Showing posts with label Phone Scam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Phone Scam. Show all posts

18 February 2024

India bans ‘private’ email service under false pretences?


Worldwide, governments hate the general population/serfs/plebs having ‘private’ communications, citing the obvious excuse, that being not crime but this next level thing called ‘terrorism’, where some nation’s governments are the very definition of terrorists.

End-to-end encrypted services such as Proton Mail, Signal, Telegram et al, are under attack by governments where in the colony called Australia, the uneducated MPs in government want the manufacturers to build a “systemic weakness” or a backdoor into the product.

Apple or Meta 'encrypted' products aren't truly 'private' as your communications data is handed over to authorities, once requested. 

They do not want the plebs to have ANY sort of (digital) privacy, where if they could in the colony, they would install a law that bans houses from having curtains/drapes/shutters.

The Indian government used a ‘convenient’ excuse to ban Proton Mail, alleging that hoax bomb threat was sent to 13 schools.

See article: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/it-ministry-looks-to-block-proton-mail-on-request-of-tamil-nadu-police-101707938167006.html

The Indian government 'supports' the criminal actions of 'scammers' from call centres specifically set-up to rip-off westerners.  

As if they (the Indian government) cares that some pensioner in the US/Australia was robbed of their life savings, because if the government factually did care, these criminal actions would have stopped decades ago.

In any event, would this also have been the case if a Hotmail or Gmail address was used?

Was the source of the email an actual hoax or a job seconded by the government?

In reality we will never know, as governments lie to people every single day.

What we do know is that end-to-end encryption services are under attack!

We therefore encourage more people to use them and support them financially if one can.

This action is part of the global Nanny State agenda.

17 May 2023

Scammers sending fake Telstra mail

(source:supplied)

When people think of scammers, many might have the idea in mind that sophisticated hooks are embedded in emails or websites or smartphone related communications.

But scammers have gone 'old school' for quite some time.

Scammers have enlisted Australia Post to deliver their fraudulent message (fake envelope on the right), as they have done so for over a decade in relation to another scam that the government has failed to act on, early in the piece, where some people are still receiving those types of letters.

In relation to the Telstra scam, the scammers have gotten hold of the customer's full name and address, stating that they have been trying to contact that person.

In the letter, there is a phone number which the scammers are in possession of, in order to steal more information to commit fraud.

Scammers have used Australia Post previously to con businesses to 'renew' their internet domain name.

The scammer's letter looks like it's a renewal for the targeted business, where in the scam letter there will be number zero (0), instead of the letter 'O', or any other character that will be different from the legitimately registered internet address.

See post:

Domain Name Group Fraud

04 April 2022

Report claims Apple saved $6.5 billion by removing charger and EarPods from iPhone boxes

Apple's not giving you a charger with your new phone has nothing to do with 'caring' about the planet but rather about their profits.


When TF International analyst Ming-Chi Kuo told clients in June 2020 that the iPhone 12 series would not include a charger or EarPods inside the box, consumers were stunned. Sure, Apple tried to hide behind the goal of being environmentally friendly and pointed out that by reducing the size of the boxes that the iPhone comes in, 70% more devices could fit on a shipping pallet.

Removing the charger and EarPods from the iPhone box allowed 70% more devices to fit on a pallet


More boxes on a pallet would allow Apple to ship more phones to users at one time. As a result, using smaller boxes would allow Apple to reduce yearly carbon emissions by 2 million metric tons, the company said. That is equivalent to taking 500,000 cars off the road.
 

But not everyone believes that Apple made this move, which was copied by most major phone manufacturers including Samsung and Google, to help the environment. While many will agree that Apple is removing the charger from iPhone boxes for a "green" reason, the "green" they are thinking about is the color of money.

The astute observer will note that Apple started this program with the release of its first 5G iPhone series, the iPhone 12. Could Apple have decided to make up for the extra costs of including a 5G modem and other parts by taking the power brick and the EarPods out of the box? 

According to the Daily Mail, by eliminating the charger and the EarPods from the box, Apple has saved a total of £5 billion thus far. That is equivalent to $6.5 billion. But Apple did not reduce the price of its handsets when it removed the accessories from the iPhone box. At the same time, many iPhone buyers who wanted to fast charge their iPhones only had the 5W adapters that came in the box with older models and were forced to spend $19 for a 20W charger and another $19 to replace the EarPods.

Of course, we might be selling Apple short here. After all, some iPhone buyers might have decided to replace the EarPods, which were free out of the box until Apple removed them, with a pair of AirPods which are currently offered at $129 and up.

If a consumer just wanted to replace the EarPods, that could be arranged for an additional $19. So even if an Apple customer just wanted to add a charging brick and the wired EarPods with his new iPhone, that would cost him an additional $38. When you consider the millions of iPhone units Apple sells each year, this certainly runs into plenty of money flowing into Apple's coffers.

Reducing the size of the box and allowing 70% more devices on each pallet should help Apple reduce its shipping costs by 40% which in turn should allow the company to reduce the price of the phone to consumers. Some analysts have computed that Apple is saving the equivalent of $35 on each iPhone it sells. Yet, there has been no cost reduction from the firm.

Since it announced that it was removing the charger and EarPods from the iPhone box, Apple is believed to have shipped 190 million iPhone units. Totaling up the amount of money that Apple has saved from this cost-cutting move and adding the amount of money it saved on shipping comes to the £5 billion (or $6.5 billion) that the Daily Mail computed. In other words, had Apple passed every penny of savings to its customers, the public could be $6.5 billion richer.

But okay, let's say Apple could keep half the amount it saved. That would still have resulted in the public saving $3.25 billion. And we're not even including the amount of money that the public spent on buying a new charger because they didn't have one, or more likely, wanted one that charged at a speed faster than 5W.

And we're not even including the $293.4 million bucks that the Daily Mail says that Apple customers spent on accessories since the company got stingy about what it puts in the box along with the iPhone.

So let's look at it this way. Apple saved money on shipping and by not having to purchase the charging brick and EarPods that used to go in the box. The public not only didn't save any money, but it also had to shell out to replace the accessories they wanted that they no longer received for "free."

This $6.5 billion goes straight to the bottom line increasing Apple's profits and pushing up the price of Apple's stock. In turn, executives like Tim Cook benefit to the tune of millions of dollars while the public pays to replace the missing accessories. Nice work if you can get it.

Source: phonearena.com

13 April 2021

Attacker can use a WhatsApp subscriber's phone number to suspend his service


A major security exploit can be used to suspend your WhatsApp account by a bad actor without your permission. The only information that the attacker needs is your phone number. According to Forbes, the attacker's first step is to install WhatsApp on a new phone using your phone number to activate the service.

What happens next is that WhatsApp, using two factor authorization (2FA), tries to verify that it is you who just set up the new WhatsApp service on your phone. Since it isn't you, this procedure will fail over and over again and if done multiple times, it results in your account log-in being suspended for 12 hours. For the next step, the attacker sends an email to WhatsApp stating that his phone (which is really your handset) has been stolen or lost and asks that the WhatsApp account associated with the number be shut down.

Following this request, WhatsApp sends an email confirming that the account has been suspended without asking the attacker for any kind of information that might prove that the request to suspend the account came from the legitimate owner of said account. This process can be repeated numerous times which basically locks you out of your WhatsApp account.


A pair of security researchers named Luis Márquez Carpintero and Ernesto Canales Pereña completed a proof of concept that showed how this attack can block you from using your WhatsApp account. What it can't do is give bad actors a way to enter your account and your confidential messages remain confidential. WhatsApp hasn't said anything yet about plugging the gaping security hole.

The Facebook-owned messaging app did suggest was that users provide it with their e-mail address and two factor authorization "credentials" to help prevent the above mentioned scenario from taking place. But even if this info is given to WhatsApp, you still have to rely on it to follow through. WhatsApp does point out that taking advantage of this exploit violates its Terms of Service which we wouldn't expect to be a deterrent against a hacker.

ESET's Jake Moore says, "This is yet another worrying hack, one that could impact millions of users who could potentially be targeted with this attack. With so many people relying on WhatsApp as their primary communication tool for social and work purposes, it is alarming at what ease this can occur."

Source: phonearena.com

21 December 2017

Apple caught out in fiddling with your phone


You may have purchased a phone from Apple and had an (anti corporate / anti consuming?) agenda to use until it died, or even better until the battery wore out where you would just replace it and carry on using this phone, but Apple have installed other ideas into your phone.

By restricting the CPU's speed, Apple have decided to degrade your phone's performance, in order for you to purchase a new model.

This is not an entirely honest action by Apple, one that realistically should see a class action lawsuit against Apple.

Seriously, how can anyone trust a company with this sort of attitude towards the product that you have purchased for a premium.


NOTE: We do not recommend the purchase of any Apple products.

See article from 20 Dec 2017 by news.com.au of the headline;

Apple does slow down your iPhone as the batteries wear out, new study claims

IT TURNS out one of the most common complaints of iPhone owners could actually be the result of something orchestrated by the company, a new study has found. 

APPLE updates slow down ageing iPhones by cutting performance power to save the batteries, researchers have claimed.

Scientists at tech firm Primate Labs analysed performance data from thousands of the devices and discovered speeding up a slow iPhone could be as simple as getting a new battery — if you’re willing to give Apple $A119 for the privilege.

Primate Labs founder John Poole said deliberately slowing the processors can have the effect of hiding a dying battery, while also encouraging users to upgrade, reports The Sun.

“Users may believe that the slow down is due to CPU performance, instead of battery performance,,” he told Geekbench.

“[This will cause] users to think, ‘my phone is slow so I should replace it’ not, ‘my phone is slow so I should replace its battery’.”

People's comments:


The huge analysis revealed that iPhone 6S performance took four massive nosedives after each update that followed iOS 10.2.1.

“The distribution of iPhone 6S scores for iOS 10.2.0 appears unimodal with a peak around the average score,” he said.

“However, the distribution of iPhone 6S scores for iOS 10.2.1 appears multimodal, with one large peak around the average and several smaller peaks around lower scores. Under iOS 11.2.0 the effect is even more pronounced.”

Researchers believe the device is designed to encourage iPhone processors to slow down if they detect battery degradation, meaning customers would need to upgrade or pay Apple for a new battery to get their device back to standard.

Batteries naturally degrade over time, with the iPhone designed to last for just 500 charge cycles.
Apple is yet to release a statement on the issue.

30 August 2017

Telstra allows fraud against your person's name


The bane of Australia's information and communications technology is Telstra.

A private company which is in charge of the Australian peoples communication infrastructure.

Why is it the "Australian peoples"?

Because the people payed for it (via their taxes), where it was unlawfully taken over by the private sector, but that is another matter for a dozen posts or so.

Telstra has stifled competition, by not allowing other companies to access the infrastructure already payed for by the Australian people.

An all too common 'problem' is that in 2017 in a 'new' suburb of a capital city, a household may not be able to get;

- the advertised internet speeds,
- internet from the competition, as Telstra has (deliberately) not allocated enough slots,
- any internet (landline) connection at all.

Telstra employs a 'low quality' migrant workforce which is based on a cheap (dollars per hour) cost rather than employing a (plentiful) skilled 'Australian' workforce.

Once the low quality workers stuff up the work, Telstra then gets another 'resource' to fix the problem, which comes at a cost to the customer. In effect work that did not need to be re-done if the correct resource was used in the first place.


Telstra has sacked many good workers only to replace them with cheap overseas outsourced labour, in questionable IT 'datacentres', with very low regards to privacy or customer data security.

At the end of the day, the shareholders, customers and 'mums and dads investors' pay for the incompetence of Telstra's management.

If you have been hacked as a result of Telstra's negligence we recommend you sue Telstra.


The results of these appalling business practices have been loosely touched on by the mainstream media in an article of the headline;

Mobile porting: Illegal hack 'happening more than we know'



One Telstra customer had her Telstra number stolen four time and the telco’s response was futile. Picture: Claudia Baxter

WHEN Katie Fletcher had her mobile number stolen and ported to a different carrier she knew it was bad news, but she didn’t necessarily expect it would lead to her friends having thousands of dollars drained from their bank accounts.

Ms Fletcher, 30, who works in Sydney and lives on the central coast has had her Telstra number illegally ported an astonishing four times in the past 18 months.

After stealing her number, hackers were able to gain access to her e-mails and from there collect personal details of her contacts and begin hacking their accounts. She believes a huge number of her friend’s personal accounts were hacked stemming from her number being ported.


“I stopped counting when I got to 33,” she told news.com.au.

Each time her own bank account was compromised, Commonwealth Bank stopped the offender from withdrawing money but some of her friends weren’t so lucky and had up to “thirty or forty thousand dollars drained from their accounts” which took months to get back, she said.

With telcos failing to adequately defend against unauthorised porting, cyber criminals are using the simple trick to steal people’s mobile numbers and use it to burrow into their digital lives. Given that most important accounts rely on two-factor authentication, which involves receiving a text message code to log into the account, the momentary access can be all they need to cause harm.

In most instances, fraudsters simply need an account number for your mobile provider and your date of birth to move the number across and begin wreaking havoc.

Dr Terry Goldsworthy is a former detective inspector for the Queensland police who now works as an assistant professor at Bond University. He began researching the prevalence of illegal porting earlier this year but says reliable data is almost non existent.

“No one seems to be collecting the data,” he told news.com.au. At least no one who is willing to share.

Last month he delivered a talk on the topic at the International Conference on Cybercrime and Computer Forensics in which he made the suggestion that there has been a regulatory failure in Australia when it comes to dealing with the issue.

At the conference “I ran into a police source and he said they’re getting hundreds of them (porting complaints), mostly referred to them by the banks,” he said.

In April the NSW police created a phone porting category for complaints however if they do get reported to police or consumer bodies, most cases typically get filed as instances of generic fraud.

“The actual offence numbers are getting diluted,” Dr Goldworthy said. “The problem is: who are we reporting to?



“I’m sure it’s happening more than we know.”

Terry Goldsworthy spent 28 years working for the Queensland police. Picture: Gosling RichardSource:News Limited

The issue made headlines earlier in the year when ABC journalist Tracey Holmes was the victim of unauthorised porting. She believed someone likely got hold of her mail after she moved house to get access to her Telstra account number and then managed to find her date of birth online to carry out the attack.

In June Telstra told news.com.au that it was “working to strengthen our identification and verification procedures even further” because it recognised the increased threat level because of the growing “availability of individual’s personal information on social media and other open platforms.” Telstra says it is continuing to do so, but couldn’t provide any concrete examples.

The first time it happened to Ms Fletcher was in March last year. Usually, it takes about a week for victims to get their number back. It happened to her again a year later and the third time her number was stolen, the hacker simply ported the number to a new SIM card on a Telstra account.

At one point, a Telstra employee called the number and someone else picked up, Ms Fletcher said.
“By the fourth time they just wouldn’t help me, they (Telstra) were useless.”

Contrary to what many disgruntled customers claim about the reality on the ground, Telstra says its porting processes are identical for pre-paid and post-paid services and comply with industry regulations.

But a number of affected customers who spoke to news.com.au have called on the telcos to ensure staff actually carry out the proper checks when porting numbers to make sure the correct procedure is followed and the number belongs to the person porting it.

“They all talk in generics, but what are they actually gonna do?” Dr Goldworthy said of industry assertions that it is addressing the problem.

In the case of Ms Fletcher, not much.

“Telstra’s advice was to just go somewhere else because we can’t stop it from happening,” she said.

Unsurprisingly, she has since switched carriers.

16 July 2011

Jude Law sues The Sun for phone-hacking

British actor Jude Law is suing The Sun for allegedly hacking his phone in what is thought to be the first such legal action against Rupert Murdoch's best-selling daily tabloid.

The paper's parent company, News International, dismissed it as a "deeply cynical" attempt to draw The Sun into the scandal which has engulfed Murdoch's media empire and forced the closure of its sister paper, the News of the World.

Law was already suing the News of the World over phone hacking, and his former girlfriend, actress Sienna Miller, won an apology and STG100,000 in damages and legal costs from the Sunday tabloid.

News International said Law, the Oscar-nominated star of Cold Mountain and Sherlock Holmes, had launched action alleging four Sun articles in 2005 and 2006 were based on information taken from his voicemails.

"We believe this is a deeply cynical and deliberately mischievous attempt to draw The Sun into the phone-hacking issue," a News International statement said.

"The allegations made in this claim have been carefully investigated by our lawyers and the evidence shows that they have no foundation whatsoever.

"In particular, the claimant's solicitors have relied on a reference in documentation that they should be well aware has nothing to do with a case against The Sun.

"Also, another article complained of merely reiterated information which was already in the public domain. The claim will be defended vigorously."

Law's lawyers confirmed he was taking action against The Sun, and rejected News International's "ridiculous" arguments.

"We have no comment to make about this claim, which will be considered by the court in due course," said a statement from the actor's lawyers, Atkins Thomson.

"Accusations of cynicism and mischief making by News International are ridiculous.

"By their own admission, News International have misled the police, parliament and the public for nearly five years about the extent of the wrongdoing by their journalists and executives. Their record speaks for itself."

AFP 2011 16 Jul 2011

Rupert Murdoch’s phone hacking pinging tabloid

Rupert Murdoch’s fraudulent methods of obtaining stories about celebrities for the tabloid trash newspaper, are known to the editors and journalists alike.

They are urged to make up stories (i.e. false reporting) in order to gain public curiosity, which in turn sell the papers.

In the recent light of the hacking of phones within Murdoch’s News of the World, comes also another criminal offence, in which the police, telecommunications companies, and the (Murdoch’s) business is involved in.

Many mobile (smart) phones have GPS capability built in (for example the iPhone4), whereas others use cell tower triangulation or A-GPS (Asynchronous Global Positioning System) to determine user location.

A method known as pinging is used by the telcos to establish the user’s whereabouts. This method can be used by police, and is authorised at the telco end by a couple of people who have the authority to do so.

In order to obtain information about celebrities, to bring the ‘gossip’ or even falsify events, the paper is involved in an act of fraud in which £300 is paid to ping a celebrities phone in order to obtain their location to get the story the publication requires.

The payoff goes through the police, and eventually o the telco, for pinging the celebrity.

This is known to the celebrities, in order to make it more difficult, the register their phone under other’s names and can have up to 10 phones at once.

This form of fraud is practiced by Murdoch’s news empire, and there is a great deal of police and telco cover up.

Again the courts will show that the world’s ruling elite is untouchable.

corpau.

03 March 2011

Mobile Phone Scams - To Aussie Phones


Internet scams, mobile fraud, loose weight following "one weird tip" scams are not covered by corpau, as not only there are dedicated websites to this, the sheer volume of these scams would cover the majority of posts on corpau.

There has been an increased number of these scams appearing on people's mobile phones, which are NOT filtered out at the telephone service providers end.


The concerning part about this is that there are so called 'laws' that do not work in Australia regarding these types of fraud.


An example of such a fraudulent message is as follows:

CONGRATS!!YOUR MOBILE NUMBER HAS WON FOR YOU $2,000,000 USD IN THE FREELOTTO MOBILE PROMO.FOR CLAIMS,SEND EMAIL: freelottoagentmb@aol.co.uk & CALL:+447035924026


For more information regarding scams, see the official Australian Government website regarding Mobile Phone Scams at:

http://www.scamwatch.gov.au/content/index.phtml/tag/MobilePhoneScams