off.
For now, there is no fix. The only way to remove it from your computer is to wipe your back up files from your computer. But then you have no back ups to restore your phone in case you lose it. And every time you sync your computer, though, it’ll create a new file. And if you do lose your phone, all your tracking data goes with it, right into the hands of whoever found it. And if you upgrade your phone to the next iPhone, the location tracking history goes with it.
Until Apple stops doing this, or explains why they are doing it, I don’t feel safe. I feel weird having all this data that I don’t want recorded on my iPhone, and so do others. Maybe they’re doing it for the government. Maybe they’re doing it because they’re forced to. So far, the researchers have found no proof that the information is being transmitted to remote servers hosted by Apple or the feds. Right now There’s no evidence of that at all – that’s the good news. But that’s still a lot of information on our phones about where we’ve been, whether or not we want it. [Pete Warden via The Guardian]
Update: Security expert Kevin Mitnick says he’s “Quite shocked and disturbed” by the revelation, noting that the logged data could be of great interest to a variety of entities – prying spouses, private investigators, and, he reckons, the government. He speculates that the existence of the log itself “could have been at the request of the government”, as such data “can’t be used for advertisements. It seems to me more to be a governmental request.” He added, “I like to know what my device is doing.” And, that the phone’s logging of data was in this case like “carrying around a bug and a tracker at the same time”.
Update 2: Google has declined to comment on the regard as to the exact nature of their locational data collection.
gizmodo.com.au 21 Apr 2011
Paths of Log files:
Home\Library\Logs\Crash Reporter\Mobile Device\*iphone name*\baseband
C:\Documents and Settings\*username*\Application Data\Apple Computer\Logs\CrashReporter\MobileDevice\*iphone name*\
C:\Users\*username*\AppData\Roaming\Apple Computer\Logs\CrashReporter\MobileDevice\*iphone name*\Baseband
Download the application!
Credit : Pete Warden
21 April 2011
An employment rights legal centre which provides assistance to Victorian workers about their rights at work.
Some of our functions include:
- A free and confidential telephone information and referral service for Victorian workers.
- Community legal education, including training, seminars and the production of a variety of publications on employment law and workers' rights.
- Representation and assistance for disadvantaged workers through a legal casework practice
- Campaign and law reform activity with a view to promoting workplace justice and equity for all Victorian workers.
JobWatch is an independent, not-for-profit organization funded by the Victorian Government, and is a member of the Federation of Community Legal Centres.
In line with policies of the New World Order, the government is retracting any place where the masses can complain to, and stand up for their rights.
- The government does not see it fit for workers to demand their rights AND fair pay.
- This closure of Jobwatch opens up the abuse of workers by corporate Goliaths.
- This is the official beginning of SLAVERY in Australia.
As stated on the website:
JobWatch has been advised by The Hon. Richard Dalla-Riva, Minister for Employment and Industrial Relations that
''It is my assessment that the activities for which the previous government provided funding are no longer clearly aligned to the objectives of my department” .
Together with the planned overpopulation (of Melbourne), there will be a huge drop in wages for the worker to the significant advantage of governments and corporations alike.
Welcome to the New Age of Slavery.
20 April 2011
Here is another lie perpetuated to the masses by the government.
In this illustration is a fridge magnet that states that you can call the Crime and Traffic Hotline, and the caller may remain anonymous.
This could NOT be further from the truth.
When a call is made to police the call number is known to police and the call is recorded.
These facts alone indicate that there is no anonymity. Of course phone call can be placed from telephone booths, again the number being known to police and the call being recorded.
The statement suggests that callers 'may' remain anonymous but does not necessarily mean they will.
Another lie to the technologically inept masses, quite simply to misinform them of the technological capabilities of law enforcement.
19 April 2011
In the mass media there is a strong emphasis on reporting how people 'scam' ( or defraud) the system, BUT there are NO reports on how the 'system' defrauds the public.
A company or government committing fraud against an individual is as illegal as an individual committing fraud against a company or government.
Since Centrelink is a business, one of the government's unwritten policies is the to 'save money'.
One way of doing this is to provide false information to the people who are on Centrelink payments then after a short period of time, they are BREACHED and payment is NOT given.
Corpau has recorded information indicating that Centrelink is deliberately providing false information in order to fraudulently accuse the participant in providing false information in order to not pay them.
If an individual then lodges or indicates that they are lodging an appeal, they are then again subjected to harassment by the government, in the form of inquiries.
The message is plain and simple to any participant who complains.
If you (justly) complain that you are being persecuted, the government will beat you on the head.
18 April 2011
This method of surveillance is across all governments from Communist to Capitalist, regimes to dictatorships. Sometimes it is used to eliminate uncomfortable people, whilst in more subtle ways it’s used to gauge public opinion or covertly monitor the masses.
Corpau, has recently been informed by a member of the public, that this person has been surveilled, and warned that the political views that they express could be monitored and the information not only held against them in their personal file but also result in them and their associates being watched.
The person who disclosed this information mentioned that the surveillance position in the government is in the vicinity of $70-80k salary, provided one meets the strict criteria, one naturally being loyal to the government, and of no political agenda. A background check of the individual is done which also takes approximately 4 weeks to complete ‘unofficially’.
Once trained the individual goes out into the community and for example sips ‘lattes’ (caffè latte) whilst reporting every move to their superior. If a subject is deemed a ‘risk’ (regarding for example political views), then further investigation is made into that person.
The above illustration shows fluoride being poured from a hazardous marked container into the water pipes the provide water to the masses.
In the writing underneath the caption states:
FACT: Fluoride is so toxic that it is considered hazardous waste by the EPA.
In Australia fluoride is added to the water supply in copious amounts, under the banner to protect healthy teeth.
One effect NOT being mentioned by the mass media is that fluoride used over time is a subduing agent, meaning it attacks the nervous system in such a manner that it suppresses the fighting instinct in people.
This is done deliberately by the governments in order to create a society that does NOT rebel, i.e population control.
This is done so covertly that it escapes the eye of most people, and it is forbidden to write this in the mass media, that the populous is being poisoned.
An interview by corpau with an Australian member of the Police Force has netted the information in this post.
The Police Officer mentioned that they are reluctant to take on 'jobs' that require many man hours that may or may not produce a conviction but rather to pursue speeding motorists as the returns are greater.
Withing the force a call out to a crime is labeled a 'job', in which as cost is taken into account once the task has been completed.
Just like Parking Inspectors, Police are expected to be an asset to the government rather than a financial liability.
The instructions are to make money for the government equal to greater to their salary.
The pressure on the Officer is from above, and it is irrespective if the Officer has good intentions or not to prevent crime or even to sentence any criminals, they must go out onto the streets to get 'easy money' from the motorists.
In one hour an officer can book approximately 3 drivers with an average fine of $200, making his worth $600 per hour.
A figure that is unobtainable pursing or convicting a criminal regarding offenses that may include robbery, aggravated assault or domestic violence.
The Herald Sun has given a few examples of this how families on a low income are struggling to make ends meet, and the real picture is grimmer than depicted by the newspaper.
The unwritten policy is VERY clear by the Labour Government which is to oppress the working class so that they cannot 'move'.
This is done on many a platform, of which one of them is to 'rob' the families of all their savings in order to 'just survive'.
One of the ways this is done is to introduce new taxes that are unnecessary other than for the sole purpose to provide more income to the politicians who make the rules.
Each government has its own method for executing 'poverty to the masses', and another one of Labour's tricks is to make motor vehicular transport unaffordable for the working classes.
Previous government catch phrases were:
"The recession we had to have"
for which the masses has to pay for.
Government and business failure is being paid for by the masses once again.
The Labour Government mentioned in its documentation that if it were up to them, they would class cars out of the reach of the masses, as it gives them too much freedom.
A plan that is now being executed by Julia Gillard's Labour Government.
One of the premises of 'election' to government was that Julia Gillard said prior to governance is that she will NOT be introducing any Carbon Tax.
As a result people have been coming up with new and innovative ways of calling her a liar.
In the illustration, the picture shows Julia Gillard, with a nose attachment bearing the inscription:
"Jul-liar - No Carbon Tax", depicting Pinocchio.
What the mass media as 'missing' is no one from the Rupert Murdoch media is asking:
- "Where is the money going" or
- "How is it going to be used to reduce carbon emissions".
The answer is that it is NOT going anywhere except into the coffers of the bureaucrats to better fund their lavish lifestyles.
The so called interviews with the Prime Minister of Australia, Julia Gillard are 'scripted' and no other questions are allowed to be asked publicly by ANY 'reporter', and if so their employment at the news outlet will be in jeopardy.
What seems to be freedom of speech is actually quite the opposite, heavily censored opinions and questions by the media moguls.