The people in Australian governments (federal and state) are human rights abusers, not too dissimilar from those in charge of China, where all you have to do is catch them out and take them to court, you know a Chapter III one, in the name of the Monarch, right?
Not exactly, there’s a huge caveat.
You see the system is rigged against you, way before the matter of Corinna Horvath made it into the public news media, something the government would have loved to remain hidden from the public.
How is it rigged against ‘you’?
Well as mentioned in another post, there is no separation of powers, where the ’brotherhood’ kicks in and takes over, or threatens your livelihood or incarcerates you, if you expose government corruption, as many people are aware of this such as Richard Boyle (ATO whistleblower).
This is what happened in the case of the principal at AdvocateMe, when a class action was filed against the government, where this is explained in the embedded video below.
The nanny state agenda by those in power is a high priority, where those who oppose this will be crushed, whatever it takes.
Please note that the government is also responsible for child abuse as a result of the lockdown.
See article by news.com.au of the headline:
A claim was filed in the Victorian Supreme Court last week, alleging residents are owed damages for the “invalid”, “oppressive” and “degrading” lockdown that failed to consider human rights.
More than 3000 people were locked inside nine apartment towers from July 4 to either July 9 or July 18 last year, before the entire state went into hard lockdown on August 2.
After being provided nothing for three days they were given four partially-defrosted sausage rolls, placed at the door step, that were “not fit for human consumption”, it alleges.
Ms Hassan and his nine-year-old son suffered asthma attacks after they ran out of medication, with the family surviving on “nuts and beans”, it alleges.
Victoria’s Deputy Chief Health Officer Annaliese van Dieman is named as the first respondent in the suit, along with Deputy Public Health Commander Finn Romanes, Chief Commissioner of Police Shane Patton, and the state of Victoria.
Residents were deprived of access to fresh air, exercise and occupational activities, it is claimed.
They were exposed to health risks as communal areas were not disinfected, and PPE was not provided, despite the presence of COVID-19 in the towers, it is alleged.
Government workers left bins overflowing and some residents lost their jobs after being unable to work during the lockdown, it is claimed.
The claim alleges they were “not consulted” about the lockdown, which banned them from leaving their homes without approval.
Victorian Deputy Chief Health Officer Dr Annaliese van Diemen is named as the first respondent in the class action lawsuit. Photo: Darrian Traynor/Getty ImagesSource:Getty Images
“Some time on 4 July 2020, prior to 3.30pm, (Victoria Police) decided to deploy hundreds of Victoria Police officers to the Estate Towers to enforce the detention of the residents of those towers,” the claim states.
It alleges Ms van Dieman had 15 minutes to review, sign, and consider the human rights implications of the lockdown before a press conference scheduled for 4pm on July 4.
It claims she “felt constrained” to approve the directions and “considered that she could not delay signing” before the press conference, which she appeared in alongside Premier Daniel Andrews.
“(She) allowed the decisions of third parties, or their actions and attitudes, to control the way she exercised her discretion,” the claim alleges.
The lockdown was not explained at the time to the residents of the towers, according to the claim.
“The decision not to inform the residents of these matters was not governed by questions of practicability, but was a deliberate decision made to ensure that the residents did not go elsewhere,” it alleges.
“Intimidating
conduct” by Victoria Police officers also began “triggering
pre-existing trauma” in some residents, the claim alleges.
The lead plaintiff, Mr Hassan, is a Somalian refugee who arrived in Australia after fleeing civil war.
Residents claim they were exposed to health risks through the lockdown in a lawsuit suing the Victorian government for damages. Picture: Sarah MatraySource:News Corp Australia
He fled his village in 1990 when it was targeted by soldiers and made his way to Australia with his six siblings, making it to Australia in 1998.
At the time of the lockdown he lived in the public housing tower in Sutton Street, North Melbourne, with his wife and three children aged 9, 7 and 4.
About an hour after the lockdown began Mr Hassan asked a police officer for permission to buy groceries and medical supplies and was refused, it is alleged.
No food deliveries were made to him for several days and authorities “refused the Australian Muslim Social Services Agency permission to deliver culturally-appropriate food supplies to the residents”, it is alleged.
He ran out of asthma medication and despite calling a hotline number played on television, was not delivered medication in time and suffered asthma attacks, the claim alleges.
The medication was supplied on July 8, four days after they were locked inside the towers, the claim says.
Food supplied was not halal, a requirement of their Muslim faith, and Somali interpreters were not engaged in explaining why they had to go COVID-19 testing, it is alleged.
Residents were tested for COVID-19 “without giving their full, free and informed consent and, or in the alternative, under duress”, the claim alleges.
The class action is being run by solicitor Serene Teffaha of law firm Advocate Me.
It will be heard in the Supreme Court at a date to be set.
See response video by Serene Teffaha to action taken by the VLSB from the class action lawsuit filing:
Source:
