26 June 2021

EXPOSED! Australian governments locking up people under false pretences

Briefly!

In a response to a question on how many cycles are used to determine if someone has the alleged disease, the NSW Health Department stated the number of cycles being 40.


The link in the above description is the following:

https://www.pathology.health.nsw.gov.au/covid-19-info/covid-19-testing-information


A quick screen capture from an apparently official global source on the topic, that governments swear by, states that the standard recommendation for the detection of the disease should be in the range of 25-30.


See reference to the above screen capture:

https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/sars-cov-2-antigen-detecting-rapid-diagnostic-test-implementation-proposals

The European Parliament even posed the question:


Within the link:

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2021-001810_EN.html


In summary, the NSW government has gone above the threshold in testing, yielding false positives and therefore unlawfully locking up Australians as have other states.

So, who is going to get sued for this?

Phone display COVID-19 virus test proves as accurate as those nasty nose swabs


Did you know that swabs taken from your phone screen, instead of your nose or throat, can deliver Covid-19 virus detection accuracy levels akin to the invasive swabs? That's exactly what a team from Diagnosis Biotech successfully pulled off, calling it - surprise, surprise - the Phone Screen Testing (PoST) method.

Established by Dr Rodrigo Young from the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, the folks from Diagnosis Biotech recognized that people who test positive on the gold standard PCR test, also tested positive on their phone screen swab, too. 

In fact, the Phone Screen Testing (PoST) method marked the presence of a virus on the screen more than 80% of the time which is similar to what the popular antigen lateral tests manage to pull off, but via throat and nose swabs. According to Dr Rodrigo Young: 



Diagnosis Biotech has been applying this type of screenings at firms and schools in Chile to determine the method's viability, and is working on a mobile station that can get a phone for sampling and deliver the results to its owner via a text message to avoid the physical contact part. 

A mass application and, ideally, home testing kits will hopefully not be far behind. On another note - can you vividly imagine the flora and fauna that lives on your phone's display already?

Source: phonearena.com

25 June 2021

Bluetooth Mesh network, the next step in surveillance independent of the Internet

Bluetooth mesh network using Bluetooth LE, ratified in December 2020.

Implemented by Amazon, in the next level of data gathering, behavioural analysis and surveillance of the masses.

See 21 minute video by privacy tech expert Rob Braxman:



EXPOSÉ OF THE MEDICAL MAFIA

See video by Glenn Floyd, posted on the 18th of July 2020:



22 June 2021

EXPOSED: Face 'rnask' farce by Brett Sutton

(filename: Keeping up with the BS)

You got to keep up with the farce, no?


"Do as we say and not as we do", right?




Don’t wear surgical rnasks, during an alleged incident but go with cloth ones, WTF?


So, in Australia, we're told that cloth 'rnasks' are an acceptable form of defence.


One question posed:

Do anaesthetists need to wear surgical rnasks in the operating theatre? A literature review with evidence-based recommendations.

Where the answer was co-authored allegedly by Brett Sutton:





See full document:

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0310057X0102900402


See Sutton's video from 11 July 2020:


within link:

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/prof-brett-suttons-mask-recommendations/video/2097e0b8198110c40c50d5631072303f

And you STILL trust the corporation aggregate (commonly referred to as 'government') that instructs you that cloth ones are sufficient?

meme time:


The letters 'rn' were substituted for a single letter that they look like, for key word scanning reasons.

20 June 2021

Google MUST be fined for crowd sourced spying!


It seems that the Australian mainstream media under reports Google’s ’data’ crimes, giving the clear impression that the Australian Government controlled mainstream media is in bed with Google.

Being part of the five eyes data hoovering infrastructure, why wouldn’t they be?

The law allegedly applies to everyone, but Google in reality operates above the tax laws not really paying their fair share of taxes in Australia the way the serfs do, where the balance sheet is mopped up the tax slaves in Australia.

Whatever fine Google get’s they’ll just pass it on to the ‘product’ that being the users with more ad revenue, like they did with the social media news feeds fiasco not that long ago.

During its global surveillance run with the street view cars Google purposely installed Wi-Fi sniffing equipment into their cars (an action called war driving) in order to obtain people’s passwords, traffic, unique MAC addresses of the routers and most importantly their geographic location.

When caught out Google stated that was done in error, a blatant lie.

Some bright spark within Google saw that this action was too expensive, where a better solution would be to get the slaves to do Google’s not only for free but most importantly without their knowledge.

If you the serf steal $0.00001 a million times or more you most probably will get incarcerated, as a similar example saw a Victorian man being imprisoned for 8 years(?).

If Google steals 4.09KB of data (which comes at a cost) say 400 billion times, nothing happens.

Governments turn a blind eye and so does the legal profession.

Why?

Is it because that collected data is used to spy on you and not the ‘real’ criminals?

Part of the global surveillance agenda on every single person, connected or not?

Prior to Android 7 (Nougat), one could scan their immediate Wi-Fi routers via an app without having to turn on the location services (GPS) of the device.

For no technical reason whatsoever, after Nougat, Google made it mandatory for the user to switch on the location tracking services when using Wi-Fi otherwise the app would not work.

As if that wasn’t enough, after Android 9 (Pie), Google also made that same action necessary in order to use Bluetooth devices, devices that are portable by design.

As always, it’s never enough for Google, so the next phase of the global surveillance agenda was installed (on your smartphone)

In Google’s modified version of Android that makes it’s way into all phones and also used by Apple, is something called Wi-Fi (and Bluetooth) scanning.

Despite the illusion that the software ‘switch’ will turn this function off, it’s on 24/7 obtaining the signal strength of all the Wi-Fi routers your phone can see transmitting this data back to the source (Apple/Google) many times a minute.

This is done without your knowledge/consent stealing your data in the process.

The ‘best’ part about all this is that Google has been getting away with this for years and it seems that it will for many more to come.

Why does one need a 5000mAh battery that ‘only’ lasts a day?

 

(advice from a flog on a mainstream media 'news' site?)

Quite simply because of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth scanning, which cannot be turned off.

What’s the solution?

To purchase hardware that can have AOSP (Android Open Source Project), or a ‘de-Googled’ (barebones, without Google's, the carrier's or manufacturer's spyware installed) version of Android, where in most instances it quite literally doubles the battery life of the smartphone.

The global surveillance agenda is quite a nefarious one, where the narrative is controlled by the authorities to limit the movement and control the lives of the general population in a dictatorial manner.

Governments have created law solely for the benefit of chosen multinational corporations.

See article from top screen capture:

https://www.theverge.com/2018/7/18/17580694/google-android-eu-fine-antitrust