VicPol Files: Court Out - Police still illegally alleging drivers are speeding

The colony’s state police forces are corrupt, they’re corrupt to the core where at the end of the day one cannot trust the police in one’s matters.

The state’s police forces are not ‘honourable’ where at the least they’re dishonest and at most their actions are criminal. 

ALWAYS record interactions with police and NEVER rely on their Body Worn Cameras.

Just because Victoria Police have been illegally catching drivers allegedly speeding and you’ve caught them out in a ‘court of public record’ doesn’t mean they’ll stop.

What’s worse nowadays is that there are no ‘investigative’ journalists or court reporters that will report such illegal activity by police.

What’s also worse is that when you ‘the defendant’ exposes this illegality by police, the judicial system does nothing about it.

It’s all about you ‘feeding’ the corrupt Anglo-Masonic legal system, that is deliberately designed against the people from the very start.

The so called ‘Rule of Law’, alleged innocent until proven otherwise or rather “Presumption of Innocence” only looks good on paper but in reality it’s a farce.

At law, it is illegal for Victoria Police to measure ‘speed’ or rather the vehicle’s velocity (distance / time), where the metric under question is distance, where the measured distance must be taken horizontally, i.e. on a plane that has zero degrees.

Example of camera car on an incline

This is not a new law, where it’s been in place for over 40 years.

Yet Victoria Police still point their measuring devices up or down hills, and therefore issuing fines illegally.

Kustom Signals, Inc. ProLaser 4 Operator Manual.

How can one prove the illegality of Victoria Police actions?

Use the Subpoena Form 42B, (from the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria), to obtain;

1). the meta data from the measuring device, 

(they may deceive you that they cannot retrieve it or it doesn't exist)

2). the Operator Manual for the measuring device used,

(they may deceive you that they do not have a copy of it)

keeping in mind that the burden of proof is on the accuser.

The judicial system provides false, misleading or deceptive information to defendants or people going 'against' the system, every single day.

Also keep in mind that the 'gatekeeper' (Registrar) may not allow your subpoena through, where that person may be obstructing the course of justice by not allowing you to obtain the necessary documents that may prove your not guilty of the alleged offence.

Obstructing the course of justice is a criminal offence.

Trump's Lies Exposed in a Series of Contradictions.

The old adage; "How do you know a politician is lying? His lips are moving" holds truth in Trump's public appearances.

See a collection of Trump's public appearances where he lies through his teeth to the world, as collated by Jimmy Dore within the video of the title: WATCH: Trump CAN’T STOP Contradicting Himself! , paying attention to Kurt Metzger's comments.

Trump lied on "regime change", day care, medicaid, medicare just to name a few.

With the U.S. and Israel attack on Iran, it's very clear that the US is Israel's soldier.

If Every Nation Is in Debt, Who Are They Paying? How Governments install Austerity

The people in governments and corporations truly do not care about the 'people'/serfs/commoners/general population.

The people in government are generally self serving, where all they truly care about is how much they can siphon from the positions they're in.

This 12 minute video is a great summary of how governments install austerity via a fraudulent monetary system.

See "If Every Nation Is in Debt… Who Are They Paying?" by Hidden Capital

"We the people" are the April Fools.

Australia's fuel crisis - 'National Security' Failure of Government

Source: PetrolSpy

FORGET about Australia being a "lucky country" spruiked by media and government.

Pen was put to paper that Australia is run "mainly by second rate people" and that was in the mid 1960's.

Well, legally it's still a colony, but that topic is beyond the scope of this article.

Nowadays it's worse, it's run by people that are not fit to run ANY kind of business, let alone a nation, period.

'National Security' is not just about military prowess but also infrastructure and resources fall under this category.

The fact that the Australian authorities have allowed the resource called fuel to (allegedly) run dry is a 'failure of government' where realistically there should be an inquiry into this with real world consequences where people MUST lose their cushy jobs.

BUT in reality this will never happen, as the nation is run by a 'cartel' where the courts are part if this as well.

Whenever Royal Commissions or inquiries are held there is no remedy for the serfs/plebs/commoners.

They're always the ones that pay.

In this example, with the highlighted cost of 91 unleaded at $3.12 per litre, corporations are racketeering the people with zero 'remedy' in sight from the authorities.

That's life in a totalitarian (penal) colony called Australia!

Hong Kong police can demand phone and computer passwords under amended national security law

Refusing to comply could lead to year in jail and hefty fine, while providing false information carries up to three years in prison

Hong Kong police can now demand that people suspected of breaching the city’s national security law provide mobile phone or computer passwords in a further crackdown on dissent.

The amendments to the law also empower customs officers to seize items that are deemed to have “seditious intention”, regardless of whether any person has been arrested for an offence endangering national security because of the items.

Refusing to comply could lead to up to one year’s jail and a fine of up to HK$100,000 ($12,773), while providing false or misleading information could bring up to three years’ imprisonment and a fine of up to HK$500,000.

The city government on Monday published the amendments to the national security law imposed by Beijing in 2020, using powers to bypass Hong Kong’s legislature. Officials will brief lawmakers on Tuesday, a government statement said.

The sweeping law punishes acts, including subversion and collusion with foreign forces, with up to life imprisonment.

The law sparked criticism from western governments and rights groups but Beijing and Hong Kong officials said it was needed to restore stability after the city was rocked by months of pro-democracy protests in 2019.

The amendments empower police to require a person under investigation suspected of endangering national security to provide any password or decryption method for electronic devices and to give the police “any reasonable and necessary information or assistance”.

Urania Chiu, a law lecturer in the UK researching Hong Kong, said the new provisions interfered with fundamental liberties, including the privacy of communication and the right to a fair trial.

Chiu said: “The sweeping powers given to law enforcement officers without any need for judicial authorisation are grossly disproportionate to any legitimate aim the bylaw purports to achieve.”

A Hong Kong government spokesperson said the amended rules conformed to the city’s mini-constitution, the Basic Law, and its human rights provisions, and “will not affect the lives of the general public or the normal operation of institutions and organisations”.

According to the Security Bureau, a total of 386 people have been arrested for national security crimes so far, with 176 people and four companies convicted. The Hong Kong media tycoon Jimmy Lai was sentenced to a 20-year jail term in February for collusion with foreign forces and sedition, sparking international criticism.

Source:theguardian

Coming to a colony (e.g. Australia), near you? Why not? We're half way there anyway!

Keeping in mind that Australia is a totalitarian state, and NOT a (purported) democracy.

Meta deletes your personal messages

The online world, or rather the World Wide Web, is a fascist corporatocracy.

If people believe they have a right to ‘free speech’ under an amendment to whatever so called constitution their nation has, this is not the case in the digital world.

Corporations rule and are given free reign over the online serfs/slaves/products.

They and only they can decide what can be not only posted ‘publicly*’ but now privately, where there is little recourse if one has been banned from posting something.

Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger now deletes content in ‘private’ messages between people.

No it wasn't, it was removed by Meta!

No only does it (Meta) delete the message from the sender but it also deletes the recipient’s message.

The message can as innocuous as a cat video can be, to political satire or a link to a medical article, where ZERO justification is given and the content is removed.

We have entered a new age of slavery, digital slavery that even law makers in the ‘real world’ are upholding. 

TV series Black Mirror seems to be a dystopian documentary series rather than just ‘entertainment’.

IF you value your privacy (and therefore security), Meta products are not recommended to be used.

* IT’s not technically ‘public’ as it exists within the (private) domain of that corporation’s forum/platform

Reddit User Uncovers Who Is Behind Meta’s $2B Lobbying for Invasive Age Verification Tech

Key takeaway points:

Meta funneled over $2 billion through shadowy nonprofits to push age verification laws that would force Apple and Google to build surveillance infrastructure into every device, while exempting Meta’s own platforms from the same requirements.

Meta’s lobbying operation spans 45 states using nonprofit shells to avoid transparency requirements, with funding traced through organizations like the Digital Childhood Alliance (DCA) as part of a $70 million fragmented super PAC strategy designed to evade FEC tracking.

Proposed age verification laws would embed persistent identity verification directly into operating systems, with Meta’s Horizon OS for Quest VR already implementing this infrastructure and lobbying efforts targeting Meta’s competitors while leaving Meta platforms untouched.

A Reddit researcher just exposed how Meta funneled over $2 billion through shadowy nonprofits to push age verification laws that would force Apple and Google to build surveillance infrastructure into every device—while conveniently exempting Meta’s own platforms from the same requirements.

Following the Money Trail Through Dark Networks

Meta’s lobbying operation spans 45 states using nonprofit shells to avoid transparency requirements.

The investigation by GitHub user “upper-up” traces funding through organizations like the Digital Childhood Alliance (DCA), which launched December 18, 2024, and testified for Utah’s SB-142 just days later. Bloomberg and Deseret News reported Meta’s backing of DCA, part of a $70 million fragmented super PAC strategy designed to evade FEC tracking. Traditional election spending disclosure requirements don’t apply to this fragmented approach.

What ‘Get Age Category API’ Really Means for Your Device

Proposed laws would embed persistent identity verification directly into operating systems.

The technical reality hits harder than policy abstractions. These bills mandate OS-level APIs that apps can query for age data—creating a permanent identity layer baked into your phone’s core functions. Meta’s Horizon OS for Quest VR already implements this infrastructure through Family Center controls. Now they want Apple and Google to build similar systems that every app can access, turning age verification into persistent device fingerprinting.

The Curious Case of Platform Exemptions

Age verification bills target Meta’s competitors while leaving Meta platforms untouched.

Here’s where the lobbying gets surgical. The proposed laws hammer Apple’s App Store and Google Play with compliance requirements but reportedly spare social media platforms—Meta’s core business. It’s like Spotify lobbying for streaming regulations that only apply to Apple Music. The “child safety” rhetoric masks a competitive strategy that shifts liability from platforms to operating system makers.

Europe Shows a Different Path Forward

EU’s eIDAS 2.0 offers privacy-preserving age verification with zero-knowledge proofs that protect personal data.

The European Union’s Digital Identity Wallet takes a radically different approach. Zero-knowledge proofs let you verify age without revealing personal data—like showing you’re over 18 without disclosing your birthdate or identity details. It’s open-source, self-hostable, and only applies to large platforms while exempting FOSS and small entities. Meanwhile, US lawmakers seem ready to let Meta bamboozle them into complete privacy annihilation.

Your device’s trustworthiness hangs in the balance. These laws could force every Linux distribution and privacy-focused Android fork to implement identity verification or face legal liability. The choice between surveillance-free computing and regulatory compliance is coming faster than you think.

Source:supplied

Fuel & Other Shortages, a DELIBERATE 'failure of government'.

Australia has truly either absolute fuckwits or arseholes in charge of this colony.

In any event MANY should be removed from their positions, as they have failed the people.

Australia is one of the most resource rich land masses on the planet, yet it's wealth has been squandered by the morons in charge.

See a video of approx. a dozen minutes by TopherField:

"Australia - the 'Lucky Country'" run by total arseholes. 

or more eloquently put by David Horne as explained in the following post:

TIL calling Australia 'The Lucky Country' was actually intended as an insult, not a compliment.     

Police corruption rife: I Catch Killers podcast Deborah Locke reveals death threats after exposing NSW police corruption that changed everything

Unfortunately for the 'good people' of Australia, the colony's police forces are rife with corruption.

The police literally cannot be trusted in any 'alleged' criminal matter.

In court they lie, tamper with evidence, destroy evidence and even tamper with witnesses and/or produce false witnesses with full support of the Anglo-Masonic setup legal system.

After all, the brethren look after each other.

Miscarriage of justice occurs in every single courtroom across the land, to the detriment of society as a whole, where the victims of the justice business are deliberately left without a remedy. 

Keep in mind that the old-adage "the system is broken" is a false one, as the reality is that the system is functioning perfectly, the way it was designed to.

Corruption has increased over the years, but the authorities would have you believe there is less.

Here is one story that the public news media are allowed to inform the general population of, the one that the colony's original corrupt police force could no longer hide.

I Catch Killers podcast: 
Deborah Locke reveals death threats after exposing NSW police corruption that changed everything

She saw too much. Then they found $20,000 in her car. What happened next would spark Australia’s biggest police corruption inquiry.

When former detective Deborah Locke joined the NSW police force in 1984 as part of the last class to graduate from the Redfern Academy female officers were, in her words, “lower than a police dog.”

“They used to make us wear these big, baggy culottes – [pants that were like] big long skirts,” she recalls of the bizarre uniform choices made on behalf of police women in the eighties on this week’s episode of I Catch Killers with Gary Jubelin.

“I remember once jumping a wooden fence chasing a bloke who was doing a break-and-enter, and I’ve jumped over the fence and my big baggy culottes have come over and hooked over the top of the wooden paling fence, and I’m hung up and I am just hanging on the fence, waiting for someone to come.”

 Yet little did Locke know that her outfit would end up being the least of her concerns during her time on the force.

The former officer turned whistleblower after witnessing first-hand the corruption that was rampant in the NSW police force during the eighties, a move that would leave her in fear for her life, a pariah in the force and the catalyst for the infamous Wood Royal Commission into police corruption.

‘They’re going to kill us’

The journey from ‘one of the boys’ to whistleblower unfolded over several years. After beginning her career in North Sydney, Locke eventually took a role within the Gaming Squad in the late eighties, at a time when she was heavily in the grips of alcoholism, something that made her male colleagues view her as a ‘drinking buddy’, on the many trips to bars and pubs the squad would partake in as part of its questionable methods.

Yet it was here that the extent of the corruption became apparent.

Cash bribes were commonplace between illegal gambling providers and police, and Locke regularly witnessed police tipping off providers before a raid in exchange for payment.

“Every time we did a raid they knew we were coming,” she tells Jubelin, “the cops, there were cops taking quids.”

“One time we went and [the illegal gaming crew] had a film crew and they’re videoing us. They had a big welcome sign waiting for us, they knew we were coming.”

But the point of no return came when $20,000 was discovered in the boot of Locke’s surveillance car. She’d been in Bathurst on a two-week study block, as part of a course she had enrolled in to advance her career, and when she returned she discovered the money had come from an illegal bookie who’d bribed members of her squad. Her boss, who was not involved in the corruption, had discovered the bribe, and had made the extraordinary decision to arrest the officers involved through the Highway Patrol.

“The next day, I rock into work and everyone’s just traumatised,” Locke, who was part of the small surveillance team now dubbed ‘dogs’, recalls. “Everyone’s rocking. And the next thing you know, people are drawing pictures. They’re going to kill us.”

“It was dangerous, we were all scared,” Locke continues. “And it was a horrible situation. It was just ridiculous. Even though I wasn’t even there or part of it, I was just tarred with the same brush – it was my car, and so I’m in on it.”

Locke was granted an overnight transfer to the Parramatta detectives unit, in order to be protected.

“By the time I got to Parramatta though, they already knew who I was, what had happened,” she says.

“And I was classified as a dog and a whistleblower.”

‘I’m going to go jail with these guys’

At Parramatta, Locke continued to witness corruption.

“If the gaming squad was like a circus, Parramatta was a whole different ball game,” she says, where detectives would have frequent contact with Roger Rogerson, a disgraced former cop who had already been dismissed from the force. Locke recalls Rogerson would “hold court” in Chinese restaurants, associating with major gangsters and being fawned over by police officers keen to win his favour.

It was Lenny MacPherson, one of Sydney’s most notorious gangsters in the eighties, that eventually triggered Locke’s whistleblowing. While drinking with senior officers and underworld figures at a Parramatta hotel, Locke was pulled aside and asked to perform a ‘favour’: obtain a gun license for MacPherson’s second wife.

The scheme was as bizarre as it was corrupt. Her superiors wanted her to go to Gladesville police station, present the application, and effectively pretend to be MacPherson’s wife.

 Despite being offered increasing amounts of money to comply, Locke refused the bribe.

However, in the process of handling the paperwork, she realised she was trapped. “I was hanging on to the piece of paper,” she says, “so the fingerprints are on it.”

Ultimately, it was a literal interpretation of the police code of conduct that led to Locke becoming an official whistleblower.

“It’s probably my autism,” she explains, “I’d read the policies and procedures and it said, if you saw corruption and you didn’t say anything or do anything, you would also be guilty of that offence. And the stuff I saw going down, I was worried. I took it literally. I thought: ‘I’m going to go to jail with these guys.’

Whistleblowing, death threats and a royal commission

When Locke first went to then soon-to-be commissioner Tony Lauer to report the corruption, she says she was met with “disgust”.

“He said, ‘you don’t know what a detective is, you’re a whistleblower’ and I’d never heard that term,” she says. “I got up my courage and I bravely said to him ‘what’s a whistleblower?’ He looked at me with disgust and said, ‘you know, that’s cops who are dobbing in cops’.”

 At Parramatta, the atmosphere turned lethal. Officers openly discussed her “disappearing,” and Locke lived in constant fear for her life.

“There was a copper that was going to speak out against the abortion squad in the seventies,” she says, “and he got shot sitting on the toilet. And I got told a few times that was gonna happen to me.”

The path to systemic change finally opened through independent MP John Hatton, a long-time crusader against the ‘boys’ club’. Locke became the only officer in the state with the backbone to sign statutory declarations alleging current corruption.

Her lone statutory declaration was enough for Hatton to set things in motion, and eventually the Wood Royal Commission into police corruption, which shattered the bubble of police impunity. It exposed a widespread culture of bribery, drug trafficking, and protecting criminals.

While many corrupt officers were granted amnesty to resign, the Commission’s findings fundamentally changed Australian policing by introducing rigorous accountability and oversight.

The downfall of Roger Rogerson and Glen McNamara

While Roger Rogerson had previously been acquitted of the attempted murder of whistleblower Michael Drury, he would eventually face justice in 2014, when he and Glen MacNamara – who had previously made a name for himself as a ‘clean’ cop – were convicted of the murder of Jamie Gao.

Locke – who had formerly posed with MacNamara at the launch of his own ‘anti-corruption’ book, was especially outraged by his involvement.

 “They said, look, he’s doing a book, come and support him … We’ve got a photo in the paper, you know, his arm around me,” she says.

Years later, Locke watched the downfall of the men who had once operated in the shadows. “I used to go down and watch them at court, and I’d wave, ‘hi Glen, hi Roger,’ and they’d just look at me. He had the gunpowder all over him and it was like a video in court,” Locke explains, describing how surveillance footage captured the pair drinking beers and stepping over Gao’s body.

“I just felt so good to see Roger in the dock, you know? He was glaring at me, like ‘that b***h!’”

See YouTube video:

source:news.com.au

Iran War: What the mainstream will not tell you?

As some even say it's "The Epstein War", a distraction from the 'Files'.

In any event BOTH Netanyahu and Trump are war criminals, that will never see the light of day in a court room, where they are literally untouchable by any law.

See 12.5 min video by George Galloway of the title 

MONOLOGUE: More than a crime, a blunder :