Is a 'To the Householder' letter a legal notice?

MANY Australians over the years have received a letter addressed 'To the Householder' and have thrown it in the 'round file' or 'lost' it in their paperwork.

This type of letter is usually considered as advertising material, where it is promptly discarded, irrespective of who the sender is.

Letters of this calibre come from Australia Post/Yellow Pages/etc, wanting you to conduct business with them.

In this case, the letter is from the federal government, where they want you to conduct 'business' with regards to a medical procedure that is part of a worldwide trial.

Briefly,

Are you even obliged to open this letter?

- No.

Did you get 'formally' notified to take onboard a medical procedure as described within the documentation enclosed within the envelope?

- No.

Can anyone prove that you received this letter?

- No.

In order for a 'formal' notification to occur it MUST be addressed to the full legal name of the person it is directed towards, where it's delivery can be verified that the person received such a notice.

A 'generic' letter in a blanket mail run is not a form of 'official' notification to the person.

Royal Melbourne Hospital medical fraud exposed

The current global health situation has given a prolific rise in fraud, price gouging and misinformation in many industries, without any consequences.

This post is with regards to the health 'business' where as a result the 'institution' involved caused irreversible harm to a person.

This is not an isolated incident, but rather a verifiable one in this case.

Australian hospitals are paid extra funding by the government when an admission into the hospital is related to the current global health situation.

In a deliberate effort obtain extra cash or rather defraud taxpayer funding, hospitals are falsifying the root cause for their 'walk-in' customers.

While the agenda is to falsify the numbers of people in for the disease, another important part of the agenda is to falsify the numbers as a result of a reaction to the trial.

We have obtained information from a source that wishes to be anonymous with regards as to what happened at the Royal Melbourne Hospital.

A person who participated in the global trial medical procedure, suffered ill effects of the so called trial.

See the above statement made by Mr. Greg Andrew Hunt, Australia's health minister on the 21st of February 2021, within the link:

https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/interview-with-david-speers-on-abc-insiders-on-the-covid-19-vaccine-rollout

This person was then brought to the Royal Melbourne Hospital with life threatening symptoms, where the hospital tried to conceal this fact and blame it on another ailment of the 'patient'.

The hospital then proceeded to carry out an operation on the alleged cause, where they stitched up the patient to be released back home.

All is good right?

Or so the doctors at the hospital thought.

Not content with the result the interested parties continued to dig further into the matter, where it was discovered that the procedure done by the hospital was completely unnecessary as the so called reason for the initial hospitalisation was deliberately falsified.

As one would expect, a legal team was brought in by the family of the patient, to sue the people involved including the hospital.

Naturally this type of information is not covered by the mainstream media in order to lull the serfs into a false sense of security in relation to the global trial.

Note: We encourage anyone who has witnessed fraud, or criminal negligence to come forward in documenting this in more than one place, just in case the 'authorities' will try to shut you up.

A comment (with verifiable evidence) to any post with redacted details can be published here if you so desire.

Google and Facebook allegedly had a secret deal to dominate ad market, lawsuit says

In recent years, governments have gotten increasingly worried about Big Tech's dealings, with tons of anti-trust probes popping up all over the world. An ongoing multistate suit in the US led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has just unveiled some juicy details about dealings between Google and Facebook.

Allegedly, the search giant and the social media company (now known as Meta), had a behind-the-curtains agreement, which would give Facebook an unfair advantage when using Google's advertising exchange. Thus, making it easier for Facebook results to pop up on ad spaces.

Where the case gets spicy is recently unredacted information, which claims that Meta (Facebook) CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Alphabet (Google) CEO Sundar Pichai were both very well acquainted with what the deal is supposed to achieve. Furthermore, Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg has been quoted as saying that "This is a big deal strategically" in a string of 2018 emails that have been uncovered during the suit.

Another email sets up a meeting between Sandberg and Zuckerberg and explicitly states that the deal will be signed only with the latter's approval. The lawsuit also alleges that Sundar Pichai was also personally acquainted with the terms of the arrangement.

Google, being the fan of quirky code names that it is, even had an internal "secret" name for the deal — it was named Jedi Blue, as per the case documents.

Both companies deny that their arrangement was illegal. Google spokesperson Peter Schottenfels calls the whole lawsuit "full of inaccuracies" and lacking legal merit. He further added "We sign hundreds of agreements every year that don’t require CEO approval, and this was no different", insisting that Sundar Pichai may not have known all the details about the deal.

Meta spokesperson Chris Sgro insisted that Facebook has similar ad bidding agreements with many other bidding platforms and they have helped increase the competition for ad placements, while still compensating publishers fairly and bringing a good amount of value to advertisers.

It's worth noting, Meta is not a defendant in this lawsuit — it's strictly against Google

What's the multistate suit against Google about?

Back in December of 2020, ten states (Texas, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Utah) filed an anti-competitive conduct lawsuit against Google in a federal court in Texas. The suit was announced and is being led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

The Google and Facebook arrangement is at the core of the lawsuit, but it also points out the fact that Google controls the Ad Tech marketplace, which is supposed to bring advertisers and content creators together in an unbiased manner.

Google absolutely denies to be abusing its power and states that it readily shares the majority of its Ad Tech revenue with 3rd party publishers.

And this whole ordeal is an entirely separate case to the Justice Department suing Google over abuse of its online search and advertising dominance. In this filing from October 2020, it's alleged that Google uses the millions of dollars its search and ad businesses generate to pay its Android phone manufacturing partners to keep Google services as default on their smartphones. Thus, creating a closed off loop, which doesn't let outsiders in easily.

On this one, Google claimed that the accusation is deeply flawed and pointed out that there are plenty of alternatives — people just choose to use Google.

The anti-trust probes just keep piling on and Google isn't the only one in the scopes — the Justice Dept. and FTC are also actively investigating Apple, Amazon, and Facebook, among other tech companies.

Source: phonearena.com

Victorian Government promoting lesbian paedophile grooming a child

In an all new low, the government of Victoria has put out an advertisement promoting a specific medical procedure via grooming.

Being all about diversity, the groomer is not the stereotypical male but rather a lesbian paedophile.

Don't forget, according to the Victorian government, a paedophile grooming a child is a “cute date idea”.

A 46 year old woman grooming a 14 year old child.

See video:

So, this advertisement of child abuse is sanctioned by the 'Victoria State Government', that's right your taxes paid for this.

All these types of actions are part of the Nanny State agenda.

Djokovic: Australians DISTRACTED with 'wrong' court documents

While the Danish 'papers' have admitted to screwing over the people with the wrong focus on misleading information from the government and not being assertive enough, there's no such luck in the colony called Australia.

So called 'journalism' is dead, where all the publications are 'people's' papers meaning sponsored by the government to spew out government sanctioned propaganda. 

How did this journalism die?

By the federal government pissing in the pockets of the publishers, in the form for tax breaks. 

That's right, Australian's tax dollars are used to lie to them, BRILLIANT! Who would have thought.

The media will allegedly go to great lengths to show you 'leaked' or even court documents on the colony's fiasco with the tennis star.

That's a distraction.

What's MORE important is this bordello called internal affairs.

Australia's CEO #ScottyFromMarketing dictates from the podium of not the Hillsong cult, but rather the unlawfully created office called the National Cabinet.

You're not even getting legitimate/lawful instructions with regards to this global event.

Scotty's 'blah blah blahs' from National Cabinet are about as lawful as him chiming to you what to do from the pulpit of his cult.

So why doesn't the mainstream media report this?

Remember when we used to have 'court reporter' telling us of the important cases?

Now what's important is some useless slapper's or rather 'influencer's' tiny bikini pics.

Why doesn't Australia largest media organisation the ABC report this?

After all, it did report about a Bill to keep National Cabinet a secret didn't it?

So why doesn't it follow that story up with the fact that National Cabinet is not legitimate?

The ABC was informed on social media of this fact and said nothing, oh except for that the comments are now closed because the 'moderator resource' is not available.

What a pathetic cop out!

The Australian people are being conned, misled, subdued and stupefied by the mainstream media, with full support of the colonial government.

Well that's what you get for not living in a 'real' country, e.g. Denmark.

See FOI on: NO VALID CREATION OF THE NEW NATIONAL CABINET:

https://constitutionwatch.com.au/no-valid-creation-of-the-new-national-cabinet/

See court document (Patrick v Prime Minister): A pretended National Cabinet:

https://constitutionwatch.com.au/patrick-v-prime-minister-a-pretended-national-cabinet/