Wednesday, November 22, 2017

International Public Notice Commercial Lien in Tort by Wayne Kenneth Glew.

People from all walks of life now have the ability to publish information on a government carriageway called the interwebs.

Apparently not too long ago a person on social media of the name Wayne Glew had a lawful seizure of the Western Australia government.

When asked of him who had the 'keys' to joint a little while later, OBVIOUSLY giving him time to settle in, no tangible response followed.

Now readers can be graced with a document of the title; 

"INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE" Common Law Commercial Lien In "Tort"

Suffice to say we love a good Australian tort.

P.S Anyone got a spare Nine Hundred and Ninety Nine Trillion Dollars to help out Western Australia??? 


WARNING: The following words must be read individually, and considered for their entertainment value only.


Common Law Commercial Lien In “Tort”


The Lien, the Lien Debtor and their address listed below;

All persons connected with the case now and in the future are severally and jointly liable and from here on referred to as lien debtors.


I, Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew CPO.OWB, For and on Behalf of the People of Western Australia Lien Claimants, have a Common Law Commercial (Security Interest) in all assets and properties, and bank accounts of the named Lien Debtor, Mark McGowan the Premier for Western Australia and the State Government of Western Australia ABN66 012 878 629 of Parliament House Perth WA.

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between I, Wayne Kenneth of the family GlewCPO.OWB and the People of Western Australia and the individual who accepts liability for the name Mark McGowan the Premier for Western Australia and the State Government of Western Australia ABN 66 012 878 629 of Parliament House Perth WA, individually herein referred to as “The Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that We have been the subject of a wrong (i.e.a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and Our Remedy IN LAW is to be able to place Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus WE ARE LAWFULLYable to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien which is $ 999.000.000.000 (Nine Hundred And Ninety Nine Trillion Dollars). current Australian Currency, severally and jointly.

This notice is to inform whomsoever that Wecan confirm that the Lien Debtor
Is in a permanent and irrevocable estoppel by THEIR failure to rebut the point-by-point MY Statement of Truth (Affidavit). The Lien Debtor is in default, and is deemed to be in bad faith. Therefore, the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor Mark McGowan the Premier for WA and the State Government of Western Australia ABN 66 012 878 629 of Parliament House Perth WA.Is henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses in 99 years or is, by some other means, removed.

Legal Authority UCC Rule 9-609 gives the Secured Party (the Lien Claimants) the right to take possession of the property on default, via the filing for Writ of Replevin in court, which in turn directs the Sheriff to take possession of the Lien Debtors’ property and give some to the Plaintiff (the Lien Claimants). Replevin, under Common Law, circa 1188, is the right to bring a lawsuit for recovery of goods improperly taken by another, and or the seizure of any personal chattels as pledge for the payment of debt, or the satisfaction of a claim.

Further, an unrebutted Affidavit stands as truth in Commerce. Universal moral/existential truth/principal, expressed in Judaic (Mosaic) Orthodox Hebrew/ Jewish Commercial Code, corollary to Exodus (chiefly Exodus 20:15,16). This is the best known Commercial process in the Commonwealth of Australia.

Yours truthfully, without ill-will, frivolity or vexation.
Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew CPO.OWB and the People of Western Australia, as commonly commonly called, Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew CPO.OWB, and the People of Western Australia and subject SOLEY to the Common Law.

Without any admission of any liability whatsoever, and with all natural Indefeasible Rights reserved.

Dated: 14thof November 2017.

Any interested parties-debt collectors, investment banks, commercial banks, trusts, brokers, solicitors. Judges, traders, futures investors and commodity clearers can contact me.

Wayne Kenneth of the family Glew CPO. OWB
For and on Behalf of the People of Western Australia
24 Hagan Road, Glenfield
Geraldton, Western Australia 6532

Tuesday, November 21, 2017

Pay your rates

Here is an article from a Melbourne suburbs newspaper telling people to pay their 'rates' at the Municipal office.

Monday, November 20, 2017

Same Sex Marriage law a con just like the Australian Constitution?

The people in this machine called government, part of an elite "boys club", have been conning the 'good people' of Australia for quite some time.

A part of Australian history that the masses may not be aware of is that due to the rampant misbehaviour of people in government, a law was brought in to bring them into line. This law was the Colonial Laws Validity Act of 1865.

Fast forwarding a bit to the years leading up to federation where a document was born which we call the Australian Constitution for short, which has apparently made a bit of a stir 116 years after its inception with regards to dual citizenship which ministers of parliament claimed that they did not know about, i.e. they were not aware of a 116 year old founding document that they all should /must be aware of.

Wouldn't it be great if the plebs did not know about a speeding or some obscure parking law claiming ignorance in the process.

Since the advent of social media and the result being a rapid rate of document sharing, some people would be aware of some early words in this document called the Constitution that being;

"Whereas the people..."

The 'problem' there is that most would have no idea what those words really mean or what was going on behind the scenes.

Leading up to this campaign of federation there were (obviously) people involved in shaping this founding document called the Constitution.

People who had a say were not the serfs, that lay person, or the pleb worker, but rather, land 'owners', pastoralists, people from various levels of governance, e.g. lawyers, judges. Also referred to as "the bearded men", "spell-binders" or ventriloquists.

Summarising, the Commonwealth [Constitution] Bill was submitted and approved by just over 11 percent of the Australian population.

Hardly what someone would call a democratic process.

In essence the Australian constitution was drafted by a small (elite) group of people with the idea of "good government" that being for the benefit of those in government or their upper / higher class of society 'brethren', where in reality this constitution was neither representative nor inclusive of the general population of Australia.

One of the most important aspects of a criminal litigation is one's actions or rather intention, leading up to the event in question.

With regards to the formation of Australia's constitution, some of the most important documents regarding to what was going on in the day, are the constitutional debates.

The people who have set up the courts also have setup rules and regulations, where if a serf has an issue with the law it can be interpreted accordingly in a place called the High Court of Australia.

The 'problem' with that (for the serf) is that documents regarding constitutional debates are not admissible as evidence.

A police generated red light camera document is not admissible as evidence in the lower courts either.

It seems that disallowing evidence which could prove vital to your matter is not allowed into the courts, yet the people presiding over you are required to be addressed as 'honourable' or 'learned'.

Is an obstruction of justice really honourable?

A more recent example of a government con is what is marketed as Same Sex Marriage laws or rather an amendment to the Marriage Act of 1961 to allow homosexuals to marry.

One should be aware there was no mass demonstrations that the majority of the Australian population wanted a small section of the community to be able to be married legally within Australia's shores.

The ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) sent out a SURVEY to Australian households, where the ABS stated that 61.6% of 'eligible' Australians responded yes to the survey.

One should also note that people stated on social media that they would 'vote' YES as many times as the number of survey envelopes appeared in their place of residence.

The Australian Prime Minister stated that if a yes 'vote' was to go through then it would become law before Christmas 2017.

So why the hurry? Was this a burgeoning issue for the heterosexual community? Was the survey result truly indicative of the Australian population's view?

What the people in government figured out that it (the proposed law to allow homosexuals to marry legally in Australia) would boost the economy by approx. one billion dollars.

It's not about the people in government giving a stuff about you (the serf) but rather how much money can be extruded from the serfs.

Sunday, November 19, 2017

Australia the chartered corporation

Some people may know that Australia's ex prime minister Tony Abbott stated that Australia was started off as a chartered corporation.

Thanking Allah ( or 'fortunately' - for the people in government) the majority of the serf population missed it, where even if they didn't they still would not comprehend what that means.

So let's get straight into the meat of the topic from information contained within UNESCO under the headline;

Deed of Settlement of the South Australia Company 1836

The Deed of Settlement and Royal Charter of Incorporation of the South Australian Company is a key document in South Australia’s history: it highlights the difference between the manner in which South Australia was established and populated and the foundation of other Australian colonies as penal settlements. It also records British economic expansionism at its peak and illustrates the interconnections between British business interests, the Colonial Office, and social and evangelical activists. In 1834, the British Parliament passed the South Australia Act, which empowered the government to establish and settle a province in South Australia. However, the Colonization Commissioners required £35,000-worth of land in South Australia to be sold before the new province could be established. Initially, only a limited amount of land was bought. The South Australian Company was formed in London on 9 October 1835, to encourage the further purchase of land. On 27 June 1836, the Deed of Settlement was signed by about 300 shareholders of the South Australian Company. The company played a pivotal role in the founding, early survival, and development of the colony, where the company built roads, bridges, ports, warehouses, and mills, and established agriculture, whaling, banking, and mining enterprises.2

The Deed of Settlement and Royal Charter of Incorporation of the South Australian Company is significant as a document representing the history of both imperial Britain and colonial South Australia. In establishing the rights and property of the South Australian Company, it demonstrates the extent of British government, business and social-evangelical interests in Australia.

Inscription Number: #11

Year of Inscription: 2004

Physical Location: State Library of South Australia

The Deed of Settlement, signed on 27 June 1836.

Image courtesy of the State Library of South Australia.

Thursday, November 16, 2017

Commercial Lien How well did it go for you?

Maybe some Corinthian once said something along the lines of ;

"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should",
where with regards to many people, breeding comes to mind first and foremost.

Some people have read about an apparent silver bullet called a Commercial Lien, which they may think is justifiable especially when the authorities have hindered a "free-man".

So, quoting some 'Common Law' let's look at a fella's success with regards to his "Commercial Lien" as seen from within paragraph 58 as shown in illustration below;

It's really really refreshing to know that law gurus communicate with mere mortals on the interwebs, where they share their out of mind experience, as shown in example below:

How well did this fella go with his "Commercial Lien"?

Which court approved it ??? !!! ???

Note to self:
Always a good idea, in the "remedy" section, to put in a few e.g. 10,000 troy ounces (over a quarter of a tonne) of not just pure silver but 'betterer' to use gold.

Australian Constitution gives us the right to bear arms

The Australian Constitution, a 116 year old law, that has made its way into the hands of the herd population and literally immortalised itself in pop culture ever since the dual citizenship saga hit the mainstream media.

Ever since then any serf may reckon they're a "Constitutional Lawyer" where the worst part about it is that they have a voice on social media that can lead other members of the herd population off a cliff, as depicted below.

A 'luser' (pronounced loser, with reference to a loser user) by the name of Lyn Bennetts stated;

"Australia's Constution also gives us the right to bear arms, it doesn't matter if you like it or not it is our right"

WHILE referring to ... wait for it .... the
"2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America"

as shown in the screen capture below:

Now, for the record, we ain't no "Constitutional Lawyer" (LOL, PMSL, etc, etc),
but can someone PLEASE tell us where does it say that the serfs have to right to firearms in the
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 ??? !!! ???

The document is available for your perusal below:

Note to self:
The Constitution is a document that people in government must follow,
therefore there is no reference (and never was any) as to the serfs bearing arms.