A look into Corporate fraud in Australia, Stranglehold of Monopolies, Telecommunications Oppression, Biased Law System, Corporate influence in politics, Industrial Relations disadvantaging workers, Outsourcing Australian Jobs, Offshore Banking, Petrochemical company domination, Invisibly Visible.
It's not what you see, it's what goes on behind the scenes.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (ABN: 122 104 616)
Australia's Prime Minister (CEO) Tony Abbott : "Australia is Open for Business"
Thursday, May 18, 2017
Catholic priests can molest children fleeing to an extradition free zone
The good Australian people were told that the police were "weighing
up" whether or not to charge Cardinal George Pell over the criminal
offence of sexual assault dating back to the late 1970s.
What the general population should know is that a
fundamental of criminal law is that there must be something called "beyond
reasonable doubt" in order for charges to proceed for that alleged criminal
Let's take an example of a 'criminal' offence Australian
motorists do every single day.
The 'good' law makers over the Australian people have
classified an action of traveling over the speed limit or through an
intersection with a red light alleged by a machine (camera) and not by any man
or woman, i.e. policeman or police woman as a criminal offence.
To make matters worse for the plebs, the registered owner of
that vehicle is (unlawfully) considered "guilty until proven innocent"
(Roman law) where the authorities unlawfully applied "owner onus" in
At law the police MUST prove who the driver was "beyond
reasonable doubt" in order for ANY alleged charges to be laid.
The police do NOT "weigh up" any actions against
the registered motorist, but rather they are considered guilty where they must
prove they are innocent.
It 'seems' like the police are in on it (Pell's matter) too.
Even if he does come back to Australia, it will be at face value.
In the matter of Cardinal George Pell, he (allegedly)
sexually assaulted children in the 1970's and when the heat got turned up he
"escaped" to a place where the Australian "Roman law" cannot
touch him i.e. Vatican City, where there is NO extradition treaty.
Let's not forget THE best excuse of too ill to face ANY
charges / prison time.
Apparently the commoners are told that no one is "above
the law", yet a man from a part of the 'executive' can be untouched by the very same laws(?) applied to the cattle
It's "Roman law" for the slave population, and
extradition free zones for the executive.
STILL not convinced you're a slave on this colony?