Monday, September 2, 2013

Australian Police check - ABN's

The Australian Police force is exactly what the name suggests a 'force'.

What the general public are not aware of is that the Australian Police are legal businesses, registered in every state.

DO YOU HAVE A CONTRACT WITH THE POLICE?

If you respond to police you are entering a VERBAL CONTRACT which you are bound to.

Your response to police must be:
"I do not consent to any contract, implied or stated with the police."

The employee of the business commonly known as the 'police officer' MUST walk away.

The police do not have ANY right to pull you over in your vehicle, even for a 'routine check'.

See corpau article:


Present this paper to any police officer who randomly stops you



Here are some details of the businesses known as the Australia's police force taken from abr.business.gov.au :

Entity Name: AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE
ABN: 17 864 931 143
Main Business Location: ACT 2600
Trading Name: AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE, ASIA PACIFIC GROUP, Australian Protective Service, AUSTRALIAN BUREAU OF CRIMINAL INTELLIGENCE, AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF POLICE MANAGEMENT


Entity Name: DEPT OF POLICE & EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (TAS)
ABN: 19 173 586 474
Main Business Location: TAS 7000
Trading Name: TASMANIA POLICE


Entity Name: NSW POLICE FORCE
ABN: 43 408 613 180
Main Business Location: NSW 2150
Trading Name: NSW POLICE FORCE, NSW POLICE, NSW POLICE DEPARTMENT, NSW POLICE SERVICE  

Entity Name: POLICE DEPARTMENT (VIC)
ABN: 63 446 481 493
Main Business Location: VIC 3008
Trading Name: VICTORIA POLICE


Entity Name: QUEENSLAND POLICE SERVICE
ABN: 29 409 225 509
Main Business Location: QLD 4000
Trading Name: QUEENSLAND POLICE SERVICE


Entity Name: SOUTH AUSTRALIA POLICE
ABN: 93 799 021 552
Main Business Location: SA 5000
Trading Name: SOUTH AUSTRALIAN POLICE, Commissioner of Police, SAPES Games, SOUTH AUSTRALIA POLICE, South Australia Police & Emergency Services Games, SA Police, SAPOL


Entity Name: WESTERN AUSTRALIA POLICE
ABN: 91 724 684 688
Main Business Location: WA 6004
Trading Name: Western Australian Police



HAVE YOU REALLY GOT A LAWFULLY BINDING CONTRACT WITH THE ABOVE ENTITIES?


These are the secrets that the corporate media are NOT prepared to expose, one of the largest frauds in the country against the people of the nation, which the legal profession is FULLY AWARE OF, and ripping of the masses.

9 comments:

Unknown said...

facebook:

melbourne authority exposed
also
Brisbane authority exposed
Adelaide authority exposed
northern temerity authority exposed
Tasmania authority exposed
Perth authority exposed
act Canberra authority exposed

Under Armour said...

FTP FTS
ACAC
ACAP

Unknown said...

Hi,
Is there a link where I can download a larger copy of the notice to show to police when they pull you over?. I've tried saving the image and it is to small to read.
Thanks :)

AuCorp said...

Hi,

On your PC's internet browser, you can click on the photo and a larger version will come up.
Then you can save the picture and print it out.
It will print out correctly on an A4 piece of paper.

The actual link to the larger sized photo is:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-uokT194GGAk/Uggib2C7qzI/AAAAAAAAGM8/gYG7qvSshJI/s1600/Notice+-+Not+to+Stop.jpg

Regards.

Unknown said...

Shouldn't it be "exercise" of rights NOT "excise"

Unknown said...

What about the NT police?...Regina -v- Banner 1970 @ p.249...it appears that the first part of your notice contains an extract of that...also Exercise or Excise?

Unknown said...

Pint name? .... . Ahhh Print perhaps? Spelling errors on legal documents? SCAM

Steven T said...

Correct the mistakes yourself, what do you mean by

Spelling errors on legal documents? SCAM ? are you a troll ?

The author has been kind enough to supply a template to assist people with handling these types of matters, It is your responsibility to check your work before you send it.

It only becomes a legal document when your details are added, all spelling has been checked and corrected and it has been sent via registered post and you have a confirmation of delivery slip, as long as the important details are spelt correct the incorrect spelling of the word print (pint) will not render the entire document invalid, this is the type baseless argument that I would expect to here from our government, all while ignoring the fundamental principles of 800 year old common law and a indissoluble constitution ratified by a legitimate referendum.

Steven T said...

In the case of this document being for the use of notifying/displaying relevant information,

does the document convey what it is intended to convey? yes it does.
are the case citation details correct ? yes they are.

this is good example of how they are are catching everyone out.

no different to when you receive a fine in the mail, you open it, read it and then call the number listed in the letter to argue the fine.

if you open it then you are accepting the rules that they impose and those rules don't have any remedy, this why staff will tell you "sorry there is nothing I can do"

in others words arguing the word print is incorrect is baseless, it doesn't change the obligation of the reader of the document and the obligation is to verify that they are not about to take unlawful action that would cause unnecessary harm through negligence.

can you imagine if a police officer read this sign on someones front door then he proceeded to take action on what later turns out to be an unlawful warrant or unlawful entry/trespass on someones property and the owner of the property sued him, and the officers defence was " but your honor the word print was spelt incorrectly" BASELESS !

in the case of the fine contained with in the letter, you assume the obligation when you assume that it's your name in the transparent window

Look up the word tacit