19 October 2019

Water company's bill fraud

It is imperative that people check the invoices that corporations issue to them ESPECIALLY for 'services' that they allegedly provide.

It is also important to know that sending out a false invoice is a criminal offence.

We've obtained information about a customer of a water company, where a challenge to the bill occurred.

The challenge was with regards to the water usage and sewerage disposal fees.

In this instance the company's employee stated that the procedure for reading the water meter was followed, also 'stating' that the person reading the meter did actually go to the property and read that meter.

This sounds all very nice and well, pretty much text book stuff, right?

Well it would be, IF there was an actual house on the property, and water usage really did occur.

Hearing the response or rather lack of, from the company's employee was ... priceless.

The 'company' blatantly lied to the customer that an event occurred when in reality it did not, and produced a false invoice to be payed.

This is not an isolated incident, where  'customers' you know (hard working, heavily taxed) mums and dads are defrauded of their cash.

Note: we do not recommend subscription to automatic deductions by corporations for alleged services they provide, if that is an option.

17 October 2019

A corrupt and biased legal system 'Rorts ruling a disgrace'

MANY people or victims complain that they do not obtain 'justice' from our legal system.

We are told that the (other) 3 tiers of government, the executive, parliament and judicature are supposed to act independently of each other.

That would be great if it were true, where many persons from each tier also subscribe to the 'brotherhood', therefore intertwining the three tiers and therefore subverting the course of 'justice' or rather verdicts and as a result orders.

The red shirts scandal that is in the public domain is just one example of many.

See article:

14 October 2019

Julia Gillard sworn in as Prime Minister incorrectly?

A video by the 10 News corporation was put up on the media sharing platform YouTube of Julia Gillard and then Governor-General of Australia Quentin Bryce swearing an oath of office approximately 9 years ago.

In the not so true spirit of 'democracy' and 'free speech' comments have been turned off by the corporation, as noted in the above screen capture.

At approximately the  2 minute mark the Governor-General, Quentin Bryce invites Ms. Gillard to an "Affirmation of Office" as Prime Minister.

Ms. Gillard then recites a piece of paper handed to her by Ms. Bryce which she then seems to read:

"I Julia Eileen Gillard do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will well and truly serve the Commonwealth of Australia her land and her people in the office of Prime Minister."

The "PARLIAMENT of AUSTRALIA" states that the swearing in before the Governor-General as an affirmation must be in the following format:

I, A.B., do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her heirs and successors according to law.[59]

The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 in its Schedule states that the affimation must be:

" I, A.B., do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her heirs and successors according to law. (Note.—The name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the time being is to be substituted from time to time.)"

So, it seems that Julia Gillard sexualised the land of Austalia as female, and is serving 'her' firstly and then 'her' people.

Gillard is registered as an MP in the "PARLIAMENT of AUSTRALIA", and was the Prime Minister from 26.10.2010 to 27.6.2013.


See video of Gillard's affirmation at:



Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900, as enacted in the UK (Oath/Affimation):