Covid exposes Australia’s police forces as abusers and molesters under totalitarian state?

The ‘mentality’ or justifications of abusers is that their victims must ‘fear’ them.

The police have full support of Australia’s lawmakers under the new ASIO Act where police can abuse children and get away with it under a so called national security blanket.

Because you have to abuse children for the safety of the serfs?

After all you can’t argue against ‘terrorism’, right?

A disproportionately high amount of women are abused in the hands of the police spouses, or just ‘plain’ police officers,  many times more than in the general population pool.

Many court cases show that the Australia’s judiciary ‘supports’ the actions of abuse by those in power, especially by the state’s police forces.

It seems that the colonists have the people wrapped up in a totalitarian, fascist (or any other description that may come to mind) régime that would make Kim Jung Un or Xi Jinping blush. 

So called 'democracy' died in Australia a long time ago.

The new 'normal' will be that you will be able to leave this colony not 'freely' but under specific conditions, then maybe in the not too distant future, they won't let you out of this colony at all, under whatever pretext they see fit.

The 'New Hope' Scholarship - Taking children away from their families

A healthy society is a happy society, is a strong motto that hits home.

Another saying that should also be well known is that 'in unity there is strength', which is well known within governance both in peace and time of war.

A sure way to control the masses is to create disparity amongst them, in order for them to divert their energies away from the source of  oppression.

Another way to control the peasants is to drug them, an all to common approach used, by for example the Anglo-Masonic invaders of countries, like the Americas and Australia, to name a couple.

Alcohol was introduced to keep the 'original' native inhabitants under control, and incarcerated for alcohol induced, white persons 'crimes'.

Ironically the native inhabitants are called Ab-original, meaning not original, as defined the prefix ab is derived from Latin meaning; away from; off; outside of or opposite to, with a simple example of abnormal meaning not normal.

The Australian government also took away children from their parents in the well documented events known as The stolen Generations, officially from a period between 1909 and 1969.

Fast forward to 2013 and the Australian government is again on the path of destroying families, but this time under the "New Hope" banner.

Migrants are being brought in on both plane and boat for 'scholarships', where they are schooled up in how to take children away from their families, legally, and under whatever pretext the social worker sees fit.

These children are then the ward of the state, and subject to abuse and experiments.

Another way of disassembling the strength of the family unit, which has many benefits for others.

Young bullies are thugs in the making

TEENAGE bullies turn into thugs and are twice as likely to be involved with the courts or police when they reach 19 or 20. 
 
Bullying in high school may be a sign of later antisocial behaviour, a long term study of 800 young Australians has found.
The study, to be presented at the Australian Institute of Family Studies annual conference, found likely offences by late teens included theft, burglary, assault, selling drugs and vandalism.
Lead researcher Suzanne Vassallo said 27 per cent of boys and 14 per cent of girls surveyed had been involved in bullying, either as victims or perpetrators.
Bullies had twice the chance of becoming criminals later in life.
"The findings provide further evidence that bullying in adolescence may be a marker of risk for a continuing pattern of antisocial behaviour," Ms Vassallo said.
"This does not mean that every schoolyard bully is destined to become a criminal.
"However, if unchecked, bullying by early teens can be a powerful marker for a tendency towards anti-social behaviour later on, particularly for males.
"It underscores the importance of early intervention initiatives."
Dr Joe Tucci, CEO of the Australian Childhood Foundation, said it would be interesting to track young people backwards to see what had led them to engage in bullying behaviour.
"We need to assess the toxic stress in their lives, particularly what's been going on from birth to eight," he said.
Dr Judith Slocombe, CEO of the Alannah and Madeline Foundation, said the findings confirmed existing research.

heraldsun.com.au 30 Jun 2012

Charlie Sheen to spend 'just seconds' in jail

Actor Charlie Sheen pleaded guilty to an assault charge arising from a violent Christmas Day altercation with his wife but avoided jail under a deal with prosecutors, his lawyer said Monday.

Although Sheen, 44, was sentenced to 30 days in jail following his guilty plea at a court in Aspen, Colorado, the star of "Two and a Half Men" will not spent any time behind bars.

Instead Sheen will undergo 30 days of treatment at the exclusive Promises rehabilitation center in Malibu near the actor's California home.

However the TMZ.com entertainment website reported that because Sheen had already spent more than one month at the facility earlier this year, the actor would face only a "few seconds" at the center.

Sheen will also spend 30 days on probation and undergo 36 hours of anger management counseling.

Sheen's attorney Yale Galanter told reporters Sheen would be back at work on the set of "Two and a Half Men" on Tuesday. "He's anxious to get the sentence over with and complete his probation," Galanter said.

Sheen was arrested on December 25 in Aspen on charges he threatened wife Brooke Mueller during an argument at a rented holiday home.

After several entanglements with the law in the 1990s in cases related to drugs, domestic violence and prostitution, Sheen is now one of the best-paid TV comedians thanks to "Two and a Half Men" and "Spin City."

In 1997, the actor was tried for attacking his girlfriend at his California home. He has also been accused of assaulting his ex-wife actress Denise Richards, a former James Bond girl.

ninemsn 3 Aug 2010

This example shows clearly that there is a different law for the rich and another one for the masses.

It also helps if you are from the 'Boys Club', of the same racial background as the judges, etc, or part of the Hollywood Financial Families.

Laws are created to keep the masses subdued do NOT apply to the corporations, or Law Makers.

The word privilege means PRIVATE LAW (not for the masses), i.e. Bought Rights, No Money, No Rights!

Child 'thrown from Melbourne bridge'

A four-year-old girl allegedly thrown from Melbourne's West Gate Bridge has died.

A Royal Children's Hospital spokeswoman said the girl died at 1.35pm (AEDT) today.

Police say a 36-year-old Hawthorn man has been charged with murder and will face the Melbourne Magistrates' Court later today.

The girl was rescued from the Yarra River this morning after she was allegedly thrown over the West Gate Bridge.

Water police reached the injured girl in the Yarra River within 10 minutes of the fall.

She was treated by paramedics before being airlifted to the Royal Children's Hospital in a critical condition, but later died.

The 36-year-old Hawthorn man was spotted with a Landcruiser and two children near the Federal Court in central Melbourne about 10.30am.

He was taken into custody and interviewed by police before being charged with one count of murder.

The girl's mother had been informed of the situation, Detective Inspector Clark said.

Det Insp Clark said the incident was "particularly distressing" for both family members and witnesses.

"This is a dreadful set of circumstances and often you think you've seen it all but you haven't," he said.

aap 15:00 29 Jan 2009

The general purpose of this blog was not to explore the child custody disputes / family law rulings, but the horrific nature of this crime has to be mentioned, together with the rulings and attitudes of the Law Makers which result in these extreme deeds.

Whilst there are NO EXCUSES, in the majority of cases where the 'unstable' male does a deed of desperation in an 'unfit' moment, is usually due to a custody dispute where the male is second rate.