This bad enough that literally every single law in Queensland is invalid from the moment the upper house was removed from the law making process, but passing laws at 2:30am seriously??? !!! ???
Just another dodgy 'money for mates' law passed while the slave population are sleeping. 
See article from 1 Dec 2016 by brisbanetimes.com.au of the headline:
Public servant super laws passed overnight 
The LNP opposition has accused the government of rushing through laws to get its hands on public servants' superannuation.
About 2.30am on Thursday, the government passed its Revenue and Other Legislation Amendment Bill.
  
The Queensland government has passed laws that will change how some public servants' superannuation is calculated.
Shadow Treasurer Scott Emerson said the changes could leave a
 public servant with more than 30 years' service $210,000 worse off.
"These
 changes will leave core public servants like teachers, police and 
nurses tens of thousands of dollars out of pocket," Mr Emerson said.
"In some cases this will cost public servants hundreds of thousands of dollars."
He accused the government of rushing through the laws late at night.
"(Treasurer Curtis Pitt) was caught trying to sneak through a change 
that could leave some public servants hundreds of thousands of dollars 
worse off," Mr Emerson said during the debate.
"We are seeing this Treasurer raiding public servants' superannuation."
The largely procedural bill includes a change to the State Public Sector (Superannuation) Act,
 which gives a government superannuation officer the power to change the
 multiple that dictates how much money an eligible worker receives from 
the fund when they go to cash out upon retirement.
The bill 
previously would have given the treasurer of the day the powers - but Mr
 Pitt introduced an amendment to that aspect overnight.
Currently,
 the formula is roughly the final salary of the worker multiplied by the
 multiple, which increases depending on the number of years of service -
 an increase in salary has an "immediate" increase in the accrued 
benefit for scheme members.
Workers eligible for the scheme could 
negotiate to use allowances to increase their overall salary; for 
example, a public servant with a base wage of $90,000 could negotiate to
 include $30,000 in allowances in their take home pay, bumping their 
salary to $120,000.
Under the changes, workers can no longer have 
their negotiated allowance payments count towards their overall pay, 
which lowers the multiple used.
Mr Pitt said the bill formalised 
the "existing administrative process to manage unfunded windfall benefit
 gains resulting from artificial salary increases".
"This amendment applies only to employees with defined benefit accounts," Mr Pitt said.
"There
 is no effect on the benefits accrued before the artificial increase in 
salary and there is no change to the treatment of normal salary growth, 
promotions or existing allowances."
Mr Pitt said if an employee 
believed a decision to adjust their multiple was an inappropriate 
application of the law, they could appeal under the Judicial Review Act.
He said the bill was no secret and accused the LNP of scaremongering.
"Sometimes
 an employee's permanent salary is increased artificially - for 
instance, because irregularly paid amounts such as loading are 
included," Mr Pitt said.
"This creates an immediate increase in the employee's defined benefits entitlement.
"While
 there is an immediate increase for those employees with a defined 
benefit account, those other employees with an accumulation account 
receive no such increase.
"That is not fair ... It is about making
 sure that co-workers who sit next to each other are treated in the same
 and equitable way."
The LNP did not oppose the bill, but opposed clause 68, which addressed the ability to change multiples.
The bill also allows state government and council workers to choose their own superannuation fund.