Dunce of Sussex

Briefly,

You were born into an ‘institution’, and were you not taught its law?

When you grew up and got married you concocted a plan to flee this institution with a one foot in and one foot out approach, but that was never going to work for you even though you did not comprehend the law you’re bound to.

You then tried to commercialised on your ‘royal’ status by branding ‘Sussex Royal’ (lol).

The sovereign had to step in and remind you of the law that you're bound to in the first place.

The removal of the brand name you tried to capitalise on makes you a laughing stock, but what’s more laughable is that people pay to hear you waffle on.

Even in the colony called Australia one cannot profit from the ‘crown’, which is what your intention was.

Your privileged and parasitic lifestyle demands that [for example] Canadian taxpayers must pay for your security as you are allegedly an IPP (Internationally Protected Person), whatever that really means.

In your case maybe it should stand for Internationally Prancing Punce?

Irrespective of whatever commercial success you may or may not have in the future, you’re still a dunce, a common trait of inbreeding (even though they tried to thin it out with the introduction of your mother) within the institution you came from.

So how did that work out for your wanna be ‘princess’?

How many 'genders' are there according to the law?

In this apparently gender fluid world we live in today,
many people have lost their way.

Some get married to a train,
while others to themselves they inflict pain.

They make an alphabet soup of their sex,
where in reality they should just take a Bex.

It doesn't matter if you're a whore,
According to [Victorian] law,

You're either a female or a male,
So shut up, sit down and drink another ale.

Breaking News: Freelee the Banana Girl's name is Leanne Ratcliffe

Last year, on the 9th of December, we published the name of Lawyer X, (at http://corpau.blogspot.com/2018/12/lawyer-x-or-informer-3838-defence.html) who is now publicly known to be Nicola Gobbo, where the post was removed by Google but not before it was read by many people.

Could the subject of this post have more shocking consequences than exposing a corrupt 'lawyer' ?

In today's digital world it is too easy to cry wolf to a global mega-corporation that holds every person's information at their administrator's fingertips, in order to have a video on its multimedia content sharing platform removed or edited under false pretenses.

A YouTube content provider that allegedly downs bananas that would put a 400lb gorilla to shame goes by the moniker of "F r e e l e e" or  Banana Girl, whose real name is Leanne Ratcliffe filed a complaint with Google, that an extremely talented young Australian comedian /'Youtuber ' (unlawfully?) revealed that her real name is Leanne Ratcliffe.

The problem with that is that in legal terms she would be classified as an unreliable witness or a vexatious litigant.

Her allegation is bananas, sorry nuts, sorry fruit loops, umm bonkers!

You see 'F r e e l e e' (please note that in this colony we call Australia, there are no 'free' men , or women, for that matter, but that's a legal digression), claims that Isaac Butterfield, revealed her (top secret?) identity to his viewers.

This is the video that was posted on the 27th of February 2019:

at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6uoINjPlmg 

As Isaac Butterfield pointed out that plenty of other mainstream media outlets 'revealed' her name, but what is most embarrassing is that she even mentions her own name in her video as documented in his video.


Should you be interested in Banana Girl, Leanne Ratcliffe, you can refer to comments on a website called Pretty Ugly Liar at:
https://prettyuglylittleliar.net/topic/1452-freelee-the-banana-girl-aka-leanne-ratcliffe/

Rosanne TV show axed in Australia

Hooray and good riddance !

Roseanne Barr is another piece of trash made famous by Hollywood.

Her rebooted show is something that Australians really do not need to waste their precious time on, but rather instead reading a good book, like the "Quick and Garran" (Commentaries on the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia by Sirs John Quick and Robert Garran).

Royal wedding fever

more like Royal parasites or virus.

Here is an accurate photo as shown by the Fairfax publication:

and here is one for the herd population from the Rupert Murdoch media empire:

Slave mentality bowing to an actor

So who is the woman in black, the woman in red bowing to?

She is an American 'actor' by the name Meghan Markle.

She has no other 'title' other than 'Ms.' Markle.

It looks like you deserve the slavery you requested.

Australian leaders offer Christmas messages

He missed the target

International Public Notice Commercial Lien in Tort by Wayne Kenneth Glew.

People from all walks of life now have the ability to publish information on a government carriageway called the interwebs.

Apparently not too long ago a person on social media of the name Wayne Glew had a lawful seizure of the Western Australia government.

When asked of him who had the 'keys' to joint a little while later, OBVIOUSLY giving him time to settle in, no tangible response followed.

Now readers can be graced with a document of the title; 

"INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE" Common Law Commercial Lien In "Tort"

Suffice to say we love a good Australian tort.

P.S Anyone got a spare Nine Hundred and Ninety Nine Trillion Dollars to help out Western Australia??? 


Source: https://larryhannigan.com/constitution-2/wayne-glew-update/

WARNING: The following words must be read individually, and considered for their entertainment value only.

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

Common Law Commercial Lien In “Tort”

Against

The Lien, the Lien Debtor and their address listed below;

All persons connected with the case now and in the future are severally and jointly liable and from here on referred to as lien debtors.

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

I, Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew CPO.OWB, For and on Behalf of the People of Western Australia Lien Claimants, have a Common Law Commercial (Security Interest) in all assets and properties, and bank accounts of the named Lien Debtor, Mark McGowan the Premier for Western Australia and the State Government of Western Australia ABN66 012 878 629 of Parliament House Perth WA.

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between I, Wayne Kenneth of the family GlewCPO.OWB and the People of Western Australia and the individual who accepts liability for the name Mark McGowan the Premier for Western Australia and the State Government of Western Australia ABN 66 012 878 629 of Parliament House Perth WA, individually herein referred to as “The Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that We have been the subject of a wrong (i.e.a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and Our Remedy IN LAW is to be able to place Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus WE ARE LAWFULLYable to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien which is $ 999.000.000.000 (Nine Hundred And Ninety Nine Trillion Dollars). current Australian Currency, severally and jointly.

This notice is to inform whomsoever that Wecan confirm that the Lien Debtor

Is in a permanent and irrevocable estoppel by THEIR failure to rebut the point-by-point MY Statement of Truth (Affidavit). The Lien Debtor is in default, and is deemed to be in bad faith. Therefore, the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor Mark McGowan the Premier for WA and the State Government of Western Australia ABN 66 012 878 629 of Parliament House Perth WA.Is henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses in 99 years or is, by some other means, removed.

Legal Authority UCC Rule 9-609 gives the Secured Party (the Lien Claimants) the right to take possession of the property on default, via the filing for Writ of Replevin in court, which in turn directs the Sheriff to take possession of the Lien Debtors’ property and give some to the Plaintiff (the Lien Claimants). Replevin, under Common Law, circa 1188, is the right to bring a lawsuit for recovery of goods improperly taken by another, and or the seizure of any personal chattels as pledge for the payment of debt, or the satisfaction of a claim.

Further, an unrebutted Affidavit stands as truth in Commerce. Universal moral/existential truth/principal, expressed in Judaic (Mosaic) Orthodox Hebrew/ Jewish Commercial Code, corollary to Exodus (chiefly Exodus 20:15,16). This is the best known Commercial process in the Commonwealth of Australia.

Yours truthfully, without ill-will, frivolity or vexation.

Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew CPO.OWB and the People of Western Australia, as commonly commonly called, Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew CPO.OWB, and the People of Western Australia and subject SOLEY to the Common Law.

Without any admission of any liability whatsoever, and with all natural Indefeasible Rights reserved.

Dated: 14^thof November 2017.

Any interested parties-debt collectors, investment banks, commercial banks, trusts, brokers, solicitors. Judges, traders, futures investors and commodity clearers can contact me.

Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew CPO. OWB

For and on Behalf of the People of Western Australia

24 Hagan Road, Glenfield

Geraldton, Western Australia 6532

Australian Constitution gives us the right to bear arms

The Australian Constitution, a 116 year old law, that has made its way into the hands of the herd population and literally immortalised itself in pop culture ever since the dual citizenship saga hit the mainstream media.

Ever since then any serf may reckon they're a "Constitutional Lawyer" where the worst part about it is that they have a voice on social media that can lead other members of the herd population off a cliff, as depicted below.

A 'luser' (pronounced loser, with reference to a loser user) by the name of Lyn Bennetts stated;

"Australia's Constution also gives us the right to bear arms, it doesn't matter if you like it or not it is our right"

WHILE referring to ... wait for it .... the
"2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America"

as shown in the screen capture below:

Now, for the record, we ain't no "Constitutional Lawyer" (LOL, PMSL, etc, etc),
but can someone PLEASE tell us where does it say that the serfs have to right to firearms in the
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 ??? !!! ???

The document is available for your perusal below:



Note to self:
The Constitution is a document that people in government must follow,
therefore there is no reference (and never was any) as to the serfs bearing arms.

What do you do when you're a loser

So what happens when you're a loser at sport?

First of all it pays to be a man or rather you pay to become a woman.

Because you know that men and women are not really equal, where you can run those 'girls' over on the field like a freight train.

|
Don't forget to bash people if they are insensitive towards your 'needs' (to win at sport by cheating).

Let's not forget the classic "I'm a woman born in a man's body"

Uuuummm, no, your desire to cheat crosses no boundaries.

The corporate media tells us that the footballer was dropped "controversially".

So, on one's BIRTH CERTIFICATE is a statement of your Sex, in this case being a MALE, as shown in example;

Thanks for playing, good bye a$$hole !!! !!! !!!


On a side note, not very important one, how does that book go again?

Genesis 5:2 He created them male and female.

Where is this Dr. God impostor, who tries to 'fix' the Creator's work... meh!

P.S If you're in Melbourne today,
don't forget that the savages are celebrating the floggin' of the horse festival.

Freeview ads littering the airwaves to zombify your children

There has been a recent re-emergence of ads depicting a so called 'Freeman' family (see, who said there were no 'Free men' in Australia) who apparently are subscribers to  a service called Freeview.

Business must not be that good (for Freeview) if they need to let people know about their product, otherwise it would be selling like hotcakes or maybe they should just close down and actually start a  hotcakes business instead.

So what are they actually showing you?

Well, that you can watch the same junk over and over again on whatever portable internet connected device you have, totally oblivious to your surroundings where over a period of time you could develop tunnel vision from watching their crap;

1).  On the bus

2). At School

3). In the car

4). At Dan's house

So, the burgeoning questions could be; Who's Dan? Is she a cheater? A possible candidate for Jerry Springer trash tv?

It may seem they are promoting your child to be glued to their device where if you're 'addicted to your device / 'free tv' and you are getting of a bus / tram / other public transport, and NOT aware of your surroundings you may get killed. 

Or another opinion could be that they are teaching the children of the cannon fodder to be nice little subservient corporate slaves, BRILLIANT idea Freeview peoples.

Here's what others wrote about this 'Freeview' farce, just in case you missed it;

An article from 10 Mar 2009 from gizmodo.com.au of the headline:

Did Freeview Pull Down That Parody Ad? (UPDATED: Yes, They Did)

What started out as a funny, accurate and refreshing take on the farce that is Freeview in Australia has grown into something much uglier. UPDATED.Last week, after we showed you the parody ad by comedian Dan Ilic and Triple J presenter Marc Fennell, advertising publication Adnews reported that Freeview were considering legal action against the duo. That was quickly updated, but not before a heap of publications like Crikey, The Australian, and TechWiredAU picked up on it. Of course, when they were questioned about threatening legal action against the video's makers, Freeview responded with a clear and concise, "No".

So, you'd think that would be the end of it. But no. Hours after Freeview denied threatening legal action, YouTube pulled the video for allegedly violating terms of use. Asher Moses over at the SMH is convinced that the only way that could have happened is if Freeview requested YouTube to pull the clip down, while Freeview has explicitly denied any such action to Margaret Simons over at Crikey.

The end result of all of this, of course, is that a funny video that would have only lasted a few days in the eyes of the Internet has now received mainstream coverage for five days or so, amplifying the message that Freeview is a joke.

So who's telling the truth? Ultimately, it doesn't matter, because as any online evangelist will tell you, once something goes online, you can never take it back. The original parody, although pulled from YouTube, has shown up on several other sites, expanding its audience even further. The real question is whether Freeview is actually going to learn from the experience - my heart hopes it does, but my gut knows it won't...

UPDATE:Turns out those bastards at Freeview did have the clip pulled down. In an email to Margaret Simons at Crikey, Google spokeman Rob Shilkin said:

I wanted to confirm that we received a DMCA notice for lawyers acting on behalf of Freeview Australia Limited to remove the video in question.

So, essentially the Freeview lawyers (and the people who pay them) are lying douchebags. Kind of makes me glad I have Foxtel, really.

An article from 9 Mar 2009 from smh.com.au of the headline:

YouTube yanks Freeview parody clip

A screen grab from the Freeview ad.

Responding to a copyright violation claim, YouTube has removed a parody video which mocked the free-to-air television networks' Freeview marketing campaign.

Freeview is the free-to-air TV industry's marketing group for its 15 "new" digital TV channels. The campaign has been widely criticised because although 12 of the channels are already available, they only contain a smattering of new content.

Critics have dubbed Freeview a marketing ploy designed to stem the flow of viewers towards pay TV and convince people to switch from analog to digital television.

Dan Ilic, a freelance filmmaker and comedian, and Triple J presenter Marc Fennell, distilled many of the criticisms into a satire video that used footage from Freeview's ads but with a different voice over.
"With up to 15 digital channels, you can watch the same thing on up to four different channels ... you can watch sports you've never heard of , news you can't understand and even question time!" it says.

The video attracted almost 12,000 views in just a few days before it was removed from the site.

However, Freeview's attempts to quash its momentum are likely to backfire as new versions of the clip have already been published on YouTube and other video sharing sites such as FunnyorDie.com, Dailymotion.com and Break.com.

"I think Freeview pulled down this video as one last ditch effort in an attempt to combat new media and I think it's only the first battle in a war that they're going to lose," said Ilic.

"Now i'm going to tell my friends to download the original version [of the satire video] and put it on YouTube, so hopefully there'll be a few hundred more versions of the video on YouTube and other sites by the end of the day."

Ilic said he and Fennell made the clip for a stand up routine called Massage My Medium, which they will be performing during the Melbourne International Comedy Festival between April 21 and 26. He said the show was "all about the death of television".

Freeview did not return calls requesting comment, however, it is understood the satire video was removed from YouTube following a copyright violation claim from the company.

Google, which owns YouTube, will only remove YouTube videos on the basis of copyright if it is satisfied that the objection has been lodged by the original owner of the copyrighted material.

______________________

So where's this ad they're all on about?

It's called:

Freeview: More of the Same Sh#t

available for download at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9JGdE-p4dQ

Kim Kardashian Paris robbery her own fault?

One thing the herd populace is told by police during every holiday season is to NOT post their holiday destination and time frame on social media in order not to alert the criminal element of society as to when the household would be ripe for the picking of valuables.

We also posted an article on why not to post one's picture of one's boarding pass, see link:

http://corpau.blogspot.com.au/2016/09/do-not-take-photos-of-your-boarding-pass.html

So, does this one simple rule also apply to people with more dollars than brain cells?

• Could Kim Kardashian have brought this upon herself?

•  Was it an 'inside' job?

• Was her security detail flawed due to her being a 'tight arse' (Australian colloquial term for stingy)?

• Would she be entitled to an insurance payout as a result of her own fault?

• Was it a 'publicity stunt' - with those retards attention whores anything is possible?

Irrespective of how much you flaunt your riches in front of the heard populace non one really 'deserves' to be robbed at gunpoint.

See (text version) of article from news.com.au from 4 October 2016 of the headline:

Kim Kardashian reunites with Kanye West in New York as ex-bodyguard says Paris robbery was inside job

AS Kim Kardashian reunited with Kanye West in New York after being robbed at gunpoint in Paris, her former security guard said the jewellery heist was “a crime waiting to happen”.

The 35-year-old and her rapper husband were surrounded by dozens of security guards and police officers as they darted inside their Manhattan apartment on Monday afternoon.

The reality TV star fled France just hours after she was tied up and held at gunpoint by thieves dressed as cops who stole around $14 million in jewellery from her room at the exclusive Hotel de Pourtalès about 3am Monday local time.

The five attackers — wearing ski masks and clothes with police markings — also reportedly made off with two of her smartphones.

Kardashian’s bodyguard, Pascal Duvier, has come under fire for not being with Kardashian during her nightmarish ordeal. He was reportedly with her two sisters as they partied at a nightclub.

Kardashian was in the country for Paris Fashion Week, alongside mother Kris Jenner and sisters Kourtney Kardashian and Kendall Jenner.

GUARD DOWN: ‘Where was Pascal Duvier?’

HEIST ‘WAS CRIME WAITING TO HAPPEN’

Steve Stanulis, who provided security for Kimye during New York Fashion Week in February for 10 days, and worked with them again around the Met Gala in May, claims the heist was an inside job.

“This was a crime waiting to happen. Kim is lucky to be alive,” he told The New York Post.

“I would say it’s either an inside job or publicity stunt. That hotel is so secure, somebody must have tipped them off that she was alone inside, or shown them a way in.”

Stanulis, who was sacked by West for allegedly getting too close to his wife, said his former bosses don’t take their security as seriously as they should.

“When I worked with them, Kanye would ask me to walk 10 feet behind him, which makes it so hard for anyone working their security to do anything if someone lunges at them. There was numerous times he’d try to ditch his security. He’d jump in a car and tell me to take a taxi,” he said.

JEWELLERY HEISTS: Kim K joins elite list of victims

SOCIAL MEDIA: Celebs react to Kim K robbery

He continued: “They need to pay for an armed security guard. She almost got killed at gunpoint, because she didn’t want to pay for an extra armed and well-trained person. It takes one minute of dialogue to figure out if someone really is a cop, they should not have got in the building.

“Sadly, the only person to blame for this incident, is Kim Kardashian. She has tens of millions of dollars of jewellery, but she can’t pay for an armed guard to protect her? The fact that five days ago that someone broke through her security chain and tried to grab her, then this happened, shows her security is not strong enough, and this should be a wake-up call.”

He said Kardashian brought the robbery on herself: “Kim’s social media and her Snapchat is her undoing. When she is posting, ‘Here I am, and this is the $5 million ring I am wearing, here’s where I am going’, you are basically inviting someone to rob you.”

KARDASHIAN ‘BEGGED FOR HER LIFE’

Kardashian’s publicist said the star was “badly shaken but physically unharmed” after robbers tied her up in the bathroom of her Paris residence and put a gun to her head.

A Paris police source told Reuters that five attackers, wearing ski masks and clothes with police markings, struck early on Monday morning.

Two of the men entered the apartment after threatening the night guard with a hand gun. Kardashian, who has two young children with West, was not beaten but the robbers put a handgun against her temple before tying her up, the source said. iTELE television said she had been tied up with packing tape.

When the thieves left with “all her jewellery”, Kardashian “broke out of her bindings and got out,” the source told E! News.

E! News, whose US network broadcasts the Keeping Up With the Kardashians, quoted a source close to Kardashian as saying she feared for her life.

“She begged for them to let her live and (said) she has babies at home ... She thought they were for sure going to kill her,” the unidentified source told E! News. 

The robbers stole a box containing jewels worth between $7.3 million to $8.7 million and a ring worth about $5.7 million, the Paris police source said.

French police are now questioning a photographer who posed as a police officer to spy on Kardashian in a restaurant earlier in the week, The Sun reports. The snapper’s identity has not been released.

INSIDE THE LUXURY APARTMENT

The New York Post reports the apartment where the heist went down is owned by Kardashian’s husband, Kanye West. Kardashian reportedly spent a lot of time there before her 2014 wedding to the rapper.

According to another insider, that’s why the robbery could be “was so well planned out.”
“They knew exactly what room, etc,” they said.


The complex, known as ‘No address France’ is a favourite of other celebrities.

Footballer Zlatan Ibrahimovic also stayed in a $30,345 suite with his family when he first moved to Paris St. Germain, according to Le Huffington Post.

Leonardo DiCaprio, Madonna and Prince are among some of the other famous names to stay at the complex, which has secret exits for the A-list clientele.

REALITY STAR FLEES PARIS AFTER ATTACK

Hours after the shocking attack, Kardashian boarded a private jet back to the US with her assistant and bodyguard. The social media entrepreneur was pictured walking to the plane with her head covered with a black scarf.

“She’s very pleased to be heading back to the United States,” a source close to the case said. “She has given a full statement for the police.”

Kendall Jenner left Paris separately on Monday, E! News reported.

Kimmy K’s WTF month of Farshun

West was pictured looking worried as he left his Tribeca apartment in New York to meet his wife.
On Sunday evening he abruptly ended a concert in New York as soon as he heard the shocking news, citing a “family emergency.”

Videos shot by fans at the concert shows the 39-year-old rapper performing the song Heartless when the music suddenly cuts out.

“I’m sorry, there’s a family emergency — I have to stop the show,” he announced, promptly leaving the stage as fans at The Meadows Music & Arts Festival in Queens could be heard voicing their confusion.

Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo condemned the attack via Twitter, saying the Keeping Up With The Kardashians star is always welcome in Paris.

“This very rare act occurred in a private space and does not in any way call into question the work of the police and the security of the public space,” she said.

The Pourtalès — a 19th-century neo-Renaissance mansion — caters to top celebrities like Brad Pitt, Mick Jagger, Leonardo di Caprio and Madonna. Its nine apartments rent for as much as $US17,000 a night, The Telegraph reported, citing The Fab Day blog.

“The address is so secret that you will not find any information on internet. They have no website, no flyers, no telephone number and no street sign,” according to the blog.

“The only way to find them and to reserve an apartment is to use the old and classical word to mouth system,” it wrote.